Re: QATracker wiki?
On 07/02/14 21:14, George DiceGeorge wrote: *I'm trying to learn how to help with Xubuntu testing,* *but i'm confused - at* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker where it says [ SUMMARY SCREEN version.png The picture above shows a single product (ubuntu) with 9 "mandatory" testcases, ] *shouldnt there be a picture where it says* *[version.png]* *(and supersededbuilds.png and testcaseexpanded.png * *etc?)* ** *George* ** ** That would be like http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/62644/testcases yes there should be a picture - looks like someone has edited the wiki and broken it somewhere Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
Re: Upgrading Precise to Trusty
On 07/02/14 20:52, Richard Elkins wrote: I should also add that the upgrade testing from 12.04.3 to 14.04.latest-at-that-time was rather pristine. I tried both an ISO image upgrade and one via `update-manager -c -d`. Very predictable and stable results. So, a bit of documentation word-smithing in the release notes for 14.04 may be sufficient. I'd also like to see other Xubuntu QA and developer folks also try out these two upgrade methods on Precise to Trusty before April and report their testing results in the usual place for upgrade testing: 64-bit: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57247/testcases 32-bit: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/308/builds/57248/testcases Anyone have a different perspective? Richard I'd not have thought so :) Once we get to Beta 1 then I would expect to have been asking people to be looking at upgrades. Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] 12.04.5
On 07/02/14 19:33, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Michael Kellat wrote: FYI How does this align with our planning? If it goes as smoothly as past point releases, it would require us to do testing of the ISOs but I don't think much else (unless we want to). We hardly even manage to do that. 5 people running around doing all the tests. Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
Package testing - XFCE Core Group
Phew ... it's all a bit thick and fast at the moment ... So following on from the other package testing we've been doing - it's time for the next group of tests. *XFCE Core * You can find them in the same place as the others - http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/306/builds/55995/testcases I promise that there will be just one more call for a group of tests - and I left the best one till last, the smallest :) That said - we will be calling as soon as we can for testing for the few things we haven't landed yet that will need testing, I'll leave that for another day. Now that we've cracked the majority of the package tests - the field should be clear for the Beta images - which are due at the ends of February and March. Many thanks for your work helping to test Trusty with us. Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
GTK3 Indicators follow-up
If you have been looking at these for us after the previous call [1] If you are running with _nouveau_ and a 'GeForce 210' card. Have you seen the indicator panel going transparent? http://i.imgur.com/mstzH87.png Do you use xchat - does it revert to this randomly? http://i.imgur.com/IiIekKB.png Open thunar - navigate to ~/.cache/upstart/ and open startxfce4.log Do you see error's similar to this The program 'xfsettingsd' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadRRCrtc (invalid Crtc parameter)'. If you see ANYTHING odd, not right, not sure with these indicators. *Please let us know.* Elfy [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2013-December/009521.html -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
Alphas - opting in/out : Cadence testing
At the meeting this week we decided to opt out of Alpha1 and concentrate on Alpha 2 and 3. The release schedule has now been amended. [1] There is no Alpha3, only 1 and 2 Alpha1 is due June 27th which is sometime around Cadence week 2 Alpha2 is due July 25th (between cadence weeks 3 and 4) Are we going to now work with Alpha1 and 2 - I assume so. Beta 1 is due August 29th Final Beta due September 26th As far as cadence testing goes - we want to try and work in any specific tests during those weeks. [2] To do that we need to have tests ready. A suggestion. if for no other reason than to start a discussion, perhaps do Cadence week 2 - office apps (abiword manual test written, gnumeric in progress) Cadence week 3 - empty for the moment Cadence week 4 - web apps (firefox written, xchat written, thunderbird written, pidgin in hand) Cadence week 5 - empty for the moment Cadence week 6 - media apps (nothing written) I've got a testcase in hand for the new greeter. But we need some pointers as to what we need to work with and some sort of prioritisation for them all. There is a bug list for these manual tests [3]. Can people look and help with at least prioritising. Thanks Elfy [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Cadence/Saucy (likely to change) [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=xubuntu&orderby=status&start=0 -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member -- xubuntu-devel mailing list xubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
