Re: vUDS Scheduling
Hi Scott, I can only speak on behalf of the Cloud and Server track, but I'd like to clarify how we intend to use this. Unlike a start-of-cycle vUDS, this is a midcycle checkpoint opportunity. The purpose of this, is to drive existing blueprints to completion. This is an chance for those involved in Cloud and Server to do a 'show-and-tell' of blueprints defined 3 months ago. We can evaluate decisions made then, check if assumptions were correct, anything we feel needs to be re-addressed and some re-scoping. Very little (if any), new work should come from this. The Canonical Server team previously did this same exercise but at an internal-only mid-cycle sprint. This is largely the same thing, but out in the open. THIS i am a big fan of and I am sure you are also supportive of this. Personally, I think the timing to clash with feature freeze lends itself nicely. This is the time that blueprints should be de-scoped if they are clearly not on track with features, and anything we /really/ need to see this cycle - can be considered very carefully with risk mitigation. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to give me a shout. -- Kind Regards, Dave Walker Engineering Manager, Ubuntu Server On 19 August 2013 18:26, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I agree that this is useful for Canonical upstreams trying to map out their > next three - six months' work. From a distro development perspective, not so > much. I would hope there's a look beyond the next three months. By starting > to plan for 14.04 now, they'll be in a much better position to understand what > needs doing and when to land things in the archive on a timely basis. > > Scott K > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 12:15:45 Rick Spencer wrote: >> For Ubuntu touch, at least, there is a lot to figure out and do before >> shipping 13.10. Personally, I think it would be most beneficial to do >> that planning and have those discussions transparently and in an >> organized manner. >> >> Cheers, Rick >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Scott Kitterman > wrote: >> > On Monday, August 19, 2013 10:52:18 Ted Gould wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 10:05 -0400, Michael Hall wrote: >> >> > UDS August 2013 >> >> > Starts: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:00:00 UTC >> >> > Ends: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:00:00 UTC >> >> >> >> Are we putting vUDS the three days before feature freeze? >> >> >> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule >> >> >> >> Seems like bad time for people working on Ubuntu. >> > >> > I think that is generically true for the mid-cycle vUDS. This is no doubt >> > worse than it might be, but it's a bit early to start planning the next >> > Ubuntu release cycle. Whoever it's for, I don't think it's for people >> > working on Ubuntu. >> > >> > Scott K >> > >> > -- >> > ubuntu-devel mailing list >> > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com >> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Minutes from the Ubuntu Server Team meeting, 2012-10-02
Damn, you are good! On 2 October 2012 18:41, Ursula Junque wrote: > Full IRC logs can be found in > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20121002, along with these > minutes. > > == Meeting summary == > > > === ACTION points === > > ACTION points from previous meeting > > * jamespage to look into aligning release team and server team > trackign reports > - No progress so far, will follow up with Ursinha next week. > > > New ACTION points: > > * ACTION: jamespage and Ursinha to look into aligning release > team and server team tracking reports > * ACTION: jamespage to provide info to hggdh about how to run > iSCSI and MAAS tests for the ISO > > > === Release Bugs === > > * bug 1017847 in qemu-linaro (Ubuntu) "qemu segfaults when creating > an armhf container on an amd64 host" [High,Confirmed] > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1017847 >* hallyn will try to reproduce the issue again, added to his list. > > * bug 1047520 in php5 (Ubuntu Quantal) "NEWS and release notes need > updating" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1047520 >* SpamapS looked and said it was already Fix Released. > > * bug 1049177 in maas (Ubuntu Quantal) "isc-dhcp-server apparmor > profile should have include ".d" " [Critical,Fix Committed] > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1049177 >* smoser said the fix is already on a PPA. > > * bug 1044632 in juju (Ubuntu Quantal) "Modify format 2 so that it > supports raw strings" [Critical,New] > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1044632 >* jimbaker said the fix is part of the 0.5.2 release of juju. > SpamapS said he has a final drop of Juju code planned for later this > week. > > Daviey asked SpamapS if any news on using ubuntu-cloud lxc template > for local provider. SpamapS said the branch is proposed and in review > today. > > > === Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) === > > hggdh reported iSCSI and MAAS tests didn't run for beta 2 ISO, so he > assumed server team wants him to run it, and asked for information on > how to do it. > > He reported found an easy way to have the ISO dns-server tests to > actually execute, and will be proposing a merge soon for USIT. > > He also reported that MAAS now seem to support virsh, but there are > not docs on how to fill in the fields on the "Add Node" screen, and > the "Doc" button on the page does not even talk about virsh. > roaksoax said we would need to check that with iupstream as he's > only worked with IPMI. smoser haven't tested current maas with virsh, > but it is on the list of things he'd like to know how to do. > > hggdh should catch up with Daview after the meeting. > > > === Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb) === > > * bug 1021471 in linux (Ubuntu Quantal) "clone() hang when creating > new network namespace (dmesg show unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo > to become free. Usage count = 2)" [High,Triaged] > https://launchpad.net/bugs/1021471 > * smb reported he's getting somewhere with it, was compiling a new > test kernel to check that. Should be on people by the time the meeting > ends. > > > === Next meeting date and time === > > Next meeting will be on Tuesday, October 9th at 16:00 UTC in > #ubuntu-meeting. Chair will be rbasak. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Ursinha (Ursula Junque) > ursi...@ursinha.net > ursi...@ubuntu.com > -- > Ubuntu - I am because we are > -- > Linux user #289453 - Ubuntu user #31144 > > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > ubuntu-ser...@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam > -- Kind Regards, Dave Walker Engineering Manager, Ubuntu Server Infrastructure -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
