[Bug 568179] Re: qt menus mispositioned on dual head with different resolutions
This looks like a bug in the Qt layer. I'm not planning to make any changes in the Bazaar Explorer code to workaround it. ** Changed in: bzr-explorer Status: New = Won't Fix -- qt menus mispositioned on dual head with different resolutions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563118] Re: Lucid upgrade switch to serve-branches.conf without providing one
Maybe Loggerhead ought to still look for Loggerhead.conf if server- branch.conf is not there? -- Lucid upgrade switch to serve-branches.conf without providing one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563118] Re: Lucid upgrade switch to serve-branches.conf without providing one
Lionel, I'd like to get this sorted ASAP but I'm pretty new to the loggerhead code base. Looking through the code, I can't see where the name of the config file is set or where the settings are loaded. Maybe I'm blind or maybe it's a packaging issue? Can you explain how you've configured Loggerhead and how you tracked down the problem? -- Lucid upgrade switch to serve-branches.conf without providing one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: UDD as a product?
James Westby wrote: On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:59:14 +1000, Ian Clatworthy ian.clatwor...@canonical.com wrote: UDD now has an active mailing list, a Launchpad project and a bug/task list. Does it make sense to begin thinking about UDD as a product? Would it be valuable to talk about UDD x.y vs x.z? By x.y and x.z do you mean versions? Yes. Would these differ from the phases in the overall specification? Is there a URL for this? Are you proposing specific changes in the way we work, or just a shift in thinking? Just wondering out loud about whether we could be harvesting knowledge better into a set of living documents (instead of archived emails). Ian C. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
UDD as a product?
UDD now has an active mailing list, a Launchpad project and a bug/task list. Does it make sense to begin thinking about UDD as a product? Would it be valuable to talk about UDD x.y vs x.z? Code wise, I guess the product is a mix of LP features, Bazaar features and Bazaar plugins. OTOH, those things come together to form a system. There's a huge amount of wisdom being imparted each week on this list. Perhaps we should turn some of the threads into tutorials (either in a wiki or bzr branch) or a UDD Hackers Guide say. Is it too early for that? Ian C. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Pidgin trunk now available on Launchpad
I've created a trunk mirror of the Pidgin (Monotone) repository today using bzr-fastimport. I've uploaded it to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ian-clatworthy/pidgin/trunk. BTW, Pidgin is the only package in the hottest100 which is managed in Monotone. It's in the top 10 though so I felt it was worth the effort to upload an import. I've contacted the owner of the Pidgin Developers team asking if this ought to be made the development focus branch. If so, I'll take a look at what's involved to keep this branch up to date. Ian C. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
fastimport and the scope of the hottest 100 effort
James raised the question recently about whether some of the packages in the hottest 100 ought to excluded or not, e.g. pidgin's upstream is in monotone and we don't have a bzr-monotone plugin. My answer is yes, we'll need to exclude some things. The import breakdown analysis I did last Friday showed some packages don't have publicly available source code, e.g. the HP printer drivers and various X drivers. In terms of strategy, I think we should focus on getting as many imports in the top 100 as possible working via bzr-svn, bzr-git and bzr-hg. We should also take a moment to confirm imports of these packages are into 2a branches, *not* earlier or development formats. Looking at the top 10 packages on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+upstreamreport, *I* can certainly see value in also supporting fastimport if my current assumptions wrt bzr-svn/git/hg are correct. The top 10 packages include: * the kernel - in git, huge and (iiuic) not supported by bzr-git * firefox - in hg and very popular * open office - in hg (now) and huge in size * pidgen - in monotone. For each of these, fastimport may be the best option, given fastimport-generated branches are often much smaller than those created via Jelmer's plugins. In summary, we need to dig a deeper *after* getting all the low hanging fruit imported but I don't feel we ought ot completely rule out using fastimport for of the above. Ian C. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
Breakdown of import failures in the hottest100
A first cut attached. I'll update poolie's spreadsheet later today with some of these details but it seems configuration problems are a larger issue than import bugs at this point? Ian C. Imports not yet defined --- == === Product VCS Comments == === aptitudehg http://hg.debian.org/hg/aptitude/head cupsys svn http://svn.easysw.com/public/cups/trunk/ fglrx ??? proprietary code - AMD video driver hplip ??? No public source code repository [*] initramfs-tools ??? ??? nvidia-drivers-ubuntu ??? proprietary code - NVIDIA video driver openjdk hg http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 openoffice hg http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300 pidgin mnt See http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/UsingPidginMonotone virt-managerhg http://hg.fedorahosted.org/hg/virt-manager xulrunner hg lots of branches but no trunk mirror? == === [*] According to http://cyberelk.net/tim/2009/11/04/hplip-3-9-10/. Failing imports --- == === Product VCS Comments == === alsa-driver git lp:~vcs-imports/alsa-driver/master ok? dpkggit failing on bzr-git symlink bug - see Q#94577 evdev git lp:~vcs-imports/evdev/master ok? gstreamer git failing on bzr-git submodules k3b svn badly configured? kdebase svn failing with pysvn._pysvn_2_5.ClientError: No such revision 1071409 vlc git lp:~vcs-imports/vlc/master ok? winegit lp:~vcs-imports/wine/git-trunk ok? xorg-server git lp:~vcs-imports/xorg-server/master ok? xserver-xorg-driver-ati git lp:~vcs-imports/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/master ok? xserver-xorg-video-intelgit lp:~vcs-imports/xserver-xorg-video-intel/master ok? == === Packages without products - gst0.10-python - gstreamer Python bindings? linux linux-restricted-modules nspluginwrapper sysvinit -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
[Bug 83867] Re: branch hooks need documentation
Docs for the Branch hooks are now automatically generated ** Changed in: bzr Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: bzr Milestone: None = 2.1.0b4 -- branch hooks need documentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207253] Re: command export zip produces files with permission 000
Ivan Sagalaev wrote: To clarify... I've read the guide: http://doc.bazaar- vcs.org/developers/HACKING.html. I've made a local stacked branch of bzr.dev which is probably why I can't commit directly to it. I can convert it to a standalone one and push it. What bothers me is pushing the whole Bazaar to LP just for a trivial one-line fix. Sounds rather ineffective :-). The recommended workflow is to grab a full copy of the branch locally, make a change, then push your branch to LP. The push to LP will create a stacked branch *there* - stacked against the trunk. So only a small amount of data is transferred by the push. Ian C. -- command export zip produces files with permission 000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425507] Re: [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa
Andrew, Can you update the Overview page to reference the PPA please? It would also be good to get the Linux install instructions updated. See http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/explorer/en/install-linux.html. The website is a bzr branch (of course): lp:bzr-explorer-website. Can you submit a merge proposal with better text for that too? -- [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425507] Re: [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa
See also bug 418469. -- [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425507] Re: [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa
** Changed in: bzr-explorer Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: bzr-explorer Status: New = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] bzr-explorer should be packaged in ubuntu and the ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392355] Re: C extensions placed in wrong directory
** Changed in: bzr Assignee: (unassigned) = Ian Clatworthy (ian-clatworthy) -- C extensions placed in wrong directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392355] Re: C extensions placed in wrong directory
So to summarise, this bug appears to be impacting all python developers on karmic building extensions via setup.py. Bazaar is affected but not the problem per se. Furthermore, it isn't affecting developers on jaunty, nor the packaging of Bazaar on karmic. Is the critical priority justified? I can dig more into this but I'll need to upgrade one of my boxes to karmic first. That's not a problem but I wasn't planning to do that prior to 2.0 shipping unless I had to. -- C extensions placed in wrong directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224039] [NEW] Printing of text selection no longer available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit In gutsy and earlier versions, the Print dialog in gedit let users print just the selected text. That option is no longer there in hardy, despite what the online help says. ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Printing of text selection no longer available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224039] Re: Printing of text selection no longer available
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Print.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14004116/Screenshot-Print.png -- Printing of text selection no longer available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104987] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_unlock()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229236/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229237/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229238/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229239/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229240/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229241/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229242/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7229243/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_unlock() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104987] [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_unlock()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Caused by update manager. At first glance, a duplicate of Bug #104355. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 10 09:17:32 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel Package: gnome-panel 2.18.0-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1 ProcCwd: /home/ian ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gnome-panel StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 pthread_mutex_unlock () malloc () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 realloc () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 Uname: Linux possum 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_unlock() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
