[utah-devel] New Stable Version
A new stable version of utah (0.7) is now available in the trunk. Packages will be in the PPA shortly. Changes include: Improved ISO static validation Packaging changes: utah-common provides common files for utah, utah-client and utah-parser utah-parser provides separate result parsing code utah split into: utah - Base provisioning code and VM provisioning utah-cobbler - Cobbler provisioner utah-bamboofeeder - bamboo-feeder provisioner for panda boards utah-all is a metapackage that installs all components Support for symlinks in lp/bzr URLs outputpreseed option in CLI/config to save final preseed used for a machine Client output longer than 64Kb now supported Better race condition detection on package installation Configurable sqlite timeouts Various logging improvements: Database, SSH, and cobbler logs can now be gathered and easily separated ISOs are now mounted for cobbler installations rather than extracted Many bugfixes Thanks for all the use, testing, suggestions, and bug reports! Max -- Ubuntu-utah-devel mailing list Ubuntu-utah-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-utah-devel
Poll
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtrwZ7irPN7TdGdNUUltUzZ2ZGpqa2RZdmtZRllIM1E#gid=0 http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2013-January/089753.html My vote is Ubuntu Studio 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 12.12, the later is a typo and should be 12.10 ;). It seems to be, that Ubuntu/Ubuntu Studio users prefer the LTS, so do I. For me it's reasonable that so many people use Arch Linux. I only dropped it (perhaps temporarily), regarding to the transition to systemd. FWIW, the release model is discussed in the Xubuntu mailing list. Regards, Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: smem report from the nexus-raring
Hello, On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:06:41 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: We recently did a smem memory snapshot from raring, running on a nexus tablet. The results have been recorded on the wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Smem-2013-01-16 At least some of the items have notes indicating work has already started on them. Do either of these have issues filed? It would be easier to follow progress and have discussions related to individual applications' memory consumption in the familiar LP bug interface, while keeping the wiki page as an overview with links to LP. Jani -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: smem report from the nexus-raring
Le 29/01/2013 10:18, Jani Monoses a écrit : At least some of the items have notes indicating work has already started on them. Do either of these have issues filed? It would be easier to follow progress and have discussions related to individual applications' memory consumption in the familiar LP bug interface, while keeping the wiki page as an overview with links to LP. Hey Jani, Good point, I've been trying to transform the actions noted there to workitems, mostly on that spec: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-r-reduced-power-ram If you see any which is not listed feel free to edit the workitems list to add it ;-) Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Minutes from the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting, 2013-01-29
= Meeting Minutes = [[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/01/29/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the meeting.]] [[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]] == Agenda == [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 29 Jan, 2013|20130129 Meeting Agenda]] === ARM Status === R/master: first batch of arm multiplatfom patches with support for omap3/4 and imx6 was sent to the ml, awaiting comments. In the mean time, i'm tracking down the SATA imx6 regression in 3.8. === Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs === Release metrics and incoming bug data can be reviewed at the following link: * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kt-meeting.txt === Milestone Targeted Work Items === || apw || hardware-r-kernel-config-review || 6 work items || || || hardware-r-delta-review || 3 work items || || ppisati || hardware-r-kernel-config-review || 1 work item || || || hardware-r-kernel-version-and-flavors || 2 work items || || || hardware-r-delta-review || 1 work item || || rtg || hardware-r-delta-review || 1 work item || || smb || hardware-r-kernel-misc|| 2 work items || I've been trying to clean house with our work items and drop us blow the trend line. If anyone has items which they can close or postpone, please do so. Thanks. === Status: Raring Development Kernel === We have rebased the Raring kernel to the latest v3.8-rc5 upstream kernel. I'll plan to upload before EOD tomorrow. Important upcoming dates: * Raring: * Mon Feb 18 - 13.04 Month 4 Milestone (~3 weeks) * Precise: * Thu Feb 14 - 12.04.2 Release (~2 weeks) === Status: CVE's === Currently we have 34 CVEs on our radar, with 0 CVEs added and 2 CVE retired this week. See the CVE matrix for the current list: * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/ALL-linux.html Overall the backlog has decreased slightly this week: * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/cve-metrics.txt * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt === Status: Stable, Security, and Bugfix Kernel Updates - Quantal/Precise/Oneiric/Lucid/Hardy === We're skipping a kernel SRU cadence to allow for an additional 3 weeks of testing for the kernel that will ship with the 12.04.2 point release. However, due to regressions, we currently have new Precise, Quantal and lts-Quantal kernels in Testing. Next week the regular SRU cycles will restart. Future stable cadence cycles: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RaringRingtail/ReleaseInterlock === Open Discussion or Questions? Raise your hand to be recognized === No discussion. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Intending to upload Libav 9 to raring
Am Sonntag, den 13.01.2013, 12:12 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com wrote: Please upload into PPA, upload rdepends and wait for them to rebuild. Find problems together with other interested people. Look, ma: https://launchpad.net/~motumedia/+archive/libav9-raring/+packages TODO list of affected packages is here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html Help is more than welcome, espcially with filing bugs and creating patches. Anyone interested in helping out, please mail me so that I can add you to ~motumedia for upload access, until that happens, please upload to your own PPA and we can then copy your fixed packages over. Our friends at Gentoo now have integrated libav9 as well, and experience similar problems: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=443230hide_resolved=0 When preparing bugs or patches it might make sense to look at those bugs. Status update: we are making good progress overall, but we really need more people working on it. So please consider helping out! Another status update: it seems that progress hat pretty much stalled since a couple of weeks, which means that we are likely to miss this libav9 for raring. I would find this very disappointing, given the many great improvements that have been integrated into this release. On the plus side, a fix for blender is currently being prepared in pkg-multimedia for debian/experimental: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/blender.git - thanks to Matteo F. Vescovi, who managed to get upstream have a closer look at this. However, there are still many packages to fix left. Help on this project would be greatly appreciated! Fixing Audacity is on my todo list. Audacity needs more work than renaming function names to work with libav 9. Help porting will be appreciated. Support for older FFmpeg/libav versions can be dropped while porting to the newer API. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch pilot report 2012-01-29
55 at start * lp:~adam-stokes/ubuntu/raring/python-tz/merge-to-2012c/+merge/145222 needs-fixing due to build failures * lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/wxbanker/dh_python2/+merge/144592 approved and sponsored (after some fixes) * lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/z3c.form/2.9.1 already sponsored, mp marked as merged * lp:~dylanmccall/update-manager/bug-1105363 approved and merged to trunk; sponsored * lp:~dylanmccall/update-manager/refactored-cellareapackage reviewed, fixed some issues, merged to trunk; sponsored * LP: #1098872 resolved via syncpackage since the Ubuntu deltas seem no longer necessary. (darn, I probably should have used -b and -s) 54 at end signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch pilot, 2013-01-30.
Queue at start of shift: 54 https://code.launchpad.net/~surfacepatterns/ubuntu/quantal/rtmidi/add-alsa-support/+merge/141471 - I consider this new functionality for quantal, so disapproved, however I went ahead and got this into Debian's vcs for the package, which should filter down to Ubuntu shortly. https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/raring/util-linux/missing-pdc-sectors/+merge/141642 - Uploaded. https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/raring/multipath-tools/fix-extended-partitions/+merge/142050 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~chrisjohnston/ubuntu/raring/vagrant/fix-dns/+merge/144004 - Already uploaded, marked the merge proposal appropriately. Bug #1102043 - Uploaded with a note about adding the bug number in the changelog for future uploads. https://code.launchpad.net/~artfwo/ubuntu/raring/indicator-cpufreq/bug-1105609/+merge/145047 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~artfwo/ubuntu/raring/libffado/bug-1105818/+merge/145056 - Already uploaded, marked merge proposal appropriately. https://code.launchpad.net/~allison/ubuntu/raring/libsvn-web-perl/fix-for-1106378/+merge/145072 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~n-muench/ubuntu/raring/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.december-merge2a/+merge/145268 - Uploaded Queue post shift: 45-46 depending on proposed status. Luke -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: APT and dpkg Translations
On 29 January 2013 10:00, Volkan Gezer vlkn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Should APT and DPKG translations be done from Debian or Launchpad? In Ubuntu it's part of the language packs. Debian is upstream. Translating in Debian will take significant amount of time to propagate into Ubuntu. I'm not sure if we have or have not Ubuntu specific strings in dpkg/apt, but it is quite lickely. Do it in Launchpad and submit to Debian as well, if same strings are missing there. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
