Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

2015-08-26 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir 
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Louis Bouchard <
louis.bouch...@canonical.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Le 25/08/2015 18:15, Istimsak Abdulbasir a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Ryein Goddard  > > wrote:
> >
> > I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the
> desired
> > reaction.  When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the
> launcher
> > it will open nautilus.  Shouldn't it just empty the trash without
> having to
> > open nautilus?
> >
> > If nautilus doesn't have this functionality you could use trash-cli
> instead.
> >
> > I'm using wily werewolf.
> >
> >
> > I would think you should have been given the option to empty the trash.
> Though
> > can't be sure. Have not used unity in a long time.
> >
> >
>
> The option to empty the trash does appear, but nautilus popping up is new
> to me.
> I would go ahead with a bug.
>
> MTCW,
>
> ...Louis
>
> I just installed unity on wily. After right clicking the trash menu, I do
see the option "emty trash". My systemm has been recently updated though. I
added a file to "trash" and emptied it. I got a prompt asking me if I
reallyy want to empty it. Not only that, the file manager window opened.
So, it does work om my end with nautilis opening up in addition.

> --
> Louis Bouchard
> Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng.
> Canonical Ltd
> Ubuntu developer   Debian Maintainer
> GPG : 429D 7A3B DD05 B6F8 AF63  B9C4 8B3D 867C 823E 7A61
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>



-- 
"Collaboration is the new innovation" (Istimsak Abdulbasir, 2013)
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

2015-08-26 Thread Colin Law 
On 26 August 2015 at 16:42, Oliver Grawert  wrote:
> hi,
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2015, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Amr Ibrahim:
>> "I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired 
>> reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher 
>> it will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without having to 
>> open nautilus?"
>>
>> It's already a bug here 
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1040158
>>
>
> if i right click on a stock 14.04 install i get a context menu with
> "empty trash" in it, if i click that option i get a yes/no dialog "do
> you really want to empty the trash ?"
>
> if this behaviour is gone in newer releases that's indeed a regression
> that should be fixed ...

On 15.04 I do see the confirmation dialog, but it also opens a new
nautilus window.  This is not exactly what is described in the bug,
but may well be a related issue.  Perhaps the bug description needs to
be updated, or a new bug opened.

Colin

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: updates to libmtp9 in trusty

2015-08-26 Thread David H. Durgee 
I asked a follow-up question in the libmtp bug report of the developer 
and was told that I could edit the /lib/udev/rules.d/69-mtp.rules file 
to add an entry for my phone to work around this with the current libmtp 
1.1.6 in trusty.  I did so and my phone is now mounted, but I still get 
some messages:


Device 0 (VID=1004 and PID=622a) is UNKNOWN.
Please report this VID/PID and the device model to the libmtp 
development team
Unable to open ~/.mtpz-data for reading, MTPZ disabled.Android device 
detected, assigning default bug flags

Error 1: Get Storage information failed.
Received event PTP_EC_StoreAdded in session 1

A file folder for it opens on the desktop and I can browse the files, 
but the mountpoint is:


/var/run/user/1000/gvfs/mtp:host=%5Busb%3A002%2C013%5D

Is there something I missed somewhere that can make this a bit 
"cleaner"?  I would have expected to see the manufacturer and model in 
some form, not what I see here.


Dave


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

2015-08-26 Thread Oliver Grawert 
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2015, 16:00 +0200 schrieb Amr Ibrahim:
> "I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired 
> reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher it 
> will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without having to open 
> nautilus?"
> 
> It's already a bug here 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1040158
> 

if i right click on a stock 14.04 install i get a context menu with
"empty trash" in it, if i click that option i get a yes/no dialog "do
you really want to empty the trash ?" 

if this behaviour is gone in newer releases that's indeed a regression
that should be fixed ...

ciao
oli


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Bug when trying to empty trash?

2015-08-26 Thread Amr Ibrahim 
"I was going to file this as a bug, but I didn't know if it was the desired 
reaction. When you go to empty the trash by right clicking on the launcher it 
will open nautilus. Shouldn't it just empty the trash without having to open 
nautilus?"

It's already a bug here 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1040158

Amr
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Information about Debian/Ubuntu patches add to packages

2015-08-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf 
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:02:38 +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
>http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/

Thank you,

this way it at least is easier to search.

For example:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libfm
|
|-https://sources.debian.net/src/libfm/1.2.3-1/debian/patches/
|-http://patches.ubuntu.com/libf/libfm/libfm_1.2.3-0ubuntu1.patch
|-https://sources.debian.net/src/libfm/1.2.3-1/debian/rules/
| |
| |-dh_auto_configure -- --enable-debug --enable-gtk-doc
|--enable-udisks --disable-silent-rules
|
|-https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfm

Ok, no udisks package is installed for my Wily install, while for my
Arch install udisks 1.0.5 and udisks2 2.1.6 are installed (not
explicitly for libfm).
Perhaps the Ubuntu libfm would behave as expected, as soon as udisks is
installed. However, it will not be installed when installing
recommended and suggested packages.

tracker.debian.org is also useful to search bug reports, without
directly visiting the Ubuntu bug tracker.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/synaptic
|
|-https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic
  |
  |-https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/0.81.4build1
|

|-https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0

Regards,
Ralf



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Information about Debian/Ubuntu patches add to packages

2015-08-26 Thread Robie Basak 
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I don't care much about this package, but wish to know, if there is
> a file or webpage that mentions all Debian/Ubuntu patches included to a
> package, with a short explanation what those patches are for,
> including hints to perhaps disabled config options. A file that is part
> of each installed package or a website for the packages.

