I want to be one of the team

2010-01-14 Thread muslim ghost

 

hi Mr

from me   Muslim El-naggar 

   from egypt 

   Engineer of electronics  communication (last year education)

   

i 've test more than o.s. like ( win 98/2000/me/xp/longhorn/vista win 7 for 
microsoft o.s. )  ( ubunto 8.1/ ubunto 9.04  google o.s. for linux) 

 

i 've experience in o.s./security/testing  hacking  as education  working 

 

 i want to be one ot the teem of ubunto 

 

thx alot 

 

 
  
_
Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail 
you.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


bug libapache2-mod-php5 5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu6.3

2010-01-14 Thread Paweł Bielecki

For some reason the Apache2 + mod_php5 segfaults.
Please see info below.
Any help much appreciated!

$ dpkg -l | grep apache
ii  apache2  2.2.12-1ubuntu2.1
Apache HTTP Server metapackage
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork  2.2.12-1ubuntu2.1
Apache HTTP Server - traditional non-threade
ii  apache2-utils2.2.12-1ubuntu2.1
utility programs for webservers
ii  apache2.2-bin2.2.12-1ubuntu2.1
Apache HTTP Server common binary files
ii  apache2.2-common 2.2.12-1ubuntu2.1
Apache HTTP Server common files
rc  libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.4-5ubuntu1
Integration of perl with the Apache2 web ser
ii  libapache2-mod-php5  5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu6.3
server-side, HTML-embedded scripting languag

==
$apache2 -e debug
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
actions_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
alias_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
auth_basic_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_file_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_default_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_groupfile_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_host_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_user_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
autoindex_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
cgi_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
dir_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
env_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
include_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
mime_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
negotiation_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
php5_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
setenvif_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
status_module
[Wed Jan 13 08:26:59 2010] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
vhost_alias_module

=

$/usr/sbin/apache2 -X
Segmentation fault


=
$uname -a
Linux pc1477 2.6.31-17-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 16:20:31 UTC
2009 i686 GNU/Linux

===
$lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10
Codename:   karmic
==
$ldd /usr/sbin/apache2
linux-gate.so.1 =  (0x00852000)
libpcre.so.3 = /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00878000)
libaprutil-1.so.0 = /usr/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0 (0x00d13000)
libapr-1.so.0 = /usr/lib/libapr-1.so.0 (0x004f2000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x00a1a000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00b5)
libuuid.so.1 = /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x003ff000)
librt.so.1 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0x00b09000)
libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00d81000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x00a08000)
libexpat.so.1 = /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x0011)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00969000)
=
$ldd /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp5.so 
linux-gate.so.1 =  (0x00185000)
libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0011)
libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00f39000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 = /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00724000)
libdb-4.7.so = /usr/lib/libdb-4.7.so (0x00887000)
libbz2.so.1.0 = /lib/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x0016)
libpcre.so.3 = /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00c8d000)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0x00142000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x00a0)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x00efd000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl.so.1 (0x006ad000)
libgssapi_krb5.so.2 = /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x006c4000)
libkrb5.so.3 = /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x0076e000)
libk5crypto.so.3 = /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x006ee000)
libcom_err.so.2 = /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00156000)
libxml2.so.2 = /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x00a26000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00cbe000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 = /lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0x00f4f000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x00e53000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b88000)

Re: Version naming

2010-01-14 Thread Mark Ellse
In theory, the name of current release of Ubuntu is 9.10. But in practice it
is referred to as both karmic and koala. Even the Help menu states You are
using Ubuntu 9.10 the Karmic Koala.

See below for the reviews, which show that the press intermingles the names.

Here are the numbers of returns for the different searches in Launchpad, our
bug reporting place. So if you search for ubuntu 9.10 you get less than 5%
of the bugs. Even if you search for ubuntu karmic you only get two thirds
of the bugs.

ubuntu 9.10795
ubuntu karmic10,813
ubuntu koala5,137

ubuntu 9.04131
ubuntu jaunty   6,438
ubuntu jackalope 666

ubutu 8.10   842
ubuntu intrepid  3,717
ubuntu ibex 588


Observations.
1. There is no unanimity in what the versions are called.
2. This wastes time with searching and reporting
3. The version number is not sticking and only the ardent or well-informed
use it.
4. The adjective, being the most familiar, is the most often used.
5. Popular animal names (koala) are a real distraction. (Less problem with
the unfamiliar ibex and jackalope)

Conclusions
Drop the animal name (no loss). Release the version with the adjective
(easier to remember than the number).

Yours ever,

Cassandra


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/29/ubuntu_9_10_review/

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/11/good-karma-ars-reviews-ubuntu-910.ars

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ubuntu-karmic-koala,2484.html

http://www.raiden.net/articles/review_ubuntu_910_karmic_koala/

http://www.linuxfacile.net/tests/116-ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala-le-test.html

http://skattertech.com/2009/12/ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala/

2010/1/10 Mark Ellse m...@chaseacademy.com

 Each version of Ubuntu has, effectively, three names.

 For instance, the latest release is:

 Ubuntu Karmic  or is it Ubuntu 9.10?or is it Ubuntu Koala?

 The presence of these three names makes it difficult to know how to search
 for issues with a particular version.

 It would be much better if each version of Ubuntu was always referred to by
 a single name and if two of these three ways of referring to a version were
 dropped.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Working with translated logs - shouldn't syslog keep an untranslated copy?

2010-01-14 Thread Przemek Kulczycki
Hi guys.
Recently, while reviewing lots of logs for bugs in msttcorefonts I
have been struck by an idea.
Lots of these logs were translated to local languages (german, french,
spanish, chinese, ...) which makes it a lot harder to troubleshoot the
issues since most people do not know all these languages at the same
time.
So I came up with this idea:
can Syslog be configured or patched so it would keep 2 sets of logs? -
1 translated for the user, and another 1 untranslated (in english) for
reporting bugs.
This would make bug troubleshooting much easier, since all logs could
be sent in 1 language, also apport could be patched then to send only
the english logs instead of the translated ones.

What do you think about it?
Would it be worth to implement it?
English is the lingua franca of bug reporting so I think it would be
worth it, even if the size of the logs on the disk would be doubled.

Regards,
-- 
## Przemysław Kulczycki = Azrael Nightwalker ##
# Jabber/XMPP/Gtalk/Tlen ID: azrael[na]jabster.pl #
# (Co to jest? Zobacz na: http://jabberfaq.info ) #
## www: http://reksio.ftj.agh.edu.pl/~azrael/ #

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss