Re: Ubuntu Desktop's GNOME Shell extensions survey ending soon
extensions, once popular enough should be part of gnome. Then it would save bad experiences when upgrading gnome and losing half of your extensions ... This the main reason why I don't use gnome anymore. Regards, BT 2017-05-24 6:57 GMT-04:00 Pander : > On 05/24/2017 11:30 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:24:01AM -0400, SDA wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:54:17PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > >>> Some of those are slightly useful. However, here are the couple of > >>> shell extensions I always install and could not live without: > > While on the subject of extensions, please endorse getting this fixed > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724076 Thanks > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: 18.04: Ubuntu GNOME --> Ubuntu ?
It looks like that. Ubuntu 18.04 desktop will be gnome according to Mark Shuttleworth. Is that a "late april's fool" ??? or is it serious ??? 2017-04-05 15:24 GMT-04:00 Paul Smith : > So, does Mark Shuttleworth's latest announcement mean that as of Ubuntu > 18.04 there won't be a need for Ubuntu GNOME anymore, and it will just > be Ubuntu? > > Not suggesting anyone actually knows the answer to this, just posing > the question out into the universe... > > https://insights.ubuntu.com/2017/04/05/growing-ubuntu-for- > cloud-and-iot-rather-than-phone-and-convergence/ > > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: GOA Google account broken
I confirm the pkil of goa-daemon worked for me too. I finally have access to my google drive via nautilus. Thanks! 2016-11-02 20:51 GMT-04:00 Michael Gratton : > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Bernard Tremblay < > tremblay.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Jeremy Bicha said "A workaround is to restart the computer". >> >> Doesn't do anything here. >> >> I will try the pkill thing tonight at home. >> > > Yeah, I don't think restarting every fixed the problem for me. That would > fix the issue if the problem was "goa-daemon not killed on logout", which > given I very rarely log out and log back in means I shouldn't very often > see this. > > However given that killing the goa-daemon after login worked for me, it > seems to indicate the issue is more likely related to be how it is launched > for the login session, per this Arch issue: https://bugs.archlinux.org/tas > k/46626 > > I believe this is the case since after doing some more digging, I was > getting the "Message: Remote error from secret service: > org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown" errors as reported in that > Arch issue. > > > //Mike > > -- > ⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler. > ⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/> > > > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: GOA Google account broken
Jeremy Bicha said "A workaround is to restart the computer". Doesn't do anything here. I will try the pkill thing tonight at home. Regards, BT 2016-11-01 11:17 GMT-04:00 Jeremy Bicha : > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Michael Gratton wrote: > > Has anyone had any problems getting GOA working with Google? My Google > > account has marked as "Credentials have expired", even after signing-in > > again. After removing the account and re-adding it, I get the same thing > > immediately after signing in. This in on Yakkety, upgrading to 3.22 in > the > > gnome-staging PPA hasn't helped. > > Yes, Google authentication has a timeout problem and we haven't > identified a fix. I don't have a Launchpad bug for the issue yet, but > the upstream bug is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/771547 > > A workaround is to restart the computer. > > Jeremy > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: HDMI sound not working anymore
OK, I got it working when I moved the laptop. It looks it was the HDMI cable that was defective. Nothing to do with upgrading to yakkety. Sorry for the noise. Regards, BT 2016-10-15 23:38 GMT-04:00 Bernard Tremblay : > Hi, > > After upgrade to 16.10, I cannot have sound on the HDMI output of my > laptop. > Anybody have similar problem ? > > I need HDMI video AND sound to watch films on TV. > > Regards, >BT > > -- > ----- > Bernard Tremblay > tremblay.bern...@gmail.com > R: (418) 658-1411 > C: (581) 988-1411 > - > Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, > le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... > > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
HDMI sound not working anymore
Hi, After upgrade to 16.10, I cannot have sound on the HDMI output of my laptop. Anybody have similar problem ? I need HDMI video AND sound to watch films on TV. Regards, BT -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: Problems with DNS resolution after upgrade to Yakkey
Did you check if you're connected to your network ? May be it's a problem with the network driver that doesn't resume ? 2016-10-06 21:39 GMT-04:00 Michael Gratton : > > Hey all, > > Is anyone else having problems with DNS resolution after upgrading to > Ubuntu GNOME Yakkety? > > /etc/resolv.conf points to 127.0.0.1 as if dnsmasq is still being used, > but nothing is listening on that, while systemd-resolved is running and > listening on 127.0.0.53 instead. > > The dnsmasq-base package is installed, but only because network-manager > depends on it. > > I think this only happens after resume, so that may be related. > > //Mike > -- ⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler. ⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/> > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com R: (418) 658-1411 C: (581) 988-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
Re: Ubuntu-GNOME and Snaps/Flatpak
For the flatpak, it relies on a runtime of gnome version 3.20 actually. When you will start an app on your current gnome 3.18, the runtime will replace the gnome-session with the 3.20 version. I don't think you could replace gdm since it's a service not an application. And if you have dependencies with systemd of a different version than the current version on you host, I don't know what it'll do ??? We need to experiment to have a better understanding of those new package format. 2016-06-15 12:27 GMT-04:00 Leo Francisco : > Yep, I assumed that would the case for the GNOME shell itself but I was > thinking it could be more useful for the apps. > > I know Ubuntu GNOME ships a lot of the older GNOME apps, Nautilus is > 3.14.3 etc. Is this due to dependency incompatibilities with the Ubuntu > repos? > > Sounds like a lot of work to keep stuff working when you could just use > upstream via these new package formats. Something to keep an eye on > perhaps. > > All the best > Leo > > > On 15/06/16 16:54, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 13:29 +0100, Adam Eveleigh wrote: > >>> Snaps are already supported in the 16.04 base, you can play with them > >>> now. It's just an idea, but maybe either snaps or XDG would make it > >>> easier to run the latest version of GNOME 3 desktop/apps under Ubuntu. > >> Yes I like that idea. It could be more stable for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > >> users to use more recent GNOME applications via Flatpak rather than > >> the PPA (the PPA could be kept, but if it works well then perhaps > >> Flatpak should be the recommended option). > > First, my understanding of the GNOME3 Staging PPA is that it's a > > testing area for the next release of Ubuntu GNOME. People using that > > PPA are, to some extent, volunteering to help test the next Ubuntu > > GNOME release. > > > > I think switching to snaps would defeat that purpose, unless we plan to > > switch the base Ubuntu GNOME installation to snaps. > > > > Second, I'm not at all sure that putting the entire desktop in a snap > > would work. I mean, how do you get the system to start the display > > manager in the snap instead of the one on the system? Or if you decide > > you'll use the system GDM, how do you tell it to start the desktop > > (gnome-session/gnome-shell/etc.) in the snap? And is it always the > > case that the dbus etc. interactions will be compatible? > > > > The desktop is infrastructural, not a separable app that can easily be > > dropped into a container with limited access to other aspects of the > > system. I'm not sure I see how these new-fangled package formats would > > work with something like that. > > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > -- - Bernard Tremblay tremblay.bern...@gmail.com (418) 658-1411 - Le but de Linux est de gérer vos ressources et faire le travail, le but des OS propriétaire est de vous vendre d'autres licences... Portae Tenebrosus Abiciantur, Infinitio! -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