The current best practice Debian packaging format for upstream projects
is "3.0 (quilt)". You can check debian/source/format in the packaging
source (as pulled by apt-get source).

If this is being used, then you'll find all upstream patching shipped by
the package in debian/patches/ (applied according to
debian/patches/series). Best practice is to document what those patches
are for using dep3 (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) - self-explanatory
metadata at the top of each patch file in debian/patches/

It looks like the current libfm has two very minor patches that you can
find in the debian/patches/ directory in this way. If you're getting
significantly different behaviour, it might be the build time
configuration or something completely different.

If you're interested in how the packages are built (eg. configure
options) then look in debian/rules.

> I want to be informed about other packages, e.g. jackd2, qtractor,
> openbox and many more, but indeed, now I also want information about
> the libfm packages.

All the information you need is in the packaging source. I suggest you
learn a little about Debian source packages to better understand how to
make sense of it.

HTH,

Robie

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Information about Debian/Ubuntu patches add to packages

2015-08-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf 
Hi,

if you build libfm based on "apt-get source libfm" you'll get 15
packages. A while back I build version 1.2.3.58.g47d0c1dd7d, IOW from
git. [1]

For testing purpose I installed the packages from the official
repositories. Excluded are the dbg, doc and dev packages, the remaining
packages are installed. [2]

The reason I build from git is this one:

"Eliminate usage of GVolumeMonitor if no FmFolder object was created.

If libfm is used without FmFolder usage then there is no reason to run
the volume monitor. Therefore it should be activated when some folder
was opened and deactivated when all of them were closed.
This may be a culprit of external green drives been waked up (see the
http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/bugs/751/ bugreport against lxpanel)." [3]

If you read the lxde bug link, you'll notice, it definitively was the
culprit. Now something strange happens, the Ubuntu Wily version that
claims to be the upstream release [4], IOW a version before the bug was
fixed, does not cause lxpanel to wake up the same external green
drive. Seemingly libfm and/or lxpanel [5] can't be the upstream release.

I don't care much about this package, but wish to know, if there is
a file or webpage that mentions all Debian/Ubuntu patches included to a
package, with a short explanation what those patches are for,
including hints to perhaps disabled config options. A file that is part
of each installed package or a website for the packages.

I want to be informed about other packages, e.g. jackd2, qtractor,
openbox and many more, but indeed, now I also want information about
the libfm packages.

Regards,
Ralf


[1]
$ echo $(ls *.deb|cut -f1 -d_)
libfm4 libfm-data libfm-dbg libfm-dev libfm-doc libfm-extra4 libfm-gtk4
libfm-gtk-data libfm-gtk-dbg libfm-gtk-dev libfm-modules
libfm-modules-dbg libfm-tools lxshortcut lxshortcut-dbg

[2]
$ dpkg -l $(ls *.deb|cut -f1 -d_)
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWa[snip]
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version   Architecture  [snip]
+++-=-=-=-
ii  libfm-data1.2.3-0ubuntu1all   [snip]
ii  libfm-extra4  1.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  libfm-gtk-data1.2.3-0ubuntu1all   [snip]
ii  libfm-gtk41.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  libfm-modules 1.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  libfm-tools   1.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  libfm41.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  lxshortcut1.2.3-0ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-dbg
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-dev
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-doc
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-gtk-dbg
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-gtk-dev
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libfm-modules-dbg
dpkg-query: no packages found matching lxshortcut-dbg

[3]
https://github.com/lxde/libfm/commit/994a1e25ba0c3da80575fc002af17ab02ed5998b

[4]
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/libfm4/changelog.Debian.gz|head
libfm (1.2.3-0ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/patches:
   - 02-disable-Werror.patch: Refreshed.

 -- Julien Lavergne   Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:27:48 +0200

libfm (1.2.2.1-3ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium

[5]
$ dpkg -l lxpanel lxpanel-data
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWa[snip]
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version   Architecture  [snip]
+++-=-=-=-
ii  lxpanel   0.8.1-1ubuntu1amd64 [snip]
ii  lxpanel-data  0.8.1-1ubuntu1all   [snip]

$ zcat /usr/share/doc/lxpanel/changelog.Debian.gz|head -n25
lxpanel (0.8.1-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium

  * Merge with Debian. Ubuntu remaining changes:
  * debian/control:
   - Add libindicator-dev build-depends.
   - Add a recommend on xterm | pavucontrol | gnome-alsamixer to enable
the mixer on the sound applet. (LP: #957749).
   - Add build-depends on libicu-dev for weather plugin.
   - Update Replaces and Breaks (LP: #1417244).
  * debian/local/source_lxpanel.py:
   - Add apport hook.
  * debian/lxpanel.install:
   - Install all plugins except indicators.
   - Install apport hook.
  * debian/lxpanel-indicator-applet-plugin.install:
   - Install indicator plugin.
  * debian/rules:
   - Add --enable-indicator-support flag.
   - Add dh_install --fail-missing.
   - Re-enable dh_makeshlibs, FTBFS with
lxpanel-indicator-applet-plugin. 
  * debian/patc