[Bug 1289047] Re: [Trusty] hostapd package is broken

2016-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
I am still using the pinned-down version hostapd_1.0-3ubuntu2.1 which
(seems to) work. If anyone lands here and it's stuck with the bug, here:
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/06/how-to-set-up-wireless-hotspot-
access.html you have the instruction on how to get it working.

Having it fixed for good would be nice, but the workaround does work, at
least last time I checked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289047

Title:
  [Trusty] hostapd package is broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1289047/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1588545] Re: escape doesn't close search bar

2017-03-12 Thread Romano Giannetti
It seems that CTRL-F does the trick, anyway...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588545

Title:
  escape doesn't close search bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1588545/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

2018-07-31 Thread Romano Giannetti
I also think it's an upgrade artifact. It happened on my upgraded laptop but 
not in the freshly installed desktop machine. 
The problem in the laptop now (I think) hostapd that requires dnsmasq. 
The workaround cited by @ahasenack in #49 seems to work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670959

Title:
  systemd-resolved using 100% CPU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1670959/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 937040] Re: Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

2018-09-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
I removed dovecot-core (I think it's more or less the same, they are
duplicated) because it was older than dovecot-imapd...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937040

Title:
  Duplicate ufw rules installed by dovecot packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/937040/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1764450] Re: pdftk missing in 18.04 (bionic)

2018-07-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
You can find more solution on https://askubuntu.com/questions/1028522
/how-can-i-install-pdftk-in-ubuntu-18-04-bionic

User pgoetz's solution is ,in my opinion, the cleanest one: just

  sudo snap install pdftk-smoser

and then alias the pdftk-smoser.pdftk command to pdftk.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764450

Title:
  pdftk missing in 18.04 (bionic)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pdftk/+bug/1764450/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768855] Re: ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

2018-09-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
I compiled ufraw-batch with -g, and this is the result:

tarting program: /home/romano/tmp/src/ufraw-0.22/ufraw-batch --embedded-image 
--out-type=png --size=64 p1040069.rw2 --overwrite --silent --output=uffa.png
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x771acb64 in lfModifier::~lfModifier() ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblensfun.so.1
(gdb) RuntimeError: object at 0x7ff6cee868c0 of type ColumnExtension is not 
initialized
bt
#0  0x771acb64 in lfModifier::~lfModifier() ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblensfun.so.1
#1  0x771acb89 in lfModifier::Destroy() ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblensfun.so.1
#2  0x555f5a62 in ufraw_close (uf=0x559ed940) at ufraw_ufraw.c:770
#3  0x555f266f in main (argc=8, argv=0x7fffe338)
at ufraw-batch.c:107
(gdb) quit
A debugging session is active.

So I tried to recompile it with

/* have the lensfun library */
/* #define HAVE_LENSFUN 1 */
#undef HAVE_LENSFUN

(I was unable to find a configure option to disable lensfun) and now the
resulting ufraw-batch is not segfaulting any more. Unfortunately, still
I can't generate thumbnails for raw files... I'm stuck.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768855

Title:
  ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufraw/+bug/1768855/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768855] Re: ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

2018-09-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
Thanks Eugene. I found the problem, was a typo in my MIME type (so it
was really unrelated).

Your solution is probably better than mine, but if someone wants the
ufraw-batch binary compiled without lensfun (you shouldn't trust
binaries from internet) just tell me --- or I can post instructions on
how to compile it.

BTW, I still think that if ufraw-batch is called with --nolensfun it
should not fails in this case. I tried to follow the option handling,
but I got lost.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768855

Title:
  ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufraw/+bug/1768855/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768855] Re: ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

2018-09-26 Thread Romano Giannetti
Probably is as big in lensfun, but the sad thing is that even calling it
with --lensfun=none still give the core dump...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768855

Title:
  ufraw-batch in bionic segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufraw/+bug/1768855/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1448778] Re: Evince fails to display some fonts (some font thing failed)

2019-01-18 Thread Romano Giannetti
And by the way, just if somebody is still struggling to find where the
"good" error messages (instead of the surprising useful "some font thing
failed"), grep for apparmor in /var/log/kern.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448778

Title:
  Evince fails to display some fonts (some font thing failed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1448778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1448778] Re: Evince fails to display some fonts (some font thing failed)

2019-01-18 Thread Romano Giannetti
My solution was to apply this diff:

diff --git a/./etc-apparmor.d-abstractions-fonts 
b/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/fonts
index 45cdf9a..44c54ac 100644
--- a/./etc-apparmor.d-abstractions-fonts
+++ b/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/fonts
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
 
   /usr/local/share/fonts/   r,
   /usr/local/share/fonts/** r,
+  /home/local/share/fonts/   r,
+  /home/local/share/fonts/** r,
 
   # poppler CMap tables
   /usr/share/poppler/cMap/**r,

...and the reloading the profiles (sudo service apparmor reload). So if
you have symlinked fonts directory, you simply have to add them to the
profile.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448778

Title:
  Evince fails to display some fonts (some font thing failed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1448778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2019-01-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
@c4pp4, could be, but I think this is already in...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2019-01-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
@c4pp4 --- you're right. So probably the only thing we need is the bind
of /etc/alternatives; upstream seems to agree it's the only way to go:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/issues/92

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2018-12-16 Thread Romano Giannetti
Notice anyway that one of the problems was that originally the
thumbnailer called

 /usr/bin/composite

which, do to the alternative setup in .deb packages, was a link to
/etc/alternatives/composite that pointed back to the real binary;
probably the "/etc/alternatives/" directory should be added to the bind-
ed directories...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] [NEW] Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2018-12-16 Thread Romano Giannetti
Public bug reported:

This bug is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
desktop3/+bug/1795668 and to the question in Ubuntu Stackexchange
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1088539/custom-thumbnailers-don-t-work-
on-ubuntu-18-10-and-18-04

The recent hardening on thumbnailers by using bubblewrap is causing a
problem with user-installed thumbnailers. Consider this (for example)
thumbnailer to add a small Dilbert icon to the GIMP .xcf files:


#!/bin/bash

tmpfile1=$(tempfile --directory /tmp --prefix xcft --suffix .png)
trap 'rm -rf $tmpfile1' INT EXIT TERM

die() {
  echo >&2 "$@"
  rm -rf $tmpfile1
  exit 1
}
 
# The script will be called with parameters : -s %s %u %o
# -s %s: vertical size,  %u: input url, %o: output file

if [ $1 = "-s" ]; then 
   size=$2
   uin=$3
   fout=$4
else
   size=32 #default size
   uin=$1
   fout=$2
fi

# uin es una url, eliminar "file://"
fin="${uin#file://*}"

/usr/bin/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer -s $size "$fin" $tmpfile1 || die 
"gnome-xcf-thumbnailer failed"
/usr/bin/composite-im6.q16  -gravity southeast  \
   \(  -resize $((size/2))x$((size/2)) /usr/share/gimp/2.0/images/wilber.png \) 
\
   \( -resize $sizex$size $tmpfile1 \)  "$fout" || die "convert failed"

rm -rf $tmpfile1
exit 0

It used to work before the last update to use bubblewrap, and now
doesn't work anymore. I tried to dig into https://github.com/GNOME
/gnome-desktop/blob/master/libgnome-desktop/gnome-desktop-thumbnail-
script.c to see what happens, and I concluded that the "reinforced"
thumbnail generator do this:

mkdir /tmp/temporary

bwrap --ro-bind /usr /usr \
--ro-bind /etc/ld.so.cache /etc/ld.so.cache \
--ro-bind /bin /bin \
--ro-bind /lib64 /lib64 \
--ro-bind /lib /lib \
--ro-bind /sbin /sbin \
--proc /proc  \
--dev   /dev  \
--chdir   /  \
--setenv   GIO_USE_VFS   local  \
--unshare-all  \
--die-with-parent  \
--bind /tmp/temporary /tmp \
--ro-bind /home/romano/software/thumbnailers/test/rgttiwm.xcf  
/tmp/gnome-desktop-file-to-thumbnail.xcf  \
/usr/bin/xcf-thumb -s 128 file:///tmp/gnome-desktop-file-to-thumbnail.xcf 
/tmp/gnome-desktop-thumbnailer.png
#
cp /tmp/temporary/gnome-desktop-thumbnailer.png test.png

...and this way, my thumbnailer did succeed in creating the PNG with the
correct preview. But when called internally by gnome, it fails, and
creates a strange "~/.cache/thumbnailer/fail" file containing the
following:

�PNG

IHDRĉd�EtEXtThumb::URIfile:///home/romano/software/thumbnailers/test/rgttiwm.xcftEXtThumb::MTime1380735765�y�O
 tEXtSoftwareGNOME::ThumbnailFactoryo 
[...]

** Affects: gnome-desktop3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: bubblewrap thumbnails

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1795668] Re: Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-12-14 Thread Romano Giannetti
This "enhancement2 broke all my thumbnailers too; unfortunately they are
quite a bit more complex than the one @eros2 commented.

