Re: [Bug 459265] Re: oops in gss_validate
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 12:23 +, Alex wrote: > @Brian Murrell > "aptitude changelog linux-image-2.6.31-17-generic" says: > > > * NFSv4: Fix two unbalanced put_rpccred() issues. > - LP: #459265, #480144 Indeed. I must have missed this the first time around. -- oops in gss_validate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 459265] Re: oops in gss_validate
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 04:50 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > > And the bug has been marked 'fix committed', implying that it will be pulled > into the next kernel SRU via 2.6.31.6. Great. Can't wait to get off of this 2.6.30 kernel. > Yes, it is. I guess my point was that it should not be. Using/exercising NFSv4 during a QA cycle should not be difficult -- quite simple in fact. It's the sort of thing that should be included into standard QA testing given how easily it can be done. No special tests even need be created for it. Just using it instead of (or rather in conjunction with) NFSv3, CIFS and local filesystems should be enough. -- oops in gss_validate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 459265] Re: oops in gss_validate
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:11:29PM -, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Yup. IIRC that is based on 2.6.31.4 and the fix went into .6 (these are > upstream release versions, not Ubuntu package release versions). And the bug has been marked 'fix committed', implying that it will be pulled into the next kernel SRU via 2.6.31.6. > Surely NFS4 is not all that uncommon. Yes, it is. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- oops in gss_validate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 459265] Re: oops in gss_validate
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 07:47 +, Wolfgang Granzer wrote: > It seems that the fix has not been integrated yet in Karmic. Right. > I have > updated to 2.6.31-15. However, the "gss_validate" problem remains. Yup. IIRC that is based on 2.6.31.4 and the fix went into .6 (these are upstream release versions, not Ubuntu package release versions). > Is there any reason why the fix has not been submitted for Karmic? Good question. > This > bug is really serious since it makes Karmic completely unusable if NFS4 > mounts are used. Indeed. What really puzzles me though is how does this kind of crap always seem to slip through the QA process? Are they not trying to exercise at least the most common functionality before calling a release "good"? Surely NFS4 is not all that uncommon. -- oops in gss_validate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 459265] Re: oops in gss_validate
I have already build a Ubuntu x86 kernel including the patch from linux-kernel-bugs #14249. I have tested the kernel for about one week. Everything works fine. The "gss_validate" problem has been disappeared. -- oops in gss_validate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
