Re: Terrible response time when using Synergy on client side on Hardy

2008-05-27 Thread Jay Crisman
I too upgraded from Gutsy to Hardy, and the mouse in the synergy
client became very unresponsive.  After sudo-ing to start the client,
and then renicing the client to increasingly higher priorities,
performance improved some, but nothing like it was under Gutsy.  The
mouse simply jumps around almost randomly.  It seems to 'catch-up' at
random intervals.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-27 Thread Onno Benschop
On 27/05/08 18:11, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
 To my mind the biggest contribution downstream projects make is saving
 developers time. My experience suggests that it if you are a developer
 and you want to spend less time fighting your distro and more time
 doing actual productive coding, then Ubuntu is one of the better
 choices.
   
+1

As an IT consultant I've been able to contribute more to Ubuntu than any
distribution or project before. I can submit bugs, create patches,
provide user help and participate with a very low entry point. I can
become a member of a team

Over the years I've contributed to other projects, but never felt that
it was noticed - I'm not talking about a thank-you, just that when you
made a contribution, it was picked up, looked at, critiqued and used
where appropriate. Ubuntu does this better than any other group of
people I know.


-- 
Onno Benschop

Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06 - E115°50'39 (Yokine, WA)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. ---   ..Morse for Onno..

ITmaze   -   ABN: 56 178 057 063   -  ph: 04 1219    -   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-27 Thread Onno Benschop
On 28/05/08 08:30, Onno Benschop wrote:
 On 27/05/08 18:11, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
   
 To my mind the biggest contribution downstream projects make is saving
 developers time. My experience suggests that it if you are a developer
 and you want to spend less time fighting your distro and more time
 doing actual productive coding, then Ubuntu is one of the better
 choices.
   
 
 +1

 As an IT consultant I've been able to contribute more to Ubuntu than any
 distribution or project before. I can submit bugs, create patches,
 provide user help and participate with a very low entry point. I can
 become a member of a team

 Over the years I've contributed to other projects, but never felt that
 it was noticed - I'm not talking about a thank-you, just that when you
 made a contribution, it was picked up, looked at, critiqued and used
 where appropriate. Ubuntu does this better than any other group of
 people I know.


   
Hmm, seems I got distracted when hitting send here :|

What I meant the first paragraph to say was this:

As an IT consultant I've been able to contribute more to Ubuntu than any
distribution or project before. I can submit bugs, create patches,
provide user help and participate with a very low entry point. I can
become a member of a team where I can contribute to a specific aspect 
of the project on a code and policy level.


-- 
Onno Benschop

Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06 - E115°50'39 (Yokine, WA)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. ---   ..Morse for Onno..

ITmaze   -   ABN: 56 178 057 063   -  ph: 04 1219    -   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Should default keyboard be based on location?

2008-05-27 Thread Yannick Gingras
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:57:48AM -0400, Yannick Gingras wrote:
   I just installed Kubuntu Hardy.  I selected my location, Montreal,
 and only a few clicks later I had to pick a keyboard which defaulted
 to US.  Since it knows where I live at this point, shouldn't the
 installer default to Canadian layout?  I think that this is related
 to ticked 37138 but I'm not sure because it seem to focus on locales
 while the keymap is mostly locale independent.

 The keymap *is* selected based on location. However, a compatriot of
 yours requested that we should select a US keyboard by default for
 English-speaking Canadians, and a Canadian keyboard by default for
 French-speaking Canadians. That's what the installer implements.

   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/64418

That is a really interesting point of view.  However, allow me to
develop since language identity is really important for our little
group of francophones lost on a continent of English speakers.  

Simon Law, the bug reporter whom happen to live in Montréal not too
far from my place, pointed out that in here, English speakers use the
US layout while French speakers use the French Canadian one.  Simon is
primarily an English speaker and I suspect that he doesn't write a lot
of French.  My primary language on the other hand is French and even
though I decided to install my distribution in English, a US layout
would be completely unusable for me since roughly I write as much
French as I write English.

Part of the problem is that Canadian Layout doesn't mean anything to
most people.  In Montréal, we refer to this layout as Clavier
Québécois and most English speakers would instantly associate this
name with the layout with funky diacritics; Canadian doesn't make it
clear that you get a keyboard optimized to input French.  

I am not too familiar with the history of layouts but I think that
there used to be a layout called Canadian International that was
promoted by the federal government.  It uses direct keys for almost
all accented characters.  The keyboard used in Québec on the other
hand uses dead keys (you type the accent then the letter you want to
compose with) which people seem to prefer, probably because that
leaves a few spare keys for stuff like brackets and curly braces.
Presently, I think that most Canadian French speakers outside of
Québec use the Clavier Québecois and this is why it shows up on your
list as Canadian.

As Simon Law suggested, renaming the layouts to make it clear which
layout is which would probably do the trick.  Further more, I think
that the US layout should show up on the list of keyboards that you
get when you click Canada because that's definitely the dominant
layout around.

I'll do a small informal informal survey around here to see which
solution would please all our opinionated local language groups.

-- 
Yannick Gingras

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss