[Bug 2028868] Re: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028868 Title: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2028868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071627] Re: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071627 Title: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2071627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071627] Re: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/ubuntu/+source/dash/+git/dash/+merge/468997 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071627 Title: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2071627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071627] Re: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/ubuntu/+source/dash/+git/dash/+merge/468780 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071627 Title: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2071627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071627] Re: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable
Also incorporate LP: #2028868 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071627 Title: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2071627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071627] [NEW] Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: This is a tracking bug to merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable into the current 0.5.12-6ubuntu6 package. ** Affects: dash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dash (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Tags: foundations-todo ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Also affects: dash (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071627 Title: Merge dash 0.5.12-9 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2071627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028868] Re: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/ubuntu/+source/dash/+git/dash/+merge/468432 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028868 Title: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2028868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071464] [NEW] mmdebstraps fails on armhf with multiple buffer overflow detected warnings
Public bug reported: I was trying to enable the mmdebstrap test case for the dash package (LP: #2028868). It succeeds on [amd64], [arm64], [ppc64el], [s390x] [amd64](https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/amd64/d/dash/20240627_185606_9f2ad@/log.gz) [arm64](https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/arm64/d/dash/20240627_183538_9cf78@/log.gz) [ppc64el](https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/ppc64el/d/dash/20240627_182632_04192@/log.gz) [s390x](https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/s390x/d/dash/20240627_184610_98ff0@/log.gz) , BUT fails on armhf with multiple reported "*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated" warnings, see: - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/armhf/d/dash/20240627_183306_77326@/log.gz (most likely an infra failure) - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/armhf/d/dash/20240627_190742_82242@/log.gz - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/armhf/d/dash/20240627_212834_1f0ae@/log.gz (most likely an infra failure) - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-dviererbe-dash/oracular/armhf/d/dash/20240628_001410_ed2ab@/log.gz Link to the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dash The error looks like this: ``` 2575s Setting up dpkg (1.22.6ubuntu10) ... 2575s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2591s Aborted (core dumped) 2591s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2593s Aborted (core dumped) 2593s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2595s Aborted (core dumped) 2595s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2596s Aborted (core dumped) 2596s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2598s Aborted (core dumped) 2598s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2601s Aborted (core dumped) 2601s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2603s Aborted (core dumped) 2605s dpkg: diffutils: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: 2605s diffutils depends on libc6 (>= 2.38); however: 2605s Package libc6:armhf is not installed. ... 2607s Setting up debianutils (5.19) ... 2608s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2616s Aborted (core dumped) 2618s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2637s Aborted (core dumped) 2640s *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated 2654s Aborted (core dumped) ... 2667s E: setup failed: E: env --unset=APT_CONFIG --unset=TMPDIR chroot /tmp/mmdebstrap.y7f1mgOSEZ dpkg --install --force-depends --status-fd=<$fd> /var/cache/apt/archives/gcc-14-base_14.1.0-1ubuntu1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.39-0ubuntu9_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libgcc-s1_14.1.0-1ubuntu1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mawk_1.3.4.20240123-1build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libcrypt1_1%3a4.4.36-4build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_13.1ubuntu1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libtinfo6_6.5-2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/debianutils_5.19_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/bash_5.2.21-2.1ubuntu1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libcap2_1%3a2.66-5ubuntu2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libgpg-error0_1.49-2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libgcrypt20_1.10.3-3_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblz4-1_1.9.4-2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/liblzma5_5.6.2-1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libzstd1_1.5.6+dfsg-1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libsystemd0_255.4-1ubuntu8_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/bsdutils_1%3a2.39.3-9ubuntu6_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libacl1_2.3.2-2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libattr1_1%3a2.5.2-1build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libgmp10_2%3a6.3.0+dfsg-2ubuntu6_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libpcre2-8-0_10.42-4ubuntu2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libselinux1_3.5-2ubuntu2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libssl3t64_3.0.13-0ubuntu4_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/coreutils_9.4-3ubuntu6_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libbz2-1.0_1.0.8-5.1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmd0_1.1.0-2build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/zlib1g_1%3a1.3.dfsg-3.1ubuntu2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/tar_1.35+dfsg-3build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.22.6ubuntu10_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/dash_0.5.12-6ubuntu6~ppa2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/diffutils_1%3a3.10-1build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/findutils_4.10.0-2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/grep_3.11-4build1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/gzip_1.12-1ubuntu3_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/hostname_3.23+nmu2ubuntu2_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libaudit-common_1%3a3.1.2-4_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libcap-ng0_0.8.5-1_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libaudit1_1%3a3.1.2-4_armhf.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/debconf_1.5.86ubuntu1_all.deb
[Bug 2064530] Re: Include support for .NET 8 for Ubuntu on Power
A ppc64el enabled .NET source package got uploaded for Ubuntu 24.10 (oracular) to the Ubuntu archive yesterday. See: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/8.0.105-8.0.5-0ubuntu2 We are waiting for the Launchpad team to enable the bootstrapping PPA which will trigger building the binaries. ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mateus Rodrigues de Morais (mateus-morais) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mateus Rodrigues de Morais (mateus-morais) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064530 Title: Include support for .NET 8 for Ubuntu on Power To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/2064530/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028868] Re: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive
I recently paired with bdrung on this issue. Upon inspecting what the issue was we could not reproduce the failure which lead to me disabling the testcase in the first place. Unfortunately I also did not find any specific records for the initial failure in the merge bug (LP: 2026730). We still found unused code. I opened a merge proposal to remove the code in question here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dash/-/merge_requests/25 I am also in the process of validating if the testcase works on all oracular architectures in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dash/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028868 Title: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2028868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028868] Re: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028868 Title: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2028868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028868] Re: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028868 Title: make mmdebstrap autopkgtest test-case work for ubuntu archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/2028868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069624] [NEW] Debian binary package using zstd only shows control.tar.zs
Public bug reported: When running e.g. apt-get download file file file_*.deb the output is file_1%3a5.41-3ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb: Debian binary package (format 2.0), with control.tar.zs, data compression zst with only "control.tar.zs". While ar -t file_*.deb correctly prints "control.tar.zst" Tested with file 5.41-3ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. ** Affects: file (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Debian binary package only shows control.tar.zs + Debian binary package using zstd only shows control.tar.zs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069624 Title: Debian binary package using zstd only shows control.tar.zs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/+bug/2069624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059180] Re: proposed migration dovecot vs interimap: autopkgtest failure
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059180 Title: proposed migration dovecot vs interimap: autopkgtest failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/2059180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060352] Re: Terminator cannot resize window anymore
Hi, This bug affects me as well. I've got the same versions as @aaronplusone using Xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060352 Title: Terminator cannot resize window anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/2060352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065178] [NEW] bundled libunwind is used
Public bug reported: It seems to me that dotnet7 and dotnet8 packages do not use the system libunwind library. ldd /usr/lib/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/*/libcoreclr.so /usr/lib/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/6.0.27/libcoreclr.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffce9bdc000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x7c022f3fe000) libunwind-x86_64.so.8 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind-x86_64.so.8 (0x7c022f3e2000) libunwind.so.8 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind.so.8 (0x7c022f3c6000) libstdc++.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7c022e80) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7c022eb15000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7c022e40) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7c022f437000) liblzma.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblzma.so.5 (0x7c022f392000) /usr/lib/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.16/libcoreclr.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fffb24d5000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x7320c345a000) libstdc++.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7320c280) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7320c336f000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7320c240) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7320c3493000) /usr/lib/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/8.0.2/libcoreclr.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffd91bea000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x737a5eff7000) libstdc++.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x737a5e40) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x737a5e715000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x737a5e00) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x737a5f03) Note that only 6.0.27/libcoreclr.so list the following: libunwind-x86_64.so.8 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind-x86_64.so.8 (0x7c022f3e2000) libunwind.so.8 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind.so.8 (0x7c022f3c6000) The build logs also indicate to me that the bundled version is used. [ Other ] * dotnet6 lists "libunwind-dev [amd64]" as Build-Depends, but the dotnet7 and dotnet8 packages list "libunwind-dev", (without the "[amd64]") * dotnet6 had a patch remove-libunwind-build.patch which is not present in dotnet7/dotnet8. This patch disabled the bundled libunwind build for non-arm64 architectures to use the system library. The patch needs to be adapted for .NET 7 & 8, because the project structure has changed and the patch does not apply cleanly. Additionally we now build .NET 8 for s390x and plan to build for ppc64el. So we have to look into how this could work for that platform. * A possible solution could be patching src/runtime/src/coreclr/pal/src/CMakeLists.txt to set CLR_CMAKE_USE_SYSTEM_LIBUNWIND ** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Triaged ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Triaged ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Bug watch added: github.com/canonical/dotnet-regular-tests/issues #6 https://github.com/canonical/dotnet-regular-tests/issues/6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065178 Title: bundled libunwind is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2065178/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065178] Re: bundled libunwind is used
See also https://github.com/canonical/dotnet-regular-tests/issues/6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065178 Title: bundled libunwind is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2065178/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060259] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129
All the .NET 6.0.129 builds pass on the autopkgtest cloud: jammy/amd64 [1] jammy/arm64 [2] mantic/amd64 [3] mantic/arm64 [4] Manual testing also shows no irregularities. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240419_172717_00777@/log.gz [2] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet6/20240421_053040_a1016@/log.gz [3] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240419_175143_09857@/log.gz [4] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet6/20240421_093922_fa058@/log.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060259 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2060259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060260] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118
All the .NET 7.0.118 builds pass on the autopkgtest cloud: jammy/amd64 [1] jammy/arm64 [2] mantic/amd64 [3] mantic/arm64 [4] Manual testing also shows no irregularities. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240425_142355_3abe2@/log.gz [2] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240425_194332_26b39@/log.gz [3] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240425_141909_aca25@/log.gz [4] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240425_181703_e9115@/log.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060260 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2060260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064354] Re: File manager crashes on run
> nautilus is the filemanager, it's not used to select files in other applications (that's the fileselector widget from GTK) Thanks, this confirms other applications are affected as well. Following the other bug you linked, I can confirm that (at least) GNOME settings and the system monitor are affected as well. I wonder why 535 was the most recent driver offered by "Software & Updates -> Additional Drivers". Anyway, switching to the nvidia 550 driver seems to resolve this issue for me fully. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064354 Title: File manager crashes on run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2064354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064354] Re: File manager crashes on run
It affects me as well, attaching a backtrace does not work as nautilus cannot be started to pick a file in Firefox so I have to insert it here in full length: Starting program: /usr/bin/nautilus [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread 0x7ba5a9e006c0 (LWP 18782)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a94006c0 (LWP 18783)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a8a006c0 (LWP 18784)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a3e006c0 (LWP 18786)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a34006c0 (LWP 18787)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a2a006c0 (LWP 18788)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a20006c0 (LWP 18789)] [New Thread 0x7ba5a16006c0 (LWP 18790)] ** Message: 13:46:13.407: Connecting to org.freedesktop.Tracker3.Miner.Files [New Thread 0x7ba5a0c006c0 (LWP 18791)] [New Thread 0x7ba597a006c0 (LWP 18792)] [New Thread 0x7ba5964006c0 (LWP 18806)] [New Thread 0x7ba595a006c0 (LWP 18807)] [New Thread 0x7ba5950006c0 (LWP 18808)] [New Thread 0x7ba58be006c0 (LWP 18809)] [New Thread 0x7ba58b4006c0 (LWP 18810)] [New Thread 0x7ba58aa006c0 (LWP 18811)] [Thread 0x7ba58aa006c0 (LWP 18811) exited] [Thread 0x7ba58b4006c0 (LWP 18810) exited] [Thread 0x7ba58be006c0 (LWP 18809) exited] [Thread 0x7ba5950006c0 (LWP 18808) exited] [Thread 0x7ba595a006c0 (LWP 18807) exited] [Thread 0x7ba5964006c0 (LWP 18806) exited] [Thread 0x7ba5a16006c0 (LWP 18790) exited] [Thread 0x7ba5a20006c0 (LWP 18789) exited] [Thread 0x7ba5a34006c0 (LWP 18787) exited] libEGL warning: egl: failed to create dri2 screen [New Thread 0x7ba58aa006c0 (LWP 18825)] [New Thread 0x7ba5964006c0 (LWP 18826)] [New Thread 0x7ba5950006c0 (LWP 18827)] [New Thread 0x7ba58b4006c0 (LWP 18828)] [New Thread 0x7ba595a006c0 (LWP 18829)] [New Thread 0x7ba58be006c0 (LWP 18830)] [New Thread 0x7ba565c006c0 (LWP 18831)] [New Thread 0x7ba5652006c0 (LWP 18832)] [New Thread 0x7ba5590006c0 (LWP 18833)] [New Thread 0x7ba54fe006c0 (LWP 18834)] [New Thread 0x7ba54f4006c0 (LWP 18835)] [New Thread 0x7ba54ea006c0 (LWP 18836)] [New Thread 0x7ba54e0006c0 (LWP 18837)] [New Thread 0x7ba54d6006c0 (LWP 18839)] [New Thread 0x7ba54cc006c0 (LWP 18841)] [New Thread 0x7ba53be006c0 (LWP 18842)] [New Thread 0x7ba53b4006c0 (LWP 18843)] Thread 1 "nautilus" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. Download failed: Invalid argument. Continuing without source file ./elf/./elf/dl-close.c. _dl_close (_map=0x0) at ./elf/dl-close.c:770 warning: 770./elf/dl-close.c: No such file or directory (gdb) where #0 _dl_close (_map=0x0) at ./elf/dl-close.c:770 #1 0x7ba5b0a8e51c in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7ffea44f2e80, operate=0x7ba5b0a8f750 <_dl_close>, args=0x0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #2 0x7ba5b0a8e669 in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7ffea44f2ee8, errstring=0x7ffea44f2ef0, mallocedp=0x7ffea44f2ee7, operate=, args=) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #3 0x7ba5af297c73 in _dlerror_run (operate=, args=) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #4 0x7ba5af2979a6 in __dlclose (handle=) at ./dlfcn/dlclose.c:31 #5 0x7ba570201e0d in ProducerCleanup () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-vulkan-producer.so #6 0x7ba5702020db in ProducerInit () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-vulkan-producer.so #7 0x7ba55aa1a0e2 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-glcore.so.535.171.04 #8 0x7ba55aa4442f in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-glcore.so.535.171.04 #9 0x7ba55aa6844d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-glcore.so.535.171.04 #10 0x7ba5a31b1b50 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLX_nvidia.so.0 #11 0x7ba5aed2a0da in terminator_CreateSwapchainKHR (device=0x64be52a66a50, pCreateInfo=0x64be53358d58, pAllocator=0x0, pSwapchain=0x64be53358d38) at /usr/src/vulkan-loader-1.3.275.0-1build1/loader/wsi.c:499 #12 0x7ba5668f93ac in kopper_CreateSwapchain (result=, h=, w=, cdt=0x64be53358710, screen=0x64be5282b8c0) at ../src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_kopper.c:316 #13 update_swapchain (screen=0x64be5282b8c0, cdt=0x64be53358710, w=, h=) at ../src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_kopper.c:379 #14 0x7ba5668fa66a in zink_kopper_displaytarget_create (screen=screen@entry=0x64be5282b8c0, tex_usage=, format=, width=, height=, alignment=alignment@entry=64, loader_private=, stride=) at ../src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_kopper.c:460 #15 0x7ba5668fff96 in resource_create (pscreen=0x64be5282b8c0, templ=0x7ffea44f3770, whandle=whandle@entry=0x0, modifiers=modifiers@entry=0x0, modifiers_count=modifiers_count@entry=0, loader_private=0x64be53351630, user_mem=, external_usage=0) at ../src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_resource.c:1498 #16 0x7ba5669001bd in zink_resource_create_drawable (pscreen=, templ=, loader_private=) at ../src/gallium/drivers/zink/zink_resource.c:1578 #17 0x7ba565eb9328 in kopper_allocate_textures (ctx=0x64be531146f0, drawable=, statts=, statts_count=) at ../src/gallium/frontends/dri/kopper.c:608 #18 0x7ba565eba876 in dri_st_framebuffer_validate (st=, pdrawable=, statts=0x64be533580b0,
[Bug 2060260] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118
Hello Timo (or someone else from the SRU Team), the dotnet7 (and also dotnet6) package is known to contain a .git directory. I should have put this in the SRU description. The build process gathers metadata that is required. Upstream fixed this with dotnet8. We do not want to spend time on backporting this, because .NET 7 will go EoL (upstream) in less than a month (on 14th May 2024). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060260 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2060260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2039097] Re: dotnet command suggested as coming from dotnet-host package
The python packages had a similar problem. See LP: #1867157 as a reference for how they implemented it. ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039097 Title: dotnet command suggested as coming from dotnet-host package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2039097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062374] [NEW] [Feature Request] Build dotnet-runtime-deps packages
Public bug reported:
Microsoft builds and recommends [1] building the packages `dotnet-
runtime-deps-6.0`, `dotnet-runtime-deps-7.0`, `dotnet-runtime-deps-8.0`.
These contain the dependencies needed by the .NET runtime for the
specific version.
This is useful if a developer created a self contained application that
is bundled with a runtime, because the bundled runtime still has
dependencies [2]. Having these packages improves the developer
experience, because developers do not need to install (& keep track of
changes to) runtime dependencies manually.
[Implementation details]
I already looked into how we would add these packages:
- `dotnet-runtime-deps-X.0` would just be an empty package
- `dotnet-runtime-X.0` would depend on `dotnet-runtime-deps-X.0`
- the `libicuXX` depends would move to `dotnet-runtime-deps-X.0`
- We need to capture the ${shlibs:Depends} of `dotnet-runtime-X.0` and copy it
I looked up that dh_shlibdeps generates `debian/*.substvars` where * is
the package name. The .substvars file will contain the substitution
values. Then we just need to "smartly" copy the values over from
`dotnet-runtime-X.0.substvar` into `dotnet-runtime-deps-X.0.substvar`
before calling dh_gencontrol in override_dh_gencontrol.
[1]
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/distribution-packaging#recommended-packages
[2]
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/install/linux-ubuntu-install?pivots=os-linux-ubuntu-2404=dotnet8#dependencies
** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Triaged
** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Triaged
** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062374
Title:
[Feature Request] Build dotnet-runtime-deps packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2062374/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2048926] Re: Not getting listed in dotnet --list-runtimes so facing an error missing 6.0 runtime
Setting this to invalid, based on the strong evidence that this is not related to the Ubuntu package. I will happily reopen the issue if the original reporter provides new information that suggests otherwise. ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048926 Title: Not getting listed in dotnet --list-runtimes so facing an error missing 6.0 runtime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2048926/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028242] Re: Integrate MS Smoke Tests into autopkgtests
Setting dotnet7 to "Won't Fix", because dotnet7 is near EoL and it is not worth fixing. ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028242 Title: Integrate MS Smoke Tests into autopkgtests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2028242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058746] Re: Support information in README.source is outdated
Fix was released with the March update. ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058746 Title: Support information in README.source is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2058746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060261] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104
I noticed that the binary packages aspnetcore-runtime-dbg-8.0, dotnet- runtime-dbg-8.0, dotnet-sdk-dbg-8.0 were not build on mantic and jammy. I build and tested the .NET 8 April Update in a new PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet-april-ppa5 The new PPA also contains a S390X build on noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060261 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2060261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023531] Re: [MIR] dotnet6
> For Noble forward we only want v8 IIUC, that seems fine as you need to let go of the old at some point - or will that change again later? Correct and this should™ not change in the near/medium distant future. FYI: dotnet6 and dotnet7 was removed from noble for that reason (see LP: #2044511, #2044513). Should not be relevant for the MIR, but just FYI: We will provide dotnet6 and dotnet7 for noble in a PPA, with best effort support limited to the upstream lifespan. Microsoft even wants to stops providing builds in there own PPA starting with noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023531 Title: [MIR] dotnet6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060056] Re: [MIR] dotnet8
Lukas (slyon) asked if the *-dbg-* packages are needed in main. [1] We had a long discussion in the .NET Team and would like to have these binary packages in main. These packages contain .pdb files of the runtimes/SDK/standard libraries. These allow developers to step through library/framework code and therefore contribute to a frictionless developer experience. [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/ubuntu- seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/463930/comments/1247825 ** Description changed: This is a follow up to the dotnet6 MIR (see LP: #2023531). We would like to have dotnet8 in main too, which was already discussed during the dotnet6 MIR (see comment 13 [1]). The dotnet8 package is structurally nearly identical. We do this deliberately to lower the maintenance burden. [Notable differences] * There is a single public upstream repository [2] to download all the source code from, therefore uscan can be used to produce the a orig tarball. Note: We do not use uscan, because its limitations adds overhead for our purposes (e.g. using the security repository by default, removing non-linux files, conditionaly including ms prebuilds for bootstraping, etc.). * The source package and it's binary packages have a different upstream version scheme (see spec FO127 [3]). * The source package produces additional binary packages, which include managed code debug symbols (packages with the name pattern *-dbg-8.0). See upstream issue [4] and PR [5]. * We no longer need a .git folder in the orig tarball thanks of upstream efforts. + [Other] + + The naming pattern of the *-dbg-8.0 packages is a recommendation by + upstream that we follow. See [6] + [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/comments/13 [2] https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xKaDHPC9QuxFOGjqK_oNmlurPr6mcaWMc0S-_IRE6A0/edit?usp=sharing [4] https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/issues/3621 [5] https://github.com/dotnet/installer/pull/17454 + [6] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/distribution-packaging#debug-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060056 Title: [MIR] dotnet8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2060056/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023531] Re: [MIR] dotnet6
Just FYI: Comment #13 states "[...] we would like to have all .NET packages in main. The only exception is .NET 7 in jammy that we want to keep in universe." .NET 7 will go EoL on May 14, 2024 and mantic will go EoL in July 2024. Therefore it does not make a lot of sense to MIR the dotnet7 package for mantic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023531 Title: [MIR] dotnet6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058746] Re: Support information in README.source is outdated
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058746 Title: Support information in README.source is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2058746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2032945] Re: Integrate minimal smoke-test during build-time
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Lunar) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Lunar) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032945 Title: Integrate minimal smoke-test during build-time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2032945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060259] Re: New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129
I build and tested the April Update in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet-april-ppa2 ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 + [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060259 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2060259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060261] Re: New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104
I build and tested the April Update in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet-april-ppa2 ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104 + [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060261 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2060261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060260] Re: New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118
I build and tested the April Update in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet-april-ppa2 ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 + [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060260 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2060260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060260] [NEW] New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118
Public bug reported: [Impact] * This correspond to an upcoming upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. * This update is bundled with minor fixes: - updates Canonical support information - fixes/adds version parsing edge cases [Test Case] * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- proposed. * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy on amd64 and arm64 architectures. * Autopackage tests should pass. * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases LP: #2057982, #2011809, #2024893, #2009855, #2003691, #2011675 (see Test Case section there). Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage provided by the mentioned manual test plans. [Regression Potential] * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk of something breaking. [Other] * dotnet7 was removed from the current development release. See LP: #2044513 for details. * 7.0.18 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 7.0.118 is the version number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the SDK version number. * We are only building the 7.0.1xx feature band, because this is the only feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation of feature bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only * Overview of how dotnet is versioned: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/versions/ ** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 6.0.118 + New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060260 Title: New upstream microrelease .NET 7.0.18 and SDK 7.0.118 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet7/+bug/2060260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060259] [NEW] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129
Public bug reported: [Impact] * This correspond to an upcoming upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. * This update is bundled with minor fixes: - updates Canonical support information - fixes/adds version parsing edge cases [Test Case] * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- proposed. * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy on amd64 and arm64 architectures. * Autopackage tests should pass. * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases LP: #2057699, #1996499, #1983380, #2011807 (see Test Case section there). Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage provided by the mentioned manual test plans. [Regression Potential] * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk of something breaking. [Other] * dotnet6 was removed from the current development release. See LP: #2044511 for details. * 6.0.29 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 6.0.129 is the version number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the SDK version number. * We are only building the 6.0.1xx feature band, because this is the only feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation of feature bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only * Overview of how dotnet is versioned: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/versions/ ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060259 Title: New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2060259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060259] Re: New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060259 Title: New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.29 and SDK 6.0.129 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2060259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060261] [NEW] New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104
Public bug reported: [Impact] * This correspond to an upcoming upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. * This update is bundled with minor fixes: - updates Canonical support information - fixes/adds version parsing edge cases [Test Case] * The package should build successfully in noble-proposed, mantic- proposed and jammy-proposed. * The packages should be installable on noble, mantic and jammy on amd64 and arm64 architectures. * Autopackage tests should pass. * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases LP: #2057982 (see Test Case section there). Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage provided by the mentioned manual test plans. [Regression Potential] * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk of something breaking. [Other] * 8.0.4 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 8.0.104 is the version number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the SDK version number. * We are only building the 8.0.1xx feature band, because this is the only feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation of feature bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only * Overview of how dotnet is versioned: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/versions/ ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060261 Title: New upstream microrelease .NET 8.0.4 and SDK 8.0.104 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2060261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023531] Re: [MIR] dotnet6
As discussed in the MIR meeting I created a dotnet8 MIR bug; see LP: #2060056 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023531 Title: [MIR] dotnet6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060056] [NEW] [MIR] dotnet8
Public bug reported: This is a follow up to the dotnet6 MIR (see LP: #2023531). We would like to have dotnet8 in main too, which was already discussed during the dotnet6 MIR (see comment 13 [1]). The dotnet8 package is structurally nearly identical. We do this deliberately to lower the maintenance burden. [Notable differences] * There is a single public upstream repository [2] to download all the source code from, therefore uscan can be used to produce the a orig tarball. Note: We do not use uscan, because its limitations adds overhead for our purposes (e.g. using the security repository by default, removing non-linux files, conditionaly including ms prebuilds for bootstraping, etc.). * The source package and it's binary packages have a different upstream version scheme (see spec FO127 [3]). * The source package produces additional binary packages, which include managed code debug symbols (packages with the name pattern *-dbg-8.0). See upstream issue [4] and PR [5]. * We no longer need a .git folder in the orig tarball thanks of upstream efforts. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/comments/13 [2] https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xKaDHPC9QuxFOGjqK_oNmlurPr6mcaWMc0S-_IRE6A0/edit?usp=sharing [4] https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/issues/3621 [5] https://github.com/dotnet/installer/pull/17454 ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: This is a follow up to the dotnet6 MIR (see LP: #2023531). We would like to have dotnet8 in main too, which was already discussed during the dotnet6 MIR (see comment 13 [1]). The dotnet8 package is structurally nearly identical. We do this deliberately to lower the maintenance burden. [Notable differences] * There is a single public upstream repository [2] to download all the source code from, therefore uscan can be used to produce the a orig tarball. Note: We do not use uscan, because its limitations adds overhead for our purposes (e.g. using the security repository by default, removing non-linux files, conditionaly including ms prebuilds for bootstraping, etc.). * The source package and it's binary packages have a different upstream version scheme (see spec FO127 [3]). * The source package produces additional binary packages, which include managed code debug symbols (packages with the name pattern *-dbg-8.0). See upstream issue [4] and PR [5]. + * We no longer need a .git folder in the orig tarball thanks of upstream + efforts. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/comments/13 [2] https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xKaDHPC9QuxFOGjqK_oNmlurPr6mcaWMc0S-_IRE6A0/edit?usp=sharing [4] https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/issues/3621 [5] https://github.com/dotnet/installer/pull/17454 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060056 Title: [MIR] dotnet8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2060056/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2039097] Re: dotnet command suggested as coming from dotnet-host package
** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039097 Title: dotnet command suggested as coming from dotnet-host package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2039097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046535] Re: Improve installation instruction on missing runtime
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046535 Title: Improve installation instruction on missing runtime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2046535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2044550] Re: Remove dotnet6 & dotnet7 autopkgtest dependencies in noble
Note: The new autopkgtests made this issue invalid. It was valid before. ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044550 Title: Remove dotnet6 & dotnet7 autopkgtest dependencies in noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2044550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046133] Re: Backport .NET 8 to jammy
** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046133 Title: Backport .NET 8 to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2046133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046241] Re: autopkgtest 013 is architecture specific
Note: The new autopkgtests made this issue invalid. It was valid before. ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046241 Title: autopkgtest 013 is architecture specific To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2046241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023531] Re: [MIR] dotnet6
> 17:46:03 - cpaelzer: just tests to be added, then it is good > 17:46:08 - cpaelzer: long things are finally good (See https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/11/28/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t15:46) The latest updates (LP: #2057982, #2057699) added minimal build time tests and extended the autopkgtest coverage by integrating the RedHat test suite. Therefore, the final requirement for the .NET MIR should be fulfilled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023531 Title: [MIR] dotnet6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2023531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
For some reason someone synced 0.7.0-1 and golang-github-google-go- github 60.0.0-1, so... my merge is no longer needed and this problem is solved. ** Changed in: dh-make-golang (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: dh-make-golang (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
The dotnet6 packages are handled in another SRU (see LP: #2057699). The regression reported above were caused by autopkgtest running older package versions with known to fail autopkgtests. This is one of the reason why this SRU caries autopkgtest changes. Therefore the above reported regressions can safely be ignored. dotnet8/noble fails to build because of clang defaults to version 18 in proposed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1 Mateus Rodrigues de Morais (~mateus-morais) already applied a patch to fix this in a PPA and tests pass, but we need to get this uploaded. Handling noble uploads is not part of the SRU anyway. Running autopkgtests against the other latests packages passes: 7.0.117-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/amd64: [1] 7.0.117-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/arm64: [2] 7.0.117-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/amd64: [3] 7.0.117-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/arm64: [4] 8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/amd64: [5] 8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/arm64: [6] 8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/amd64:[7] 8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/arm64:[8] [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240327_005240_f5428@/log.gz [2] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240327_015841_0299a@/log.gz [3] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240327_005627_40d31@/log.gz [4] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240327_030204_8a006@/log.gz [5] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet8/20240327_012456_95865@/log.gz [6] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet8/20240327_014048_5d7ca@/log.gz [7] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet8/20240327_013827_7ed88@/log.gz [8] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet8/20240327_025047_e55ac@/log.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
The regression reported above were caused by autopkgtest running older package versions with known to fail autopkgtests. This is one of the reason why this SRU caries autopkgtest changes. Therefore the above reported regressions can safely be ignored. Running autopkgtests against the new packages passes: * 6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/amd64: [1] * 6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 jammy/arm64: [2] * 6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/amd64: [3] * 6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 mantic/arm64: [4] [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240327_004441_196db@/log.gz [2] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet6/20240327_020912_3f637@/log.gz [3] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240327_005258_533e7@/log.gz [4] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet6/20240327_120126_9732e@/log.gz ** Tags removed: block-proposed-jammy block-proposed-mantic verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
+1 maintenance report
Hello everyone, I was on +1 maintenance this week (week 12 – 2024) and worked on the following issues: FTBFS = * [lbcd] blocked migration from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4 (LP: #2058410) - FTBFS on amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x due to failing build time tests. - Disabling lto solved the failing build time test. - Reported bug upstream: [1] - Debian merge request: [2] * [dh-make-golang] blocked migration from 0.6.0-2 to 0.6.0-2build1 (LP: #2046369) - FTBFS on amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x - New upstream release (0.7.0-1) fixes issue; requires [golang-github-google-go-github] 60.0.0-1 from debian unstable. - Got a succeeding build in a PPA (with proposed enabled) [3], but some reverse build depends of [golang-github-google-go-github] FTBFS. - Backported changes from 0.7.0-1 in a PPA (with proposed enabled) [4] that fix the FTBFS; see also the merge proposal [5] - Debian merge request to disable lto: [6] Retries === * [numpy] blocked migration from 1:1.24.2-2 to 1:1.24.2-3ubuntu1 - re-triggered [bottleneck] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [fiat] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [iminuit] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [lerc] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [netgen] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [optuna] (ppc64el) => SKIPPED - re-triggered [python-mapbox-earcut] (ppc64el) => PASSED * [usb.ids] blocked migration from 2024.01.30-1 to 2024.03.18-1 - re-triggered [fusioninventory-agent] (ppc64el, s390x) => FAILED * [apparmor] blocked migration from 4.0.0~alpha4-0ubuntu1 to 4.0.0-beta3-0ubuntu2 - re-triggered [dbus] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [rsyslog] (ppc64el) => PASSED * [openbsd-inetd] blocked migration from 0.20221205-3 to 0.20221205-3build2 - re-triggered [csync2] (ppc64el) => PASSED * [python3.11] blocked migration from 3.11.8-1 to 3.11.8-1build4 - re-triggered [ros-ros-comm] (ppc64el) => PASSED - re-triggered [hamlib] (ppc64el) => PASSED * [openjpeg2] blocked migration from 2.5.0-2 to 2.5.0-2build2 - re-triggered [libreoffice] (ppc64el) => PASSED I was distracted by fixing issues related to .NET SRUs. Therefore, unfortunately I did not get any more done :/ [1] https://github.com/rra/lbcd/issues/1 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lbcd/-/merge_requests/1 [3] https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lp2046369/+packages [4] https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lp2046369-ppa2/+packages [5] https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+git/dh-make-golang/+merge/463019 [6] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/dh-make-golang/-/merge_requests/5 [apparmor] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor [bottleneck] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bottleneck [csync2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/csync2 [dbus] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/dbus [dh-make-golang] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang [fiat] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fiat [golang-github-google-go-github] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-google-go-github [hamlib] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/hamlib [iminuit] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/iminuit [lbcd] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd [lerc] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/lerc [netgen] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/netgen [numpy] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numpy [openbsd-inetd] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbsd-inetd [openjpeg2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2 [optuna] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/optuna [python3.11] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.11 [python-mapbox-earcut] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/python-mapbox-earcut [ros-ros-comm] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/ros-ros-comm [rsyslog] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/rsyslog [usb.ids] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb.ids Best regards, Dominik -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
Rebuilding bettercap, distrobuilder, golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix- go against golang-github-google-go-github (60.0.0-1) resulted in build failures :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
$ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:golang-github-google-go-github Reverse-Build-Depends = * bettercap (for golang-github-google-go-github-dev) * dh-make-golang(for golang-github-google-go-github-dev) * distrobuilder (for golang-github-google-go-github-dev) * golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go * golang-github-zitadel-oidc(for golang-github-google-go-github-dev) $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:bettercap No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:dh-make-golang No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:distrobuilder No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:golang-github-weppos-publicsuffix-go No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:golang-github-zitadel-oidc Reverse-Build-Depends = * incus (for golang-github-zitadel-oidc-dev) $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:incus Reverse-Build-Depends = * distrobuilder (for golang-github-lxc-incus-dev) $ reverse-depends --release noble --arch=source src:dh-make-golang No reverse dependencies found Note: I have the feeling that the reverse-depends output for src:dh- make-golang is just empty, because packages buikld depend on the Provides: dh-sequence-golang :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
** Changed in: dh-make-golang (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
I got a passing build of dh-make-golang - 0.7.0-1 with golang-github- google-go-github 60.0.0-1. See [1]. Actions to take: 1. Sync golang-github-google-go-github 60.0.0-1 from debian unstable 2. Sync dh-make-golang - 0.7.0-1 from debian unstable [1] https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lp2046369/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
This is not a real regression. The autopkgtest cloud was running older package versions that do miss fixes for the autopkgtest suite. Therefore the failure is to be expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058766] Re: .NET 8 fails to build with clang 18
We will temporarily revert to glibc-17 and fix the issue with future upstream releases. Rationale: We want to Bootstrap .NET for S390X before 24.04 GA, but the 24.04 Beta and Release Candidate dates are getting closer and Archive Admins get progressively busier. Therefore, a working .NET version has currently higher priority than fixing this issue. ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058766 Title: .NET 8 fails to build with clang 18 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2058766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058766] [NEW] .NET 8 fails to build with clang 18
Public bug reported: .NET 8 (8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1) fails to build on noble in -proposed. The reason for this is that llvm-defaults switched to version 18, see [1]. Upstream Issue: [2] [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-defaults/0.59~exp1 [2] https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/99825 ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Tags: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058766 Title: .NET 8 fails to build with clang 18 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+bug/2058766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058746] [NEW] Support information in README.source is outdated
Public bug reported: The debian/README.source file still contains the old Ubuntu support policy, which is outdated. ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058746 Title: Support information in README.source is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2058746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058732] [NEW] Manpages don't mention that dpkg-genchanges generates Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed field
Public bug reported: The dpkg-genchanges(1) [1] does not mention that a Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed field is generated if the -v flag is specified. https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/noble/en/man1/dpkg- genchanges.1.html ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058732 Title: Manpages don't mention that dpkg-genchanges generates Launchpad-Bugs- Fixed field To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2058732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
** Summary changed: - Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? + [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: [SRU] Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046369] Re: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source
I am currently looking into this on my +1 shift. I already tried to disable lto, because of the warning: > dh_auto_build: warning: LTO optimize is enable in buildflags. But cgo doesn't > support it. LTO flags will > be stripped in cgo. Unfortunately this did not solve it and I have no experience with go, so I may have to ask @zhsj what could cause the error: cannot find package "golang.org/x/tools/go/vcs" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046369 Title: dh-make-golang 0.6.0-2 fails to build from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-make-golang/+bug/2046369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058410] Re: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4
Upstream Bug: https://github.com/rra/lbcd/issues/1 Note: Upstream project is no longer maintained. ** Bug watch added: github.com/rra/lbcd/issues #1 https://github.com/rra/lbcd/issues/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058410 Title: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd/+bug/2058410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058410] Re: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4
> You should also consider forwarding the patch to Debian My rationale was that debian does not enable lto and therefore does not need that change. > and raising the LTO issue with the upstream project I will do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058410 Title: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd/+bug/2058410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058410] Re: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4
Don't ask me why, but disabling lto (link time optimization) solves the failure. Passing build in a PPA [1]. Download source package: $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lbcd/+sourcefiles/lbcd/3.5.2-4ubuntu1~ppa1/lbcd_3.5.2-4ubuntu1~ppa1.dsc [1] https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lbcd ** Changed in: lbcd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: lbcd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058410 Title: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd/+bug/2058410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058410] [NEW] lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4
Public bug reported: The build failure is caused by a failing build time test. The failing assertion is at tests/util/network/server-t.c:482 [1]. [1] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd/tree/tests/util/network/server-t.c?h=applied/3.5.2-4=4d9a1643b4f82b247fe4b5ffc287dc044014a2a0#n482 ** Affects: lbcd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058410 Title: lbcd fails to migrate from 3.5.2-3 to 3.5.2-4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbcd/+bug/2058410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * This fix improves the .NET developer experience with Ubuntu container + images. + + * This update is bundled with quality assurance improvements. +See section other for more details. + + [Test Case] + + * The packages should build successfully in the -proposed pocket of + their target release & architecture. + + * The packages should be installable on their target release & + architechture. + + * Autopkgtests should pass. + + * The usual manual tests that have been seen in previous microreleases +LP: #1996499, #1983380, #2011807 (see Test Case section there). + +Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, + because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage + provided by the mentioned manual test plans. + + [Regression Potential] + + * Minimal, because this update just adds a dependency on ca-certificate + (which is widely used anyway) and increases the test coverage, but there + is always a risk of breaking something. + + [Other] + + * The dotnet6 packages SRU are handled by another SRU (currently in progress). +See LP: #2057699 + + * The quality assurance improvements include: +- Adding build time smoke test that fail the build if fundamental flaws + of the build artifacts are detected. +- Using the RedHat test suite which significantly increases the test coverage. + + * dotnet7 were removed from noble. +See LP: #2044511 for details. + + * Original Bug Report: + I was doing some (very basic) testing on Jammy. I didn't get the behavior I was expecting. I installed `ca-certificates` and the problem was resolved. I'm wondering if we're just missing having `ca- certificates` as a dependency. Observed behavior: https://gist.github.com/richlander/27c03db34b3f06fd044c611562def589 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058354] [NEW] Enabling FIPS breaks password hashing
Public bug reported:
We are running x11vnc 0.9.16-8 on a FIPS enabled Ubuntu 22.04 with
libvncserver1 0.9.13+dfsg-3build2 and libssl3 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1.
With the fips=1 kernel parameter enabling FIPS, it seems that the
password hashing is broken and only a clear text password is written:
$ cat /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled
1
$ x11vnc -storepasswd Abc /tmp/.testpw && cat /tmp/.testpw
stored passwd in file: /tmp/.testpw
Abc
Any connection attempt fails with a 'password check failed!' error.
Running x11vnc with
sudo /usr/bin/x11vnc -auth guess -forever -localhost -loop -noxdamage
-repeat -rfbauth /root/.vncpasswd -rfbport 5900 -shared
logs the following:
Got connection from client 127.0.0.1
0 other clients
Normal socket connection
check_access: client 127.0.0.1 matches host 127.0.0.1
incr accepted_client=1 for 127.0.0.1:54968 sock=10
Client Protocol Version 3.8
Protocol version sent 3.8, using 3.8
rfbProcessClientSecurityType: executing handler for type 2
Couldn't read password file: /root/.vncpasswd
rfbAuthProcessClientMessage: password check failed
rfbClientSendString("password check failed!")
client_count: 0
Client 127.0.0.1 gone
By turning off FIPS with fips=0 in the kernel, it works as expected:
$ cat /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled
0
$ x11vnc -storepasswd Abc /tmp/.testpw && cat /tmp/.testpw
stored passwd in file: /tmp/.testpw
�97l܊
** Affects: x11vnc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058354
Title:
Enabling FIPS breaks password hashing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11vnc/+bug/2058354/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
.NET 6 == PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128-ppa5 Mantic -- [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128-ppa5/+sourcefiles/dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa/dotnet6_6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-dviererbe-dotnet6-0-128-ppa5/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240319_040337_effa4@/log.gz - arm64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-dviererbe-dotnet6-0-128-ppa5/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet6/20240319_074127_d35da@/log.gz Jammy - [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128-ppa5/+sourcefiles/dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa/dotnet6_6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-dviererbe-dotnet6-0-128-ppa5/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet6/20240319_035721_f9088@/log.gz - arm64: waiting for build .NET 7 == PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3 Mantic -- [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/+sourcefiles/dotnet7/7.0.117-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa/dotnet7_7.0.117-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-dviererbe-7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240319_030315_d5d92@/log.gz - arm64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-dviererbe-7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/mantic/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240319_005057_9a5ea@/log.gz Jammy - [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/+sourcefiles/dotnet7/7.0.117-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa/dotnet7_7.0.117-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-dviererbe-7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet7/20240319_025559_451cf@/log.gz - arm64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-dviererbe-7.0.117-7.0.17-ppa3/jammy/arm64/d/dotnet7/20240319_014502_cc889@/log.gz .NET 8 == PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa5 Mantic -- [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa5/+sourcefiles/dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa/dotnet8_8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-dviererbe-8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa5/mantic/amd64/d/dotnet8/20240319_072708_e25b9@/log.gz - arm64: waiting Jammy - [download] $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa5/+sourcefiles/dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa/dotnet8_8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.2~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-dviererbe-8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa5/jammy/amd64/d/dotnet8/20240319_075425_0f6e6@/log.gz - arm64: waiting Noble - PPA: https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa6 [download} $ dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa6/+sourcefiles/dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~ppa/dotnet8_8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu1~ppa.dsc [autopkgtest] - amd64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-dviererbe-8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa6/noble/amd64/d/dotnet8/20240319_083738_6@/log.gz - arm64: pass logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-dviererbe-8.0.103-8.0.3-ppa6/noble/arm64/d/dotnet8/20240319_032720_e0776@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy block-proposed-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
I just confirmed LP: #2057982 which affects this SRU, because I would like to include the fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057982] Re: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing?
I replicated this with ubuntu:jammy and ubuntu:mantic also with dotnet8. CLI interactions like `dotnet new global.json --search` are also affected by this, even without installing a second SDK. I think we did not encounter this issue so far, because our test infrastructure installs ubuntu-minimal which installs ca-certificates. The impact should be limited to docker images which do not ship with ubuntu-minimal. I will prepare a bug fix, that adds ca-certificates to dotnet-sdk-6.0, dotnet-sdk-7.0 and dotnet-sdk-8.0. Still I do not fully understand why the restore action only fails when restoring projects with a lower SDK version :/ ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Noble) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet7 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057982 Title: Is a ca-certificates dependency missing? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
** Description changed: [Impact] - * This correspond to an upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday + * This correspond to an upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). See: https://github.com/dotnet/source- build/discussions/4211 - * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the + * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. + + * This update is bundled with quality assurance improvements. +See section other for more details. [Test Case] - * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- + * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- proposed. - * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy on amd64 and - arm64 architectures. + * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy +on amd64 and arm64architectures. - * Autopackage tests should pass. (Note: this release coincides with - enhanced autopkgtests ) + * Autopackage tests should pass. - * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases [1] [2] [3] (see Test Case section there). -Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, because the autopkgtests nowadays cover a broad set of scenarios, that far exceeds the mentioned manual test plans. + * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases +LP: #1996499, #1983380, #2011807 (see Test Case section there). + + + Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, + because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage + provided by the mentioned manual test plans. [Regression Potential] - * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk + * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk of something breaking. [Other] - * 6.0.28 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 6.0.128 is the - version number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the - SDK version number. + * The quality assurance improvements include: + - Adding build time smoke test that fail the build if fundamental flaws + of the build artifacts are detected. + - Using the RedHat test suite which significantly increases the test coverage. - Although the dotnet SDK 6.0.115 is part of the dotnet 6.0.15 release we - refer to the release as 6.0.115, because source build only supports the - 6.0.1xx feature band. (See https://github.com/dotnet/source- - build#support) + * dotnet6 was removed from the current development release. + See LP: #2044511 for details. - * We are only building the 6.0.1xx feature band, because this is the - only feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation - of feature bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- - us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only + * 6.0.28 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 6.0.128 is the version + number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the SDK version + number. + + * We are only building the 6.0.1xx feature band, because this is the only + feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation of feature + bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only * Overview of how dotnet is versioned: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/versions/ - - [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1996499 - [2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1983380 - [3] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011807 ** Description changed: [Impact] - * This correspond to an upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday - microrelease). See: https://github.com/dotnet/source- - build/discussions/4211 + * This correspond to an upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). +See: https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/discussions/4211 * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. - * This update is bundled with quality assurance improvements. -See section other for more details. + * This update is bundled with quality assurance improvements. + See section other for more details. [Test Case] * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- proposed. * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy -on amd64 and arm64architectures. + on amd64 and arm64architectures. * Autopackage tests should pass. * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases -LP: #1996499, #1983380, #2011807 (see Test Case section there). - + LP: #1996499, #1983380, #2011807 (see Test Case section there). Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, - because the autopkgtests improvements far exceeds the coverage - provided by the mentioned manual test plans. +
[Bug 2057699] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
Both build fine in a PPA https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128. Autopkgtest pass locally, but fail in the autopkgtest cloud, because they run out of disk space. I opened a merge proposal to add dotnet to big_packages: https://code.launchpad.net/~dviererbe/autopkgtest- cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/+merge/462296 To get the source packages: dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.1: dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128/+sourcefiles/dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.1/dotnet6_6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.1.dsc dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.1: dget https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/dotnet6-0-128/+sourcefiles/dotnet6/6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.1/dotnet6_6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057699] [NEW] [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128
Public bug reported: [Impact] * This correspond to an upstream microrelease (Microsoft Patch Tuesday microrelease). See: https://github.com/dotnet/source- build/discussions/4211 * It is beneficial for our latest LTS users to have access to the latest .NET stack. [Test Case] * The package should build successfully in mantic-proposed and jammy- proposed. * The packages should be installable on mantic and jammy on amd64 and arm64 architectures. * Autopackage tests should pass. (Note: this release coincides with enhanced autopkgtests ) * The usual manual tests that have been seen in the previous microreleases [1] [2] [3] (see Test Case section there). Note: The need for manual testing is largely reduced since the last SRU, because the autopkgtests nowadays cover a broad set of scenarios, that far exceeds the mentioned manual test plans. [Regression Potential] * Upstream tests are usually satisfactory, but there is always a risk of something breaking. [Other] * 6.0.28 is the version number of the .NET Runtime and 6.0.128 is the version number of the .NET SDK. The package version only refers to the SDK version number. Although the dotnet SDK 6.0.115 is part of the dotnet 6.0.15 release we refer to the release as 6.0.115, because source build only supports the 6.0.1xx feature band. (See https://github.com/dotnet/source- build#support) * We are only building the 6.0.1xx feature band, because this is the only feature band that allows to be build from source. See explanation of feature bands: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/releases-and-support#feature-bands-sdk-only * Overview of how dotnet is versioned: https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/dotnet/core/versions/ [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1996499 [2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1983380 [3] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011807 ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominik Viererbe (dviererbe) ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: dotnet6 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057699 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.28 and SDK 6.0.128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet6/+bug/2057699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: dotnet-templates-8.0 broken by dotnet-host-8.0
Hello André, thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to improve Ubuntu and .NET. To help us with investigating what exactly went wrong and replicating this issue could you report a bug ticket with $ apport-bug dotnet8 (note: this will collect information about you system which may help us diagnosing the issue; alternatively create a bug ticket with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+filebug) and further elaborate on what you were doing (or trying to do) when you got the message? > dotnet-templates-8.0 (8.0.102-0ubuntu1 noble) broken by dotnet-host-8.0 > (8.0.2-0ubuntu1 noble ) Best regards, Dominik -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: dotnet-templates-8.0 broken by dotnet-host-8.0
Hello André, thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to improve Ubuntu and .NET. To help us with investigating what exactly went wrong and replicating this issue could you report a bug ticket with $ apport-bug dotnet8 (note: this will collect information about you system which may help us diagnosing the issue; alternatively create a bug ticket with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotnet8/+filebug) and further elaborate on what you were doing (or trying to do) when you got the message? > dotnet-templates-8.0 (8.0.102-0ubuntu1 noble) broken by dotnet-host-8.0 > (8.0.2-0ubuntu1 noble ) Best regards, Dominik -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[Bug 1824530] Re: Heap Buffer Overflow in UzpPassword
I just looked in the wrong place (thanks ~juliank). The patch is also present in all supported Versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824530 Title: Heap Buffer Overflow in UzpPassword To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unzip/+bug/1824530/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1824530] Re: Heap Buffer Overflow in UzpPassword
The patch for this bug is present in the unzip package for focal, jammy, kinetic, lunar, mantic. The patch for this bug is NOT present in the unzip package for trusty, xenial, bionic. bionic reaches end of standard support this month, so we should set this to won't fix. BUT bionic is in extended security maintenance until April 2028 xenial is in extended security maintenance until April 2026 trusty is in extended security maintenance until April 2024 Because this is related to a CVE this should be covered by ESM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824530 Title: Heap Buffer Overflow in UzpPassword To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unzip/+bug/1824530/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
gemmi-dev package third-party files
Greetings, I would like to ask if it would be possible to add a dependency library to the *gemmi-dev* Ubuntu package (https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/gemmi-dev ). The library in question is *stb_sprintf.h* which is in the official Gemmi Github repo ( https://github.com/project-gemmi/gemmi/blob/master/include/gemmi/third_party/stb_sprintf.h). This library is required in this header file: https://github.com/project-gemmi/gemmi/blob/3dee76918187f1a0680d654d5805a846d52e4720/include/gemmi/sprintf.hpp#L16-L27 . Kind regards, Dominik Tichy -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
[Bug 1970957] Re: suspend problem
Guys, can you resume your session by using the Ctrl+Alt+Fn key combo? E.g.: I have a similar problem where Ubuntu cannot resume from lock screen / dim screen. On screen lock the screen goes dark and then the monitor powers off. In this state mouse movements or key presses won't bring the lock screen back. To resume I have to use Ctrl+Alt+F1 and wait for the login screen to appear. Then I use Ctrl+Alt+F2 to switch back to the previous session, however I also have to move the mouse to bring back the lock screen. Only then I'm able to login again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970957 Title: suspend problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1970957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842320] Re: Out of Memory on boot with 5.2.0 kernel
Exactly the same problem with GRUB occurs on LG Gram 14 (2021) with Ubuntu 22.04. In my case it means that after upgrading Ubuntu from 21.10 to 22.04, GRUB no longer boots, showing "error: out of memory.". I had to boot another OS from USB which is not Ubuntu 22.04, because live image have the same problem. I`ve used the image of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. CSM/UEFI and Secure boot enabled/disable - tried all and thats not related to this in any case. After chrooting and regenerating GRUB with GFXMODE set to 800x600, I could finally reach the stage of loading kernel and decrypting the disk. :) It still not booting due to another problems, but thats another case, not related to this problem. The real problem is that I cannot perform clean installation due to not booting USB live image of Ubuntu 22.04 with "error: out of memory.". For now I've tried to repack squashfs with GFXMODE=800x600 change applied and write that to USB stick, but for now without luck (still the same error) which is strange, because it helped in already installed Ubuntu 22.04. Maybe I missed something - I will dig into this later and let you know. I'm gonna also try @ybdjkfd fix. Also, its a little bit frustrating, because if something happens in the future with OS on my PC storage and it stops working, I can't revive it with USB stick with latest Ubuntu, because it's also not working. :) Keeping additional old OS versions on pendrives or specially prepared (with repacked squashfs) is not an ideal solution when sometimes "on the go" you just need to download the ISO. It generates unnecessary extra work, mounting/chrooting and systems juggling, so thats a real problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842320 Title: Out of Memory on boot with 5.2.0 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1842320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970585] Re: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped
Oh, I did just see the explanation in the postinst and templates file: Template: openssh-server/permit-root-login Type: boolean Default: true Description: Disable SSH password authentication for root? ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970585 Title: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1970585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970585] Re: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped
** Description changed: In the config script of openssh-server, the debconf database is updated with the values that are read from sshd_config. But if I'm not mistaken the yes/no logic is flipped: if [ "$permit_root_login" = yes ]; then - db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login false + db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login false else - db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login true + db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login true fi Discovered this in openssh-server 7.6p1-4ubuntu0.5 on Ubuntu 18.04.5 - LTS. Checked that this still unchcanged in 8.9p1-3 on jammy. + LTS. Checked that this is still unchcanged in 8.9p1-3 on jammy. I marked this a vulnerability as this might lead to unintended flipped settings of permitting root to log in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970585 Title: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1970585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1970585] Re: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Description changed: In the config script of openssh-server, the debconf database is updated with the values that are read from sshd_config. But if I'm not mistaken the yes/no logic is flipped: if [ "$permit_root_login" = yes ]; then - db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login false + db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login false else - db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login true + db_set openssh-server/permit-root-login true fi Discovered this in openssh-server 7.6p1-4ubuntu0.5 on Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS. Checked that this still unchcanged in 8.9p1-3 on jammy. - I marked this a vulnerability as this might lead to unintend flipped + I marked this a vulnerability as this might lead to unintended flipped settings of permitting root to log in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970585 Title: Logic for PermitRootLogin in config script is flipped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1970585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965466] [NEW] [DEFENDER P10, Realtek ALC293, Mic, Internal] No sound at all
Public bug reported: auto-generated ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-22.22-generic 5.15.19 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mdb2244 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: mdb2244 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Mar 18 02:51:06 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-10 (1193 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaRecordingTest: ALSA recording test through plughw:PCH successful Symptom_Card: Eingebautes Tongerät - HDA Intel PCH Symptom_DevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mdb2244 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: mdb2244 F pulseaudio Symptom_Jack: Mic, Internal Symptom_PulseAudioRecordingTest: PulseAudio recording test through plughw:PCH successful Symptom_Type: No sound at all Title: [DEFENDER P10, Realtek ALC293, Mic, Internal] No sound at all UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/29/2020 dmi.bios.release: 7.5 dmi.bios.vendor: INSYDE Corp. dmi.bios.version: 1.07.05RME1 dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: NH77Dx dmi.board.vendor: MEDION dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: MEDION dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.ec.firmware.release: 7.