[Bug 833891] Re: lvscan often times out during boot
So the same deadlock issue was hit again: root 1378 1 0 1031 560 0 17:28 ?00:00:00 /lib/udev/watershed sh -c /sbin/lvm vgscan; /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y root 1379 1378 0 1055 588 0 17:28 ?00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/lvm vgscan; /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y root 1381 1379 0 8719 14080 0 17:28 ?00:00:00 /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y root 1387 1 0 1031 324 0 17:28 ?00:00:00 /lib/udev/watershed sh -c /sbin/lvm vgscan; /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y There is clearly 2 incarnations of the udev rule being triggered. The vgchange command took the LVM lock and waits for some udev event: (gdb) bt #0 0x7fd37e8750f7 in semop () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x7fd37ed3863c in dm_udev_wait () from /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02.1 #2 0x00476d8b in ?? () #3 0x00477a9e in dev_manager_activate () #4 0x0042f15c in ?? () #5 0x0043069b in ?? () #6 0x004311ee in lv_activate_with_filter () #7 0x0047c5c1 in ?? () #8 0x0044e8a8 in ?? () #9 0x0044f4a6 in lock_vol () #10 0x00428103 in ?? () #11 0x00424036 in ?? () #12 0x00424ddd in process_each_vg () #13 0x0041acd9 in lvm_run_command () #14 0x0041b4d4 in lvm2_main () #15 0x7fd37e7abeff in __libc_start_main () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #16 0x0040f1a9 in _start () Apparently the udev event does not arrive, because the second rule instance also triggered vgscan/vgchange, and those cannot proceed because of the flock() taken by the first vgchange. Any views? What version of liblvm do we plan to ship in 11.10 Oneiric? (2.02.66 seems dated) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833891 Title: lvscan often times out during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/833891/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765275] Re: metadata server cannot be contacted when deploying new instances on EUC
Reinstalling fixes the issue on Maverick, but not fully tested on 11.04, which could be a different issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765275 Title: metadata server cannot be contacted when deploying new instances on EUC -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 765275] Re: metadata server cannot be contacted when deploying new instances on EUC
Reinstalling fixes the issue on Maverick, but not fully tested on 11.04, which could be a different issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765275 Title: metadata server cannot be contacted when deploying new instances on EUC -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Hi, Not sure which bug to comment, but seeing the exact same issue here with nfs-common 1:1.2.2-1ubuntu1.1 on Ubuntu 10.10. Was this bug re- introduced somehow? Setting up nfs-common (1:1.2.2-1ubuntu1.1) ... statd start/running, process 15149 start: Unknown job: gssd invoke-rc.d: initscript gssd, action restart failed. dpkg: error processing nfs-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: nfs-common sudo start gssd gives me a 'start: Unknown job: gssd' Machine is fully up2date, stock ubuntu maverick repos. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 Title: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Hi Steve, Thanks for the quick answer. /etc/init/gssd.conf is present and untouched as far as I am aware. wc -l /etc/init/gssd.conf 70 /etc/init/gssd.conf md5sum /etc/init/gssd.conf 6288ac6f6eaec52634a00d3390c87627 /etc/init/gssd.conf I use nfs V3 mounts on this machine (client) but it does not serves any nfs shares, never used nfs V4 auth mounts, and never had to edit / change any of the services related to it. This issue happened few days back on its own right. Sorry for the noise on resolved bugs, let me know if I should open something new. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 Title: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Steve, Forget it, start on and stop on were commented, removed the comments and a sudo dpkg --configure -a sorted the machine. Sorry for the noise, fix released it is ;-) Thanks again ! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 Title: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665163] Re: kernel panic with 'rejecting i/o to offline device'
I am curious to know if anything special was used when on EXT4? (specific options when mounting or did you use default options?) -- kernel panic with 'rejecting i/o to offline device' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 472057] Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
Apparently pcie_aspm=off as a kernel parameter fixes the issue. Not sure what this implies regarding PM. From : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538920#c78 Trying to reproduce here. Will report back. -- NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614274] Re: modem-manager fails to recognize 3G modem after suspend/resume
Torsten, Possibly related to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/259028 ( upstream https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594085 ) Seems we might need the usb_modeswitch udev helper to run on wake up from suspend. Hope this helps, ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #594085 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594085 -- modem-manager fails to recognize 3G modem after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614274 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 602255] [NEW] no keyboard input on plymouth SSL password prompt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upstart Steps to reproduce: Install Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, install apache and apache ssl, create a certificate for SSL, protect the certificate with a passphrase. Reboot the machine. Results: Graphical console (Plymouth) display a password entry field ... however no keyboard input make it impossible to continue boot sequence, and apache is never started. Expected results: Keyboard input works at password prompt, Apache SSL is started, boot sequence finishes normally. ** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- no keyboard input on plymouth SSL password prompt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563698] Re: Ekiga crashes during incoming and outgoing SIP calls when registered with Cisco CM
Thanks Yannick for your comments, we will be trying and reporting as indicated asap. -- Ekiga crashes during incoming and outgoing SIP calls when registered with Cisco CM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
As far as the new package containing the eucalyptus-interface jar file, this is verified, and also fixes this escalation bug (package respin). -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
As far as the new package containing the eucalyptus-interface jar file, this is verified, and also fixes this escalation bug (package respin). -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small
Agreed for Karmic. It was mainly filed to make sure we test the most common and rapid way to 'try' UEC which is to download and launch the 'default' image from the store, and run it in the default instance size. Is 192 meg a requisite for current uec lucid images? -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small
Agreed for Karmic. It was mainly filed to make sure we test the most common and rapid way to 'try' UEC which is to download and launch the 'default' image from the store, and run it in the default instance size. Is 192 meg a requisite for current uec lucid images? -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS)
Ok, Verified and confirmed fixing. I effectively get the right hostname without even a reboot. Thanks !! -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 532700] [NEW] Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI
Public bug reported: When creating users in the WebUI, there is no way to remove those users. Only an edit button, but i cluld not find any way to deactivate or remove an user. Reproducable: Always Steps: Install UEC, connect to the web management interface (https:/IP:8443/) and create many users from the users tab Try to remove users just created - no evident way to do so in the same interface. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 532700] Re: Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI
Indeed, this solves it. Thank you very much. -- Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS)
Ok, Verified and confirmed fixing. I effectively get the right hostname without even a reboot. Thanks !! -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532700] [NEW] Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI
Public bug reported: When creating users in the WebUI, there is no way to remove those users. Only an edit button, but i cluld not find any way to deactivate or remove an user. Reproducable: Always Steps: Install UEC, connect to the web management interface (https:/IP:8443/) and create many users from the users tab Try to remove users just created - no evident way to do so in the same interface. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532700] Re: Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI
Indeed, this solves it. Thank you very much. -- Cannot remove UEC/Eucalyptus users from webUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529056] Re: instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
euca-run-instances emi-DFE5107D is the command line, after sourcing the .euca/eucarc file. The entity testing is only plainly following the docs there: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/CDInstall (Specifically Chapter 7) apart that he omitted the -t c1.medium (which, funnily, does not run the default m1.small ;-) instance size) Doing this result in the instance starting and immediately terminating. Changing the config of m1.small to 3 gig disk and restarting the instance fixes the issue. If there is an overhead between filesystem sizes and storage reservation on Eucalyptus, it should be taken into account and transparent to the user. -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 529056] Re: instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
Mathias Gug wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:45:13AM -, Boris Devouge wrote: euca-run-instances emi-DFE5107D is the command line, after sourcing the .euca/eucarc file. Could add the command line used to register the image (emi-DFE5107D)? This the image from the image-proxy-store. As mentionned in our docs. The registration is automatic once the use click 'install' in the store. apart that he omitted the -t c1.medium (which, funnily, does not run the default m1.small ;-) instance size) I guess it's an issue with the default machine type used to start the instance. That is precisely the issue i am trying to highlight. There is no difunctionality at the core here, just that the image we ship in the store, epanded, is exactly 2 gb. When ran in the default machine type (where disk space is set to 2 gb), the machine fails to run. So either we need to reduce the default image size of our image shipped in the store, or take on the little overhead in the feault 'm1.small' size. Hope this clear things. -- -- Boris Devouge boris.devo...@canonical.com Sales Engineer Office: +44 (0)20 7630 2476 Canonical Mobile: +44 7809 389 874 GPG FPR: ADB9 0AE9 2451 2BAD B2C7 BB2C DB22 052A 7A37 FC75 -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 529056] Re: instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
euca-run-instances emi-DFE5107D is the command line, after sourcing the .euca/eucarc file. The entity testing is only plainly following the docs there: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/CDInstall (Specifically Chapter 7) apart that he omitted the -t c1.medium (which, funnily, does not run the default m1.small ;-) instance size) Doing this result in the instance starting and immediately terminating. Changing the config of m1.small to 3 gig disk and restarting the instance fixes the issue. If there is an overhead between filesystem sizes and storage reservation on Eucalyptus, it should be taken into account and transparent to the user. -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 529056] Re: instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
Mathias Gug wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:45:13AM -, Boris Devouge wrote: euca-run-instances emi-DFE5107D is the command line, after sourcing the .euca/eucarc file. Could add the command line used to register the image (emi-DFE5107D)? This the image from the image-proxy-store. As mentionned in our docs. The registration is automatic once the use click 'install' in the store. apart that he omitted the -t c1.medium (which, funnily, does not run the default m1.small ;-) instance size) I guess it's an issue with the default machine type used to start the instance. That is precisely the issue i am trying to highlight. There is no difunctionality at the core here, just that the image we ship in the store, epanded, is exactly 2 gb. When ran in the default machine type (where disk space is set to 2 gb), the machine fails to run. So either we need to reduce the default image size of our image shipped in the store, or take on the little overhead in the feault 'm1.small' size. Hope this clear things. -- -- Boris Devouge boris.devo...@canonical.com Sales Engineer Office: +44 (0)20 7630 2476 Canonical Mobile: +44 7809 389 874 GPG FPR: ADB9 0AE9 2451 2BAD B2C7 BB2C DB22 052A 7A37 FC75 -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529056] [NEW] instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
Public bug reported: This bug does not present a good initial experience to UEC new commers: - When running the first instance, downloading the default Ubuntu 9.10 image from the Image Proxy, and try to simply launch it with all default settings, fails to run the instance. It seems the disk reservation from the instance _needs_ to be superior to the EMI fs size. So when a emi has a fs of 2 gb, we should make a reservation for 3 gb for the instance to run, as a 2gb reservation will fail. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 529056] [NEW] instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size
Public bug reported: This bug does not present a good initial experience to UEC new commers: - When running the first instance, downloading the default Ubuntu 9.10 image from the Image Proxy, and try to simply launch it with all default settings, fails to run the instance. It seems the disk reservation from the instance _needs_ to be superior to the EMI fs size. So when a emi has a fs of 2 gb, we should make a reservation for 3 gb for the instance to run, as a 2gb reservation will fail. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Thanks Dustin. I hope to be able to get hardware for a Lucid cloud soon, in the meantime i have not reproduced it yet, but i have verified as you have that eucalyptus-interface-1.6.2.jar is indeed packaged in eucalyptus-java-common_1.6.2. As for Karmic, this is only about repackaging eucalyptus-java-common to include the eucalyptus-interface jar file, or is there more to it? Thanks ! -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Thanks Dustin. I hope to be able to get hardware for a Lucid cloud soon, in the meantime i have not reproduced it yet, but i have verified as you have that eucalyptus-interface-1.6.2.jar is indeed packaged in eucalyptus-java-common_1.6.2. As for Karmic, this is only about repackaging eucalyptus-java-common to include the eucalyptus-interface jar file, or is there more to it? Thanks ! -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524434] [NEW] Lucid Alpha 2 server iso install fails at bootloader in KVM
Public bug reported: Grub2 (grub-pc) fails when installing on a KVM virtual machine running virtio disks. The disk appears as /dev/vda and it seems the installer tries against /dev/sda and /dev/hda, fails to find the disk, and proposes to continue without a bootloader. Step to reproduce: - set up Ubuntu virtualization on a 64 bit KVM able machine (Karmic: apt-get install qemu-kvm virt-manager) - download Lucid Alpha 2 srv 64 bit iso from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid/alpha-2/ - install Lucid alpha 2 server in KVM and watch it fail over grub install I have tried grub2, legacy grub and lilo and all failed. I could not complete Lucid Alpha 2 server 64 bit install How reproducible: Always, as long as VirtIO the disk interface on the guest (disk is presented as /dev/vda) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid Alpha 2 server iso install fails at bootloader in KVM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Ubuntu-ha] Call for testing: cluster solutions for Ubuntu 10.04
Ante Karamatić wrote: Pacemaker in ubuntu-ha PPA for Lucid now support both OCFS2 and GFS2. Give it a try: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha Post to : ubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp Ante, Thank you very much for all that work. I am currently deploying 2 lucid nodes and intend to test. Hopefully will report before end of week. Cheers, -- -- Boris Devouge boris.devo...@canonical.com Sales Engineer Office: +44 (0)20 7630 2476 Canonical Mobile: +44 7809 389 874 GPG FPR: ADB9 0AE9 2451 2BAD B2C7 BB2C DB22 052A 7A37 FC75 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Bug 519513] [NEW] UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
Public bug reported: Started with a 9.10 karmic fully updated as of yesterday UEC working install, with one CLC/CC/SC and 2 NCs. I proceed as follow: - ssh in the NCs and stopped eucalyptus related services. - ssh in the CLC and did the same - updated my sources.list to lucid on all machines - ran on 3 nodes: 'sudo apt-get clean all sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade' - upgrade went well on all 3 machines, with no issues, and a 'sudo dpkg --configure -a' confirmed all was well with no output. - on reboot, UEC is not working anymore, any command in the shell time out indefinitely, a look at the logs showed eucalytus services were 'looping' as I saw several times the same thing. I am attaching the most of that log, my UEC install is logging with 'DEBUG'. There is a java null pointer error along it. Sorry for the length of that log. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
** Attachment added: euca-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38944263/euca-debug.log -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
Version info (after upgrade) = ii eucalyptus-cc1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-cloud 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-common 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-gl 1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii eucalyptus-java-common 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-sc1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii eucalyptus-walrus 1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii libeucalyptus-commons-ext-java 0.4.2-0ubuntu1 -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
As additional comment, we understand Lucid is moving target, so the importance of this bug should be well diminished as the upgrade will need retesting with final lucid release. -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
I did not thought the 'do-release-upgrade -d' method worked until we release Lucid, or does it? Do you think it could have avoided the breakage? -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 519513] [NEW] UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
Public bug reported: Started with a 9.10 karmic fully updated as of yesterday UEC working install, with one CLC/CC/SC and 2 NCs. I proceed as follow: - ssh in the NCs and stopped eucalyptus related services. - ssh in the CLC and did the same - updated my sources.list to lucid on all machines - ran on 3 nodes: 'sudo apt-get clean all sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade' - upgrade went well on all 3 machines, with no issues, and a 'sudo dpkg --configure -a' confirmed all was well with no output. - on reboot, UEC is not working anymore, any command in the shell time out indefinitely, a look at the logs showed eucalytus services were 'looping' as I saw several times the same thing. I am attaching the most of that log, my UEC install is logging with 'DEBUG'. There is a java null pointer error along it. Sorry for the length of that log. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
** Attachment added: euca-debug.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38944263/euca-debug.log -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
Version info (after upgrade) = ii eucalyptus-cc1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-cloud 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-common 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-gl 1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii eucalyptus-java-common 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-sc1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii eucalyptus-walrus 1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 ii libeucalyptus-commons-ext-java 0.4.2-0ubuntu1 -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
As additional comment, we understand Lucid is moving target, so the importance of this bug should be well diminished as the upgrade will need retesting with final lucid release. -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails
I did not thought the 'do-release-upgrade -d' method worked until we release Lucid, or does it? Do you think it could have avoided the breakage? -- UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS)
Dustin, Which version of UEC are you using? Not managed to get internal DNS working here (up2date 9.10 UEC). Cheers. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS)
Dustin, Which version of UEC are you using? Not managed to get internal DNS working here (up2date 9.10 UEC). Cheers. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data (DNS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516083] [NEW] Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Public bug reported: Please see initial issue reported here: http://open.eucalyptus.com/forum/walrus-configuration-failed-contact- server When running Walrus/S3 services of a different machine than the Cloud controller (CLC), we are missing some jar files. We seems to assume that the Walrus/S3 services are running out of the CLC by default. From the earlier referenced page: There is an issue, however, with starting standalone Eucalyptus components due to a missing file in the Ubuntu Karmic packages (we, the upstream, do not produce those packages). Try purging all eucalyptus packages, go through the steps again, then manually copy /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-interface-1.6-devel.jar from the CLC host to /usr/share/eucalyptus on the Walrus host, run stop eucalyptus and then start eucalyptus on the Walrus host. Copying the /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-interface-1.6-devel.jar to the walrus host fixes the problem. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Sorry, this is fully updated Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 as of 01 Feb 2010. -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
Thanks for all comment and explanations for the DNS services of eucalyptus, however it is not accepted/possible in all cases, and not the whole issue. There is still an issue where we do not get an full IP attributed as a hostname (which would help already assuming the uniqueness of hostnames and make things work), but only the first 3 digit, so '172' in the case as only the private IP space is visible from the instance. The main issue is that '172' seems to break many things, Jboss running RMI on http://172:8083 but also other basic networking tools... and seems to not comply with what is an allowed hostname by convention. Could we not generate an unique hostname with random bits everytime, and let people the option then to edit / have them in DNS if desired? Courtesy of Andrew Glen-Young, the following snippet of code, work around for current issue, not sure if it would help: https://pastebin.canonical.com/27281/ -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
To be clear, i understand Eucalytus has a mapping as described in the url Dan Nurmi provided, but i am trying to understand if it is the job of UEC to assign a proper hostname to its instances (even when DNS is missing), or if it sole responsibility is to launch the instances, even if they all end up with the same hostname of 172. A simple iterator as mentioned by Disconnect will be a great addition. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 516083] [NEW] Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Public bug reported: Please see initial issue reported here: http://open.eucalyptus.com/forum/walrus-configuration-failed-contact- server When running Walrus/S3 services of a different machine than the Cloud controller (CLC), we are missing some jar files. We seems to assume that the Walrus/S3 services are running out of the CLC by default. From the earlier referenced page: There is an issue, however, with starting standalone Eucalyptus components due to a missing file in the Ubuntu Karmic packages (we, the upstream, do not produce those packages). Try purging all eucalyptus packages, go through the steps again, then manually copy /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-interface-1.6-devel.jar from the CLC host to /usr/share/eucalyptus on the Walrus host, run stop eucalyptus and then start eucalyptus on the Walrus host. Copying the /usr/share/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-interface-1.6-devel.jar to the walrus host fixes the problem. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516083] Re: Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC
Sorry, this is fully updated Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 as of 01 Feb 2010. -- Missing jar file when Walrus/S3 runs on different host than CLC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
Thanks for all comment and explanations for the DNS services of eucalyptus, however it is not accepted/possible in all cases, and not the whole issue. There is still an issue where we do not get an full IP attributed as a hostname (which would help already assuming the uniqueness of hostnames and make things work), but only the first 3 digit, so '172' in the case as only the private IP space is visible from the instance. The main issue is that '172' seems to break many things, Jboss running RMI on http://172:8083 but also other basic networking tools... and seems to not comply with what is an allowed hostname by convention. Could we not generate an unique hostname with random bits everytime, and let people the option then to edit / have them in DNS if desired? Courtesy of Andrew Glen-Young, the following snippet of code, work around for current issue, not sure if it would help: https://pastebin.canonical.com/27281/ -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
To be clear, i understand Eucalytus has a mapping as described in the url Dan Nurmi provided, but i am trying to understand if it is the job of UEC to assign a proper hostname to its instances (even when DNS is missing), or if it sole responsibility is to launch the instances, even if they all end up with the same hostname of 172. A simple iterator as mentioned by Disconnect will be a great addition. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464418] Re: Official UEC image fails to boot
I am affected by this and have a 50 % failure rate (or success rate) ar running images. One out of 2 of my launched instances from my 'custom' image exhibits the same issue. -- Official UEC image fails to boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
This also badly breaks JBoss. I am not sure this is specific to Jboss, as other java app servers will also most likely grab the wrong hostname. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 464418] Re: Official UEC image fails to boot
I am affected by this and have a 50 % failure rate (or success rate) ar running images. One out of 2 of my launched instances from my 'custom' image exhibits the same issue. -- Official UEC image fails to boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
This also badly breaks JBoss. I am not sure this is specific to Jboss, as other java app servers will also most likely grab the wrong hostname. -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
As suggested, tried editing /etc/ec2-init/templates/hosts.tmpl and replacing the $hostname var with a fixed value (ubuntu), rebundling and restarted the instance still landed me in a shell: ubu...@172 -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
ubu...@172:~$ cat /etc/ec2-init/templates/hosts.tmpl 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 ubuntu # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters ff02::3 ip6-allhosts ubu...@172:~$ cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters ff02::3 ip6-allhosts ubu...@172:~$ hostname 172 ubu...@172:~$ -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
As suggested, tried editing /etc/ec2-init/templates/hosts.tmpl and replacing the $hostname var with a fixed value (ubuntu), rebundling and restarted the instance still landed me in a shell: ubu...@172 -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data
ubu...@172:~$ cat /etc/ec2-init/templates/hosts.tmpl 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 ubuntu # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters ff02::3 ip6-allhosts ubu...@172:~$ cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2 ip6-allrouters ff02::3 ip6-allhosts ubu...@172:~$ hostname 172 ubu...@172:~$ -- Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364794] Re: JAVA_HOME should be set by default to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java
But this is Java ... not really directly relating to debian packages policies, no? Majority of java apps (read enterprise software) require it to be set, and it will be nice that something like update-alternatives or some other mechanism takes care of it, or is this totally out of scope? -- JAVA_HOME should be set by default to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411542] Re: [upstream] OpenOffice.org 3.1 Impress Very Slow due to AA
It seems turning off AA makes the 'drag and drop' of slides fast and non blocking, could we please ship OO.org by default with AA turn off until we find out the real issue? It will really improve the 'initial' experience and impressions of the users. -- [upstream] OpenOffice.org 3.1 Impress Very Slow due to AA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423184] Re: [upstream] OOImpress, slides copy/paste has a wrong behavior when inserting
This bug (along with the one moving slides order in the slide sorter) makes OpenOffice very frustrating to use. This happening on amd64 / x86_64 machine, 4 gigs ram, 2 months old, running fully up2date Karmic 9.10. Happy to provide more info and test anything possible. -- [upstream] OOImpress, slides copy/paste has a wrong behavior when inserting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503036] Re: MIR for autofs5
Autofs5 was created as it originally allowed to remove a limitation of the numbers of anonymous bind against ldap one could do with autofs4. The rationale of this MIR is that majority of customers will set up autofs5 rather than 4, and that in 9.04 Jaunty we had a situation where autofs4 was in main, but autofs5 was not. This did not give a lot of confidence to customers, and the logic as to why one would be fully supported and not the other was missing. Autofs5 is definitely not experimental anymore, and is ran in production (one of our customer runs autofs5 with about 20 000 users in production). Also, if we are to look at other Enterprise distros, autofs5 will be default, and autofs4 is also packaged and installable 'just in cases. Hope this helps. -- MIR for autofs5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495410] Re: PKCS#11 signing does not work
SRU: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- PKCS#11 signing does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo'
Any news on this issue? -- NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456602] Re: libvirtError: operation failed: could not query memory balloon allocation
My experience on fully updated karmic amd64 kvm host: - an ubuntu 8.04 LTS i386 guest crashes constantly (VM simply goes *poof* and disappears after 5 to 10 minutes uptime) - 9.10 amd64 guest lives Now what is interesting relating to the 'acpi' suggested cause is: - All 2 guests have acpi/ defined in their xml definitions - Pressing the 'Shutdown' button on the 9.10 guest has no effect - Pressing the 'Shutdown' button on the 8.04 LTS guest works and shuts the VM I have the same messages in logs: libvirtd: 03:02:32.711: error : qemudDomainGetMemoryBalloon:3117 : operation failed: could not query memory balloon allocation Happy to provide more info. -- libvirtError: operation failed: could not query memory balloon allocation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 430694] Re: agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail
#63, you missed ~rtg/ dir in the second url. Thank very much, testing it now. -- agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430694] Re: agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail
on 2.6.31-12-generic #39: 5 reboots, 3 black screens after GDM login. When it works, its accelerated and fast, and displays this in the logs: [8.270350] agpgart-intel :00:00.0: Intel Mobile Intel® GM45 Express Chipset [8.272230] agpgart-intel :00:00.0: detected 32764K stolen memory [8.276255] agpgart-intel :00:00.0: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd000 Trying #32 now. -- agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430694] Re: agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail
This works for KMS here, however GDM and booting into gnome is slow, giving me an load average of 2.85 right after finishing to load gnome. in gnome glxinfo shows it is using hw rendering. and the desktop is snappy again. I cat'd the 2 files requested in one attachment. ** Attachment added: dmesg-modules.dep.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33190886/dmesg-modules.dep.txt -- agpgart-intel not loaded before drm sometimes, causes KMS to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 386268] Re: autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64
Robbie Williamson wrote: Need some clarification of the present situation. Are we, or the customer, aware of a current upstream fix for this issue? If so, could someone provide a pointer to this? Not sure about upstream autofs, however the fix the customer suggested is already in latest autofs5 on jaunty, and we have not managed specific reproduction of this issue. I have a call scheduled with the customer tomorrow at 18.00BST/10.00PST to find out more details. -- Boris Devouge boris.devo...@canonical.com Sales Engineer +44 (0)20 7630 2476 Canonical -- autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386268] [NEW] autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64
Private bug reported:
Binary package hint: autofs5
Ubuntu release: Jaunty x86_64 Server, fully up2date as of 12/06/2009
apt-cache policy autofs5
autofs5:
Installed: 5.0.3-3
Candidate: 5.0.3-3
Version table:
*** 5.0.3-3 0
500 http://ubuntu-repo.XX jaunty/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Customer has routines that run every 15 minutes to refresh the hosts
automount map entries. The routines just call /etc/init.d/autofs
reload, which can cause a core dump. This doesn't happen each and every
time, but almost.
$ sudo /etc/init.d/autofs reload
Password:
Reloading maps
$ ps -afe | grep auto
brandons 4845 4642 0 07:52 pts/100:00:00 egrep auto
$ sudo /etc/init.d/autofs start
Starting automount: done.
Customer also provided a 11Mg Core file.
Trace below:
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf949\cocoasubrtf460
{\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;}
{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;}
\margl1440\margr1440\vieww12400\viewh12440\viewkind0
\pard\tx720\tx1440\tx2160\tx2880\tx3600\tx4320\tx5040\tx5760\tx6480\tx7200\tx7920\tx8640\ql\qnatural\pardirnatural
\f0\fs24 \cf0 sudo strace -f -p 15658 \
Password:\
Process 15667 attached with 6 threads - interrupt to quit\
[pid 15660] restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ... unfinished
...\
[pid 15663] restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ... unfinished
...\
[pid 15659] restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ... unfinished
...\
[pid 15658] rt_sigtimedwait(~[CHLD CONT RTMIN RT_1], unfinished ...
\
[pid 15666] restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ... unfinished
...\
[pid 15667] restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ... unfinished
...\
[pid 15660] ... restart_syscall resumed ) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed
out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93639, \{0, 59342\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93641, \{0, 70448\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93643, \{0, 73383\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93645, \{0, 73158\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93647, \{0, 72601\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93649, \{0, 68631\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93651, \{0, 70986\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93653, \{0, 72290\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93655, \{0, 73300\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93657, \{0, 73022\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93659, \{0, 73029\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 93661, \{0, 70883\})
= -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a20, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
\
[pid 15660] futex(0x7fc2cc452a64, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE,
[Bug 386268] Re: autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64
** Attachment added: core http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27812882/core ** Visibility changed to: Private -- autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386268] Re: autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64
LDAP server is Sun One Directory Server. -- autofs5 segfaults in Jaunty x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381367] [NEW] Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty
Public bug reported:
Release: Jaunty
autofs does not seems to exit cleanly on Jaunty.
After users log on the system, /proc/mounts is not being cleared, and a
segfault is shown in the system logs:
[ 5839.284941] automount[19289]: segfault at 7fbf078cdd90 ip
7fbf078cdd90 sp 7fbf037e1118 error 4 in
libresolv-2.9.so[7fbf07d99000+14000]
The issue seems to come from this section in /etc/init.d/umountfs:
do_stop () {
exec 90 /proc/mounts
PROTECTED_MOUNTS=$(sed -n '0,/^\/[^ ]* \/ /p' /proc/mounts)
WEAK_MTPTS= # be gentle, don't use force
REG_MTPTS=
TMPFS_MTPTS=
while read DEV MTPT FSTYPE REST
do
which takes a long while to iterate over 9K+ lines.
** Affects: autofs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381367] Re: Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty
Customer has provided the following auto_master entries from LDAP (attached). Novell provided a new autofs with the following changelog that has fixed the issue: Distribution: home:cseader:autofs5 / SLE_10\ \ Changelog:\ \ * Tue Apr 14 2009 - csea...@novell.com\ - PTF for bug #410450\ +autofs-dont-kill-process-on-stop.patch\ \ * Wed Apr 01 2009 - mvanc...@suse.de\ - PTF for bug #428674\ \ ** Visibility changed to: Private ** Attachment added: auto_master entries from LDAP http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27251377/auto.projects.ldap -- Autofs does not exit cleanly in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
