[Bug 990772] Re: package clamav-freshclam 0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2013-07-08 Thread Yolanda Robla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1074708 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074708

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1074708
   Debconf errors cause clamav-freshclam installation failure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990772

Title:
  package clamav-freshclam 0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/990772/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1196921] Re: updating packages to lua5.2 in main

2013-07-19 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Branch linked: lp:~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/rubyluabridge/lua5.2

** Changed in: rubyluabridge (Ubuntu Saucy)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Changed in: rubyluabridge (Ubuntu Saucy)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-13.07

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196921

Title:
  updating packages to lua5.2 in main

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphviz/+bug/1196921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1200878] Re: Upgrade breaks existing pyjuju deployment

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200878

Title:
  Upgrade breaks existing pyjuju deployment

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1200878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203226] Re: package apache2-bin 2.4.4-6ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py', que está también en el paquete apache2-utils 2.4.

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1199318 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199318

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1199318
   package apache2-utils 2.2.22-6ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py', which is also in 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-6ubuntu5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203226

Title:
  package apache2-bin 2.4.4-6ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade:
  intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py',
  que está también en el paquete apache2-utils 2.4.4-6ubuntu2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1203226/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1201022] Re: package iscsitarget 1.4.20.3+svn490-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this. Please can you provide the iscsi logs to
check what is preventing that from start?

Best
Yolanda

** Changed in: iscsitarget (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: iscsitarget (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201022

Title:
  package iscsitarget 1.4.20.3+svn490-2ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iscsitarget/+bug/1201022/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1202660] Re: package php5-cli 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this.
Please can you try:

sudo dpkg --configure  php5-cli

And check the output? Your log shows configuration problems for this
package.

Best
Yolanda

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202660

Title:
  package php5-cli 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1202660/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1200581] Re: exim-gencert creates 1024 bit key

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200581

Title:
  exim-gencert creates 1024 bit key

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1200581/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1200136] Re: Impossible to disable TLSv1.1 and TLSv1.2 without disabling TLSv1

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200136

Title:
  Impossible to disable TLSv1.1 and TLSv1.2 without disabling TLSv1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1200136/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203033] Re: wbinfo --user-sidinfo returns NT_STATUS_SERVER_DISABLED

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203033

Title:
  wbinfo --user-sidinfo returns NT_STATUS_SERVER_DISABLED

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1203033/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1198258] Re: wrong path for config files in /etc/keystone/keystone.conf

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198258

Title:
  wrong path for config files in /etc/keystone/keystone.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/1198258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1201996] Re: Options 'destdir' and 'tmpfs' ignored in config file

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201996

Title:
  Options 'destdir' and 'tmpfs' ignored in config file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vm-builder/+bug/1201996/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1199474] Re: rabbitmq fails to start unless /etc/hosts is set a specific way

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199474

Title:
  rabbitmq fails to start unless /etc/hosts is set a specific way

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1199474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1202521] Re: “start: Job failed to start” when mysql-5.5 start in Ubuntu12.04

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this
Can you please provide the mysql logs to check what's preventing mysql from 
starting?
Best
Yolanda

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202521

Title:
  “start: Job failed to start” when mysql-5.5 start in Ubuntu12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1202521/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1199469] Re: MaaS WebUI does not work after reboot

2013-07-22 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: maas (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199469

Title:
  MaaS WebUI does not work after reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1199469/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203633] Re: package apache2-bin 2.4.4-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket apache2-utils 2.4.4-6ubunt

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1199318 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199318

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1199318
   package apache2-utils 2.2.22-6ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py', which is also in 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.22-6ubuntu5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203633

Title:
  package apache2-bin 2.4.4-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch,
  »/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/apache2.py« zu überschreiben, welches
  auch in Paket apache2-utils 2.4.4-6ubuntu3 ist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1203633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1203516] Re: package php5-mysql 5.4.9-4ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203516

Title:
  package php5-mysql 5.4.9-4ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert
  1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1203516/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1203430] Re: dnsmasq doesn't listen on a given 127.* listen-address if bind-dynamic, interface and except-interface options are given

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203430

Title:
  dnsmasq doesn't listen on a given 127.* listen-address if bind-
  dynamic, interface and except-interface options are given

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1203430/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203556] Re: Ubuntu - Saucy Salamander: Auth-mod not working

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this
I verified the issue:

apt-get install libapache2-mod-auth-mysql
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libapache2-mod-auth-mysql : Depends: apache2.2-common (>= 2.2.3-3) but it is 
not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


** Changed in: mod-auth-mysql (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: mod-auth-mysql (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203556

Title:
  Ubuntu - Saucy Salamander: Auth-mod not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mod-auth-mysql/+bug/1203556/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203432] Re: do not install package apache2 2.4.4-6ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: podproces zainstalowany skrypt post-installation zwrócił kod błędu 1

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this.
Can you take a look at this thread?

http://linuxhostingsupport.net/blog/ubuntu-php-libphp5-so-missing-
cannot-open-shared-object-file

This will help to solve your problem

Best
Yolanda

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203432

Title:
  do not install package apache2 2.4.4-6ubuntu5 failed to
  install/upgrade: podproces zainstalowany skrypt post-installation
  zwrócił kod błędu 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1203432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1203537] Re: s/mime signature not working

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: m2crypto (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203537

Title:
  s/mime signature not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/m2crypto/+bug/1203537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203569] Re: package apache2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for reporting this
According to the logs, problem seems to be with apache2-mpm-prefork. Can you 
try:

sudo apt-get purge apache2-mpm-prefork

And retry again? If not, you should completely remove and purge apache:

sudo apt-get purge apache2.2*

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203569

Title:
  package apache2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert
  1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1203569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1201323] Re: Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-07-23 Thread Yolanda Robla
Updated changelog and fixed deltas.
Submitted diff between Debian and current Ubuntu version

** Patch added: "python-webob_1.2.3-2_1.2.3-2ubuntu1.diff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-webob/+bug/1201323/+attachment/3746574/+files/python-webob_1.2.3-2_1.2.3-2ubuntu1.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201323

Title:
  Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-webob/+bug/1201323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1203541] Re: Include output of bug script in crash reports

2013-07-24 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203541

Title:
  Include output of bug script in crash reports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1203541/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1201323] Re: Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-07-24 Thread Yolanda Robla
Thanks for your comments and for fixing the pending issues.
I already forwarded the python 3 changes to Debian: 

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717655

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #717655
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717655

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201323

Title:
  Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-webob/+bug/1201323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1201323] Re: Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-07-24 Thread Yolanda Robla
About fix_test_headers2.py that patch is already upstream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201323

Title:
  Please merge python-webob 1.2.3-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-webob/+bug/1201323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1194489] Re: Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-6 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-07-24 Thread Yolanda Robla
Added an MP with the latest Debian version merge.

** Branch linked: lp:~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/sikuli/debian_merge

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194489

Title:
  Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-6 (universe) from
  Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sikuli/+bug/1194489/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1194489] Re: Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-07-24 Thread Yolanda Robla
Attached new debdiff

** Summary changed:

- Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-6 (universe) from Debian 
unstable (main)
+ Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7 (universe) from Debian 
unstable (main)

** Description changed:

- Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-6 (universe) from Debian
+ Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7 (universe) from Debian
  unstable (main)

** Attachment removed: "sikuli_debdiff.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sikuli/+bug/1194489/+attachment/3713479/+files/sikuli_debdiff.txt

** Patch added: 
"sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7ubuntu1.diff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sikuli/+bug/1194489/+attachment/3747698/+files/sikuli_1.0%7Ex%7Erc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7_1.0%7Ex%7Erc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7ubuntu1.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194489

Title:
  Please merge sikuli 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7 (universe) from
  Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sikuli/+bug/1194489/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1180054] Re: package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.31-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2013-05-15 Thread Yolanda Robla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469

Thanks for reporting this.
Can you try the following commands in a terminal?

sudo rm -rf /var/cache/debconf/*
sudo apt-get install -f

This should be solving your problem

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 349469
   debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by 
another process: Resource temporarily unavailable

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180054

Title:
  package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.31-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: Unterprozess neues pre-installation-Skript gab den
  Fehlerwert 1 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1180054/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1180438] Re: 'ceilometer *-list' too slow to respond

2013-05-15 Thread Yolanda Robla
This is doesn't seem to be a valid Ubuntu bug. Marking it as invalid.

** Changed in: ceilometer (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180438

Title:
  'ceilometer *-list'  too slow to respond

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1180438/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678007/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678023/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16356

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745/+attachment/3678010/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16356

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745/+attachment/3678026/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16227
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16722

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859/+attachment/3678009/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16227
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16722

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859/+attachment/3678025/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678008/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678024/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/14326
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/14368

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/14326
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/14368

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Re: do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314/+attachment/3678011/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Re: do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314/+attachment/3678027/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Re: lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924/+attachment/3678015/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Re: lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924/+attachment/3678031/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Re: ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982/+attachment/3678016/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16133
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16133
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Re: ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982/+attachment/3678032/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12623
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12624

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12623
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12624

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Re: At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is called

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313/+attachment/3678017/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Re: At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is called

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313/+attachment/3678033/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Re: Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently enough

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152/+attachment/3678018/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12335
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12985

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12335
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12985

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Re: Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently enough

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152/+attachment/3678034/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12304
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12479

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Re: nova usage-list returns wrong usage

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999/+attachment/3678020/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12304
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12479

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Re: nova usage-list returns wrong usage

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999/+attachment/3678036/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11925
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12123

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Re: Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537/+attachment/3678021/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Re: Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537/+attachment/3678038/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Re: Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210/+attachment/3678022/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9995
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9995
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11925
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12123

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Re: Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210/+attachment/3678039/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Re: deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633/+attachment/3678012/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8971
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13678

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Re: deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633/+attachment/3678028/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8971
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13678

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9175
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12661

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Re: When attach volume lost attach when node restart

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791/+attachment/3678019/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9175
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12661

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996482] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7515
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13681

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Re: When attach volume lost attach when node restart

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791/+attachment/3678035/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996482] Re: failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482/+attachment/3678013/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996482] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7515
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13681

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996482] Re: failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482/+attachment/3678029/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 921774] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12390
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12395

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 921774] Re: snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774/+attachment/3678014/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 921774] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12390
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12395

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 921774] Re: snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774/+attachment/3678030/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Glance has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678041/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Glance has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1065187] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Glance has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15564
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/15562

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065187

Title:
  Non-admin users can cause public glance images to be deleted from the
  backend storage repository

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1065187/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: "2012.1.3+stable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678043/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >