Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:28AM -, Alexander Sack wrote: > > please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 > patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 > patch does) > > > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004499.html > > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004556.html > Any luck with this? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:20AM -, Ban wrote: > Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > > > > i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the > usbstorage device name includes "modem" in its name, > but if you look closely at the first initialisation you'll see: > > [ 433.542594] hso: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/usb/hso.c: 1.2 > Option Wireless > [ 433.542653] usbcore: registered new interface driver hso > > that is actually the hso driver getting loaded. > it remains in lsmod as it should, but no /dev entries are created for the > modem > i'm assuming that is because the device is already hijacked by the > usbstorage driver. > > positive is that the hso driver is loaded for my device as it should (not > the option driver) > but the prevention of the usb storage driver is not working, or at least not > for my usbid. > the usb storage gets mounted. no hso dev entries anywhere. please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 patch does) https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004499.html https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-January/004556.html - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the usbstorage device name includes "modem" in its name, but if you look closely at the first initialisation you'll see: [ 433.542594] hso: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/usb/hso.c: 1.2 Option Wireless [ 433.542653] usbcore: registered new interface driver hso that is actually the hso driver getting loaded. it remains in lsmod as it should, but no /dev entries are created for the modem i'm assuming that is because the device is already hijacked by the usbstorage driver. positive is that the hso driver is loaded for my device as it should (not the option driver) but the prevention of the usb storage driver is not working, or at least not for my usbid. the usb storage gets mounted. no hso dev entries anywhere. Ban -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:40:17PM -, Ban wrote: > i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like > interesting results: > it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, > only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, > then the storage gets mounted and the modem seems not usable, or at least i > cant find device nodes Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:57PM -, Ban wrote: > I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 > has) > > these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) > > do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that > the same one ?) > i can re-try tonight but i'm on umts right now. > The idea is that userspace stuff isnt needed to not open the storage device; kernel fixes have flowed into 2.6.28 (jaunty) and now into 2.6.29; just wanted to check whether your device is already fixed or if we need to look around for cherry-picks from 2.6.29 development tree. So please check whether it works with 2.6.28 kernel out-of-box. - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:49:20PM -, Ban wrote: > i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option > Icon 225 (GIO225) > > I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for > this device, that works great. > i can use the connection in networkmanager, but as soon as the connection > stops (for example because of signal loss), > the systems hangs completely and has to be forcibly powered off Could you check whether the jaunty kernel works for your without rezero? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:46:58AM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Medium > Leann, this sounds like rather a simple fix. Can you ensure that this gets done during this cycle so users with that hardware dont get a wrong driver? - Alexander -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
