Re: Bug in libicu48-dev please update version 4.8.1.1-8 = 4.8.1.1-10

2012-12-17 Thread Lanoxx

Yeah, but for some reason it didint go into quantal and precise?

I know that new features down go into stable releases, but this is a bug 
fix release, so I assume it would go to the current stabel versions as 
well, not? Should I manually pull the raring package and install it in 
quantal now?


Regards
Lanoxx

On 17/12/12 07:53, Robie Basak wrote:

This should auto sync. In fact, it already has:

libicu-dev |  4.8.1.1-3 |   precise | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc
libicu-dev |  4.8.1.1-8 |   quantal | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc
libicu-dev | 4.8.1.1-10 |raring | amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc




--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Bug in libicu48-dev please update version 4.8.1.1-8 = 4.8.1.1-10

2012-12-17 Thread Emmet Hikory
Lanoxx wrote:
 Yeah, but for some reason it didint go into quantal and precise?
 
 I know that new features down go into stable releases, but this is a
 bug fix release, so I assume it would go to the current stabel
 versions as well, not? Should I manually pull the raring package and
 install it in quantal now?

The migration of such fixes into earlier releases is very much a manual
process (0).  The change for -10 might be appropriate (to my non-authoritative
eyes), but the change for -9 probably isn't.  You might want to follow up on
bug #1037588 (1), where there is a start on SRU processing for quantal.
In this specific case, I suspect it unlikely that the change will be processed,
based on my reading of the current bug comments, although with the status set
to Incomplete, I do not believe a final determination has yet been made,
and is likely pending preparation of a quantal-specific patch along with
comprehensive test results documenting the impact, etc. as required by the
SRU process.

0: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1037588

-- 
Emmet HIKORY

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Misc problems with quantal

2012-12-17 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 18 December 2012 00:37, Dale Amon a...@vnl.com wrote:
 A couple broken items in quantal...

 First off, I also have been bit by the dselect
 problem discussed in

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1066847

 I always use dselect unless I am only installing one or two
 packages. I just do not particularly like aptitude, etc.


As noted in the bug report dselect does not work with multi-arch.

Either write patches to dselect to make it support multi-arch, or
disable multi-arch, or use a different package management tool.
Each of these proposals has advantages  drawbacks. The first one is
universally best, but requires significant technical work. The latter
two, are compromises one way or another.

 Second, I am getting hit with a blinking screen even in
 virtual terminals on a quantal amd64 server build. Terminal
 is an ADI ProVista attached to a KVM.


Sorry, can't help you here. File a bug maybe?

 Eventually the screen seems to go to sleep and I cannot
 get it to ever come back.

 I have modified /etc/default/grub to get

 # Uncomment to disable graphical terminal (grub-pc only)
 GRUB_TERMINAL=console

 which I assumed would shut off any graphical silliness,
 but it seems to have had no affect.


Regards,

Dmitrijs.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss