Re: texlive
Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:39:06PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote: > >> >> 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that. Maybe a good topic of discussion? >>> Debian/sid has already transitioned, so won't gutsy automatically pick >>> this up unless otherwise prevented? >>> >>> >> Well, the issue is more replacing tetex with texlive in Main. Currently >> texlive is in Universe and tetex in Main. We'd need to coordinate with >> core-devs and do Main Inclusion Reports. I wonder if we need a spec for >> this? Perhaps Matt Zimmerman or Martin Pitt could give us some guidence >> here. >> > > A main inclusion report should be sufficient; if Debian has made the package > dependency transition then that should be pulled in during the merge. The > remaining work (looking after it in Ubuntu, pulling in any additional Debian > changes, responding to bugs) sounds like a job for the TeX team you just > created. > > Yes, it sounds like Martin is going to be working on the merges (perhaps I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was actually more dealing with the broken deps and invariable upgrade/install issues that people seem to have with a transition like this. I put in a request for an ubuntu-tex mailing list yesterday so that we can coordinate this kind of work better with the Debian TeX people. Thanks for the replies Martin and Matt. -Jordan -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: texlive
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:39:06PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote: > > > > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive > > > 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that. > > > Maybe a good topic of discussion? > > > > Debian/sid has already transitioned, so won't gutsy automatically pick > > this up unless otherwise prevented? > > > > Well, the issue is more replacing tetex with texlive in Main. Currently > texlive is in Universe and tetex in Main. We'd need to coordinate with > core-devs and do Main Inclusion Reports. I wonder if we need a spec for > this? Perhaps Matt Zimmerman or Martin Pitt could give us some guidence > here. A main inclusion report should be sufficient; if Debian has made the package dependency transition then that should be pulled in during the merge. The remaining work (looking after it in Ubuntu, pulling in any additional Debian changes, responding to bugs) sounds like a job for the TeX team you just created. -- - mdz -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Opening development for Gutsy Gibbon
That toolchain is sure going to take a while, if it's taking 11 months - and even then, Mar 26 2008 isnt a Thursday. :P Must be meaning april. Hobbsee Matthias Klose wrote: > Gutsy is now open in "frozen" mode to allow the upload / sync of basic and > some > infrastructure packages first, which should be available before the normal > uploads start. Please follow the normal sync rules (file a bug and subscribe > ubuntu-archive) and rules for upload in frozen periods (upload and notify > archive admins on #ubuntu-devel). The archive will be open for normal > operation > around Thursday noon UTC (Mar 26). > > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ubuntu server kernel with IMQ and other useful patches?
Have you consider including ESFQ, connlimit, L7-filter, IMQ, ipt_account, IPP2P etc. patches to ubuntu server version kernel? (also iptables IMQ and iproute2 patches would be needed). It would be easier for people who are using ubuntu server as a gateway with traffic shaping and they wouldn't need to recompile kernel and apply patches. In desktop version it's not nessesary but in server I think it would be a good idea. What do you think? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
