Re: upower 0.99
Ted Gould [2014-06-16 8:10 -0500]: > Considering we haven't migrated to systemd yet, it would seem that would > leave us without suspend support. Is there a plan to distro patch that > back into upower? Can the suspend be used via one of the shims? Jackson/Tim are really talking about logind here, which we've been (exclusively) using since Saucy. systemd-shim has made the suspend etc. functionality work with upstart. So none of this is new, and yes, we indeed want projects to move away from upower for suspend stuff, as logind's is much more reliable in terms of hooking into the suspend/resume cycle (screen savers, NM, etc. -- they can now synchronously block the operation instead of hoping to be "fast enough"). Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: upower 0.99
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 18:49 +1000, Jackson Doak wrote: > Upower 0.99 is now required by gnome 3.12. As a result, we are trying > to have the transition completed this cycle. The new release changes > the SONAME, changed from the "changed" signal to "notify" as well as > the function signature, and drops suspend support (which systemd now > handles). This means nearly all packages that use upower will need > changes. > Considering we haven't migrated to systemd yet, it would seem that would leave us without suspend support. Is there a plan to distro patch that back into upower? Can the suspend be used via one of the shims? Ted signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: upower 0.99
On 16/06/14 18:49, Jackson Doak wrote: > Upower 0.99 is now required by gnome 3.12. As a result, we are trying to have > the transition completed this cycle. The new release changes the > SONAME, changed from the "changed" signal to "notify" as well as the function > signature, and drops suspend support (which systemd now > handles). This means nearly all packages that use upower will need changes. > > A number of upstreams already have fixes (gnome, xfce, mate, cairo-dock, and > telepathy) but a few packages need work. If anyone involved with > sugar or kde could let me know the status, that would be great. Just to add here, as far as canonical components go, powerd, indicator-power and python-dbusmock need porting. > > The bug report is at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1330037 . > > wmbattery will need removal, as it is orphaned and broken with new linux > anyway > > Jackson > > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
upower 0.99
Upower 0.99 is now required by gnome 3.12. As a result, we are trying to have the transition completed this cycle. The new release changes the SONAME, changed from the "changed" signal to "notify" as well as the function signature, and drops suspend support (which systemd now handles). This means nearly all packages that use upower will need changes. A number of upstreams already have fixes (gnome, xfce, mate, cairo-dock, and telepathy) but a few packages need work. If anyone involved with sugar or kde could let me know the status, that would be great. The bug report is at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1330037 . wmbattery will need removal, as it is orphaned and broken with new linux anyway Jackson -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
