Libvirt packaging branch OUT-OF-DATE
I could not pull updates from launchpad. I get - $ bzr pull Using saved parent location: bzr+ssh:// bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu/precise-updates/libvirt/ Most recent Ubuntu Precise Updates version: 0.9.8-2ubuntu17.5 Packaging branch version: 0.9.8-2ubuntu17.4 Packaging branch status: OUT-OF-DATE No revisions or tags to pull. Is there some way so solve this problem? Should I file a bug? Kind regards, Kirill Zaborsky. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Patch Pilot Report bzr workflow used.
I did quite a few bzr merge proposals. The workflow I used was this: bzr branch lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6 cd 0.6.0-6 bzr bd -S sbuild ../build-area/*.dsc bzr diff -rtag:last-ubuntu | filterdiff -x .pc* bzr diff -rtag:last-debian | filterdiff -x .pc* debsign ../build-area/*_source.changes dput ../build-area/*_source.changes bzr mark-uploaded bzr push lp:ubuntu/rbbr It worked very well I had no hickups with any of the below listed branches I sponsored. It was quicker than using debdiffs / interdiff. And for some, the original new upstream tarball was in the branch as pristine delta, so I didn't need to manually fetch tarball. Here is my patch pilot report for today: reject (stray proposal): https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/postgresql-8.4/precise-proposed/+merge/139408 comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pam/+bug/952185 sync: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-feet/+bug/1099704 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subtitleeditor/+bug/1099769 won't fix: for same reasons as in debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clementine/+bug/995689 push upload: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/lazr.delegates/lintian-fixes/+merge/143060 https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/raring/tvtime/1099042/+merge/143038 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/sblim-cmpi-base/1.6.2/+merge/143018 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/nxcomp/3.5.0-2/+merge/143017 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6/+merge/143015 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/swi-prolog/5.10.4-5/+merge/143007 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/festival/1-2.1-release-5.1/+merge/142843 upload debdiff:
Re: Patch Pilot Report bzr workflow used.
I'm glad I could be a part of this process. ;P On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote: I did quite a few bzr merge proposals. The workflow I used was this: bzr branch lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6 cd 0.6.0-6 bzr bd -S sbuild ../build-area/*.dsc bzr diff -rtag:last-ubuntu | filterdiff -x .pc* bzr diff -rtag:last-debian | filterdiff -x .pc* debsign ../build-area/*_source.changes dput ../build-area/*_source.changes bzr mark-uploaded bzr push lp:ubuntu/rbbr It worked very well I had no hickups with any of the below listed branches I sponsored. It was quicker than using debdiffs / interdiff. And for some, the original new upstream tarball was in the branch as pristine delta, so I didn't need to manually fetch tarball. Here is my patch pilot report for today: reject (stray proposal): https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/postgresql-8.4/precise-proposed/+merge/139408 comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pam/+bug/952185 sync: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-feet/+bug/1099704 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subtitleeditor/+bug/1099769 won't fix: for same reasons as in debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clementine/+bug/995689 push upload: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/lazr.delegates/lintian-fixes/+merge/143060 https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/raring/tvtime/1099042/+merge/143038 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/sblim-cmpi-base/1.6.2/+merge/143018 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/nxcomp/3.5.0-2/+merge/143017 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6/+merge/143015 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/swi-prolog/5.10.4-5/+merge/143007 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/festival/1-2.1-release-5.1/+merge/142843 upload debdiff: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-python/+bug/1098597 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1085392 (Q P SRU) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1085392 (Q P SRU) upstreamed: lp:~psusi/ubuntu/raring/indicator-power/show-ups upstreamed into lp:indicator-power https://code.launchpad.net/~charlesk/indicator-power/lp-1007095/+merge/143138 needs fixing: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/cutmp3/2.1/+merge/143016needs to honor DESTDIR https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/player/+bug/979841 needs python2.7 multiarch FTBFS fix. -- Regards, Dmitrijs. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: Minutes from the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting, 2013-01-15
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:10:37PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: === Status: Raring Development Kernel === We have rebased the Raring kernel to the latest v3.8-rc3 upstream kernel and uploaded last week. Please test and let us know your results. A few people have come to us about new GPU lockups they're seeing. See bug 1099394 for instance. Bryce -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Patch Pilot Report bzr workflow used.
I'm glad I could be a part of this process. ;P On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote: I did quite a few bzr merge proposals. The workflow I used was this: bzr branch lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6 cd 0.6.0-6 bzr bd -S sbuild ../build-area/*.dsc bzr diff -rtag:last-ubuntu | filterdiff -x .pc* bzr diff -rtag:last-debian | filterdiff -x .pc* debsign ../build-area/*_source.changes dput ../build-area/*_source.changes bzr mark-uploaded bzr push lp:ubuntu/rbbr It worked very well I had no hickups with any of the below listed branches I sponsored. It was quicker than using debdiffs / interdiff. And for some, the original new upstream tarball was in the branch as pristine delta, so I didn't need to manually fetch tarball. Here is my patch pilot report for today: reject (stray proposal): https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/postgresql-8.4/precise-proposed/+merge/139408 comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pam/+bug/952185 sync: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-feet/+bug/1099704 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subtitleeditor/+bug/1099769 won't fix: for same reasons as in debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clementine/+bug/995689 push upload: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/lazr.delegates/lintian-fixes/+merge/143060 https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/raring/tvtime/1099042/+merge/143038 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/sblim-cmpi-base/1.6.2/+merge/143018 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/nxcomp/3.5.0-2/+merge/143017 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/rbbr/0.6.0-6/+merge/143015 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/swi-prolog/5.10.4-5/+merge/143007 https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/festival/1-2.1-release-5.1/+merge/142843 upload debdiff: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-python/+bug/1098597 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1085392 (Q P SRU) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1085392 (Q P SRU) upstreamed: lp:~psusi/ubuntu/raring/indicator-power/show-ups upstreamed into lp:indicator-power https://code.launchpad.net/~charlesk/indicator-power/lp-1007095/+merge/143138 needs fixing: https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/raring/cutmp3/2.1/+merge/143016needs to honor DESTDIR https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/player/+bug/979841 needs python2.7 multiarch FTBFS fix. -- Regards, Dmitrijs. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: raring ringtail test rebuild
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:39:43AM -0600, Micah Gersten wrote: I was wondering what an upstreamable way to fix the python multiarch dir issue is. I've seen some people using python-config --includes (or the appropriate variable for python-config), but wasn't sure if that was cross-platform and upstreamable or not. pkg-config support was added in http://bugs.python.org/issue3585. From the discussion there, it looks to me that upstreams can use pkg-config unless they want to retain support for 2.6. There's a comment saying that it's cross-platform, including Windows. signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: raring ringtail test rebuild
On 01/10/2013 02:31 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: On 3 January 2013 05:20, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am 03.01.2013 03:56, schrieb Julian Taylor: On 01/03/2013 03:46 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Yes, is this something that can be fixed once in the python-defaults source, or are we really going to have to patch every Python package in the archive? Not and have multiarch. couldn't we just move all headers to multiarch paths and let get_python_inc(plat_specific=False) and return that path? its less than a kilobyte of duplicated data. no, unfortunately this breaks the other half of configure scripts expecting the headers in prefix/include. we may want to fix this with a compatibility header, but first it would be good to identify all these issues. On my list, however if somebody wants to help, please let me know. I've opened http://pad.lv/1098317 so that we can track this issue. I'll be helping out with this trying to take care of packages in main. --chris j arges Thanks, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Vacant Developer Membership Board seat: Call for nominations