Is there any instruction on how enabling back a personal script for
thumbnails generation after the upgrade? Note that this has been noticed
by users; see for example https://askubuntu.com/questions/1088539
/custom-thumbnailers-don-t-work-on-ubuntu-18-10

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795668

Title:
  Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/+bug/1795668/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2018-12-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
Indeed. So it must be something different; the problem with alternative
is real, but nevertheless the aforementioned thumbnailer does not work
even with the absolute path to composite...

Will dig a bit more. The puzzling thing is that using the wrapper script
from http://bernaerts.dyndns.org/linux/74-ubuntu/360-ubuntu-nautilus-
external-thumbnailer-failure *does* fix things...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2018-12-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
As an aside, can you hint where I can find the messages printed by the
`g_warning()` in the code? I was utterly unable to find them...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1795668] Re: Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-12-19 Thread Romano Giannetti
...and we have also the huge slowdown, see
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/issues/90

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795668

Title:
  Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/+bug/1795668/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808702] Re: Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

2018-12-19 Thread Romano Giannetti
Ok, the problem is that the commit from:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
desktop/commit/259e7e4edb0d9b84fb7cf0847149ff8d42ab9a56

should be added, since Ubuntu/Debian has unmerged /usr.

Also, the problem with alternatives still stands, see
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/issues/92

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808702

Title:
  Bubblewrap integration broke user thumbnailers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1808702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1795668] Re: Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-12-19 Thread Romano Giannetti
Yep: @nicolas-bernaerts is right. Ubuntu should include this commit:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
desktop/commit/259e7e4edb0d9b84fb7cf0847149ff8d42ab9a56

since we have unmerged /usr.

Also, the problem with alternatives still stands, see
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/issues/92

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795668

Title:
  Enable bubblewrap in gnome-desktop3 for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/+bug/1795668/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 381017] Re: Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

2019-12-01 Thread Romano Giannetti
Still here in TB 68.2.1. Must be a record...

Really, I suppose this bug has been forgotten... ;-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381017

Title:
  Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/381017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 381017]

2019-12-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
It seems that the firefox bug (which is listed as a duplicate, I do not
think is 100% correct) #396370 has been marked as fixed. Could this be
the case for thunderbird also? That would be great...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381017

Title:
  Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/381017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 381017]

2019-12-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
Yes, still here; will not disappear alone.

I still think that the worst problem of this bug is that is _seems_ to
work, and can lead to data loss. It would be much better to forbid the
drag and drop completely, if fixing it is too difficult.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381017

Title:
  Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/381017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 381017]

2019-12-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
Checked right now with thunderbird 68.2.1 --- the bug is still here. The
dropped attachment creates a file which consists of a broken link.

I *suspect* that this bug has been forgot; it seems really strange that,
with all the nice things happened to thunderbird in the last couple of
years, no one fixed this quite gross "feature..."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381017

Title:
  Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/381017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899736] [NEW] package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1: dependency problem

2020-10-14 Thread Romano Giannetti
Public bug reported:

Setting up grub-pc (2.04-1ubuntu26.4) ...
dpkg: error processing package grub-pc (--configure):
 installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of grub-gfxpayload-lists:
 grub-gfxpayload-lists depends on grub-pc (>= 1.99~20101210-1ubuntu2); however:
  Package grub-pc is not configured yet.

dpkg: error processing package grub-gfxpayload-lists (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup 
error from a previous failure.
  Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-0ubuntu9.1) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 grub-pc
 grub-gfxpayload-lists
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

...seems that something is broken here.

this is the result of apt list| grep grub:

