KLF Setup

2007-05-04 Thread Johnathan Falk
One of the biggest things that linux users forget all the time is that
Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly because of their pretty desktop because if
desktop beauty was the deciding factor we would all use OS X.  The biggest
thing is that one a windows server you can have Ldap + Kerberos + File
Serving setup in under 10 minutes with no hassle. On windows its Hey do you
want to install Active Directory? Ok I can do that for you type your dns
domain name and admin password POOF! I'm done.

I have spent the last 8 days trying to get Ldap + Kerberos + NFSv4 to work
at home with a little 6 node network and I can't even do that, how do you
expect me or anyone to try and deploy this at a business or a school?  Its
practically impossible to find a good howto on this, and then feeding ldap
information with ldif's? What the hell?! Yes I know this is standard but I
come from a windows world and to paraphrase the Mac people it just works
I am sick of struggling with this and pretty soon am just going to go back
to windows work stations.

Maybe in the next iteration of Ubuntu instead of just 1. DNS server and 2.
LAMP server, they could have another option Directory Server. Server roles
are a big reason people like windows.  I just click a server role and BAM!
Everything is done for me, and in the end Ubuntu's goals are to make linux
easy.

Johnathan Falk
Network Admin
Clinton Community Schools

MCP, MCSA, A+, Network+, CCNA


Johnathan Falk
Network Administrator
Clinton Community Schools


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: KLF Setup

2007-05-04 Thread George Farris
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:01 -0400, Johnathan Falk wrote:
 One of the biggest things that linux users forget all the time is that
 Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly because of their pretty desktop because if
 desktop beauty was the deciding factor we would all use OS X.  The biggest
 thing is that one a windows server you can have Ldap + Kerberos + File
 Serving setup in under 10 minutes with no hassle. On windows its Hey do you
 want to install Active Directory? Ok I can do that for you type your dns
 domain name and admin password POOF! I'm done.
 
 I have spent the last 8 days trying to get Ldap + Kerberos + NFSv4 to work
 at home with a little 6 node network and I can't even do that, how do you
 expect me or anyone to try and deploy this at a business or a school?  Its
 practically impossible to find a good howto on this, and then feeding ldap
 information with ldif's? What the hell?! Yes I know this is standard but I
 come from a windows world and to paraphrase the Mac people it just works
 I am sick of struggling with this and pretty soon am just going to go back
 to windows work stations.
 
 Maybe in the next iteration of Ubuntu instead of just 1. DNS server and 2.
 LAMP server, they could have another option Directory Server. Server roles
 are a big reason people like windows.  I just click a server role and BAM!
 Everything is done for me, and in the end Ubuntu's goals are to make linux
 easy.

You couldn't be more right about this.  I've been through this myself
and though I did manage to set up samba and ldap there are so many
howto's and other pieces of information that contradict one another it,
is just plain ugly and that's being kind.  Clear concise and TESTED
instructions on the Ubuntu site would be a real help.

Even a setup script would be a better first step, something like:

would you like to set up

[ ] ldap
[ ] samba
[ ] nfsv4
[ ] kerberos

Do you need to connect to ADS as a workstation
[ ] yes
[ ] no

Do you need to be a member server in an ADS tree
[ ] yes
[ ] no


Even that would be better than what happens now
If I had experience with Kerberos and an ADS machine to play with I
might do this but I just don't have the resources.



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: KLF Setup

2007-05-04 Thread Andrew Price
On 04/05/07 16:01, Johnathan Falk wrote:
 One of the biggest things that linux users forget all the time is that
 Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly because of their pretty desktop because if
 desktop beauty was the deciding factor we would all use OS X.  The biggest
 thing is that one a windows server you can have Ldap + Kerberos + File
 Serving setup in under 10 minutes with no hassle. On windows its Hey do you
 want to install Active Directory? Ok I can do that for you type your dns
 domain name and admin password POOF! I'm done.
 
 I have spent the last 8 days trying to get Ldap + Kerberos + NFSv4 to work
 at home with a little 6 node network and I can't even do that, how do you
 expect me or anyone to try and deploy this at a business or a school?  Its
 practically impossible to find a good howto on this, and then feeding ldap
 information with ldif's? What the hell?! Yes I know this is standard but I
 come from a windows world and to paraphrase the Mac people it just works
 I am sick of struggling with this and pretty soon am just going to go back
 to windows work stations.

There's a specification being worked on to provide the features you
mention. It seems to be making good progress:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/network-authentication

Feel free to find out if there are any contributions you can make
towards this goal.

--
Andy Price


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: KLF Setup

2007-05-04 Thread George Farris
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 16:16 +0100, Andrew Price wrote:

 There's a specification being worked on to provide the features you
 mention. It seems to be making good progress:
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/network-authentication
 
 Feel free to find out if there are any contributions you can make
 towards this goal.

Yes I am aware of that and well done, however, that spec has been worked
on ever since Breezy or Hoary,  I got the feeling nothing was happening.
I'm not complaining so much per say just that this is a big issue and
has been mentioned here on the lists for the last couple years.

I guess what I'm saying is I think this is an important enough issue
that maybe Mark might think about pumping some resources into it for a
month or so.

Cheers



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


glade-3 doesn't have Gnome stuff?

2007-05-04 Thread shirish

Hi all,
   As a newbie I installed glade-3 as well as glade-gnome . Now while
in glade-3 one can easily do GTK+ stuff but not GNOME. Please look at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glade-3/+bug/112479 and confirm or
lemme know where I've gone wrong. Cheers!
--
 Shirish Agarwal
 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons NonCommercial Sampling
Plus 1.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc-sampling+/1.0/
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss