Patch for qemu
Hi, I have a patch to Qemu regarding bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/427612?redirection_url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/%2Bbug/427612 Where do I send the patch? Thank you, Shahar Havivi -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
idjc doesn`t work with voip since karmic
Hallo, The voip-function in idjc doesn't work. It should work like this: http://www.onlymeok.nildram.co.uk/voip.html But since Ubuntu karmic, which works with pulseaudio, and also since Debian squeeze there are no ~/.asoundrc files, because there is no program asoundconf in the packet alsa-utils. I also tried to delate pulseaudio and to install asoundconf from older sources manually, but first it wouldn't be a nice way and second it also doesn't worked. If pulseaudio is the soundserver of the future, how to work with voip in idjc and how to record voip? /Ralf Eleven -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Problems with debug packages on ubuntu 9.10 karmic
Quoting Thomas Mittelstaedt tmsta...@t-mittelstaedt.de: I have problems producing bug reports containing backtraces with all debug symbols. Even though I do have the dbg packages installed, gdb 7 doesn't pick them up automatically, neither for an installed app like rhythmbox nor for a custom build of gnome evolution. The non-stripped libraries get installed under /usr/lib/debug and I tried to use add-symbol-file, to load the symbols. And this procedure would only be partly successful, i.e. in the backtrace, some function calls of a library would show nicely while others would be just the usual '???'. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606881 and https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=trace.htmltrace_id=220468. It looks like mostly libraries are left. You can try installing the following debug packages. libc6-dbg gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-dbg gstreamer0.10-plugins-good-dbg libgstreamer0.10-0-dbg libglib2.0-0-dbg libpulse0-dbg libpulse-browse0-dbg libpulse-mainloop-glib0-dbg And this is why it's easer to send bugs to launchpad. They can use apport-retracer to get the debugging symbols themselves. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
upstream for acl?
Where can i find the upstream for acl? The package says it's at the xfs project, but I can't find any source for getfacl/setfacl there. Thanks. --larry -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
About Rails Package on Ubuntu
O.S: Ubuntu 9.10 Kernel version: 2.6.31-19-generic Arch: x86 Regard to all list I´m seeying that the Rails Package for that Ubuntu version has on the DESC file: Official Site: http://www.rubyonrails.com The correct address is: http://www.rubyonrails.org Thanks a lot and regards again. -- Para ser realmente grande, hay que estar con la gente, no por encima de ella. Montesquieu Ing. Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda PostgreSQL System DBA DWH -- BI Apprentice Centro de Tecnologías de Almacenamiento y Análisis de Datos (CENTALAD) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas Linux User # 418229 -- PostgreSQL -- TIP 4: No hagas 'kill -9' a postmaster http://www.postgresql-es.org http://www.postgresql.org http://www.planetpostgresql.org -- DWH + BI -- The Data WareHousing Institute http://www.tdwi.org http://www.tdwi.org/cbip - attachment: mlortiz.vcf-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: idjc doesn`t work with voip since karmic
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Ralf Eleven ral...@gmx.net wrote: The voip-function in idjc doesn't work. It should work like this: http://www.onlymeok.nildram.co.uk/voip.html This approach will fail because j-a-c-k has not been repromoted to main yet, and thus alsa-plugins cannot be compiled with j-a-c-k support and is missing the plugin. But since Ubuntu karmic, which works with pulseaudio, and also since Debian squeeze there are no ~/.asoundrc files, because there is no program asoundconf in the packet alsa-utils. There is not an ~/.asoundrc by default /ever/. It's a user-created file (whether by hand or by some utility). asoundconf is no longer maintained and was removed from the alsa-utils source package, but one can always construct an asoundrc by hand. The bit about PulseAudio is not really relevant; the real cause is due to missing j-a-c-k in main, so PulseAudio cannot be compiled with j-a-c-k support, etc. Even if j-a-c-k is available in main, you'd still need to configure PulseAudio to use j-a-c-k. (There are unofficial packages that have j-a-c-k support, but they should be unnecessary for Lucid.) I also tried to delate pulseaudio and to install asoundconf from older sources manually, but first it wouldn't be a nice way and second it also doesn't worked. Again, PulseAudio really isn't the cause here but suffers indirectly. If pulseaudio is the soundserver of the future, how to work with voip in idjc and how to record voip? Help get j-a-c-k back into main. Best, -Dan -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: upstream for acl?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote: Where can i find the upstream for acl? The package says it's at the xfs project, but I can't find any source for getfacl/setfacl there. Thanks. See /usr/share/doc/acl/copyright: It can be downloaded from http://mirror.its.uidaho.edu/pub/savannah/acl/; One may also use apt-get source acl presuming there's an active deb-src entry for main. A simple find over the extracted source directory reveals the source: acl-2.2.49 $ find -name '*getfacl*' ./getfacl ./getfacl/getfacl.c ./test/sort-getfacl-output ./test/getfacl-noacl.test ./test/getfacl-recursive.test ./man/man1/getfacl.1 Best, -Dan -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Patch for qemu
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Shahar Havivi: Hi, I have a patch to Qemu regarding bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/427612?redirection_url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/%2Bbug/427612 Where do I send the patch? Where do you want to send it? Do you want to send it upstream (to the QEMU devs or Debian) or do you want to know how to get the patch included into Ubuntu? -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Patch for qemu
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Shahar Havivi: Hi, I have a patch to Qemu regarding bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/427612?redirection_url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/%2Bbug/427612 Where do I send the patch? Where do you want to send it? Do you want to send it upstream (to the QEMU devs or Debian) or do you want to know how to get the patch included into Ubuntu? As maintainer of the qemu-kvm package in Ubuntu, I would appreciate it if you would send this patch to the qemu-de...@nongnu.org mailing list, and CC me on it. If upstream has no objections to the patch and they add it to their git tree, I will gladly apply it to the Lucid qemu-kvm package and upload. Please note upstream's standards on submitting a patch and coding style. You are going to need a signed-off-by line too. http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/StartHere :-Dustin -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ntfs-3g in Lucid
Subject: Re: Can we get ntfs-3g 2010.1.16 in Lucid? From: stephan marg...@rutgers.edu Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:48:32 -0500 To: Daniel Chen seven.st...@gmail.com It looks like Michael will help us all out and do a non-maintainer upgrade to get 2010.1.16 into testing: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560685#44 Does that mean it will automatically go into Lucid? Or is there more work to be done since the package in Ubuntu ends with -1ubuntu5 ? Thanks, Doesn't look like it: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=ntfs-3gsearchon=namessuite=lucidsection=all Package ntfs-3g * lucid (otherosfs): read-write NTFS driver for FUSE 1:2009.4.4-1ubuntu5: amd64 i386 This is the kind of small thing that makes a HUGE difference in people's perception of the quality of Ubuntu. In point of fact, in the real world, NTFS is the logical choice, and hence needs to work well. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: upstream for acl?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote: thanks, but I guess what i should have said is, I want to find the maintainer. I found a bug in it and i want to give him a patch. Either Nathan Scott nathans at debian dot org or Anibal Monsalve Salazar anibal at debian dot org (see PTS, http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acl.html) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: upstream for acl?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote: so there's no upstream beyond the debian maintainers? Please note that one of the maintainers, Nathan, appears to (have) work(ed) for SGI. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Question regarding A828_Installer_x64_0.28-Beta
I have the above mentioned driver installed in my system (currently running Ubuntu 10.04). I find it frustrating that every time I update the kernel, I have to re-install the driver. is there a way I can update the driver module without manually running the shell script? Contemplating writing a *.deb package for the driver. -- David Hunter -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
