[Bug 2056100] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056100 Title: sru cloud-init (24.1.3 update) Focal, Jammy, and Mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2056100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2049197] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ruby3.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049197 Title: ruby_xfree segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.0/+bug/2049197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051380] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ruby3.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051380 Title: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.0/+bug/2051380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063465] Re: Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
Indeed, the Jammy package depended on `python3-distutils` but the Noble package does not. I believe this is a packaging bug. https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/docker-compose https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/docker-compose https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/python3-compose -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063465 Title: Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker-compose/+bug/2063465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063465] Re: Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
Not sure if this is the right package, but installing `python3-distutils-extra` seems to fix the issue, but now I'm running into a different problem so I'm not absolutely sure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063465 Title: Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker-compose/+bug/2063465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063465] [NEW] Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
Public bug reported:
After an upgrade of my server from Jammy to Noble, I get
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/docker-compose", line 33, in
sys.exit(load_entry_point('docker-compose==1.29.2', 'console_scripts',
'docker-compose')())
^^^
File "/usr/bin/docker-compose", line 25, in importlib_load_entry_point
return next(matches).load()
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/importlib/metadata/__init__.py", line 205, in load
module = import_module(match.group('module'))
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/importlib/__init__.py", line 90, in import_module
return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
File "", line 1387, in _gcd_import
File "", line 1360, in _find_and_load
File "", line 1331, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "", line 935, in _load_unlocked
File "", line 995, in exec_module
File "", line 488, in _call_with_frames_removed
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/compose/cli/main.py", line 9, in
from distutils.spawn import find_executable
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
```
I suspect this is missing a dependency declaration?
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: docker-compose 1.29.2-6ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Date: Thu Apr 25 15:32:27 2024
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: docker-compose
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-25 (0 days ago)
** Affects: docker-compose (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063465
Title:
Noble: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker-compose/+bug/2063465/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063464] [NEW] Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble
Public bug reported: I just do-release-upgraded from Jammy to Noble on a pretty minimal server. After upgrade, network was fine but DNS names could not be resolved. I discovered systemd-resolved wasn't installed. I copied and installed that package manually, which immediately resolved the problem. So I assume this is a mistake in the upgrade process. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: systemd-resolved 255.4-1ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Thu Apr 25 15:27:23 2024 SourcePackage: systemd UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-25 (0 days ago) ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063464 Title: Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2063464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0
I think this is a dupe of #2059197, but let's wait for confirmation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063381 Title: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2063381/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0
Ryan, I think you are experiencing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197 which is a regression on focal from a previous update that also tried to address the version negotiation. There is a new nfs-utils package in focal-proposed to address that, would you mind trying it out? The instructions are in that bug. ** Package changed: util-linux (Ubuntu) => nfs-utils (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063381 Title: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2063381/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063257] [NEW] Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so
Public bug reported: pam_lastlog.so was dropped by upstream in 1.5.3[1][4]. It's still there in the code, but not built by default. And indeed, in noble (1.5.3) we don't have it, while mantic (1.5.2) does. This does not prevent console logins, but generates an error in the logs: Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_lastlog.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_lastlog.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_lastlog.so Debian's shadow package is also still shipping this config[2]. If you think we should re-enable pam_lastlog, then this becomes a bug in the src:pam package, but keep in mind upstream is keen on removing it, and we might be better off switching to an alternative, perhaps pam_lastlog2[3]. 1. https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/blob/cec36a8cd2c69cc87eacc21da471334fbef128ee/NEWS#L65 2. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/shadow/-/blob/master/debian/login.pam?ref_type=heads#L82 3. https://wiki.debian.org/PamLastlog2 4. https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/commit/357a4ddbe9b4b10ebd805d2af3e32f3ead5b8816 ** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: shadow (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - Default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam module pam_lastlog.so + Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam module pam_lastlog.so ** Also affects: shadow (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam module pam_lastlog.so + Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so ** Description changed: pam_lastlog.so was dropped by upstream in 1.5.3[1]. It's still there in the code, but not built by default. And indeed, in noble (1.5.3) we don't have it, while mantic (1.5.2) does. - This does not prevent console logins, but generates an error in the logs: Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_lastlog.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_lastlog.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_lastlog.so + Debian's shadow package is also still shipping this config[2]. - Debian's shadow package is also still shipping this config[2]. + If you think we should re-enable pam_lastlog, then this becomes a bug in + the src:pam package, but keep in mind upstream is keen on removing it, + and we might be better off switching to an alternative, perhaps + pam_lastlog2[3]. 1. https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/blob/cec36a8cd2c69cc87eacc21da471334fbef128ee/NEWS#L65 2. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/shadow/-/blob/master/debian/login.pam?ref_type=heads#L82 + 3. https://wiki.debian.org/PamLastlog2 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1068229 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068229 ** Also affects: shadow (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068229 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: - pam_lastlog.so was dropped by upstream in 1.5.3[1]. It's still there in - the code, but not built by default. + pam_lastlog.so was dropped by upstream in 1.5.3[1][4]. It's still there + in the code, but not built by default. And indeed, in noble (1.5.3) we don't have it, while mantic (1.5.2) does. This does not prevent console logins, but generates an error in the logs: Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_lastlog.so): /usr/lib/security/pam_lastlog.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apr 23 20:02:09 n1 login[835]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_lastlog.so Debian's shadow package is also still shipping this config[2]. If you think we should re-enable pam_lastlog, then this becomes a bug in the src:pam package, but keep in mind upstream is keen on removing it, and we might be better off switching to an alternative, perhaps pam_lastlog2[3]. - 1. https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/blob/cec36a8cd2c69cc87eacc21da471334fbef128ee/NEWS#L65 2. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/shadow/-/blob/master/debian/login.pam?ref_type=heads#L82 3. https://wiki.debian.org/PamLastlog2 + 4. https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/commit/357a4ddbe9b4b10ebd805d2af3e32f3ead5b8816 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063257 Title: Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
** Tags added: block-proposed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062561] Re: There are no APT sources configured in /etc/apt/sources.list or /etc/apt/sources.list.d.
** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062561 Title: There are no APT sources configured in /etc/apt/sources.list or /etc/apt/sources.list.d. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2062561/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile
I added a noble release notes entry for this: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/noble-numbat-release-notes/39890#samba- apparmor-profile-91 ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063079 Title: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba- profile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2063079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile
Given that: - samba's apparmor profile is not enabled by default. One has to install apparmor-profiles, and put the profile in enforce mode (it's in complain mode by default) - we are in the release week, isos are being built. This could at most be a 0-day SRU - we have been running without this fix since at least January, and enabling it now could be risky (every smbd start will invoke a shell script which could make the service fail I think a normal SRU for noble is best. I could even add a set of DEP8 tests for this, to see how samba works with the profile from apparmor- profiles. The only downside I see is that not applying the fix now would mean a release-upgrade regression for the users who are using an apparmored samba. We can release note it for now. What do you think? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063079 Title: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba- profile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/2063079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063079 Title: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba- profile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/2063079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile
Hm, this was introduced in this version, and I missed it in the subsequent merge: samba (2:4.19.4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * new upstream stable/bugfix release. See WHATSNEW.txt for details. * d/control: drop pkg.samba.nouring build profile: was needed for focal which we do not support anymore * remove /etc/cron.daily/samba: there's no reason to keep backing it up, most stuff is in ldb/tdb files these days. * d/samba.maintscript, d/winbind.maintscript: remove old rm_connfiles (pre-buster versions) * d/rules, d/*.service: provide .service files directly instead of renaming and patching upstream templates, and use dh_installsystemd to install them (partially Closes: #1059187) * d/rules: run dh_movetousr for libpam-winbind & libnss-winbind, if exists. This fixes remaining files in /lib (hopefully). In a search for better way to detect where to put system libs (/lib vs /usr/lib) as a configure option. Closes: #1059187 -- Michael Tokarev Mon, 08 Jan 2024 19:11:37 +0300 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063079 Title: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba- profile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/2063079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063040] [NEW] network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2 on noble causes IPv4 address removal when no DHCP server is present
Public bug reported: I tried using a noble VM using a "host-only" network connection (which does not have a DHCP server). After adding an IPv4 address manually (using the ip command), NetworkManager retries activating the network connection, which removes the address that was previously added. AFAIK, this does not happen on jammy. Reproduction steps: 1. Create a host-only network connection 2. Leave it on Automatic in the NetworkManager settings panel 3. Add an IPv4 address manually using the ip command 4. Wait for the "Connection failed" notification 5. Check whether the configured address was removed The reproduction video is attached as a WebM. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: noble ** Attachment added: "Reproduction video" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063040/+attachment/5768774/+files/NetworkManager%20Bug.webm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063040 Title: network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2 on noble causes IPv4 address removal when no DHCP server is present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2063040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058687] Please test proposed package
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected, Accepted libreoffice into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058687 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2058687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058687] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic
translations tarball verified help tarball verified tarballs tarball: @@ -14,12 +14,13 @@ tiff-4.6.0.tar.xz libepubgen-0.1.1.tar.xz a39f6c07ddb20d7dd2ff1f95fa21e2cd-raptor2-2.0.15.tar.gz +libxslt-1.1.39.tar.xz freetype-2.13.0.tar.xz beeca87be45ec87d241ddd0e1bad80c1-bsh-2.0b6-src.zip openldap-2.6.6.tgz gpgme-1.18.0.tar.bz2 libodfgen-0.1.8.tar.xz -liblangtag-0.6.3.tar.bz2 +liblangtag-0.6.7.tar.bz2 libatomic_ops-7.6.8.tar.gz xmlsec1-1.2.37.tar.gz breakpad-b324760c7f53667af128a6b77b790323da04fcb9.tar.xz @@ -30,12 +31,10 @@ Firebird-3.0.7.33374-0.tar.bz2 frozen-1.1.1.tar.gz 3404ab6b1792ae5f16bbd603bd1e1d03-libformula-1.1.7.zip -zlib-1.3.tar.xz 1f5def51ca0026cd192958ef07228b52-rasqal-0.9.33.tar.gz lxml-4.1.1.tgz odfvalidator-0.9.0-RC2-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies-2726ab578664434a545f8379a01a9faffac0ae73.jar 5ade6ae2a99bc1e9e57031ca88d36dad-hyphen-2.8.8.tar.gz -libxslt-1.1.38.tar.xz libmwaw-0.3.21.tar.xz libmspub-0.1.4.tar.xz mDNSResponder-878.200.35.tar.gz @@ -59,12 +58,12 @@ libwps-0.4.14.tar.xz 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4-epm-3.7.tar.gz poppler-23.09.0.tar.xz +zlib-1.3.1.tar.xz libetonyek-0.1.10.tar.xz 17410483b5b5f267aa18b7e00b65e6e0-hsqldb_1_8_0.zip d8bd5eed178db6e2b18eeed243f85aa8-flute-1.1.6.zip ba2930200c9f019c2d93a8c88c651a0f-flow-engine-0.9.4.zip glm-0.9.9.8.zip -libxml2-2.11.4.tar.xz 1725634df4bb3dcb1b2c91a6175f8789-GentiumBasic_1102.zip a7983f859eafb2677d7ff386a023bc40-xsltml_2.1.2.zip libabw-0.1.3.tar.xz @@ -75,6 +74,7 @@ dragonbox-1.1.3.tar.gz pixman-0.42.2.tar.gz libexttextcat-3.4.6.tar.xz +libxml2-2.12.5.tar.xz libpng-1.6.40.tar.xz f543e6e2d7275557a839a164941c0a86e5f2c3f2a0042bfc434c88c6dde9e140-opens___.ttf libffi-3.4.4.tar.gz So the changes are: libxslt 1.1.38 -> 1.1.39: verified liblangtag: 0.6.3 -> 0.6.7: verified zlib 1.3 -> 1.3.1: verified libxml2 2.11.4 -> 2.12.5: verified Tarballs of the same version didn't change. ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058687 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2058687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058687] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic
I downloaded the original tarballs from https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/7.6.6/ and: - verified their signatures - matched 7.6.6.orig.tar.xz to upstream's 7.6.6.3 (it's a versioning quirk to call 7.6.6rc3 7.6.6.3 in the end): $ sha256sum libreoffice_7.6.6.orig.tar.xz upstream/libreoffice-7.6.6.3.tar.xz 41a83a7f09c539e22c873107d5d4088ac7cdf1a299ad9e9de15e30600fe521b6 libreoffice_7.6.6.orig.tar.xz 41a83a7f09c539e22c873107d5d4088ac7cdf1a299ad9e9de15e30600fe521b6 upstream/libreoffice-7.6.6.3.tar.xz I also verified the packaging changes in debian/* via debdiff. The extra repacked tarballs from the source package are a bit harder to verify, I'm trying to do that next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058687 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2058687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062421] [NEW] ceph-mgr-dashobard is uninstallable on noble due to dependency on python3-distutils
Public bug reported: python3-distutils was removed from ceph in [1], but added back in [2]. This makes the package currently in noble-proposed[2] uninstallable, and is blocking its migration, because python3-distutils doesn't exist anymore. Note the coming back of python3-distutils is not mentioned in [2]'s d/changelog, you have to check the diff. 1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/19.2.0~git20240301.4c76c50-0ubuntu2 2. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/19.2.0~git20240301.4c76c50-0ubuntu5 ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062421 Title: ceph-mgr-dashobard is uninstallable on noble due to dependency on python3-distutils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2062421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059197] Please test proposed package
Hello Jeff, or anyone else affected, Accepted nfs-utils into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs- utils/1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Title: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together
Thanks for the detailed -o vers=x.y tests. I think we are just missing the default case, with nothing fancy specified in the command-line. Please also include in the test a normal without-options mount attempt, i.e., the default. Something like a series of these, verifying which version it ended up using (and that the mount worked, of course): mount server:/path /otherpath mount -t nfs4 server:/otherpath mount -t nfs server:/otherpath And also include v3 mounts please, in particular when the server does not support v4 and the default mount command is used, without specifying a version. All of these could be DEP8 tests I suppose. I won't require it, but it would be really helpful given the amount of details and checks that have to be done manually :) Later versions of the package have more such tests, but they were done for v2 of nfs-utils, so I'm not sure they are straightforward backports. ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Title: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057576] Re: php-fpm sometimes SIGSEGVs (signal 11) when running fpm_get_status
So what are you saying, that phpinfo() is causing random segfaults? So you have a run with just phpinfo() with the php8.2 packages from release and proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057576 Title: php-fpm sometimes SIGSEGVs (signal 11) when running fpm_get_status To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.4/+bug/2057576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/19.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- trusty to verification-done-trusty. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-trusty. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty
** Description changed: [Impact] As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new service called esm-infra-legacy to extend ESM support for more time. - This service will only be available and visible on Trusty and users who - are entitled to that service, will need to run both of these commands to + This service will only be available and visible on Trusty, and users who + are entitled to that service will need to run both of these commands to enable the service in their machine: $ ua refresh $ ua enable esm-infra-legacy The first command will update the contract definitions on the machine, making it aware of the esm-infra-legacy service, and the second command enables it on the machine. Additionally, we can see that esm-infra-legacy will be a standalone service, meaning that users won't need to have esm-infra already enabled before enabling that service. This also means that both esm-infra and esm-infra-legacy are completely independent of one another, in the sense that changes on esm-infra should not affect esm-infra-legacy and vice versa. However, there is one situation where esm-infra will impact esm- infra-legacy. We will better discuss that on the discussion section. Finally, users should now see esm-infra-legacy output on status from now on, when attached and unattached. Users will also see that service on the output of ua help as well. [Test cases] The Trusty version of the client only has a subset of the integration tests we have on the other releases that support the client. Due to that, we will need to perform several manual tests to guarantee that the support for esm-infra-legacy is working and we are not affecting existing customers. Therefore, besides running the current test for the Trusty package, we will run the following tests: * Enabling esm-infra-legacy - User is attached to a subscription that is entitled to esm-infra-legacy - User can see esm-infra-legacy on ua help - User can enable esm-infra-legacy through ua enable esm-infra-legacy - User see esm-infra-legacy as enabled on the output of ua status - User can see esm-infra-legacy enabled on the output of apt-cache policy - User can disable esm-infra-legacy - User can see that esm-infra-legacy is disabled on the machine - User enables esm-infra-legacy again - User can detach with esm-infra-legacy enabled on the machine * Interactions with esm-infra - User is attached to a subscription that is entitled to both esm-infra and esm-infra-legacy - User has esm-infra enabled - User can enable esm-infra-legacy - User can see both esm-infra and esm-infra-legacy as enabled on status - User can disable esm-infra-legacy and not affect esm-infra * User that is not entitled to esm-infra-legacy - User is attached to a subscription - User cannot enable esm-infra-legacy - User can see the service on status, which will show the service as not entitled * User that buys access to esm-infra-legacy - User is already attached to a subscription - User runs ua refresh - User enable esm-infra-legacy - User can see that the service is enabled on ua status * User that is attaching a new subscription - User subscription can be either entitled or not to esm-infra-legacy - In both situations, when the user runs ua attach, they will verify that: - esm-infra will be enabled by default - esm-infra-legacy should not be enabled by default * Upgrade scenarios: - User on Trusty running version <= 19.6 - User is attached to a subscription - User has esm-infra enabled - User upgrades to new Trusty package - User is still attached and sees esm-infra as enabled - User can enable esm-infra-legacy - User on Trusty running version <= 19.6 - User is attached to a subscription - User upgrades to new Trusty package - User enables esm-infra-legacy - User runs a do-release-upgrade - User will see that it is still attached - User still has esm-infra service enabled - User cannot see any indication of esm-infra-legacy on ua status and ua help - Users on other Ubuntu releases - Users should never see any mention of esm-infra-legacy service [Discussions] There are main aspects of the esm-infra-legacy service that need to be discussed here: The interaction between esm-infra-legacy and esm-infra and the disable strategy used for esm-infra-legacy. Regarding the first aspect, the services should be independent of one another, however there is one situation where that doesn't happen. If the user disables esm-infra it will also disable esm-infra-legacy. That is because the esm-infra service in Trusty is disabled by performing the following steps: * removing the service line from /etc/apt/auth.conf.d * Create a
[Bug 2062269] Re: incorrect parsing of long command lines
** Changed in: unhide (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb) ** Changed in: unhide (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062269 Title: incorrect parsing of long command lines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unhide/+bug/2062269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062269] [NEW] incorrect parsing of long command lines
Public bug reported: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble/noble/ppc64el/u/unhide/20240418_084331_7a010@/log.gz """ 534s autopkgtest [08:42:25]: test command5: unhide reverse 534s autopkgtest [08:42:25]: test command5: [--- 534s Unhide 20211016 534s Copyright © 2010-2021 Yago Jesus & Patrick Gouin 534s License GPLv3+ : GNU GPL version 3 or later 534s http://www.unhide-forensics.info 534s 534s NOTE : This version of unhide is for systems using Linux >= 2.6 534s 534s Used options: 534s [*]Searching for Fake processes by verifying that all threads seen by ps are also seen by others 534s Found FAKE PID: 0 Command = .1ubuntu4 -- bash -ec 'unhide reverse' not seen by 3 sys fonc """ Look at "command", it's clearly a portion of a long command line. And '.1ubuntu4' is the ubuntu release of net-tools, which was a trigger for this test. ** Affects: unhide (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062269 Title: incorrect parsing of long command lines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unhide/+bug/2062269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
Uploaded to noble unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061370] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
This was uploaded and is in noble-unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061370 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radvd/+bug/2061370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
This was uploaded and is in noble-unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
The configure check is failing due to a missing include: conftest.c: In function 'main': conftest.c:177:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 177 | struct timeval tv; exit(gettimeofday(, NULL)); |^~~~ conftest.c:174:1: note: include '' or provide a declaration of 'exit' 173 | #include 174 | int conftest.c:177:20: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit' [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch] 177 | struct timeval tv; exit(gettimeofday(, NULL)); |^~~~ conftest.c:177:20: note: include '' or provide a declaration of 'exit' cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Since the failure is due to that missing include, instead of the gettimeofday() function, the check reaches the incorrect answer to the question "checking if gettimeofday takes tz argument ". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
Thanks for verifying it. This is up for review and as soon as it's approved I'll upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
This PPA has a patched version for noble, would you mind trying it out please? https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/autofs-segfault-2061667 ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Also affects: autofs (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
I managed to reproduce it finally after I added "strictexpire" to /etc/auto.master -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
And your second reproducer, with /mp in auto.master, doesn't work here: # ls -la /mp/mumon/_. ls: cannot access '/mp/mumon/_.': No such file or directory handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 43, name mumon, request pid 4242 attempting to mount entry /mp/mumon lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up mumon key "mumon" not found in map source(s). dev_ioctl_send_fail: token = 43 failed to mount /mp/mumon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
Which kernel are you running? There are some kernel version checks in the code which affect a buffer size, and that's a buffer that make_options_string() writes to. I haven't been able to reproduce this yet, with any of your config files. I'm on noble's kernel: 6.8.0-22 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112
Hi, I can confirm that linux-generic 5.15.0.105 is not available yet in proposed repository. Latest version is 104. # apt policy linux-generic linux-generic: Installed: 5.15.0.102.99 Candidate: 5.15.0.104.101 Version table: 5.15.0.104.101 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages *** 5.15.0.102.99 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 Packages 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 5.15.0.25.27 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages # apt info linux-image-generic Package: linux-image-generic Version: 5.15.0.104.101 Priority: optional Section: kernel Source: linux-meta Origin: Ubuntu Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug Installed-Size: 21.5 kB Provides: spl-modules (= 2.1.5-1ubuntu6~22.04.3), v4l2loopback-modules (= 0.12.7-2ubuntu2~22.04.1), virtualbox-guest-modules (= 5.15.0-104), wireguard-modules (= 1.0.0), zfs-modules (= 2.1.5-1ubuntu6~22.04.3) Depends: linux-image-5.15.0-104-generic, linux-modules-extra-5.15.0-104-generic, linux-firmware, intel-microcode, amd64-microcode Recommends: thermald Download-Size: 2,514 B APT-Sources: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages Description: Generic Linux kernel image This package will always depend on the latest generic kernel image available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Title: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
Thanks for this, I know better where to look now. The config files or a minimal reproducer would still help, of course. In the meantime, you can also try debuginfod[1], which is a way for gdb to automatically fetcl all the symbols for you. TL;DR Something like this sudo -i (because automounter needs to run as root) export DEBUGINFOD_URLS="https://debuginfod.ubuntu.com; gdb r -f 1. https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/service-debuginfod -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
Tried direct and indirect nfs mounts, and the test suite also does nfs
and cifs mounts, no segfault:
root@server:~# automount -d3 -f
Starting automounter version 5.1.9, master map /etc/auto.master
using kernel protocol version 5.05
lookup_nss_read_master: reading master file /etc/auto.master
do_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null)
lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry /mnt
lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry /-
master_do_mount: mounting /mnt
lookup_nss_read_map: reading map file /etc/auto.mnt
do_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null)
mounted indirect on /mnt with timeout 300, freq 75 seconds
st_ready: st_ready(): state = 0 path /mnt
master_do_mount: mounting /-
lookup_nss_read_map: reading map file /etc/auto.direct
do_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null)
mounted direct on /foo with timeout 300, freq 75 seconds
do_mount_autofs_direct: mounted trigger /foo
st_ready: st_ready(): state = 0 path /-
handle_packet: type = 5
handle_packet_missing_direct: token 43, name /foo, request pid 14188
attempting to mount entry /foo
lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up /foo
lookup_mount: lookup(file): /foo -> localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded entry: localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered options:
parse_mount: parse(sun): dequote("localhost:/storage") -> localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): core of entry: options=, loc=localhost:/storage
sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting root /foo, mountpoint /foo, what
localhost:/storage, fstype nfs, options (null)
mount(nfs): root=/foo name=/foo what=localhost:/storage, fstype=nfs,
options=(null)
mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /foo
mount_mount: mount(nfs): /foo is local, attempt bind mount
mount_mount: mount(bind): calling mkdir_path /foo
mount(bind): calling mount --bind -o defaults /storage /foo
mount(bind): mounted /storage type bind on /foo
dev_ioctl_send_ready: token = 43
mounted /foo
handle_packet: type = 3
handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 44, name nfs, request pid 14191
attempting to mount entry /mnt/nfs
lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up nfs
lookup_mount: lookup(file): nfs -> localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded entry: localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered options:
parse_mount: parse(sun): dequote("localhost:/storage") -> localhost:/storage
parse_mount: parse(sun): core of entry: options=, loc=localhost:/storage
sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting root /mnt, mountpoint nfs, what
localhost:/storage, fstype nfs, options (null)
mount(nfs): root=/mnt name=nfs what=localhost:/storage, fstype=nfs,
options=(null)
mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /mnt/nfs
mount_mount: mount(nfs): nfs is local, attempt bind mount
mount_mount: mount(bind): calling mkdir_path /mnt/nfs
mount(bind): calling mount --bind -o defaults /storage /mnt/nfs
mount(bind): mounted /storage type bind on /mnt/nfs
dev_ioctl_send_ready: token = 44
mounted /mnt/nfs
# mount -t autofs
systemd-1 on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type autofs
(rw,relatime,fd=32,pgrp=1,timeout=0,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=3020)
/etc/auto.mnt on /mnt type autofs
(rw,relatime,fd=6,pgrp=14168,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect,pipe_ino=47695)
/etc/auto.direct on /foo type autofs
(rw,relatime,fd=9,pgrp=14168,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=47702)
It would definitely help to have a reproducer, or the core file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667
Title:
Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/2061667/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
Looks good, but please also include: - azure run (to at least show it's still working, if you cannot reproduce the bug there easily) - what a test failure looks like, according to this plan +1 to go ahead and update the bug description's [test plan]. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service
> However, CPC is already aware of this issue and will help us creating the test plan here. I understand CPC can hit this bug quite frequently in the affected cloud images, so releasing this SRU to updates is conditional on an actual test plan being better described by them, and followed. ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059952 Title: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2059952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?
This is in noble-proposed now. ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2061325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
Great! I'm unable to reproduce the bug on my machine with the new version (2.4.7-1.2ubuntu7). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1058214 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058214 ** Also affects: sosreport (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058214 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2061325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?
** Description changed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.5.6-0ubuntu3 is failing to build in noble. Lots of test failures like: ERROR: test_open_file (tests.unittests.utilities_tests.GrepTest.test_open_file) -- Traceback (most recent call last): - File "/<>/tests/unittests/utilities_tests.py", line 35, in test_open_file - self.assertEquals(matches, ['import unittest\n']) - ^ + File "/<>/tests/unittests/utilities_tests.py", line 35, in test_open_file + self.assertEquals(matches, ['import unittest\n']) + ^ AttributeError: 'GrepTest' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? + + + Update: + https://github.com/sosreport/sos/commit/769768aabcae3d0265332ee72e9df94d1001f14c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2061325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061325] [NEW] FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?
Public bug reported: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.5.6-0ubuntu3 is failing to build in noble. Lots of test failures like: ERROR: test_open_file (tests.unittests.utilities_tests.GrepTest.test_open_file) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<>/tests/unittests/utilities_tests.py", line 35, in test_open_file self.assertEquals(matches, ['import unittest\n']) ^ AttributeError: 'GrepTest' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2061325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
Mantic verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "mantic-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765296/+files/mantic-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
Jammy verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "jammy-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765295/+files/jammy-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
Focal verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "focal-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765294/+files/focal-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
Bionic verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "bionic-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765293/+files/bionic-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
The remaining verifications were done with the attached script. ** Attachment added: "test-apparmor.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765292/+files/test-apparmor.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install
Xenial verification a) Reproducing the problem, and confirming the fix Starting with 31.2: $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ubuntu-advantage-tools ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2~16.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client Removing apparmor: $ sudo apt remove apparmor -y (...) The following packages will be REMOVED: apparmor liblxc1 lxc-common lxd snapd ubuntu-core-launcher (...) Removing apparmor (2.10.95-0ubuntu2.12) ... (...) Rebooting... Logging back in, checking apt-news.service to see it fails to start due to apparmor: $ sudo systemctl start apt-news.service Job for apt-news.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status apt-news.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. $ systemctl status apt-news.service ● apt-news.service - Update APT News Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/apt-news.service; static; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2024-04-14 15:41:47 UTC; 10s ago Process: 1486 ExecStart=/usr/bin/python3 /usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/apt_news.py (code=exited, status=231/APPARMOR) Main PID: 1486 (code=exited, status=231/APPARMOR) Installing ubuntu-advantage-tools from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~16.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~16.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~16.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~16.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~16.04 Now the service starts: $ sudo systemctl start apt-news.service $ $ sudo systemctl status apt-news.service ● apt-news.service - Update APT News Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/apt-news.service; static; vendor preset: enabled) Active: inactive (dead) (...) Apr 14 15:43:40 x-vm systemd[1]: Starting Update APT News... Apr 14 15:43:40 x-vm systemd[1]: Started Update APT News. b) Confirming that apparmor, when available, is being applied Continuing from test (a), we already have the proposed package installed. Re-installing apparmor: $ sudo apt install apparmor -y (...) Setting up apparmor (2.10.95-0ubuntu2.12) ... update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling back to defaults Rebooting Confirming profile is loaded and enforced: $ sudo grep ubuntu_pro_apt_news /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/profiles ubuntu_pro_apt_news (enforce) Starting apt-news, it does not fail: $ sudo systemctl start apt-news.service ; echo $? 0 Hacking the service unit file to force the service to stay running so we can inspect it: $ sudo systemctl start apt-news.service (it's sleeping) Checking process: # ps auxwZ|grep time\\.sleep ubuntu_pro_apt_news (enforce) root 1749 0.0 0.8 35296 8716 ? Ss 15:49 0:00 /usr/bin/python3 -c import time; time.sleep(500) We can see it's confined with ubuntu_pro_apt_news in enforce mode. Xenial verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057937 Title: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
Jammy verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~22.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~22.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~22.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~22.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 27.7~22.04.1 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~22.04 $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ^ii ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2.2~22.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client THe versions match. Verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
Xenial verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~16.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~16.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~16.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~16.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~16.04 $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ^ii ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2.2~16.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client The versions match. Verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
Bionic verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~18.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~18.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~18.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~18.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages 17 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~18.04 $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ^ii ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2.2~18.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client The versions match. Verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
Focal verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~20.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~20.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~20.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~20.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 20.3 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~20.04 $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ^ii ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2.2~20.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client The versions match. Verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
Mantic verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~23.10 Candidate: 31.2.2~23.10 Version table: *** 31.2.2~23.10 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 31.2~23.10 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic-updates/main amd64 Packages 29.4 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 Packages $ pro version 31.2.2~23.10 $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools|grep ^ii ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2.2~23.10 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client The versions match. Verification succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update
This is fix released in noble via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.2 (and noble has 31.2.3 already). ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058934 Title: Missing version.py update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2058934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061295] Re: No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04
Here's a log file when booting with kernel 6.5. ** Attachment added: "Kernel-6.5-boot.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061295/+attachment/5765233/+files/Kernel-6.5-boot.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061295 Title: No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061295] Re: No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04
Attaching a log file from a failed boot with kernel 6.8 with splash enabled ** Attachment added: "failedboot.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061295/+attachment/5765213/+files/failedboot.txt ** Description changed: I upgraded from 23.10 to 24.04, and with it the new 6.8 kernel. I do not see the Kubuntu EFI logo, and the system never reaches the sddm login - screen. If I boot kernel 6.5 it works as expected. + screen. I could not switch to a tty to login either. If I boot kernel + 6.5 it works as expected. If I remove "quiet splash" from the boot parameters, then kernel 6.8 also boots. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: linux-image-6.8.0-22-generic 6.8.0-22.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CRDA: N/A CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Sun Apr 14 16:08:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-16 (454 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20230115) MachineType: ASRock B650E PG Riptide WiFi ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-22-generic root=UUID=5863f9c0-ef4f-497e-81f5-12268da1003b ro RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A - linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2 + linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A + linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-13 (1 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 03/01/2024 dmi.bios.release: 5.32 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends International, LLC. dmi.bios.version: 2.08 dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: B650E PG Riptide WiFi dmi.board.vendor: ASRock dmi.board.version: Default string dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string dmi.chassis.version: Default string dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInternational,LLC.:bvr2.08:bd03/01/2024:br5.32:svnASRock:pnB650EPGRiptideWiFi:pvrDefaultstring:rvnASRock:rnB650EPGRiptideWiFi:rvrDefaultstring:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuDefaultstring: dmi.product.family: Default string dmi.product.name: B650E PG Riptide WiFi dmi.product.sku: Default string dmi.product.version: Default string dmi.sys.vendor: ASRock -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061295 Title: No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061295] [NEW] No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04
Public bug reported: I upgraded from 23.10 to 24.04, and with it the new 6.8 kernel. I do not see the Kubuntu EFI logo, and the system never reaches the sddm login screen. I could not switch to a tty to login either. If I boot kernel 6.5 it works as expected. If I remove "quiet splash" from the boot parameters, then kernel 6.8 also boots. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: linux-image-6.8.0-22-generic 6.8.0-22.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CRDA: N/A CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Sun Apr 14 16:08:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-16 (454 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20230115) MachineType: ASRock B650E PG Riptide WiFi ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-22-generic root=UUID=5863f9c0-ef4f-497e-81f5-12268da1003b ro RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-22-generic N/A linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-13 (1 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 03/01/2024 dmi.bios.release: 5.32 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends International, LLC. dmi.bios.version: 2.08 dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: B650E PG Riptide WiFi dmi.board.vendor: ASRock dmi.board.version: Default string dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string dmi.chassis.version: Default string dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInternational,LLC.:bvr2.08:bd03/01/2024:br5.32:svnASRock:pnB650EPGRiptideWiFi:pvrDefaultstring:rvnASRock:rnB650EPGRiptideWiFi:rvrDefaultstring:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuDefaultstring: dmi.product.family: Default string dmi.product.name: B650E PG Riptide WiFi dmi.product.sku: Default string dmi.product.version: Default string dmi.sys.vendor: ASRock ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061295 Title: No graphical boot with default Kubuntu 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2061295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
Are you sure the changes were uploaded? I'm having a hard time finding them in https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected
I'm surprised this wasn't caught by the DEP8 tests. Care to also perhaps add a simple smoke test, like (note it's not using ssh or any network): $ rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/os-release /tmp/ *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (34 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(231) [sender=3.2.7] ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060967 Title: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/2060967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060848] Re: minifycss fails to run in Noble
diff -Nru matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch
matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch
--- matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch 2024-04-10
18:48:17.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+Description: Fix paths of the files minify required
+Author: Sudip Mukherjee
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060848
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 2024-04-10
You could also add the debian bug to this header:
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068767
I wouldn't block the upload on this, though. But I have another
question.
Are there more fixes needed? I just quickly tried to run it with a
random css file that is in the same package, and it failed:
$ minifycss ./tests/css/sample/convert_relative_path/source/absolute.css
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class
"MatthiasMullie\PathConverter\Converter" not found in
/usr/share/php/MatthiasMullie/Minify/CSS.php:788
Stack trace:
#0 /usr/share/php/MatthiasMullie/Minify/CSS.php(339):
MatthiasMullie\Minify\CSS->getPathConverter()
#1 /usr/share/php/MatthiasMullie/Minify/Minify.php(149):
MatthiasMullie\Minify\CSS->execute()
#2 /usr/bin/minifycss(41): MatthiasMullie\Minify\Minify->minify()
#3 {main}
thrown in /usr/share/php/MatthiasMullie/Minify/CSS.php on line 788
The DEP8 tests also seems to be failing, at least locally:
$ AUTOPKGTEST_TMP=$(mktemp -d) sh debian/tests/upstream
phpab %development% - Copyright (C) 2009 - 2024 by Arne Blankerts and
Contributors
Scanning directory ./tests
Autoload file ./vendor/autoload.php generated.
Proceeding without a composer.json file.PHPUnit 9.6.17 by Sebastian
Bergmann and contributors.
Warning: Incorrect filter configuration, code coverage will not be
processed
... 63 / 343 ( 18%)
... 126 / 343 ( 36%)
..FE... 189 / 343 ( 55%)
... 252 / 343 ( 73%)
... 315 / 343 ( 91%)
343 / 343 (100%)
Time: 00:00.091, Memory: 12.00 MB
There was 1 error:
1) MatthiasMullie\Minify\Test\AbstractTest::testCache
Error: Class "MatthiasMullie\Scrapbook\Adapters\MemoryStore" not found
/tmp/tmp.w3M8gzyBuN/tests/js/AbstractTest.php:218
--
There was 1 failure:
1) MatthiasMullie\Minify\Test\AbstractTest::testLoadOpenBaseDirRestricted
open_basedir restriction caused minifier to fail
Failed asserting that 0 matches expected 512.
/tmp/tmp.w3M8gzyBuN/tests/js/AbstractTest.php:157
ERRORS!
Tests: 343, Assertions: 352, Errors: 1, Failures: 1.
** Changed in: matthiasmullie-minify (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060848
Title:
minifycss fails to run in Noble
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/matthiasmullie-minify/+bug/2060848/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060848] Re: minifycss fails to run in Noble
** Also affects: matthiasmullie-minify (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: matthiasmullie-minify (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060848 Title: minifycss fails to run in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/matthiasmullie-minify/+bug/2060848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu6 is in noble- proposed claiming to fix this bug. Comment #6 above says there is a missing patch still. In any case, doesn't look like there is anything to sponsor here, so unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
And unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
At the moment, noble-proposed has https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/1.90.3-1, uploaded a few hours ago: upower (1.90.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 1.90.3 * Drop patches, merged upstream * Bump Build-Depends on meson to (>= 0.60.0) and libglib2.0-dev to (>= 2.66) as per meson.build * Switch Build-Depends on pkg-config to pkgconf * Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0 -- Michael Biebl Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:42:45 +0200 According to https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/upower/noble/arm64 arm64 tests with that version have passed already: (...) 905s Ran 67 tests in 174.527s 905s 905s OK 905s PASS: upower/upower-integration.test 905s SUMMARY: total=1; passed=1; skipped=0; failed=0; user=11.5s; system=4.9s; maxrss=33304 906s autopkgtest [06:17:15]: test installed-tests: ---] 907s installed-tests PASS Closing bug (fix committed, since it's not yet in the release pocket). ** Changed in: upower (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056442 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056442 Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052961 Title: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/+bug/2052961/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
Till, Your changed only backported on of the two commits that fix this regression. The missing commit can be found here: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/pull/935 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git
Great! Where did you publish the changes? I would like to make sure the bug does not reproduce with the new package :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060692 Title: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2060692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060780] Re: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112
Hi, I also did some testing with 5.15.0-104-generic from proposed repository and can confirm this version works again. I urgently request you to reconsider the decision to postpone the release until the end of the month. Automatic patching/updating currently breaks several servers every day but I also don't want to leave them unpatched! Thanks, Andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060780 Title: CIFS stopped working/is unstable with kernel update to 5.15.0-102.112 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2060780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053157 Title: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2053157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056100] Please test proposed package
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056100 Title: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2056100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056100] Please test proposed package
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056100 Title: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2056100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056100] Re: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056100 Title: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2056100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056100] Re: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3
I was careful in checking that the debian/patches/status-retain- recoverable-error-exit-code.patch patch was kept for mantic and earlier, as to not reintroduce #2048522. And I know it was decided that in noble the decision is to not patch it, i.e., return 2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056100 Title: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2056100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings
This is missing the SRU template, or clarification whether the test plan of the main SRU bug at #2056100 covers this change here. Normally, called-out bugs in d/changelog need to have the SRU template filled in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053157 Title: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2053157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings
Changing jammy status to "in progress", because it's still in unapproved. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053157 Title: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2053157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x
Adding a release notes task to put a note under "known issues". ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2060217/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052642] Re: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy
This update is still missing the mantic verification, which blocks a jammy release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052642 Title: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2052642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058133] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058133 Title: [SRU] update-manager crashes when ua security-status response is an error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-livepatch-client/+bug/2058133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058133] Re: [SRU] update-manager crashes when ua security-status response is an error
Focal still has an ubuntu-release-upgrader regression on armhf. I triggered that one again. Jammy is ok. Bionic is ok, but can't be released before focal. The xenial upload is still in unapproved, probably because there is another xenial SRU going on in xenial-proposed: 1:16.04.21 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058133 Title: [SRU] update-manager crashes when ua security-status response is an error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-livepatch-client/+bug/2058133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported
> # dpkg -l crun Markus, thanks for the verification, but crun can be installed together with runc, and it's not clear which one will end up being used. That's why it's best to also make sure runc is *not* installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2056442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported
This is blocked on a mantic upload fixing the same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2056442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054621] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for php8.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054621 Title: Fix PHP crashes due to accessing dangling pointers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php8.1/+bug/2054621/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051166] Re: [SRU] lcov 2.0-1 FTBFS on Mantic
The changes file that was accepted didn't include version 0.1, which is the one that fixed this bug here. Marking it "fix released" manually, since I just released https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcov/+bug/2029924 ** Changed in: lcov (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051166 Title: [SRU] lcov 2.0-1 FTBFS on Mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcov/+bug/2051166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2029924] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for lcov has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029924 Title: [SRU] "Can't locate lcovutil.pm" after updating to 2.0-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcov/+bug/2029924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2012763] Re: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors
Hello Jeff, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.19 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763 Title: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/2012763/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2012763] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for qemu has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763 Title: qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/2012763/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
