Re: The transition to add support for Python 3.6 is beginning
Hi Michael, thanks for all the work on this. I checked packages in your list that I often touch and found openvswitch: It fails with: Copying ovs.egg-info to /<>/debian/python3-openvswitch/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ovs-2.7.0.egg-info Skipping SOURCES.txt running install_scripts /bin/sh: 2: cd: can't cd to python debian/rules:84: recipe for target 'override_dh_install' failed That is [1] that I fixed in [2]. In general I wonder, other than your work of fixing these issues one-by-one, will you just re-upload new versions of the remaining failed packages iteratively every now and then to see things if like that resolved? Or do you need us other devs to notify you in any known case? [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1691658 [2]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/2.7.0-0ubuntu2 On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > An update on the transition to Python 3.6: Python 3.6 is now a supported > version in artful release, and almost all packages that build C extensions > have been rebuilt (pandas is still a problem). > > We have created a PPA where python3.6 is the default and rebuilt all > python packages: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+ > archive/ubuntu/python3.6-as-default/+packages and the next step is to fix > all the failures this reveals. The initial failing source packages are > listed in http://paste.ubuntu.com/24903638/ although some of those have > been fixed now. > > Once the failures are accounted for, we can flip the switch to make python > 3.6 the default in the archive. > > Cheers, > mwh > > On 12 May 2017 at 11:29, Michael Hudson-Doyle < > michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The process of adding Python 3.6 as a supported version has begun. >> >> The transition tracker is here: >> >> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/htm >> l/python3.5-6.html >> >> and I'm currently working my way down the list. >> >> I did a test rebuild of all/most dependent packages in a ppa: >> >> https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages >> >> And compiled some terse notes on the failures here: >> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/24557408/ >> >> And help resolving the failures would be appreciated (especially pandas!) >> >> Cheers, >> mwh >> > > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: The transition to add support for Python 3.6 is beginning
Hi all, An update on the transition to Python 3.6: Python 3.6 is now a supported version in artful release, and almost all packages that build C extensions have been rebuilt (pandas is still a problem). We have created a PPA where python3.6 is the default and rebuilt all python packages: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/python3.6-as-default/+packages and the next step is to fix all the failures this reveals. The initial failing source packages are listed in http://paste.ubuntu.com/24903638/ although some of those have been fixed now. Once the failures are accounted for, we can flip the switch to make python 3.6 the default in the archive. Cheers, mwh On 12 May 2017 at 11:29, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The process of adding Python 3.6 as a supported version has begun. > > The transition tracker is here: > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ > html/python3.5-6.html > > and I'm currently working my way down the list. > > I did a test rebuild of all/most dependent packages in a ppa: > > https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages > > And compiled some terse notes on the failures here: > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/24557408/ > > And help resolving the failures would be appreciated (especially pandas!) > > Cheers, > mwh > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Development Summary - 20 June 2017
Hello, The Ubuntu Kernel Team has published this weeks newsletter, which is in the body of this email. It will also be published on the insights blog[0]. The Newsletter is published weekly. It contains highlights from the week, announcements regarding the development and stable kernels, as well as any other news the Kernel Team may have. Sincerely, The Ubuntu Kernel Team [0] https://insights.ubuntu.com/ Tues June 20, 2017 -- This newsletter is to provide a status update from the Ubuntu Kernel Team. There will also be highlights provided for any interesting subjects the team may be working on. If you would like to reach the kernel team, you can find us at the #ubuntu-kernel channel on FreeNode. Alternatively, you can mail the Ubuntu Kernel Team mailing list at: kernel-t...@lists.ubuntu.com Highlights -- * FWTS 17.06.00 released: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirmwareTestSuite/ReleaseNotes/17.06.00 * Released stress-ng 0.08.05, new Real Time cyclic stressor and Real Time scheduling softlockup stressor. * Prepare 4.4.73 (Xenial) * Update artful/4.11 to v4.11.6 * The embargo for CVE-2017-1000364 [1] has expired and the fix was released for the following packages in the updates and security pockets: * Trusty - linux 3.13.0-121.170 - linux-lts-xenial 4.4.0-81.104~14.04.1 * Xenial - linux 4.4.0-81.104 - linux-aws 4.4.0-1020.29 - linux-gke 4.4.0-1016.16 - linux-raspi2 4.4.0-1059.67 - linux-snapdragon 4.4.0-1061.66 - linux-hwe 4.8.0-56.61~16.04.1 - linux-hwe-edge4.10.0-24.28~16.04.1 - linux-joule 4.4.0-1003.8 * Yakkety - linux 4.8.0-56.61 - linux-raspi2 4.8.0-1040.44 * Zesty - linux 4.10.0-24.28 - linux-raspi2 4.10.0-1008.11 Due to that, the proposed updates for the above packages being prepared on the current SRU cycle are being re-spun to include the fix. [1] CVE description: It was discovered that the stack guard page for processes in the Linux kernel was not sufficiently large enough to prevent overlapping with the heap. An attacker could leverage this with another vulnerability to execute arbitrary code and gain administrative privileges. Devel Kernel Announcements -- We intend to target a 4.13 kernel for the Ubuntu 17.10 release. The Ubuntu 17.10 Kernel Freeze is Thurs Oct 5, 2017. Stable Kernel Announcements --- Current cycle: 02-Jun through 24-Jun 02-Jun Last day for kernel commits for this cycle 05-Jun - 10-Jun Kernel prep week. 11-Jun - 23-Jun Bug verification & Regression testing.. 26-Jun Release to -updates. Next cycle: 23-Jun through 15-Jul 23-Jun Last day for kernel commits for this cycle 26-Jun - 01-Jul Kernel prep week. 02-Jul - 14-Jul Bug verification & Regression testing.. 17-Jul Release to -updates. Status: CVE's - The current CVE status can be reviewed at the following: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/ALL-linux.html -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Jeremy Bicha
Congraz Jeremy! On Jun 12, 2017 12:05 PM, "David" wrote: > Congrats Jeremy > > thoroughly deserved! > > David > > On Wed, 7 Jun, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Lukasz Zemczak < > lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hello! Please congratulate Jeremy Bicha on his successful Ubuntu Core > Developer application! Welcome to the team! Cheers, > -- > Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Foundations Team lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com > www.canonical.com > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings > or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Rolling Release Ubuntu?
> On 6 May 2017, at 12:32, N. W. wrote: > > So why even do releases in between (16.10/17.04./17.10 for example)? > > You're doing a 16.10/17.04./17.10 release (which most users do not use > anyway) and then in addition to that also backport lots of things to 16.04. > So much wasted/duplicated effort. It would be much better if you would rather > do one rolling release and concentrate on that one. I’d be interested to see these statistics that back-up the claim of "most users" not using intermediate releases between LTSes. While 51% of users would count as “most” that would also mean several million users (I’m guessing here) using intermediate releases. While it is appropriate to discuss the potential for a rolling release I think that arguments in favour, which are based on assumptions of “most users”, need to be thoroughly researched rather than bandied about liberally without hard facts. Daniel Llewellyn -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
