lastpass-cli
Hello, The lastpass-cli available in the ubuntu repositories (1.3.3) is out of date. I was able to employ it despite the lack of support for some LastPass functions added in 1.3.4. Earlier this year, the coded certificate authorities expired and the corrected version on github, 1.3.6, will not compile properly on ubuntu 22 (I actually run kubuntu to better support low vision). How do I request a small update such as this? Thank you, J. Damon -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote: > Hi, > > A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving to a time-based > release (April and October): > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/09/29/OpenSSL-Update-ICMC23/ > > > Key takeaway 3 : Time Based Release Policy > > We’re transitioning to time-based releases. This shift ensures > > predictability, allowing our users and developers to plan better and > > benefit from timely updates. The releases will be scheduled every > > April and October. > > Based on this and the openssl 3.0 release date, I'd expect a new LTS > version to be released (almost) in time for 26.04 but not for 24.04. > > *IF* an openssl LTS release is out in April 26.04, we might want to > track the corresponding openssl git branch during the 26.04 release in > order to be able to ship it. This is more than two years away however > and a lot can happen until then. I don't have a crystal ball > unfortunately. In any case, we'll know if the planned and the actual > release cadence and calendar match. Dimitri asked me for some more details so I dug a bit more. It's actually better explained in a better blog post from late August: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/08/27/steps-forward > We’re also shifting how we release the OpenSSL library. We’ve adopted > a time-based release policy, with releases every April and October. > After our 3.2 release in October, our 3.3 release in April next year > will be our first time-based release, marking our initial venture into > this approach. And the release policy has been updated too: https://www.openssl.org/policies/general/release-policy.html > Planning: Continuous process, provides input to the Release Definition phase. > Release Definition: Defines release backlog, lasts up to 4 weeks. > Development: Execution of the release backlog, spans from 20 to 24 weeks. > Release: Addressing issues discovered by the community in pre-releases. Up to > 6 weeks. > Support: A support phase. If they follow their plan, we'd therefore have pre-release versions several weeks before Ubuntu releases. Of course, feature freeze concerns apply if the pre-release isn't out in time. That's all I've seen so far (OK, I didn't dig that much). We'll see very soon how that turns out in practice for the 3.2 release. -- Adrien -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Choice of the openssl version for 23.10 and 24.04
Hi, A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving to a time-based release (April and October): https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/09/29/OpenSSL-Update-ICMC23/ > Key takeaway 3 : Time Based Release Policy > We’re transitioning to time-based releases. This shift ensures > predictability, allowing our users and developers to plan better and > benefit from timely updates. The releases will be scheduled every > April and October. Based on this and the openssl 3.0 release date, I'd expect a new LTS version to be released (almost) in time for 26.04 but not for 24.04. *IF* an openssl LTS release is out in April 26.04, we might want to track the corresponding openssl git branch during the 26.04 release in order to be able to ship it. This is more than two years away however and a lot can happen until then. I don't have a crystal ball unfortunately. In any case, we'll know if the planned and the actual release cadence and calendar match. -- Adrien On Wed, May 31, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 18, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > We had similar dilemma around focal release. And I did SRU one off upgrade > > > from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1. it was a minor disaster. (As in like the sad > > > depressing songs in A minor scale). > > > > > > It is best to stick to one openssl version in a release. > > > > > > It is best to stick to longer supported one. > > > > > > It is best not to chase minor ones that nobody will use or want long term. > > > > Note that experimental currently has 3.1 (yes, it's experimental and it > > doesn't have to go anywhere else). > > > > I need to get in touch with the team on the debian side and ask them > > their plans regarding versions support. > > I don't actually have a particularly good channel to discuss with them. > > I guess it would also make more sense that the people doing the updates > in the stable releases do, especially if that involves more than Debian. > > -- > Adrien > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
