Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Thursday, December 15 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:15:21PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote: > >> > On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> >>> Hello, >> >> >> >>> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have >> >>> just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing >> >>> no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. >> >> >> >>> The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition >> >>> can be obtained by running: >> >> >> >>> $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap >> >> >> >>> I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything >> >>> looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). >> >> >> >> I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any >> >> packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language >> >> transitions >> >> for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings >> >> right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder >> >> to get them migrated. >> > >> > Ah, no problem. It can wait. >> > >> >> Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this >> >> week >> >> and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above >> >> in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against >> >> libldap-2.5-0. >> > >> > +1. Thanks, and enjoy your PTO. > >> Perl and Python have migrated, so I will go ahead with the no-change >> uploads tomorrow. > > FWIW seeing that these hadn't been done yet and openldap had migrated (so > all of the reverse-dependencies were on the NBS report), I went ahead and > did uploads today of a filtered list of reverse-dependencies, excluding any > of those that are currently in -proposed. > > Uploading those other packages won't cause entanglements between any > remaining transitions, but it may slow down the migration of some of them, > so I didn't upload them - but if you want to upload them now, there's no > fundamental reason you can't. > > Remaining packages would be: > > Package gvm-libs already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package gvm-libs not built in lunar-proposed) > Package lua-apr already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package lua-apr not built in lunar-proposed) > Package openscap already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > Rebuilding openscap > Rebuilding postgresql-14 > Package sssd already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package sssd not built in lunar-proposed) > Package uwsgi already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package uwsgi not built in lunar-proposed) > Package virtuoso-opensource already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package virtuoso-opensource not built in lunar-proposed) > Package wine already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package wine not built in lunar-proposed) > Package wine-development already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) > (Package wine-development not built in lunar-proposed) > > This also gives you the list of reverse-dependencies that FTBFS. Thanks, Steve. I will start working on this list tomorrow. Cheers, -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:15:21PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote: > > On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >>> Hello, > >> > >>> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have > >>> just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing > >>> no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > >> > >>> The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition > >>> can be obtained by running: > >> > >>> $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > >> > >>> I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything > >>> looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). > >> > >> I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any > >> packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language > >> transitions > >> for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings > >> right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder > >> to get them migrated. > > > > Ah, no problem. It can wait. > > > >> Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this week > >> and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above > >> in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against > >> libldap-2.5-0. > > > > +1. Thanks, and enjoy your PTO. > Perl and Python have migrated, so I will go ahead with the no-change > uploads tomorrow. FWIW seeing that these hadn't been done yet and openldap had migrated (so all of the reverse-dependencies were on the NBS report), I went ahead and did uploads today of a filtered list of reverse-dependencies, excluding any of those that are currently in -proposed. Uploading those other packages won't cause entanglements between any remaining transitions, but it may slow down the migration of some of them, so I didn't upload them - but if you want to upload them now, there's no fundamental reason you can't. Remaining packages would be: Package gvm-libs already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package gvm-libs not built in lunar-proposed) Package lua-apr already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package lua-apr not built in lunar-proposed) Package openscap already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) Rebuilding openscap Rebuilding postgresql-14 Package sssd already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package sssd not built in lunar-proposed) Package uwsgi already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package uwsgi not built in lunar-proposed) Package virtuoso-opensource already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package virtuoso-opensource not built in lunar-proposed) Package wine already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package wine not built in lunar-proposed) Package wine-development already present in lunar-proposed (but not fixed) (Package wine-development not built in lunar-proposed) This also gives you the list of reverse-dependencies that FTBFS. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Monday, November 21 2022, I wrote: > On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> Hello, >> >>> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have >>> just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing >>> no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. >> >>> The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition >>> can be obtained by running: >> >>> $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap >> >>> I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything >>> looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). >> >> I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any >> packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language transitions >> for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings >> right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder >> to get them migrated. > > Ah, no problem. It can wait. > >> Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this week >> and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above >> in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against >> libldap-2.5-0. > > +1. Thanks, and enjoy your PTO. Hi, Perl and Python have migrated, so I will go ahead with the no-change uploads tomorrow. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 01:37:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:17:55AM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:41:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Sergio, > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have > > > > just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing > > > > no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > > > > > The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition > > > > can be obtained by running: > > > > > $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > > > > > I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything > > > > looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). > > > > I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any > > > packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language > > > transitions > > > for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings > > > right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder > > > to get them migrated. > > > It would be great if these kinds of activities were mentioned on the > > release schedule: > > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/27284 > > These are not scheduled transitions; this is the contents of the Debian sync > when the archive opened. Given that these unplanned transitions created a clog that is forcing an indefinite delay to a planned transition, and indeed is causing migration delays to other assorted package uploads more generally, allowing these large language runtime transitions to occur at the same time seems suboptimal. If it's not specifically intended to have that happen, perhaps it would be worth considering switching some of these languages to sync block at the start of the cycle? That would permit better coordination for when they kick off. This approach has proven workable and effective with other language runtimes that had clog problems in the past. Bryce -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:17:55AM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:41:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Sergio, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > Hello, > > > This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have > > > just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing > > > no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > > > The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition > > > can be obtained by running: > > > $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > > > I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything > > > looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). > > I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any > > packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language transitions > > for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings > > right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder > > to get them migrated. > It would be great if these kinds of activities were mentioned on the > release schedule: > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/27284 These are not scheduled transitions; this is the contents of the Debian sync when the archive opened. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:41:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > Hello, > > > This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have > > just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing > > no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > > > The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition > > can be obtained by running: > > > $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > > > I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything > > looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). > > I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any > packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language transitions > for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings > right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder > to get them migrated. It would be great if these kinds of activities were mentioned on the release schedule: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/27284 Bryce -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
On Monday, November 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sergio, Hi Steve, > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Hello, > >> This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have >> just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing >> no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > >> The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition >> can be obtained by running: > >> $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > >> I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything >> looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). > > I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any > packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language transitions > for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings > right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder > to get them migrated. Ah, no problem. It can wait. > Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this week > and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above > in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against > libldap-2.5-0. +1. Thanks, and enjoy your PTO. -- Sergio GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14 -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: OpenLDAP 2.6 transition
Hi Sergio, On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:32:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Hello, > This is a heads up that the OpenLDAP 2.6 transition has started. I have > just uploaded the package to lunar-proposed and will be performing > no-change uploads to its reverse dependencies soon. > The list of packages that are going to be affected by this transition > can be obtained by running: > $ reverse-depends -r lunar src:openldap > I did a mass-rebuild of said packages in a bileto PPA and everything > looks good (aside from some unrelated FTBFSes). I would ask you to hold off right now on doing no-change rebuilds of any packages currently in -proposed. There are in-progress language transitions for perl, python, and R, and rebuilding all the openldap language bindings right now will entangle all of those transitions and likely make it harder to get them migrated. Hopefully, the autopkgtest backlogs on arm64 and s390x will clear this week and then we'll have a better view on what it takes to finish the above in-progress transitions, and then rebuild anything still linking against libldap-2.5-0. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
