Re: Do you really want developers to be on this list was (Re: Very bad status of hardware (especially wifi) support in ubuntu, due to the too many accumulated regressions)
> Canonical does provide Support for Ubuntu for You, when you want to > pay > it. If not, fix it yourself, or help us fixing it e.g. join the irc > and > point people to it. If people can't help you directly, because of not > having the broken hardware, you can try to provide this hardware to > the > people (that's an example, and hey, this you can't do when you use MS > Windows). Nailed it. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Midnight Commander in 8.10
Phillip Susi wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > > How nice for you that you've never had broken X, and never will > have, and > > never will need to help someone else with broken X. > > > >> So no, I don't think MC _needs_ to be anywhere. > > > > Right. You'll never need it, so no one else should have it either. > Ever heard > > of the tyranny of the majority? > > How exactly is mc vital to fixing a broken X? Your argument seems > like > complaining that emacs is not installed on the livecd. While it is > my > favorite editor, I can get by just fine with pico or even vi if I > must > for rescue/recovery purposes. I might be missing the point here, but from reading Felix's previous messages, I believe he's more concerned that someone sold him a car without a jack... Sean -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Rejecting the Firefox EULA in Ubuntu
>> Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with >> Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the >> source code to remove this yet? >> *SNIP* > >This is on Fedora, but should help: >http://www.toad.com/gnu/sysadmin/index.html#firefox-eula-sux Morgan, Thanks for the suggestion, I have seen this article before. It describes how to modify the binary and not the source. I'm looking to remove the EULA dialog from the source altogether, so the resulting packages do not have it. Or alternatively allow you to reject the terms but still use the program. It seems no'one has looked into this yet, so I will have a look this weekend. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Rejecting the Firefox EULA in Ubuntu
Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the source code to remove this yet? I'm not just an end-user of the software, and I do not want to mess around with licence agreements each time I want to modify parts of it that could be construed as branding. If someone has a solution right now, I'll roll a package and point to it on the Wiki. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
