Giving developers access to requeue package imports [Was: Ubuntu Platform developers BOF session?]
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would > make me happy would be if all Ubuntu Developers could trigger the > equivalent of the local 'requeue_package.py --full' command that UDD > admins can run. Some history might get lost, but at least out of date > branches could be made usable. This seems to have been the topic that has generated the most interest. It seems to be a bit of an overkill to have a vUDS session on it, especially if we don't have the right people in the room. So maybe we can try to hammer out the requirements here? Currently you need shell access to Jubany in order to run the command. [0] I know that this request has come up in the past, but my Google-fu is failing me now. Adding the (seemingly dormant) UDD list to the conversation in hopes of catching the right person. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/713719 -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Developer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: landscape-client in oneiric-updates
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/19/2012 10:57 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote: >> On 06/19/2012 10:47 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/653312 >> >>> Well it's a bug in the importer, so there is not much that you >>> can do. Your best case is to use regular non-udd style of >>> packaging. > > It's harder than I thought :( I really got used to udd and using branches. If you're used to working with the UDD tools, you could always do something like create a temporary branch to work in: pull-lp-source landscape-client bzr init landscape-client cd landscape-client bzr import-dsc ../landscape-client_12.04.3-0ubuntu0.11.10.dsc That will at least give you a branch you can work with. Though obviously, it won't have full history nor can you use a merge request with it. You'll still have to proved a debdiff in the end. -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Maintainer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Re: UDD survey results
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Martin Pool wrote: > TLDR? Mixed but generally positive feedback. Top issues to fix are > speed of branching/merging from Launchpad; keeping import branches > reliably up to date; getting branches where possible to current > formats; removing various small-medium roadblocks; supporting v3 > packages and being smarter about merging. A lot of interesting stuff in there. Thanks for sharing the results. > There is a good even mix of core devs, motus, contributing developers, > casual developers, and new developers. It might be interesting to see the cross-tabs on this. For instance, do casual developers and new developers feel more dissatisfaction with the experience than core-devs and MOTUs? Thanks, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
