Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hello Andrea, On 09/09/2012 03:44 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: pbuilder-dist quantal ../libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu4.dsc I've followed the instructions and now I've two .deb generated in /home/andrea/pbuilder/quantal_result/ but why their name begins with "happycoders" ?! andrea@centurion:~/pbuilder/quantal_result$ ls -al total 452 drwxrwxr-x 2 andrea andrea 4096 Sep 9 15:39 . drwxrwxr-x 4 andrea andrea 4096 Sep 8 16:52 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 110390 Sep 9 15:39 happycoders-libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 38476 Sep 9 15:39 happycoders-libdbg-dev_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 52600 Sep 9 15:39 last_operation.log -rw--- 1 andrea andrea692 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3.dsc -rw-rw-r-- 1 andrea andrea 1801 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.changes -rw-rw-r-- 1 andrea andrea 226532 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3.tar.gz I cannot understand this That's expected. The debian/control file contains: Source: libdbg [...] Package: happycoders-libdbg [..] Package: happycoders-libdbg-dev [..] It means that when the source package 'libdbg' (specified by the 'Source' field) is built, 2 binary packages (specified by the 'Package' field) are produced. That's quite usual for library packages, one package is containing the library used at runtime by the compiled programs, and the other one (*-dev) the files needed to compile software using the library (for example C/C++ header files). Regards, JeanFI. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hi a.grandi (2012.09.09_15:44:08_+0200) > I've followed the instructions and now I've two .deb generated in > /home/andrea/pbuilder/quantal_result/ > but why their name begins with "happycoders" ?! The source package libdbg builds two binary packages: happycoders-libdbg and happycoders-libdbg-dev http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-pkg_basics.en.html SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559 -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hi On 9 September 2012 14:53, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Yes. pdebuild doesn't know how to find pbuilder-dist's tarballs. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377179 > > You need to build a source package: > bzr bd -S > And then build it: > pbuilder-dist quantal ../libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu4.dsc we should update this wiki page then https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/BugFixingInitiative I'll test the changes then I will update it if it works. Regards, -- Andrea Grandi - Software Engineer / Qt Ambassador Ubuntu Member: https://launchpad.net/~andreagrandi website: http://www.andreagrandi.it -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hi, On 9 September 2012 14:53, Stefano Rivera wrote: > You need to build a source package: > bzr bd -S > And then build it: > pbuilder-dist quantal ../libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu4.dsc I've followed the instructions and now I've two .deb generated in /home/andrea/pbuilder/quantal_result/ but why their name begins with "happycoders" ?! andrea@centurion:~/pbuilder/quantal_result$ ls -al total 452 drwxrwxr-x 2 andrea andrea 4096 Sep 9 15:39 . drwxrwxr-x 4 andrea andrea 4096 Sep 8 16:52 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 110390 Sep 9 15:39 happycoders-libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 38476 Sep 9 15:39 happycoders-libdbg-dev_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 andrea andrea 52600 Sep 9 15:39 last_operation.log -rw--- 1 andrea andrea692 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3.dsc -rw-rw-r-- 1 andrea andrea 1801 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3_i386.changes -rw-rw-r-- 1 andrea andrea 226532 Sep 9 15:39 libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu3.tar.gz I cannot understand this -- Andrea Grandi - Software Engineer / Qt Ambassador Ubuntu Member: https://launchpad.net/~andreagrandi website: http://www.andreagrandi.it -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hi a.grandi (2012.09.09_11:51:16_+0200) > but when I execute this: bzr bd --builder=pdebuild > I get the following errors: http://pastebin.com/ytYZxThh > > Please note that I built both "quantal" and "precise" pbuilder targets with: > > pbuilder-dist quantal create > pbuilder-dist precise create > > Am I missing something else? Yes. pdebuild doesn't know how to find pbuilder-dist's tarballs. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377179 You need to build a source package: bzr bd -S And then build it: pbuilder-dist quantal ../libdbg_1.2-2ubuntu4.dsc SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559 -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Simple but worthwhile to fix bugs?
Hi Daniel, On 4 September 2012 11:47, Daniel Holbach wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/BugFixingInitiative I'm trying to follow these instructions to submit upstream to Debian, but when I execute this: bzr bd --builder=pdebuild I get the following errors: http://pastebin.com/ytYZxThh Please note that I built both "quantal" and "precise" pbuilder targets with: pbuilder-dist quantal create pbuilder-dist precise create Am I missing something else? Thanks! -- Andrea Grandi - Software Engineer / Qt Ambassador Ubuntu Member: https://launchpad.net/~andreagrandi website: http://www.andreagrandi.it -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