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnINSYDECorp.:bvr1.07.05RME1:bd08/29/2020:br7.5:efr7.1:svnMEDION:pnDEFENDERP10:pvrNotApplicable:rvnMEDION:rnNH77Dx:rvrNotApplicable:cvnMEDION:ct10:cvrN/A:skuML-21000930028862: dmi.product.family: Erazer dmi.product.name: DEFENDER P10 dmi.product.sku: ML-210009 30028862 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: MEDION ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965466 Title: [DEFENDER P10, Realtek ALC293, Mic, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1965466/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962626] Re: tracker-miner-fs-3 crashed with SIGABRT
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1962495 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962495 might affect bugs: 1955758 1962495 1962623 1962624 1962626 1962630 1962633 I will add this text to all open bugs. affected parts: tracker-miner-fs-3 totem gvfsd-mtp udisksd background information: - installed 18.04 lts - dist-upgraded to 20.04 lts - back up before sending hardware for repair, got replacement hardware (with default rubbish) - restore on replaced hardware with -- modified filesystem (btrfs, dont remember previously used fs) and -- full-disk encryption (multiple luks2 partitions instead of home-only) - noticed that integrating grub-2.06 correctly (building package etc) would be too much effort - downgraded luks-headers from luks2 to luks1 to make it compatible with grub used in 20.04 - added grub-setup script to include cryptmount grub module etc. - got btrfs kernel warnings regularly - dist-upgraded to 22.04 lts (beta, late January) - still btrfs kernel warnings regularly [- many updates since, as to be expected.] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962626 Title: tracker-miner-fs-3 crashed with SIGABRT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tracker-miners/+bug/1962626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962624] Re: udisksd assert failure: malloc_consolidate(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1955758 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955758 might affect bugs: 1955758 1962495 1962623 1962624 1962626 1962630 1962633 I will add this text to all open bugs. affected parts: tracker-miner-fs-3 totem gvfsd-mtp udisksd background information: - installed 18.04 lts - dist-upgraded to 20.04 lts - back up before sending hardware for repair, got replacement hardware (with default rubbish) - restore on replaced hardware with -- modified filesystem (btrfs, dont remember previously used fs) and -- full-disk encryption (multiple luks2 partitions instead of home-only) - noticed that integrating grub-2.06 correctly (building package etc) would be too much effort - downgraded luks-headers from luks2 to luks1 to make it compatible with grub used in 20.04 - added grub-setup script to include cryptmount grub module etc. - got btrfs kernel warnings regularly - dist-upgraded to 22.04 lts (beta, late January) - still btrfs kernel warnings regularly [- many updates since, as to be expected.] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962624 Title: udisksd assert failure: malloc_consolidate(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/1962624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1962633] Re: tracker-miner-fs-3 crashed with SIGABRT
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1962495 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962495 might affect bugs: 1955758 1962495 1962623 1962624 1962626 1962630 1962633 I will add this text to all open bugs. affected parts: tracker-miner-fs-3 totem gvfsd-mtp udisksd background information: - installed 18.04 lts - dist-upgraded to 20.04 lts - back up before sending hardware for repair, got replacement hardware (with default rubbish) - restore on replaced hardware with -- modified filesystem (btrfs, dont remember previously used fs) and -- full-disk encryption (multiple luks2 partitions instead of home-only) - noticed that integrating grub-2.06 correctly (building package etc) would be too much effort - downgraded luks-headers from luks2 to luks1 to make it compatible with grub used in 20.04 - added grub-setup script to include cryptmount grub module etc. - got btrfs kernel warnings regularly - dist-upgraded to 22.04 lts (beta, late January) - still btrfs kernel warnings regularly [- many updates since, as to be expected.] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962633 Title: tracker-miner-fs-3 crashed with SIGABRT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tracker-miners/+bug/1962633/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953218] [NEW] package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: just updating regularily with do-release-upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-91.102-generic 5.4.151 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-91-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Sat Dec 4 10:17:14 2021 ErrorMessage: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 Logs.var.log.daemon.log: MySQLConf.etc.mysql.conf.d.mysql.cnf: [mysql] MySQLConf.etc.mysql.conf.d.mysqldump.cnf: [mysqldump] quick quote-names max_allowed_packet = 16M MySQLConf.etc.mysql.my.cnf: Error: [Errno 40] Too many levels of symbolic links: '/etc/mysql/my.cnf' MySQLConf.etc.mysql.mysql.conf.d.mysqld_safe_syslog.cnf: [mysqld_safe] syslog MySQLVarLibDirListing: ['ntkonto', 'wikidb', 'ca-key.pem', 'server-key.pem', 'debian-5.7.flag', 'undo_002', 'da', 'WG@002dBiblio', 'horde2', 'nconf', 'mysql_dd_upgrade_info', 'undo_1_trunc.log', 'mysqld_safe.pid', 'server-cert.pem', 's9y_tk', 'ib_logfile1', 'darkman', 'webmoviedb', 'ca.pem', 'ib_logfile0', 'auto.cnf', 'netjuke', 'mysql_upgrade_info', 'horde', '#innodb_temp', 'undo_2_trunc.log', 'cpg', 'ib_buffer_pool', 'performance_schema', 'client-key.pem', 'diak', 'binlog.index', 'client-cert.pem', 'gallery2', 'pydio', 'ibtmp1', 'ibdata1', 'intranet', 'phpmyadmin', 'sys', '#ib_16384_1.dblwr', 'debian-5.6.flag', 'buerowg', 'public_key.pem', 'mysql', '#ib_16384_0.dblwr', 'ocb', 'private_key.pem', 'wikidb_hdm'] ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-91-generic root=UUID=0b33cf7f-bfbb-4b24-a021-f56d07d8b804 ro Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: mysql-8.0 Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-12-04 (0 days ago) ** Affects: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal need-duplicate-check third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953218 Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1953218/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943833] Re: Failed to update metadata for lvfs
I've been getting this on 20.04 in KDE's Discover application. When I just ran fwupdmgr refresh, it completed fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943833 Title: Failed to update metadata for lvfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1943833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1911055] Re: [modeset][nvidia] suspend/resume broken in nvidia-460 : Display engine push buffer channel allocation failed
Identical problem. only that my machine is frozen after the nvidia error messages. Running Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Nvidia driver 470.57.02 on Razer Blade 15 Advanced (2018) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911055 Title: [modeset][nvidia] suspend/resume broken in nvidia-460 : Display engine push buffer channel allocation failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/+bug/1911055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946109] [NEW] touchpad is not wokring at all, does not get recognized
Public bug reported: Touchpad does not show after: cat /proc/bus/input/devices > ~/devices All drivers are up to date. Laptop is a: Fujitsu Lifebook U-7510 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.11.0-36-generic 5.11.0-36.40~20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-36.40~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-36-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Oct 5 10:04:33 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-22 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946109 Title: touchpad is not wokring at all, does not get recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.11/+bug/1946109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946108] [NEW] touchpad is not wokring at all, does not get recognized
Public bug reported: Touchpad does not show after: cat /proc/bus/input/devices > ~/devices All drivers are up to date. Laptop is a: Fujitsu Lifebook U-7510 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.11.0-36-generic 5.11.0-36.40~20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-36.40~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-36-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Oct 5 10:04:33 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-22 (13 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946108 Title: touchpad is not wokring at all, does not get recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.11/+bug/1946108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944041] Re: ausweisapp2 package dependencies missing, starts without gui
added "misery" Andre Klitzing - hope I got the right person involved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944041 Title: ausweisapp2 package dependencies missing, starts without gui To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ausweisapp2/+bug/1944041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
