Re: Puppet version bump

2013-02-11 Thread John Moser
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen  wrote:
> John Moser  writes:
>
>> While we're at it, why is etckeeper stuff in the package? The
>> Puppetlabs guys said because it's in Debian's package and "Debian
>> packagers are fruitbats", so they're imitating "for compatibility."
>
> The etckeeper integration is a contribution from the Ubuntu packaging.
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571127
>
> If etckeeper is not installed, the hooks in the default configuration do
> nothing.
>

Interesting.  That's a more in-depth (but less amusing) explanation
than the one I received previously.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Puppet version bump

2013-02-11 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
John Moser  writes:

> While we're at it, why is etckeeper stuff in the package? The
> Puppetlabs guys said because it's in Debian's package and "Debian
> packagers are fruitbats", so they're imitating "for compatibility."

The etckeeper integration is a contribution from the Ubuntu packaging.
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571127

If etckeeper is not installed, the hooks in the default configuration do
nothing.

-- 
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss