Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-04-15
On 15.04.2011 23:36, Scott Moser wrote: I did make some progress. One overall theme I see is that there are things in that queue that should not be there. That means that patch-pilots (or anyone using it, really) potentially lose time reading bugs and coming to the conclusion that this is not ready. My thoughts exactly.. it was the first pilot day for me, and after learning how the procedure works I spent quite a lot of time going through the bugs on the list. I could've documented those to save you some time, but.. :) t -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 2011-04-15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sea-defender/+bug/745876 - turned into a sync request, 0.9-2 has the FTBFS fix in it https://code.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl/ubuntu/natty/openwsman/lp760835/+merge/57790 - test-built, and uploaded to natty https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucarp/+bug/760223 - test-built, and uploaded to natty - SRU, uploaded to lucid-proposed, pending approval https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults-armel-cross/+bug/676454 - test-built, and uploaded to natty, pending approval -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
