Re: missed meeting
On Mar 03, 2011, at 07:54 AM, Martin Pool wrote: >Sorry, I'm going to be about 15m late. No problem, thanks for the heads up. I'll start the meeting on time (3m from now) but we can wait to get into the meat of it until you get there. -Barry signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: missed meeting
Sorry, I'm going to be about 15m late. - Martin On 03/03/2011 4:04 AM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote: > On Mar 02, 2011, at 06:02 PM, Martin Pool wrote: > >>Those dates work well for me. (I'm going to be offline again on the >>10th of March, but here this week and also the 17th.) >> >>I could have a reasonable chance of being awake at 7am Sydney == >>20:00UTC, if that is any better. (Personally I think 10pm is actually >>a bit less disruptive than 9pm.) > > Thanks for updating the Calendar Martin. See you all at 2100 UTC. > > -Barry -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: missed meeting
On Mar 02, 2011, at 06:02 PM, Martin Pool wrote: >Those dates work well for me. (I'm going to be offline again on the >10th of March, but here this week and also the 17th.) > >I could have a reasonable chance of being awake at 7am Sydney == >20:00UTC, if that is any better. (Personally I think 10pm is actually >a bit less disruptive than 9pm.) Thanks for updating the Calendar Martin. See you all at 2100 UTC. -Barry signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: missed meeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/2/2011 8:19 AM, Martin Pool wrote: > On 25 February 2011 02:20, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> Sounds good. I propose we meet on 2011-03-02, then skip the 03-09 meeting >> and >> start back up again on the regularly scheduled 03-23 meeting. Thus: >> >> 2011-03-02 meet >> 2011-02-23 meet >> >> I've updated the wiki pages to reflect this schedule. > > I updated the Google calendar too. If anyone wants to be invited and > is not, just ask. > > For now I have left it at the regular time, ie 8am Sydney, 21:00 utc. > > Martin 10pm is going to usually be after my son (and probably wife) is asleep. So it actually is less disrupting. I don't think I'm directly invited to that event, might help me coordinate it a bit better. John =:-> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1uEfEACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOwXQCcDarOkSk+bfPqmHbIjYNb15kf QPIAoMyuSC42kay9ZAaH+WoqPA4Sr8HU =JkKu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: rfc: permissions on package branches
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Martin Pool wrote: > From the thread so far, it seems like the simplest thing might be to > allow branches to only be made official when they are also directly > owned by the distro series owner? That seems more complex than just fixing the permissions, and less understandable than making the official branches real rather than aliases. Users find arbitrary restrictions hard to understand. Lets aim for 'excellent' not 'least work' (while still aiming for 'done soon'). -Rob -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
