Unable to set system properties on ubuntu 22.04

2022-05-11 Thread lds19850124
hello all,


I want to add support information links(www.163.com) to system properties(as 
follow<1>),but there's no way to do that.
Do you have a way to do that?


lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Release:  22.04
Codename: jammy


<1>
Contact information:
Company: net
Web: www.163.com
Model: Allbook 3/1




thanks
joe-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Consideration of archive mirror requirements (filling up to 1TB now)

2022-05-11 Thread Fumihito YOSHIDA
Hi developers and mirror server admins (+Canonical IS team?),

I would like to raise a warning(#1) and discussion(#2) about archive
mirror capacity and
want to clarify requirements.

#1 warning for mirror admins
---

Firstly, I would like to pull your attention immediately, if you are
admin of mirror
servers, and your server uses 2TiB physical storage, please check the capacity
of your storage free space that is used for archive mirrors.

Current archive size is filling up to approx. 1.8TB, and default ext4
reserved block is
5%, as a result, as a result, we are consuming approx 2TB (in typical,
buffer is 15GB),
like below:

$ df -m | grep extra1
/dev/sdc1   1877613 1767423 14791 100% /extra1

- And, if your server has release mirrors (several GB), it can reach
to full and you
  might see something bad in your mirrors.

- I assume that 15TB is not enough for future development in kinetic
(in development
  phase, we will consume more storage.)

- So, if you are using 2TB storage, you might consider tune2fs -m0 for releasing
  reserved blocks for freeing mirror capacities. It can provide
additional storage
  as first aid (approx 80+GB).
  Note: You have to change "/dev/sdc1" section to fit your server's.

$ sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sdc1 | grep 'Reserved block count'
Reserved block count: 24418227

$ sudo tune2fs -m0 /dev/sdc1
tune2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
Setting reserved blocks percentage to 0% (0 blocks)

$ sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sdc1 | grep 'Reserved block count'
Reserved block count: 0


#2 discuss about old archives, such as trusty/xenial
-

Okay, acute care is finished, and we might have some discussion time for
discussion.  I would like to raise about that matter for considering future
archive mirror requirements.

At right now, we have great guide in w.u.c and it says:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Mirrors
> The Ubuntu archive, as of 2021-07-01, uses about: 1.5TB of disk space
> for the Ubuntu package archive.

However, today, we consumed 1.8TB storage and it might hit 2TB storage limit
shown above. And I assume that some of us mirror admins are using
2TB storage for this purpose.

And we have trusty (14.04) and xenial (16.04) in our archive and they consumed
some space.

$ ls -1d ubuntu/dists/*-updates
ubuntu/dists/bionic-updates
ubuntu/dists/devel-updates
ubuntu/dists/focal-updates
ubuntu/dists/hirsute-updates
ubuntu/dists/impish-updates
ubuntu/dists/jammy-updates
ubuntu/dists/kinetic-updates
ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates
ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates

- They (trusty, xenial) are already EOLed, but live with ESM, and consumed some
  capacity and reached to 2TB physical storage limit.

- hirsute is EOLed already and will be deleted in the near(?) future.

- Considering with rational viewpoint with some assumptions, the state
is balanced, and
  might not be so serious. Now is full, and we will have some spaces
in near future
  but the timing of removing old archives is a matter.

- 4 years rough estimation is below, and with optimistic projection,
freeing reserved
  space of ext4 (and getting 80+GB storage) is enough to handle.

(now) hirsute should be deleted.  (-1) sum: -1
2022-04 impish will be EOLed  (-1) sum: -2
2022-10 K will release and L will start   (+1) sum:-1
2023-04 L will release and M will start   (+1) sum: 0
2023-07 K will be EOLed   (-1) sum: -1
2023-10 M will release and N(LTS) will start   (+1) sum:0
2024-01 L will be EOLed (-1) sum: -1
2024-04 N(LTS) will release and O will start   (+1) sum: 0
2024-04 trusty ESM will be EOLed (-1) sum: -1
2024-07 M will be EOLed  (-1) sum: -2
2024-10 O will release and P will start   (+1) sum: -1
2025-04 P will release and Q will start   (+1) sum: 0
2025-07 O will be EOLed  (-1) sum: -1
2025-10 Q will release R(LTS) start   (+1) sum: 0
2026-01 P will be EOLed   (-1) sum: -1
2026-04 R(LTS) will release and S start  (+1) sum: 0
2026-04 xenial ESM will be EOLed  (-1) sum: -1

So, possible measures are:
a) update wiki for warning to 2TB storage admins.
b) a+ delete xenial/trusty (and future "dead" LTS releases)
c) a+ update mirror requirements (to 2+TB) in the future.

Any ideas?

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


[ubuntu-studio-devel] CD image ubuntustudio/focal/dvd failed to build on 20220511

2022-05-11 Thread noreply+ubuntu-cdimage
= Building live filesystems =
Wed May 11 18:17:01 UTC 2022
ubuntustudio-amd64 on Launchpad starting at 2022-05-11 18:17:01
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bin/../lib/cdimage/build.py", line 699, in 
build_image_set_locked
live_successful = run_live_builds(config)
  File "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bin/../lib/cdimage/livefs.py", line 364, in 
run_live_builds
tracker_set_rebuild_status(config, [0, 1], 2, arch)
  File "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/bin/../lib/cdimage/tracker.py", line 71, in 
tracker_set_rebuild_status
for rebuild in tracker.qatracker.get_rebuilds(current_state):
  File "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-archive-tools/qatracker.py", line 521, 
in get_rebuilds
for entry in self.tracker.rebuilds.get_list(list(record_filter)):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 1109, in __call__
return self.__send(self.__name, args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 1450, in __request
response = self.__transport.request(
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 1153, in request
return self.single_request(host, handler, request_body, verbose)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 1169, in single_request
return self.parse_response(resp)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 1335, in parse_response
p.feed(data)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/xmlrpc/client.py", line 438, in feed
self._parser.Parse(data, 0)
xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError: syntax error: line 1, column 0

-- 
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Ubuntu Studio is good for 22.10.

On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 2:40:07 AM PDT Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hello flavors!
> 
> As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
> the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
> the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.
> 
> Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
> make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
> time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
> similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
> about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:
> 
>  * Kubuntu
>  * Xubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Studio
>  * Lubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Kylin
>  * Ubuntu MATE
>  * Ubuntu Budgie
> 
> If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
> reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Graham


-- 
Erich Eickmeyer
Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio
Member - Ubuntu Community Council

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread Dani Llewellyn
Hi,

I've been given permission by Martin (Wimpy) Wimpress to confirm that
Ubuntu MATE is participating this cycle.

Dani Llewellyn (for Ubuntu MATE)

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 10:40, Graham Inggs  wrote:

> Hello flavors!
>
> As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
> the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
> the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.
>
> Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
> make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
> time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
> similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
> about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:
>
>  * Kubuntu
>  * Xubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Studio
>  * Lubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Kylin
>  * Ubuntu MATE
>  * Ubuntu Budgie
>
> If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
> reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Graham
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread Rik Mills

Kubuntu can be counted in for 22.10

On 11/05/2022 10:40, Graham Inggs wrote:

Hello flavors!

As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.

Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:

  * Kubuntu
  * Xubuntu
  * Ubuntu Studio
  * Lubuntu
  * Ubuntu Kylin
  * Ubuntu MATE
  * Ubuntu Budgie

If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.

Thank you!

Graham




--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread David Mohammed
Graham,

 as an aside I did a reply to all and got the following

"The response from the remote server was:

550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in relay recipient table "

I'm not sure of Martin's current email address

David

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 10:52, David Mohammed  wrote:
>
> Hi Graham,
>
> the Ubuntu Budgie team are looking forward to participating in the
> 22.10 release - team-members are already working on 22.10 plans &
> activities
>
> thx
>
> David (Project Lead Ubuntu Budgie)
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 10:40, Graham Inggs  wrote:
> >
> > Hello flavors!
> >
> > As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
> > the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
> > the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.
> >
> > Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
> > make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
> > time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
> > similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
> > about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:
> >
> >  * Kubuntu
> >  * Xubuntu
> >  * Ubuntu Studio
> >  * Lubuntu
> >  * Ubuntu Kylin
> >  * Ubuntu MATE
> >  * Ubuntu Budgie
> >
> > If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
> > reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Graham
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-devel mailing list
> > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread David Mohammed
Hi Graham,

the Ubuntu Budgie team are looking forward to participating in the
22.10 release - team-members are already working on 22.10 plans &
activities

thx

David (Project Lead Ubuntu Budgie)

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 10:40, Graham Inggs  wrote:
>
> Hello flavors!
>
> As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
> the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
> the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.
>
> Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
> make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
> time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
> similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
> about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:
>
>  * Kubuntu
>  * Xubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Studio
>  * Lubuntu
>  * Ubuntu Kylin
>  * Ubuntu MATE
>  * Ubuntu Budgie
>
> If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
> reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Graham
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Question to flavors: touch-base on flavor participation for 22.10!

2022-05-11 Thread Graham Inggs
Hello flavors!

As we do around the start of every new cycle, I am reaching out to all
the current official Ubuntu flavors to confirm active participation in
the upcoming Ubuntu release - 22.10.

Working towards a release requires a lot of effort, so we'd like to
make sure all the flavors are ready, properly staffed and have enough
time allocated to make 22.10 happen for their users. This is why,
similarly to last year, I will need a confirmation follow-up message
about kinetic participation from every flavor, that is:

 * Kubuntu
 * Xubuntu
 * Ubuntu Studio
 * Lubuntu
 * Ubuntu Kylin
 * Ubuntu MATE
 * Ubuntu Budgie

If you have any concerns regarding your participation, feel free to
reach out to me or anyone else from the ubuntu-release team.

Thank you!

Graham

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel