Re: [ubuntu-in] Reliance 3G USB Mobile Broadband Dongle

2011-05-06 Thread Lokesh Chauhan 
I am using it. Had to no nothing except plug it in and fix one line in
default config for reliance smart net.
Setting APN to rcomnet
Rest is working fine. Just to clear thing i was on 10.10 and then
moved to a fresh 11.04 yesterday. Maybe 10.04 has its own set of
issues but nm update should fix all that.

enjoy
Locx


On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Kaushal Shriyan
 wrote:
> Hi,
> Have Anyone configured Reliance 3G USB Mobile Broadband Dongle on Ubuntu
> Linux 10.04 ?
> I can see it in dmesg and lsusb,but the NM applet does not detect it. I have
> added usbserial and options in /etc/modules and rebooted the laptop still it
> does not get detected by NM (Network Manager). Have added usb-modeswitch and
> usb-modeswitch-data. I have the latest modemmanager and NM and Tried all
> options but works fine in Ubuntu Linux 10.10.
> Any clue ?
> Regards,
> Kaushal
> --
> ubuntu-in mailing list
> ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
>
>

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in

Re: [ubuntu-in] Is Partition problematic ??

2011-05-06 Thread Onkar Shinde 
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Nitesh Mistry  wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:11:36PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> But I also think this output is broken or probably the partitioning is
>> actually broken. Check the blocks for sda2 and sda5. They are both
>> same, which is ok of sda5 is the only logical partition. But then
>> check how blocks for sda3 are between sda2 and sda5.
>
> Really? IIRC, blocks for sda3 are starting after sda2 and sda5. From the
> look of it, its just showing up in between lines for sda2 and sda5. Either
> that or I am really deprived of caffeine.

You are correct. My mistake. There doesn't seem to be problem. Looks
like my mind was caught up on something and i couldn't read between
lines (literally). :-)


Onkar
-- 
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in

Re: [ubuntu-in] Is Partition problematic ??

2011-05-06 Thread Nitesh Mistry 
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:11:36PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> But I also think this output is broken or probably the partitioning is
> actually broken. Check the blocks for sda2 and sda5. They are both
> same, which is ok of sda5 is the only logical partition. But then
> check how blocks for sda3 are between sda2 and sda5.

Really? IIRC, blocks for sda3 are starting after sda2 and sda5. From the
look of it, its just showing up in between lines for sda2 and sda5. Either
that or I am really deprived of caffeine.


-- 
Regards,
Nitesh Mistry | www.mistrynitesh.com
PGP key id: A6FEF696 | 'geekosopher' on freenode irc


pgpICExqfK2Bz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in

Re: [ubuntu-in] Is Partition problematic ??

2011-05-06 Thread Onkar Shinde 
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Jkhatri  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> following is the output of fdisk -l command ( on ubuntu 10.04 LTS)
> -
> Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x0003951f
>
>    Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sda1   *   1 498 3998720   82  Linux swap / Solaris
> Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
> /dev/sda2 499   14940   115998721    5  Extended
> /dev/sda3   14941   38913   192563122+  83  Linux
> /dev/sda5 499   14940   115998720   83  Linux
> --
>
> sda1 is bootable ( grub is installed here ) ,  and it shows file system is
> Linux swap !
>
> what is wrong with the partition ?

Grub is usually installed on /dev/sda (not sda1). So it is likely that
sda1 is actually swap partition.
But I also think this output is broken or probably the partitioning is
actually broken. Check the blocks for sda2 and sda5. They are both
same, which is ok of sda5 is the only logical partition. But then
check how blocks for sda3 are between sda2 and sda5.

Output of 'sudo mount' (without any arguments) will tell you which
partition is which. You can continue your analysis from there.


Onkar
-- 
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in

[ubuntu-in] Is Partition problematic ??

2011-05-06 Thread Jkhatri 

Hi All,

following is the output of fdisk -l command ( on ubuntu 10.04 LTS)
-
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0003951f

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *   1 498 3998720   82  Linux swap / Solaris
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2 499   14940   1159987215  Extended
/dev/sda3   14941   38913   192563122+  83  Linux
/dev/sda5 499   14940   115998720   83  Linux
--

sda1 is bootable ( grub is installed here ) ,  and it shows file system 
is Linux swap !


what is wrong with the partition ?

though system is working fine


--

*/

Jatin Khatri

www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Jatin 

Phone (+91) 98250 20393

Save Paper, Save Environment.**
/*(Plant at least one tree in your life and nurture it !!!)*/



-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in