Re: [Bug 86277] Re: [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV
On 2/22/07, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you have not attached all parts of the crash report. You still have > those missing? e.g. look at what is attached in bug 86414. It was an automatic process on Ubuntu Feisty, so whatever it didn't upload it left out and is probably a bug in the automatic crash reporting tool on amd64 feisty (or others)! So, I don't know where the other files are, but here is the entire crash dump. http://www.kristian-hermansen.com/firefox-crash.tar.gz I will attach it to this bug specifically, but it is 40 MB... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://launchpad.net/bugs/86277 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86277] Re: [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV
The /var/crash/ output... ** Attachment added: "The /var/crash/ output..." http://librarian.launchpad.net/6507063/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash -- [apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://launchpad.net/bugs/86277 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74326] unknown banshee crash
Public bug reported: crash report attached... ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- unknown banshee crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/74326 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74326] Re: unknown banshee crash
crash report... ** Attachment added: "unknown crash" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5241204/_usr_bin_banshee.1000.crash -- unknown banshee crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/74326 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 74326] Re: unknown banshee crash
On 12/3/06, Jeremy Teale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you please describe what you were doing when the crash occurred? Also, > it might be Just playing music. Only crashes when I have the Audioscrobbler plugin enabled and configured. Disabled it and now it works fine, no crash. -- Kristian Hermansen -- unknown banshee crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/74326 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75554] Unable to connect to SSID containing asterisks (*)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager-gnome Tried connecting to an SSID configured as "* we like baseball *" NetworkManager applet (nm-applet) in Gnome fails to properly connect and get a DHCP address. However, naming it something without asterisks works fine. And iwconfig is able to associate properly. So, it appears that the problem lies in network-manager-gnome or one of it's libraries... $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=edgy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 6.10" -- Kristian Hermansen ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Unable to connect to SSID containing asterisks (*) https://launchpad.net/bugs/75554 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71996] pasting certain strings to nano buffer causes high cpu utilization (DoS)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nano Copy and paste the contents of the attached file into a nano buffer and watch CPU usage. It should stop inserting around the last line, which is very long and contains ampersands... -- Kristian Hermansen ** Affects: nano (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- pasting certain strings to nano buffer causes high cpu utilization (DoS) https://launchpad.net/bugs/71996 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71996] Re: pasting certain strings to nano buffer causes high cpu utilization (DoS)
paste the contents of this file into a nano buffer... ** Attachment added: "triggers the DoS..." http://librarian.launchpad.net/5081615/nano_paste_bug-keh.txt -- pasting certain strings to nano buffer causes high cpu utilization (DoS) https://launchpad.net/bugs/71996 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54684] Re: High CPU usage
This should get you upgraded from a shell. You must reboot to get changes (or restart gnome/X?)...haven't tested non-reboot scenario... mkdir /tmp/fix && cd /tmp/fix && wget http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/debug/54684/libgnomevfs2-common_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_all.deb && wget http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/debug/54684/libgnomevfs2-0_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_i386.deb && wget http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/debug/54684/libgnomevfs2-bin_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_i386.deb && wget http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/debug/54684/libgnomevfs2-extra_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_i386.deb && sudo dpkg -i libgnomevfs2-common_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_all.deb && rm libgnomevfs2-common_2.16.1-0ubuntu3_all.deb && for i in *.deb; do sudo dpkg -i "$i"; done -- High CPU usage https://launchpad.net/bugs/54684 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73193] Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin
Public bug reported: No other info...see attached crash report ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin https://launchpad.net/bugs/73193 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73194] Unknown Crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: chntpw no more info ... see attached crash report ** Affects: chntpw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Unknown Crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/73194 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73194] Re: Unknown Crash
** Attachment added: "crash report" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5168269/_usr_sbin_chntpw.1000.crash -- Unknown Crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/73194 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 73193] Re: Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin
On 11/24/06, Daniel T Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) > Sourcepackagename: firefox => flashplugin-nonfree >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info Sorry, took a while to upload the 20 MB crash report, and while doing so, I found a bug in launchpad itself! -> https://launchpad.net/products/launchpad/+bug/73196 -- Kristian Hermansen -- Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin https://launchpad.net/bugs/73193 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73193] Re: Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin
** Attachment added: "crash report" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5168318/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash -- Lost control (hung) when using Macromedia Flash 9 Beta plugin https://launchpad.net/bugs/73193 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 73194] Re: Unknown Crash
On 11/24/06, Philip Paquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How did the crash happen and what steps are necessary to reproduce the > problem? Can you reproduce the crash and provide a back trace > (instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace) I cannot reproduce the crash. However, I was recently working with some registry files from a Windows XP Home SP2 machine. I think I tried to use the recursive listing feature on a file and chntpw choked at one point. However, I was too preoccupied to debug it then. I thought the least I could do was submit a report, and if you could deduce the bug from the report, then so be it. I don't think I can provide any more info, so it is your choice to junk it... -- Kristian Hermansen -- Unknown Crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/73194 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 37798] Re: XGL's expose-type feature (F12) should not separate multi-windowed applications
Unofrtunately, I don't have a machine handy to test compiz natively. I downloaded the Edgy VMware image, and upgraded it to Feisty, but that fails to boot properly. So, I cannot even test compiz in VMware, nor am I certain that would work anyways. When Feisty becomes more stable, maybe I can try again, but please try to test on your end as well or let me know if VMware compiz testing is not feasible... On 11/30/06, Corey Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your bug report. As generic compiz as now been uploaded to > Feisty (compiz-quinn is now known as beryl), we need to see if your bug > is still present. If you can test the version of compiz in feisty > (1:0.3.3-0ubuntu2~git2006112 or later) and tell us if you bug still > exists, please do. Please make certain you are using Ubuntu's Xorg as > well. We also require the make of your video card, to help debug driver > issues. If you are using a newer ATI card (x1000 series or newer), > please indicate so. To get this information, please attach > /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) >Status: Confirmed => Needs Info > > -- > XGL's expose-type feature (F12) should not separate multi-windowed > applications > https://launchpad.net/bugs/37798 > -- Kristian Hermansen -- XGL's expose-type feature (F12) should not separate multi-windowed applications https://launchpad.net/bugs/37798 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default
Why not just change the Ubuntu installer to query the user for IPv6 support? Jzzz! -- Kristian Hermansen -- IPv6 should be disabled by default https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default
On 12/20/06, Martin Tasker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I respect Kristian Hermansen's conciliatory suggestion, but I am not > keen on it. It's bad to offer users a choice between options they don't > understand. If you offer them such choice, you must of course tell > people to select IPv4 unless they really really know what they're doing. > My preference would be not to bother, just to disable IPv6 by default, > and to offer a FAQ aimed at enabling IPv6 post-install for such users as > may wish to. By that same token of advice, why not just disable IPv6 yourself? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=6841 -- Kristian Hermansen -- IPv6 should be disabled by default https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 24828] Re: IPv6 should be disabled by default
On 12/23/06, Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kristian: we all fixed that ourselves, I personally am worried for > newbies who will just not understand why e.g. google earth is unusable > on their system, and will trash ubuntu. Many of them will trash > GNU/linux "in toto", because ubuntu is nowadays advertised as the "best > and easiest to use" linux distribution by many people. Being the latter > a good thing, why shouldn't it be really so? Ubuntu is really easy to > set up and to use, and apt to newbies, the problem in my opinion is > mainly to fix bugs. You make some good points, and I agree. Let me ask you one final question. How does Microsoft Windows Vista enable IPv6 without making problems for the end users? Presumably, the Ubuntu users who are experiencing IPv6 issues would see the same on Vista... -- Kristian Hermansen -- IPv6 should be disabled by default https://launchpad.net/bugs/24828 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 19124] Re: partimage won't run on amd64
Will 32-bit fix for 64-bit be available in Edgy or not? Or do we have to wait for Edgy+1? Why is partimage not 64-bit clean? Is this is small or large task to fix in the sources...hrmmm -- Kristian Hermansen -- partimage won't run on amd64 https://launchpad.net/bugs/19124 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