grub-common/focal-updates,now 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64 [installed]
grub-coreboot-bin/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-coreboot-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-coreboot/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-customizer/focal 5.1.0-2 amd64
grub-efi-amd64-bin/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-amd64-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-amd64-signed-template/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-amd64-signed/focal-updates 1.142.6+2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-amd64/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-ia32-bin/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-ia32-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi-ia32/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-efi/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-emu-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-emu/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-firmware-qemu/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-gfxpayload-lists/focal,now 0.7 amd64 [installed,automatic]
grub-ieee1275-bin/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-ieee1275-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-ieee1275/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-imageboot/focal,focal 0.6 all
grub-invaders/focal 1.0.0-13 amd64
grub-ipxe/focal-updates,focal-updates 1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu3.2 all
grub-legacy-ec2/focal,focal 1:1ubuntu1 all
grub-linuxbios/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-pc-bin/focal-updates,now 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64 [installed]
grub-pc-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-pc/focal-updates,now 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64 [installed,automatic]
grub-rescue-pc/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-splashimages/focal,focal 1.2.3 all
grub-theme-breeze/focal 5.18.4.1-0ubuntu1 amd64
grub-theme-starfield/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-xen-bin/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-xen-dbg/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-xen-host/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub-xen/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grub2-common/focal-updates,now 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64 [installed]
grub2-splashimages/focal,focal 1.0.1+nmu1 all
grub2-themes-ubuntu-mate/focal,focal 0.3.7 all
grub2-themes-ubuntustudio/focal,focal 0.3 all
grub2/focal-updates 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 amd64
grubzfs-testsuite/focal-updates 0.4.10.1 amd64
lubuntu-grub-theme/focal,focal 20.04.3 all
pv-grub-menu/focal,focal 1.3 all
sabily-grub-artwork/focal,focal 1.2 all

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_5_4_0_48_52_generic_72
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Wed Oct 14 08:36:06 2020
DuplicateSignature:
 package:grub-pc:2.04-1ubuntu26.4
 Setting up grub-pc (2.04-1ubuntu26.4) ...
 dpkg: error processing package grub-pc (--configure):
  installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 1
ErrorMessage: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-07-22 (2275 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.2)
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-48-generic 
root=UUID=19b393fa-dffe-4123-84a6-bfbea89a7b72 ro nosplash 
i915.enable_execlists=0
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed 
grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-05 (8 days ago)

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1899736] Re: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1: dependency problem

2020-10-14 Thread Romano Giannetti
I have solved it by

 sudo apt purge grub-pc
 sudo apt install grub-pc

Quite scaring but it worked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899736

Title:
  package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 1: dependency problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1899736/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 811604] Re: uvcdynctrl spams uvcdynctrl-udev.log and fills up filesystem

2020-08-28 Thread Romano Giannetti
I have (Ubuntu 18.04) also a spamming on /var/log/syslog, like:

Aug 28 12:01:13 pern kernel: [ 4554.463716] uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) 
UVC control 2 on unit 1: -32 (exp. 1).
Aug 28 12:01:13 pern kernel: [ 4554.464089] uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) 
UVC control 2 on unit 1: -32 (exp. 1).
Aug 28 12:01:13 pern kernel: [ 4554.464464] uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) 
UVC control 2 on unit 1: -32 (exp. 1).
Aug 28 12:01:13 pern kernel: [ 4554.464878] uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) 
UVC control 2 on unit 1: -32 (exp. 1).

...which is not shut off by the debug=0 (at least, that seems to me, I
have not tested extensively)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811604

Title:
  uvcdynctrl spams uvcdynctrl-udev.log and fills up filesystem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwebcam/+bug/811604/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1868502] Re: Synchronization with earlier Ubuntu versions or a recent Debian version fails

2020-10-03 Thread Romano Giannetti
@christos pontikis (pontikis) this saved my day, thanks!

As a small improvement: you do not need to remove all cache, just the
fp* files that have been created after you started using the new
version.

I think that this is the kind of software that would benefit greatly the
snap/appimage/flatpack whatever, to have always the same version in all
your machines...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868502

Title:
  Synchronization with earlier Ubuntu versions or a recent Debian
  version fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/1868502/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1855500] Re: obs-studio: "Failed to initialize video." on Intel Core 2 systems

2020-10-23 Thread Romano Giannetti
I am not sure about the resolution of this bug... If I use:

   LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 obs

OBS studio works perfectly ok. So I think that hard-crashing the app is
not really a nice solution, no? Shouldn't just propose to use software
GL?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855500

Title:
  obs-studio: "Failed to initialize video." on Intel Core 2 systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obs-studio/+bug/1855500/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 381017]

2021-03-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
In version 78.7.1 the behavior is better: still not working, but it raises an 
error instead of copying an unusable link.
The error is also ok: "drag and drop not supported".

Definitely better!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381017

Title:
  Cannot drag attachment from mail attachment pane to desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/381017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058409] Re: Install of tevlive-full hangs: tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module 'socket.core' not found

2024-04-28 Thread Romano Giannetti
Notice that this is making all sorts of CI integration for LaTeX
packages development using the Ubuntu images fail, given that the
"solution" of pressing enter several times is unfeasible in that
environment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058409

Title:
  Install of tevlive-full hangs:
  tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module 'socket.core' not
  found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/context/+bug/2058409/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

<    5   6   7   8   9   10