Hi, We will soon have four vacant Developer Membership Board seats. Benjamin Drung, Stéphane Graber, Iain Lane and Cody Somerville will reach the end of their terms on 2013-02-13. This mail is a call for nominations. The DMB is responsible for reviewing and approving new Ubuntu developers, meeting for about an hour once a fortnight. Candidates should be Ubuntu developers themselves, and should be well qualified to evaluate prospective Ubuntu developers and decide when to entrust them with developer privileges or to grant them Ubuntu membership status. The new member will be chosen using Condorcet voting. Members of the ubuntu-dev team in Launchpad will be eligible to vote. To ensure that you receive a ballot in the initial mail, please add a visible email address to your Launchpad profile (although there will be an opportunity to receive a ballot after the vote has started if you do not wish to do this). The term of the new board member will be 2 years. Providing at least five nominations are received, voting will commence on Monday 28th January 2013 and will last for 2 weeks, ending on Monday 11th February 2012. The DMB will confirm the appointments in its next meeting thereafter. Please send nominations to developer-membership-bo...@lists.ubuntu.com (which is a private mailing list accessible only by DMB members) by midnight UTC on 28 January 2013. If nominating a developer other than yourself, please confirm that the nominee is happy to sit on the board before emailing the DMB. Please consider writing a short statement on your wiki page if nominating so that others get a better idea of who they are voting for. If you include a link to this in your nomination mail or a followup, the DMB will share it when the call for votes begins. -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list ubuntu-devel-announce@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce
Brother brscan2 not working on 12.10
Hello, does anyone know if the proprietary Brother Driver for their scanner generation brscan2 is no longer working on ubuntu 12.10? It was working fine for me in 12.04 but ever since the upgrade I cannot scan anymore. Are their maybe any open source drivers available which I can try? If any fix is known, or you know some bug report or mail discussing this problem, I would be more than happy to hear about it. Currently lsusb lists my printer and I can print, but none of the scanner tools detect the scanner (no matter if they are started as root or not). I tried so far with sane-find-scanner, scanimage, xsane, simple-scan, brsaneconfig2, to no avail. I have a DCP-560CN which is using the generation 2 drivers. Kind Regards Lanoxx -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ubuntu android mobile use Bionic or glibc
Dear All, I am checking http://www.ubuntu.com/devices/phone link, I need below clarification. 1. ubuntu using glibc or bionic. 2. Is it possible to simulate on X86. 3. from where we can get environment ( Kernel, toolchain ,SDK) Thanks -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: ubuntu android mobile use Bionic or glibc
On 15 January 2013 11:02, naveen yadav yad.nav...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I am checking http://www.ubuntu.com/devices/phone link, I need below clarification. 1. ubuntu using glibc or bionic. 2. Is it possible to simulate on X86. 3. from where we can get environment ( Kernel, toolchain ,SDK) All currently available public information is available here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPhone Toolkit and SDK are here: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/ Kernel/phone images are not released yet. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: ubuntu android mobile use Bionic or glibc
Dear Dmitrijs Ledkovs, I could not find toolchain information, and how to download, will you pls share. Thanks On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 15 January 2013 11:02, naveen yadav yad.nav...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I am checking http://www.ubuntu.com/devices/phone link, I need below clarification. 1. ubuntu using glibc or bionic. 2. Is it possible to simulate on X86. 3. from where we can get environment ( Kernel, toolchain ,SDK) All currently available public information is available here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPhone Toolkit and SDK are here: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/ Kernel/phone images are not released yet. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Brother brscan2 not working on 12.10
On 2013-01-15 12:00, Lanoxx wrote: does anyone know if the proprietary Brother Driver for their scanner generation brscan2 is no longer working on ubuntu 12.10? It works fine for me on 12.10 (I'm using MFC-240C), so there is probably no general problem. Did you possibly forget to add a Brother rule again to /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules ? Please note that this is not a developer topic, so if that hint doesn't help, you'd better seek help at e.g. askubuntu.com. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
