Re: WRONG ARCHITECTURE 'I386'
Or wait until mozilla / webkit release html5 media objects and make the whole add-on thing redundant. On 12 May 2009, at 10:37, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 03:52 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: >> On Sunday 10 May 2009 4:55:26 pm Jonas wrote: >>> (section message is web) >>> Hello. >>> >>> I have an ibook g4, the one that came quite before the day apple >>> decided to use x86 processors. >>> I have a reccurrent problem I think A BIG part of the alt release of >>> ubuntu are concerned : >>> flash will only work on x86 >> >> Is that true even of Swfdec and Gnash? And actually, due to >> demand, Adobe has >> released a 64bit version of Flash that's only for Linux. >> > Swfdec & Gnash should both work, for some values of "work". I believe > they should both play youtube, at least until youtube changes again > and > requires flash features neither of them implement. > > Of course, in the long term you could also hope that > Silverlight/Moonlight gain traction; mono already works just fine on > PPC :). > > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: WRONG ARCHITECTURE 'I386'
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 03:52 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Sunday 10 May 2009 4:55:26 pm Jonas wrote: > > (section message is web) > > Hello. > > > > I have an ibook g4, the one that came quite before the day apple > > decided to use x86 processors. > > I have a reccurrent problem I think A BIG part of the alt release of > > ubuntu are concerned : > > flash will only work on x86 > > Is that true even of Swfdec and Gnash? And actually, due to demand, Adobe > has > released a 64bit version of Flash that's only for Linux. > Swfdec & Gnash should both work, for some values of "work". I believe they should both play youtube, at least until youtube changes again and requires flash features neither of them implement. Of course, in the long term you could also hope that Silverlight/Moonlight gain traction; mono already works just fine on PPC :). -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: WRONG ARCHITECTURE 'I386'
On Sunday 10 May 2009 4:55:26 pm Jonas wrote: > (section message is web) > Hello. > > I have an ibook g4, the one that came quite before the day apple > decided to use x86 processors. > I have a reccurrent problem I think A BIG part of the alt release of > ubuntu are concerned : > flash will only work on x86 Is that true even of Swfdec and Gnash? And actually, due to demand, Adobe has released a 64bit version of Flash that's only for Linux. > Flash is a proprietary technology, cleary difficult to integrate in > ubuntu, mainly because it is pretty far away from the GPL. (I guess > its proprietary) > Can you eventually please speak about this problem with your somebody > at canonical? I think you should ask macromedia to make an Adobe is the one to bug about it. -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
WRONG ARCHITECTURE 'I386'
(section message is web) Hello. I have an ibook g4, the one that came quite before the day apple decided to use x86 processors. I have a reccurrent problem I think A BIG part of the alt release of ubuntu are concerned : flash will only work on x86 Flash is a proprietary technology, cleary difficult to integrate in ubuntu, mainly because it is pretty far away from the GPL. (I guess its proprietary) Can you eventually please speak about this problem with your somebody at canonical? I think you should ask macromedia to make an There are so little chances Macromedia release the source code of flash player, at least if we ask this to them, they could change their mind... maybe make some contract with canonical to compile this binary for powerpc architectures... Don't you think ? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
