Re: [Bug 1955347] Re: rsync works bad with encfs now
Hi Utkarsh Gupta, I understand better what is a step-by-step reproducer :-) I have tried to downgrade rsync with apt-get install rsync=3.1.3-8 and there is no change. But the version who seemed to work on my PC was older rsync_3.1.2-2.1 I've tried to install it but apt-get refused. Is there a way to do this installation? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955347 Title: rsync works bad with encfs now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1955347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1955347] Re: rsync works bad with encfs now
Hi Bryce and Sergio I did not downgrade rsync yet, so I will do it using apt-get install rsync=3.1.3-8 I will do the test with this previous version, but how can I provide a step-by-step reproducer for this bug ? With --verbose option or something else ? Thanks. Claude Le lundi 24 janvier 2022 à 19:16 +, Bryce Harrington a écrit : > Hi Claude, > > Were you able to downgrade to see if the prior version works > properly, > as Lucas suggested? If you haven't yet done so, I'd recommend using > apt > rather than co-installation from a tarball in this case both because > it'd be a better apples-to-apples check, and because the behavior > will > be more predictable (co-installation can mess up config files and > such). > For example, downgrade using a command somewhat like this: > > $ apt-cache policy rsync > rsync: > Installed: 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.1 > Candidate: 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.1 > Version table: > *** 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.1 500 > 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main > amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 3.1.3-8 500 > 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 > Packages > > $ sudo apt-get install rsync=3.1.3-8 > [sudo] password for bryce: > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: > rsync > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 26 > not upgraded. > Need to get 322 kB of archives. > After this operation, 12.3 kB of additional disk space will be > used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > > Let us know when you've completed the check. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955347 Title: rsync works bad with encfs now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1955347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1955347] Re: rsync works bad with encfs now
Hi Lucas, I wanted to do this to make the test, but because of all the dependencies, I'm scared to make a big mistake if I do it using apt ou dpkg. I'd like to install the previous and the actuel versions side by side, but I have to learn to do it before. Maybe with a tar archive? Thanks. Claude -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955347 Title: rsync works bad with encfs now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1955347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1955347] Re: rsync works bad with encfs now
Hi Athos, so you mean that this patch is in focal and the error I'm talking about is a IOERR_GENERAL error? I thought no, but I may be mistaken (surely) :-) today's versions of rsync and encfs are rsync 3.1.3-8ubuntu0.1 encfs 1.9.5-1build2 and Ubuntu's version was (and is) focal Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS I've looked for the date of the first problem : it was about the 2021- 11-07. I've searched in my /var/log/apt/history.log* and the unique file which contains rsync is dated 2021-11-07 (the oldest log in my machine is dated 2021-03-02). However there is no encfs in the logs of apt. That's why I thought that the origin of the change/bug was in the update of rsync. I've found an old log of synaptic 2020-03-28 who says: rsync (3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1) to 3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1.1 I've looked in ubuntu server site and found that the previous version of rsync is dated 2021-11-06 rsync_3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1.2_amd64.deb 2021-11-06 01:09327K and the date of the actual encfs is 2020-03-23. Thank you for reading me. Claude MICOUIN -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955347 Title: rsync works bad with encfs now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1955347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1955347] Re: rsync works bad with encfs now
Hi Christian and thank you for answer. As you said --ignore-errors could work, but il would be very very dangerous. I had tried --exclude=PATTERN (more precisely --filter "- /home/claude/Documents_chiffres/") and it seemed to work better because there's not more the "IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion" error. rsync did not save the virtual directory corresponding to the encrypted directory but that's no matter because the user's script does it. It could be good BUT because of the --delete-excluded option, rsync deletes the backup of the existing virtual directory corresponding to the encrypted directory. I've found a way modifying my backup's script : first it moves the backup of the virtual directory to a safe place before rsync acts and after it moves it back to the previous place. It works but it could be better I think. Best regards. Claude MICOUIN Le lundi 03 janvier 2022 à 14:05 +, Christian Ehrhardt a écrit : > Hi, > I'm not 100% sure but to me that is a setup and configuration issue > with the new version being a bit more insisting that it can > read/access paths it is supposed to back up. > > The new behavior can be disabled with --ignore-errors, but I'm > tempted > to consider this dangerous as you could have any other I/O error and > it > would still delete things. > > Did you try to use --exclude=PATTERN and if that matches your use > case > --delete-excluded to make the new version behave as you were used > from > the older one? > > ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955347 Title: rsync works bad with encfs now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1955347/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
