Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, January 25, 2013 03:13:54 PM Allison Randal wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Ubuntu.com is an element of Canonical marketing.  Don't be confused into
> > thinking it's more than that.
> 
> Each flavor has a dedicated landing page: kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org,
> xubuntu.org, ubuntustudio.org, mythbuntu.org, lubuntu.net. The one for
> *U*buntu (with *U* for Unity  is ubuntu.com.
> 
> The centralized page for the Ubuntu *Project* is wiki.ubuntu.com. This
> seems right to me, as it's open for collaborative ownership by all
> flavors, all members. It'd be quite appropriate to add a prominent link
> from the main page of the wiki to:
> 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam/Derivatives

I know all that, but AFAIK there is no one not an employee of Canonical that 
is involved in decision making about ubuntu.com.

Scott K

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Allison Randal  wrote:
> That was meant to be "*U* for Unity ;)", but the winky got lost when I
> had to manually retrieve/resend the message. (Mailman isn't as smart as
> Launchpad about figuring out messages sent from one of many different
> aliases.)

Fair enough... now it makes more sense! Also yeah I have that problem
sometimes too where I accidentally send from my GMail and Ubuntu is
like "nope, not today bud."

> The fact is, "Ubuntu" is the name of two distinct things: a project
> encompassing many flavors, and one of those flavors. Recognizing which
> one you're talking about at any given moment helps immensely.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Allison Randal
On 01/25/2013 03:17 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Allison Randal  wrote:
>> On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Each flavor has a dedicated landing page: kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org,
>> xubuntu.org, ubuntustudio.org, mythbuntu.org, lubuntu.net. The one for
>> *U*buntu (with *U* for Unity  is ubuntu.com.
> 
> By that flawed and short-sighted logic how do you explain Ubuntu with
> a G for GNOME up until a couple of years ago?

That was meant to be "*U* for Unity ;)", but the winky got lost when I
had to manually retrieve/resend the message. (Mailman isn't as smart as
Launchpad about figuring out messages sent from one of many different
aliases.)

The fact is, "Ubuntu" is the name of two distinct things: a project
encompassing many flavors, and one of those flavors. Recognizing which
one you're talking about at any given moment helps immensely.

Allison

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread John Moser


On 01/25/2013 06:17 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Allison Randal  wrote:

On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Each flavor has a dedicated landing page: kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org,
xubuntu.org, ubuntustudio.org, mythbuntu.org, lubuntu.net. The one for
*U*buntu (with *U* for Unity  is ubuntu.com.


By that flawed and short-sighted logic how do you explain Ubuntu with
a G for GNOME up until a couple of years ago?



Mark Shuttleworth hadn't figured out what direction he wanted to take 
his megalomania in yet and was biding his time for something disruptive 
to happen so he could try to usurp GNOME's position.


(Honestly, Unity gets criticized, laughed at, and used as a primary 
example of how Ubuntu is nothing more than a new love child of Microsoft 
Embrace-Extend-Extinguish and RedHat Not-Invented-Here mentalities.  Do 
you think it would have lasted more than a week if they had rolled that 
out without major disruptive changes in GNOME a la Gnome-Shell?  People 
jumped ship as-is.)


--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Allison Randal  wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Each flavor has a dedicated landing page: kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org,
> xubuntu.org, ubuntustudio.org, mythbuntu.org, lubuntu.net. The one for
> *U*buntu (with *U* for Unity  is ubuntu.com.

By that flawed and short-sighted logic how do you explain Ubuntu with
a G for GNOME up until a couple of years ago?

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Allison Randal
On 01/25/2013 02:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Ubuntu.com is an element of Canonical marketing.  Don't be confused into 
> thinking it's more than that.

Each flavor has a dedicated landing page: kubuntu.org, edubuntu.org,
xubuntu.org, ubuntustudio.org, mythbuntu.org, lubuntu.net. The one for
*U*buntu (with *U* for Unity  is ubuntu.com.

The centralized page for the Ubuntu *Project* is wiki.ubuntu.com. This
seems right to me, as it's open for collaborative ownership by all
flavors, all members. It'd be quite appropriate to add a prominent link
from the main page of the wiki to:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam/Derivatives

Allison

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu and derivatives (Re: Ubuntu.com Download Page)

2013-01-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
Ubuntu.com is an element of Canonical marketing.  Don't be confused into 
thinking it's more than that.

Scott K

On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:32:44 AM Vesa Paatero wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for you message, Volkan. I also noticed at some point that the
> Ubuntu website says surprisingly little about the variants, even the
> officially supported variants. I have an Edubuntu installation since
> 2007 and I'd appreciate better information as a basis for
> decision-making between Ubuntu and Edubuntu and other variants.
> 
> It seems that there is some information about the interrelationship of
> variants (or derivatives) but it is not easy to find. Dmitrijs already
> brought up the link
> http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/derivatives and I like how
> the page
> 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam/Derivatives
> 
> presents a classification for the variants: "Official editions",
> "Recognized flavors", "Customizations"... with a few words about what
> each class is about.
> 
> Whereas the owner(s) of Ubuntu are doing well in allowing the
> derivatives/variants to coexist peacefully with Ubuntu, it seems that
> they prefer to keep ubuntu.com the home page of exactly Ubuntu rather
> than an umbrella for the whole family of derivatives.
> 
> In theory, someone could make e.g. a wiki-styled documentation site
> about the essential differences between derivatives, such as what you
> can and what you can't install in a given derivative compared to the
> main line of development (Ubuntu), but the challenge comes from how
> swiftly these things change from release to release. And I'd guess that
> most applications can be installed to any derivative, the difference
> between derivatives being more about what is installed by default.
> 
> Vesa
> 
> 25.01.2013 16:34, Volkan Gezer wrote:
> > I think most people don't know that Kubuntu, Lubuntu and Xubuntu
> > versions are officially supported by Ubuntu.
> > 
> > I highly suggest you telling in download page something like that:
> > 
> > 
> > "Ubuntu is using Unity desktop environment.
> > 
> > We also have official distributions for KDE, XCFE  environments
> > too..."
> > 
> > to give a link to other official Ubuntu distros. You can also add a
> > page which users can reach in one click to these distributions and
> > comparison.
> > 
> > -Volkan

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss