Karmic Beta

2009-10-02 Thread Brian A
To All,

I just wanted to say that karmic looks great so far. Boots fast, looks
great, and there's a big improvement in battery life. I know that you guys
must have been busy with the replacement of HAL as well as everything else.
Just wanted to congratulate you on a great beta. There are a few bugs, but
that's to be expected and I am sure that they will be ironed out before
release.

Thank you,
Brian
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Karmic Alpha 6/Beta

2009-10-02 Thread Patrick Goetz
Siegfried-A. Gevatter wrote:
> GRUB 2 is a special case. It is only (automatically) installed on a
> clean install, and not on upgrades, given the risk of this operation.
> 

Speaking of Grub 2, does anyone know if the grub2 automatic boot-through 
to default bug has been fixed?  I posted it on launchpad 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/428570)
but apparently no one has had a chance to look at it.

Although not a big deal for desktop installs, this is a serious PITA for 
server environments, particularly for collocated or dedicated server 
pools where the admin doesn't have access to a console.

If you're using 9.10, server, I suggest you use the work around 
described in the bug report.







-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Karmic Alpha 6/Beta

2009-10-02 Thread NoOp
On 10/02/2009 09:50 AM, NoOp wrote:
> On 10/02/2009 07:51 AM, Siegfried-A. Gevatter wrote:
>> 2009/10/2 David Curtis :
>>> If it is true that there are packages/sets of packages that will not
>>> get installed through 'apt-get dist-upgrade' during the development
>>> cycle
>> 
>> GRUB 2 is a special case. It is only (automatically) installed on a
>> clean install, and not on upgrades, given the risk of this operation.
>> 
> 
> On my fully updated Alpha 6, I'm showing:
> 
> $ apt-cache policy grub-common
> grub-common:
>   Installed: 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6
>   Candidate: 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6
>   Version table:
>  *** 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6 0
> 
> Which, according to this, seems to be the latest?
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2
> 
> And of course I no longer have menu.lst, but /boot/grub/grub.cfg &
> /etc/default/grub etc., as well.

Ah... nevermind. I understand the upgrade issue :-)

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Grub2
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Grub2Testing

Thanks folks.




-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Karmic Alpha 6/Beta

2009-10-02 Thread NoOp
On 10/02/2009 07:51 AM, Siegfried-A. Gevatter wrote:
> 2009/10/2 David Curtis :
>> If it is true that there are packages/sets of packages that will not
>> get installed through 'apt-get dist-upgrade' during the development
>> cycle
> 
> GRUB 2 is a special case. It is only (automatically) installed on a
> clean install, and not on upgrades, given the risk of this operation.
> 

On my fully updated Alpha 6, I'm showing:

$ apt-cache policy grub-common
grub-common:
  Installed: 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6
  Candidate: 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6
  Version table:
 *** 1.97~beta3-1ubuntu6 0

Which, according to this, seems to be the latest?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2

And of course I no longer have menu.lst, but /boot/grub/grub.cfg &
/etc/default/grub etc., as well.



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Karmic Alpha 6/Beta

2009-10-02 Thread Siegfried-A. Gevatter
2009/10/2 David Curtis :
> If it is true that there are packages/sets of packages that will not
> get installed through 'apt-get dist-upgrade' during the development
> cycle

GRUB 2 is a special case. It is only (automatically) installed on a
clean install, and not on upgrades, given the risk of this operation.

-- 
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Free Software Developer   363DEAE3

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss