Now that's not very diplomatic, i didn't expect to see this sort of conversations on a developers list, specially those about open source software. Too bad to see that.. in here.. News will talk about this.
> From: castleofwh...@mail.com > To: john.r.mo...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:13:54 +0100 > CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > > Nope. Fuck you. > It was good enough for us then and it's good enough for us now. > You can use this media with any GPL program or other GPL media. > Go and fuck yourself. > (and hey, it's dual licensed under CC BY SA anyway if you're a homosexual who > is anal) > > The Law is all about appeals to authority, dumbass. > > It's my fucking song and I can distribute it as I like, and I say the GPL is > the license. > You can certainly use it and modify it and do anything you could do with a > GPL program. > YOU cannot tell ME what I decide for MY FUCKING SONGS YOU PIECE OF SHIT. > > FUCK YOU YOU DAMNED PRO FEMINIST FUCK. > And Fuck SystemD. > > > My Copyright protected work, MY LICENSING DECISION. > And I have decided GPL. It has always worked and is proven. > And if you continue to keep saying I have licensed it less permissably. > > Well then that's libel and I hope to see you in an alleyway, because you're > spreading lies about me. > Shut your fucking mouth. > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 at 6:07 PM > From: "John Moser" <john.r.mo...@gmail.com> > To: "Castle OfWhite" <castleofwh...@mail.com>, > ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. > On 11/05/2014 01:01 PM, Castle OfWhite wrote: > > It's licensed elsewhere under CC-BY-SA aswell, just for such an occasion. > > The GPL is a fine media license when said media is a part of a program > > (game etc). In such cases Judges usually see the entire thing as a whole > > rather than a collection of parts. > > > > That's a weak argument. It's an appeal to authority and to tradition. > > The GPL directly describes considerations for linking and source code, > as well as program executable modules. While it makes some sense to > include resources in the definition of the program in general, > extracting the media from the program immediately creates confusion > about what exactly was violated; the only proper interpretation is that > distributing the media with the program is allowed, while the media > without being part of the program is not under any permissive license > and, thus, distributing it is a copyright violation. > > > I do know what I'm doing, and You show your ignorance :). > > I've been writing programs and making free/opensource media > > from before the CC license were created. > > > > Back then we just licensed our stuff under the GPL, the BSD license, or > > the gnu FDL. (or all of them) Worked fine. People understood. > > > > SO FUCK YOU! > > > > Go fuck yourself you pro-feminist pro-systemd piece of shit. > > (I remeber when there weren't feminists in free/opensource too) > > (nor better-than-thou systemd loving assholes) > > > > I hope Mr Cook is edged out because he supports your beliefs > > (and that is leading to a ban in russia of apple products) > > You people need to be fought back against. You've ruined the > > world for regular men. > > > > Okay, civilized conversation has broken down. > > > >> On 11/05/2014 12:27 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote: > >>> A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. > >>> "More code .: better" > >>> > >>> youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk > >>> > >>> SystemD introduces (further) systemic vulnerabilities into Gnu/Linux. > >>> Here is a song feeling that situation out. > >>> > >> > >> Take this immaturity elsewhere. I thought I was being spammed by > >> YouTube again. > >> > >>> (C) Gnu GPL v2 > >>> > >> > >> GPL is not an appropriate media license; it is a license for source > >> code. This usage shows you like to make statements about things you > >> don't understand; thus your assessments of systemd are immediately > >> suspect, and readily assumed misguided. > >> > >> In other words: you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and > >> your input on any matter is valueless. > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
