Re: [python3-glance-store] Package update request
By looking more accurately this patch as already landed in glance-store and embedded in 2.0.1 release under the stable/ussuri branch: https://opendev.org/openstack/glance_store/src/branch/stable/ussuri commit ca0c58b52756058b6d51bf6a47aeac3d525c1e16 (HEAD -> stable/ussuri, tag: ussuri-em, tag: 2.0.1, origin/stable/ussuri) Bug report filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-glance-store/+bug/1983608 Thanks, Cédric > On 4 Aug 2022, at 14:31, Corey Bryant wrote: > > As part of the SRU process, the patched package will get accepted into > focal-proposed for testing, and then once it passes testing it will get > promoted to focal-updates. If you could do that testing once it gets to > -proposed, that would be very helpful. > > We should open a new bug here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-glance-store > to track the SRU. Sometimes we re-use upstream bugs for package fixes but > since the upstream bug is a partial fix, I think we should probably open a > new one. > > If you can sign up to do the testing I can upload the patched package for the > SRU team to review. > > Thanks, > Corey > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:09 AM Lemarchand Cedric > wrote: > Hi Corey, > > Thanks for the info, unfortunately upgrade to newer release is not an option > now. > > What do you mean exactly by test it and report back to SRU ? Should I apply > patch to current version/files of glance-store, en reports if Glances tests > went well ? > > Cédric Lemarchand > > > On 3 Aug 2022, at 21:58, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > > Hi Cedric, > > > > It looks like this is fixed in the victoria+ releases. Victoria through > > Xena are available via the cloud archive for focal, if it helps. > > If we were to SRU the fix for focal, would you be able to test it and > > report back results to the SRU bug? > > > > Thanks, > > Corey > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:21 PM Lemarchand Cedric > > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to know if this patch [1] can be applied to package > > python3-glance-store (2.0.0-0ubuntu3) in focal-updates. > > > > It is about real performance improvements regarding glance image upload > > when using Ceph/rbd backend and when the source image size is not known. > > > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/762498 > > > > Sorry for the noise if this is not the good place to ask, if so please > > advice. > > -- > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Ubuntu 22.04.1 delayed until August 11
Hello everyone, This is basically a copy-paste of my discourse announcement earlier. During testing of our 22.04.1 release candidates, we were made aware of an unexpected issue regarding the OEM Installation feature of our Ubuntu Desktop installer images. This bug causes preinstalled snaps not to work on the final target system after the “OEM install” option is selected during installation (i.e. after the end-user setup is performed) (LP: #1983528 3). This behavior would seriously impact the experience of any users whose login was created after an OEM install. In order not to compromise the quality of the installation media, we have decided to delay the release of 22.04.1 by a week, releasing on August 11, 2022. The issue has been identified and a fix is in review, so we are confident it will be resolved shortly. However, moving release to the 11th will give us time to address the bug and test the fix, and will allow users to plan for the update with a definitive date. # As a regular user of 22.04, am I affected? This issue only affects new installations using the OEM Install mode of Ubiquity and using the release candidate images for 22.04.1. Existing users and users installing with the currently available 22.04 images are not affected in any way. # Why delaying and not hotfixing? We identified this issue late in testing. The current identified fix is in a core Ubuntu component (snapd), so we would like to perform a full test cycle on the package and the new images before we ship them to our users. We do not want to risk introducing any new issues while pushing out a hotfix to a core component, so we believe the best approach is to delay the update. On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team, Łukasz ‘sil2100’ Zemczak -- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Foundations Team Tools Squad Interim Engineering Manager lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [python3-glance-store] Package update request
As part of the SRU process, the patched package will get accepted into focal-proposed for testing, and then once it passes testing it will get promoted to focal-updates. If you could do that testing once it gets to -proposed, that would be very helpful. We should open a new bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-glance-store to track the SRU. Sometimes we re-use upstream bugs for package fixes but since the upstream bug is a partial fix, I think we should probably open a new one. If you can sign up to do the testing I can upload the patched package for the SRU team to review. Thanks, Corey On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:09 AM Lemarchand Cedric wrote: > Hi Corey, > > Thanks for the info, unfortunately upgrade to newer release is not an > option now. > > What do you mean exactly by test it and report back to SRU ? Should I > apply patch to current version/files of glance-store, en reports if Glances > tests went well ? > > Cédric Lemarchand > DSI TDF > +33 6 37 23 40 93 > > > On 3 Aug 2022, at 21:58, Corey Bryant > wrote: > > > > Hi Cedric, > > > > It looks like this is fixed in the victoria+ releases. Victoria through > Xena are available via the cloud archive for focal, if it helps. > > If we were to SRU the fix for focal, would you be able to test it and > report back results to the SRU bug? > > > > Thanks, > > Corey > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:21 PM Lemarchand Cedric < > cedric.lemarch...@tdf.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to know if this patch [1] can be applied to package > python3-glance-store (2.0.0-0ubuntu3) in focal-updates. > > > > It is about real performance improvements regarding glance image upload > when using Ceph/rbd backend and when the source image size is not known. > > > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/762498 > > > > Sorry for the noise if this is not the good place to ask, if so please > advice. > > -- > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[ubuntu-studio-devel] Ubuntu Studio daily CD health check
This is a daily health check report on the Ubuntu Studio CD images. If you have any questions, contact Colin Watson . ubuntustudio/dvd: kinetic-dvd-amd64.iso oversized by 59454976 bytes (5059454976) -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
