Re: [Bug 244670] Re: [hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release

2009-02-03 Thread Fabio Pedretti
Citando Surfaz Gemon Meme :

> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/a/amule/amule_2.2.0~svn20080218-0ubuntu4/changelog
>
> "  * debian/control:
> - Do not build-depend on libupnp-dev as the headers needed are shipped
>   by upstream and not used from the system, and make amule depend on
>   libupnp2 as it uses dlopen() to call the library.
>   Changes taken from the Debian package, thanks to Adeodato Simó
>   for letting me know about this."

OK, older version of amule didn't Build-Depends on the libupnp*-dev
packages (but Depends on binary version of libupnp).

> And see this: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-
> d...@lists.debian.org/msg596361.html
>
> "It seems from version 2.2.2 on, aMules configure is able to correctly detect
> the presence of libupnp3-dev and use it accordingly.
>
> Earlier versions (=< 2.2.1) seem to try to unconditionally dlopen()
> libupnp.so.3, but the version from experimental does it right by checking at
> compile time, if the library is available.
>
> Please apply attached patch to correctly use libupnp3, as current version
> in experimental depends on libupnp3 but the binary does not use it, because
> libupnp3-dev was not present during build."

 From 2.2.2 amule appears to be able to link to libupnp at build time, so 
libupnp3-dev was added to Build-Depends (and libupnp3 removed from explicit 
Depends). Apparently 2.2.2 only support libupnp linked during built time and 
not dlopened, see comments from 2008-11-07 of:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amule/+bug/201624

-- 
[hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 244670] Re: [hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release

2009-02-03 Thread Fabio Pedretti
> the library libupnp3-dev is not available in Hardy

What about libupnp-dev ?

-- 
[hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 244670] Re: [hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release

2009-02-02 Thread Fabio Pedretti
Citando Surfaz Gemon Meme :

> Also, this sru will fix:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amule/+bug/201624

I think that for this bug you should use at least 2.2.2-2 (note the -2)
or 2.2.3, due to this change:

amule (2.2.2-2) experimental; urgency=low

   * The "The Luckiest Guy on the Lower East Side" release.

>  * Build-Depend on libupnp3-dev: configure now detects its presence at build
>time and links against it, instead of the program dlope'ing it at run time.
>(Thanks Sven Hartge for the heads-up, closes: #509218).

   * Make amule Replace: old versions of amule-common as found in Ubuntu
 (they used to ship the skins in amule-common for some time).

-- 
[hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 244670] Re: [hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release

2008-11-13 Thread JD Evora
Hello Luca,

Sorry for disturb you with this but  why did you change it to Fix
Released?  The "fix" was indeed released for 8.10  but the bug was
requesting a fix for the LTS 8.04 that still is a svn snapshot

Cheers
 JD


Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 7:39:01 PM, you wrote:

> ** Changed in: amule (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>Status: In Progress => Fix Released



-- 
Best regards,
 JDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
[hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 244670] Re: [hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release

2008-10-23 Thread Luca Falavigna
Fabio Pedretti ha scritto:
> amule 2.2.2-1ubuntu1 is now also in intrepid. Can we make an SRU for
> hardy?

At a first glance, I'd say go for a backport instead. There have been
some new features in Kademilia and I think they're most suitable for the
backport process, but if you can provide motu-sru team a good rationale,
it can be reviewed properly.

-- 
[hardy] Request of update of aMule to 2.2.2 final release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs