That's what I was originally wondering.
If they exist for BSD, is there a license issue that restricts them from
being added to the man pages for the Linux counterparts of the same
commands.
If noting the license difference is all that is required, why aren't more of
the "undocumented commands" in the debian archive gaining documentation by
including the BSD docs with the appropriate notifications of license
differences in place?
Thanks for the clarification.
On Feb 7, 2008 3:43 PM, Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:53:53AM -, Steve Stalcup wrote:
> > here goes
> >
> > ** Attachment added: "ncpfs_2.2.6-4ubuntu3.debdiff"
> >http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11807166/ncpfs_2.2.6-4ubuntu3.debdiff
>
> Thanks for you debdiff. As you've taken the man pages from freebsd,
> they're not covered by a GPL license. Could you add a note to
> debian/copyright clarifying the license of the two man pages you've
> added ?
>
> There are also a couple of other binaries that don't have a man page.
> Could you have a look at the freebsd cvs to see if they have some there
> ?
>
> Once a new debdiff is attached, please re-subscribe
> ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
>
> status incomplete
> unsubscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors
>
> --
> Mathias Gug
> Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
>
>
> ** Changed in: ncpfs (Ubuntu)
> Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
>
> --
> No manual pages for ncplogin and ncplogout in package
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72208
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
No manual pages for ncplogin and ncplogout in package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72208
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
