GTK packages fail to build

2012-10-30 Thread Timothy Arceri
Hi Guys,
  I'm working on a GTK bug but when I try to build the GTK sources 
that i get from 'apt-get source gtk+3.0' I get the following error:

# Install the binaries with a -3.0 suffix
mv debian/libgtk-3-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3-0/gtk-update-icon-cache \
       
debian/libgtk-3-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3-0/gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0
mv: cannot stat 
`debian/libgtk-3-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3-0/gtk-update-icon-cache': 
No such file or directory
make: *** [binary-install/libgtk-3-0] Error 1

I've tried this on both 12.04 and 12.10 both 64-bit.
I'm trying to build with debain/rules binary and I have installed all the build 
dependencies via 'apt-get build-dep gtk+3.0' anyone got any ideas what I might 
be doing wrong?

Thanks,
Tim
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: EFF Privacy; hopefully Ubuntu will listen to users

2012-10-30 Thread German Larrain M.
I agree with every single word Nick wrote.

The path Ubuntu is taking with regard to privacy and unauthorized
background connections to the internet makes me VERY uneasy. I do
understand this is a complex problem, which can not be tackled with only
one perspective in mind (e.g. Canonical wants to make money out of the OS
it created, which seems fair). This problem may not appeal to many, or the
majority may think this is not to be wasted time on. Well, issues like this
are the ones that motivate a fork (e.g. OpenOffice and LibreOffice) at one
time or another. Is it necessary to reach that point? I don't think so. It
would be a waste of code and resources.

So, what can we do? IMHO, speak up as a community and draw a clear line of
what is and what is not acceptable. Too difficult to specify? Then let's
create some guidelines (that may very well exist already) to which built-in
applications/packages shall comply.

Best regards,
Germán

PS: I'm not a relevant developer for Ubuntu at all. Nonetheless, I'm quite
an evangelist of it, and other open source software too (among them some
I've contributed to) thus I feel compelled to protect what I've defended
countless times in arguments with anti-OSS people.



Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:03:13 -0400
 From: nick rundy nru...@hotmail.com
 To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
 ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
 Subject: EFF  Privacy; hopefully Ubuntu will listen to users?
 Message-ID: bay002-w3239077a170718e5b5745dd5...@phx.gbl
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1256



 The most important thing to me as a computer user is the
 privacy  security of the data I entrust my OS to handle and the
 OS's communication to me about what internet connections my OS and the
 Applications installed on it are making.
 Ubuntu is not doing well
  in this regard lately. In the dialog that comes up on a new 12.10
 install asking me to contribute to Ubuntu, I saw no option indicating
 Privacy  Security of Ubuntu. Yet this is the most important thing
  to me and the thing most likely to make me want to contribute.
 I
  have been speaking out about the privacy (data leaking) issues that
 keep popping up in Ubuntu over the last few development cycles for a
 while now.
 I've received a lot of grief over it on the Ubuntu
 forums  elsewhere. But it is very important to me so I have
 continued to speak out. I speak out not to put Ubuntu down or criticize
 anyone in particular. I simply want to draw attention to an important
 topic and hopefully get the issues addressed in the development cycle.
 It's
  encouraging to see that the EFF shares my concerns:

 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-amazon-ads-and-data-leaks
 The
  Amazon ads are just the latest example however. The problem was seen in
  12.04 with the geoclue-ubuntu-geoip package. This package is/was a
 major privacy issue with no solution. There is no way to uninstall this
 package from 12.04 without loosing Time in the top-panel. And then there
  is/was the unity-lens-video and unity-lens-music package issues. These
 regularly connected to the internet in the early 12.04 days, even when
 the Local Disk filter was selected. Thankfully I spotted this and
 reported it and it was fixed. But the whole idea that the Dash connects
 to the internet for everything is a concept that is VERY unappealing to
 many users who value their privacy and security. Web Browsers are
 designed and built with Security  Privacy capabilities by design.
 The Dash does not have these same Privacy  Security features nor
 does it have the UI to communicate security  privacy to the user
 like Web Browsers can. Why would I want to use the Dash for internet
 connections when I can use a Web Browser and gain all the
 security/privacy it offers? I want the Dash to SOLELY work locally and
 have nothing to do with the internet (which is the province of my Web
 Browser). It is encouraging to see Ubuntu start to work towards
 addressing this with 13.04. But I have been speaking to this for over a
 year now, and all I've got from it is criticism and frankly meanness
 from many people.
 Notwithstanding the Dash, the larger issue
 still exists that there is no way to control internet connections in
 general from an Application perspective. Users of Ubuntu cannot control
 which Applications can and cannot connect to the internet. And users
 have poor options for learning about active connections. There are tools
  available, but these are real time apps with no logging capabilities.
 Couple this with the fact that Ubuntu is now sending data off to Third
 Parties as a course of doing business and this issue is now the most
 serious issue facing Ubuntu as there are users that will totally stop
 using the OS for privacy/security concerns.
 Essentially, Ubuntu needs to do two things:
 1)
  make privacy/security a important consideration in all new features
 while giving users the option of making the Dash a completely LOCAL