Re: mdadm bugs 946758 and 946344
On 04/07/12 10:23, Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:57:15PM +1200, Tim Frost wrote: >> Now that I can see activity and comments for both bug reports, I see >> that apport-retrace has changed the summary in bug 946758, although the >> crash reports on the affected systems that I run show the same >> information as in bug 946344. >> >> What is the best forum for discussing these specific bugs? And, as an >> affected user, how can I assist in working to identify cause, and/or >> possible fixes [the affected systems are my work desktop, and my main >> home system, so I don't want to put alpha code on either of them]? > > I browsed the bug and from looking at the stack trace the problem seemed > obvious, so I investigated and have posted a fix. It's now in the > sponsorship queue so somebody will review it in the next week or two. > > The bug doesn't exist in Quantal as it has already been fixed upstream. > It only affects Precise. > > If this is to get fixed in Precise, the hardest part is to get the fix > tested carefully to ensure that it doesn't cause regressions. Assuming > that the fix is accepted for Precise, it'll enter precise-proposed and > there will be a call for testing in the bug. If you can follow the bug > and test the proposed package when it is announced, then this would be > great. If nobody can test a proposed fix, then it is unlikely to go in, > and your only option will be to upgrade to the next release when it > comes out. > > Robie > Please note, that I had an mdadm SRU targeting precise, but it got rejected on a couple of technical points. I will integrate your debdiff into that one, and reupload. see details at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/mdadm/+bug/1009973 -- Regards, Dmitrijs. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: mdadm bugs 946758 and 946344 (was: Re: Private bugs - mdadm)
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:57:15PM +1200, Tim Frost wrote: > Now that I can see activity and comments for both bug reports, I see > that apport-retrace has changed the summary in bug 946758, although the > crash reports on the affected systems that I run show the same > information as in bug 946344. > > What is the best forum for discussing these specific bugs? And, as an > affected user, how can I assist in working to identify cause, and/or > possible fixes [the affected systems are my work desktop, and my main > home system, so I don't want to put alpha code on either of them]? I browsed the bug and from looking at the stack trace the problem seemed obvious, so I investigated and have posted a fix. It's now in the sponsorship queue so somebody will review it in the next week or two. The bug doesn't exist in Quantal as it has already been fixed upstream. It only affects Precise. If this is to get fixed in Precise, the hardest part is to get the fix tested carefully to ensure that it doesn't cause regressions. Assuming that the fix is accepted for Precise, it'll enter precise-proposed and there will be a call for testing in the bug. If you can follow the bug and test the proposed package when it is announced, then this would be great. If nobody can test a proposed fix, then it is unlikely to go in, and your only option will be to upgrade to the next release when it comes out. Robie -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
mdadm bugs 946758 and 946344 (was: Re: Private bugs - mdadm)
Dmitrijs, On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:35 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 02/07/12 12:25, Tim Frost wrote: > > I am one of a number of people affected by an apparent bug in mdadm. > > The official master bug in launchpad is marked as private - #946758 [trimmed] > Automatically filed bugs via apport are all initially marked as private. > Ubuntu BugSquad works on the bugs and trianges / makes them public if > there is no sensitive data in the bug report and the automatically > attached files. > > I have checked the attachments on the bug, and there doesn't seem to be > anything private (apart from hostnames, user names & mount points). > > I therefore have now marked the bug public. > Thanks for that. Now that I can see activity and comments for both bug reports, I see that apport-retrace has changed the summary in bug 946758, although the crash reports on the affected systems that I run show the same information as in bug 946344. What is the best forum for discussing these specific bugs? And, as an affected user, how can I assist in working to identify cause, and/or possible fixes [the affected systems are my work desktop, and my main home system, so I don't want to put alpha code on either of them]? Tim -- Tim Frost signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss