Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to libreadline-dev for readline transition. aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: Build-Depend on libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of libreadline5-dev. (Closes: #553726) * src/Makefile.am, src/Makefile.in: Apply patch from Ubuntu to remove unknown -avoid-version from LDFLAGS. (Closes: #628245) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:20:08 -0500 Changed-By: Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella nicolas.valcar...@canonical.com Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptsh/0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 This doesn't seem right, can you please reupload with the libreadline that Debian used and a note that it should be sync'd next time unless there's a reason to override Debian's libreadline choice? Thanks, MIcah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
* Fixed top post On 10/25/2011 03:25 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Micah Gersten wrote: On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to libreadline-dev for readline transition. aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: Build-Depend on libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of libreadline5-dev. (Closes: #553726) * src/Makefile.am, src/Makefile.in: Apply patch from Ubuntu to remove unknown -avoid-version from LDFLAGS. (Closes: #628245) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:20:08 -0500 Changed-By: Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella nicolas.valcar...@canonical.com Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptsh/0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 This doesn't seem right, can you please reupload with the libreadline that Debian used and a note that it should be sync'd next time unless there's a reason to override Debian's libreadline choice? Thanks, MIcah We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird debian naming thing rmadison libreadline-gplv2-dev libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-9ubuntu1 | oneiric | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-11 | precise | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc Please fix :) Thanks, Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird debian naming thing On the contrary: libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-11 | precise | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc I second Micah's request; please revert your change ASAP, as it results in a licence violation by linking a GPLv2-only package against a GPLv3 version of readline. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
Hello, Am 25.10.2011 18:26, schrieb Steve Stalcup: Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no need to be an ass about it. This tone is absolutely not necessary on the mailing list. Everybody else manages to keep the tone polite. Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might be different for others) would learn a lot from them. Daniel -- Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging Stay up to date: follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am 25.10.2011 18:26, schrieb Steve Stalcup: Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no need to be an ass about it. This tone is absolutely not necessary on the mailing list. Everybody else manages to keep the tone polite. Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might be different for others) would learn a lot from them. Agreed. -- Mackenzie Morgan -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might be different for others) would learn a lot from them. +1 here. Provided that everyone on the list takes it in the right spirit :-) Regards, -- Bhavani Shankar Ubuntu Developer | www.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/~bhavi -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On 26/10/2011 00:38, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might be different for others) would learn a lot from them. +1 here. Provided that everyone on the list takes it in the right spirit :-) +1 from me too. Haven't we been through this discussion before? -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On 10/25/2011 10:26 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird debian naming thing On the contrary: libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-11 | precise | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc I second Micah's request; please revert your change ASAP, as it results in a licence violation by linking a GPLv2-only package against a GPLv3 version of readline. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] Sorry, i don't know how i missed that one :S, ok, just reverted the change. Thank you for your prompt attention on this, but I don't see the upload. Could you please verify that it actually made it to the archive? Thanks, Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
Fixed Top Post... On 10/25/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Stalcup wrote: On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com mailto:mic...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to libreadline-dev for readline transition. aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: Build-Depend on libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of libreadline5-dev. (Closes: #553726) * src/Makefile.am, src/Makefile.in: Apply patch from Ubuntu to remove unknown -avoid-version from LDFLAGS. (Closes: #628245) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:20:08 -0500 Changed-By: Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella nicolas.valcar...@canonical.com Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptsh/0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 This doesn't seem right, can you please reupload with the libreadline that Debian used and a note that it should be sync'd next time unless there's a reason to override Debian's libreadline choice? Thanks, MIcah Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no need to be an ass about it. With love, Steve This was a public upload that was sent to a mailing list monitored by Ubuntu developers that resulted in a license violation. The reason I sent it to the list was 2 fold. First, that others should be aware of such things (i.e. possible license violations, although it was Colin who actually spelled that out properly). Second, that I was sure that I wasn't going to be the only one to raise an eyebrow about this. In order to keep everyone on the same page, I moved the discussion to the ubuntu-devel list. This has been done before. This is not about pointing fingers, but about raising awareness and getting things fixed. We all make mistakes. Sometimes, one person's error can be a learning lesson for everyone. I certainly hope no one is looking down on Nicolas for this, I certainly am not. In fact, it's because Nicolas did something right, that this was able to be caught at all. He included the changelogs from Debian properly in his upload which allowed the merge to be contrasted with what was done in Debian. Thanks, Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:26:58AM -0600, Steve Stalcup wrote: Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no need to be an ass about it. Speaking (I hope) for the ubuntu-devel moderation team, Micah's original message seemed entirely appropriate for this list. Calling people names is not on, though. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
