Ubuntu Open week----Who wants to do it?
Now read http://ubuntuclassroom.wordpress.com/2012/09/17/ubuntu-open-week-for-quantal-call-for-instructors/ Ubuntu Open week is coming for community-driven teams to explain their work. I do think it is a great opportunity to promote Ubuntu Studio. Lubuntu is already planning a session as I know... So... 1. Are we gonna have a session and 2. Who is going to do it? It will be on October 24th and 25th. We can have an hour all to ourselves. So tell us in ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com that you want to do it:P Thanks to all. Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
i want to join and help in open week
Thanks smartboyhw for organising open week https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2012-October/004492.html OK i am interested to participate. drupin @ freenode -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
My email is changing
To lukefro...@hushmail.com due to unacceptable account security demands from Hotmail that violate my own security standards -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: My email is changing
On Thu, October 4, 2012 10:03 am, Luke Kuhn wrote: To lukefro...@hushmail.com due to unacceptable account security demands from Hotmail that violate my own security standards For what it is worth, my mother (who knows not much about computers) feels the same and has gotten rid of her hotmail account too. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Application Review Board Election Poll
I've sent out an election poll to Ubuntu Developers for newly nominated and returning members of the Application Review Board. The poll will close on Monday, Oct 15th. If you didn't receive a poll request email and should have, let me know. We still have a few more open seats, so we're also running a second round of nominations through the week of UDS (often a good place to find new recruits). Allison -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Application Review Board Election Poll
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Allison Randal alli...@ubuntu.com wrote: I've sent out an election poll to Ubuntu Developers for newly nominated and returning members of the Application Review Board. The poll will close on Monday, Oct 15th. Done with voting. Regards, -- Bhavani Shankar Ubuntu Developer | www.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/~bhavi -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Why are there dependencies that aren't actually dependencies on some packages?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15:06AM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote: Since when does Brasero or other packages need/require liblaunchpad-integration-common to work properly, or they will suddenly fall to the ground and never work again. Jeremy has already given you an answer that will probably be more to your liking. However, I'd like to point out that this aspect of the package dependencies in precise is precisely correct given how the binary is built. Looking at /usr/bin/brasero in precise with 'objdump -p', I see: Dynamic Section: ... NEEDED liblaunchpad-integration-3.0.so.1 Since this is a normal straightforward dynamic link, the binary literally will not start without that library being present. So feel free to complain about the binary being built such that it's linked against that library (and Jeremy's post completely addresses that for 12.10), but given that linkage the dependency is absolutely correct. While it's possible to arrange things such that dynamically-linked libraries are loaded conditionally at run-time, it's a fair bit of work, rather cumbersome, and can often end up introducing bugs. So, in the case of a library whose total .deb size (liblaunchpad-integration1 + liblaunchpad-integration-common) weighs in under 16KiB, we often don't feel that it's worth making that kind of thing optional. Of course I'm glad to see it go since it makes it easier to stay in sync with Debian and thus makes the system as a whole that bit easier to maintain. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
