Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2012/3/14 Rodney Dawes :
> Can you please clarify what you mean by "laggy" here? And are
> there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?

The smooth scroll bug covers it mostly, but some specifics might use
separate bug reports. At least the following come to mind right away:

- You can see the photos/images being drawn, and they flicker from
time to time when the scrolling stops.
- Keeping arrow down pressed feels laggy, both because of the low
update rate, lack of smooth scrolling and visible lag of drawing the
images.
- With mouse wheel scroll, the initial responsiveness feel snappier
than with keyboard, but the application may easily become unresponsive
for 2-10 seconds on my machine at least (Core 2 Duo 2.5GHz)
- When you send a message, the lag when pressing Send seems to be gone
in 3.3.91, although there is still no feedback of the actual sending
until it's fetched from the remote server (user needs to just trust
that it's being sent)

Some are performance issues, some are simply about additional code
needed for giving immediate visible feedback/animation/transition on
all actions user may do. But in principle the truly "smooth scrolling"
covers already fixing so many things, that after that the rest will be
comparatively minor UI enhancements to reduce the perceived lagginess.

I now filed bug #955747 [1] for the feedback wishlist item.

-Timo

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/955747

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Andreas Moog
On 14.03.2012 15:44, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
>>  Sure it's the
>> good ol' laggy Gwibber,
> 
> Can you please clarify what you mean by "laggy" here? And are
> there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?

I don't know if Timo means the same what I do, but "laggy" is usually
used when the time between an action (e.g. mouseclick, scrolling wheel
turn) and a reaction is noticeably high.

A really quick search
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber?field.searchtext=slow)

shows for example:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927494
- Slow gwibber in general

https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828593
- Scrolling slow

Cheers,

Andreas



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Controlling menubar title on Ubuntu 11.10?

2012-03-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

(I initially sent this to ubuntu-devel, but it didn't make it through.)

Hello.

I wrote an application that, at startup, prompts the user for a file 
(using a standard "open file" dialog).  Ubuntu 11.10 takes the title of 
that dialog ("Choose the file you wish to play") and uses it for the 
rest of the application's session.  This is wrong of course.  The menu 
bar should display the application's name.


Is there a way I can control the title of the menu bar?

The GUI of the application is written using Qt.


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Rodney Dawes
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
>  Sure it's the
> good ol' laggy Gwibber,

Can you please clarify what you mean by "laggy" here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2012/3/12 Ken VanDine :
> For those that haven't tried the latest version, I really suggest
> getting 3.3.91 and taking that for a spin.  Most of the effort we've put
> into it recently have been quality, so no stunning changes but more
> reliability.  Duplicate detection and handling of the content.
> Scrolling and keyboard navigation has improved quite a bit, but we
> really need smooth scrolling.  I would say that would be at the top of
> the todo list.

Thanks for your efforts so far! I tried the 3.3.91 out. Sure it's the
good ol' laggy Gwibber, but at some point earlier it regressed in
usability for me so far that I stopped using it. Now it seems to be
back on track, and hopefully indeed the four bugs mentioned in the
original post will see themselves fixed at some point.

-Timo

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Chris Coulson
On 14/03/12 10:03, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>
> To be honest, I can't stand anything to do with Gwibber and also agree
> that it should be removed from the default install. And anyone with
> half an understanding of programming code knows that Gwibber is
> terrible by design.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris Jones
>

I'm assuming that you have that understanding? In which case, could you
please give specific, concrete examples of exactly which bits of the
code are terrible by design so that somebody can fix it. Perhaps you
could even provide patches for the parts that you found are terrible.

Thanks
Chris

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Chris Jones

On 03/10/2012 09:11 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:


Is there anybody actually using Gwibber on a daily basic? I have it
uninstalled on all my machines and use Twitter through the Web-Interface.

fwiw, I leave it open all day on my workstation. However, I wouldn't
have a problem if I had to install it if it was removed.

Cheers, Rick







To be honest, I can't stand anything to do with Gwibber and also agree that 
it should be removed from the default install. And anyone with half an 
understanding of programming code knows that Gwibber is terrible by design.



Regards

Chris Jones 



--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss