[Bug 162138] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed
** Attachment added: main_pre_req.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10790271/main_pre_req.log -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162138] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed
** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10790264/main.log -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162138] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed
Somehow I missed your request for more information. I'm attaching the files you requested, but since I've now completed the upgrade, some data may have been overwritten. When I filed the bug, I guessed that it might be incomplete, but I wasn't able to find the relevant log files. Perhaps a note somewhere about the location of the needed files would be appropriate. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162138] [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Got this when trying to upgrade to Gutsy from the alternate install CD. ProblemType: Package Date: Sun Nov 11 23:01:38 2007 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed Package: update-manager SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 162138] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed
** Attachment added: Crash file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10337492/update-manager.0.crash -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161094] knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions
Public bug reported: Some games have multiple possible solutions, but knetwalk apparently only accepts one. The attached screenshot shows a game that I recently solved, but knetwalk thinks that it's still unsolved. I'm reporting it here because I haven't been able to find an upstream bug tracker. EDIT: I'm still running Feisty. The knetwalk in question is version 1.0. ** Affects: kdegames (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kdegames in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161094] Re: knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions
** Description changed: Some games have multiple possible solutions, but knetwalk apparently only accepts one. The attached screenshot shows a game that I recently solved, but knetwalk thinks that it's still unsolved. I'm reporting it here because I haven't been able to find an upstream bug tracker. + + EDIT: I'm still running Feisty. The knetwalk in question is version 1.0. -- knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161094] Re: knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions
** Attachment added: Solved knetwalk game that knetwalk thinks is unsolved http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10314073/Screenshot-knetwalk.png -- knetwalk uses incorrect win conditions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105334] Re: No search field
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #462003 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462003 ** Also affects: gnome-main-menu (upstream) via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462003 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- No search field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127654] Labels use the wrong dimensions and/or page size
Public bug reported: I'm trying to print name tags using Avery labels #5383 (US letter size). However, when I try to print them, they're aligned wrong. Although I've been careful to specify US letter size in the label creation wizard, the created document is wrong. The settings dialog available from the print dialog lists the paper size as A4, NOT letter. In Format Page, the size is given as 7.77 x 9.85. The correct page size is 8.5 x 11. Of course, printing with these settings simply doesn't work when I have letter size paper in the printer's tray. (A4 paper isn't available here.) In addition, the labels are too short, so that they don't align with the perforations on the paper. The labels are supposed to be 2 1/6 high, but they're printing at approximately 2 1/8. In case it's relevant, I'm running OpenOffice 2.2.0-1ubuntu4 on Feisty. My printer is an HP Deskjet 5150 using the hpijs driver. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Labels use the wrong dimensions and/or page size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95310] Re: CD Quality, MP3 option in Sound Juicer and Rhythmbox cause partial freeze
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84007 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 As the previous comment indicates, this bug is a duplicate of bug 84007. That means that discussion here is pointless. In fact, this bug has already been fixed. Read bug 84007 for details. -- CD Quality, MP3 option in Sound Juicer and Rhythmbox cause partial freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84007] Re: Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list
The fix has been committed, but it has to go through some quality control testing before it's released to the wild. If you've been using Ubuntu long enough, you might remember that there were a couple of updates to Xorg that were broken and made serious trouble for a lot of people. That's why thorough testing is important. Nonetheless, fixed packages have been posted to this thread. You just have to download them and install. -- Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119006] Re: OpenOffice.org crashes on startup
Since I can't reproduce the crash anymore, there's no point in pursuing that further. Also, today's update alerted me to bug 106186 which deals with the icon issue. I can't find a way to mark this one as a duplicate; feel free to do so. -- OpenOffice.org crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106186] Re: Fallback icon theme is not installed which causes icons to disappear
Thanks to the update's alerting me to this bug, I now have icons. However, the fix didn't give me any icons (it didn't do anything noticeable). I now have icons because some of the comments alerted me to the existance of icon themes for OOo. Installing openoffice.org-style- tango did the trick. So, in summary, this bug isn't fixed. ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Fallback icon theme is not installed which causes icons to disappear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84007] Re: Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list
Bruce: I get a 404 Not Found error when I try to download your packages. The link you posted works, but none of the actual deb links work. -- Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115205] Re: editing profile dialog inactive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84007 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 Alfredo, This bug is a duplicate of bug #84007. A fix is available there, and all discussion takes place there. -- editing profile dialog inactive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84007] Re: Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list
If you'll put the source package where I can get it, I'll be glad to build an i386 package. I still haven't found out how to apply a debdiff, so the debdiff is currently useless to me, unless I want to go through and modify the source by hand (I don't). -- Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84007] Re: Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list
Neither Google nor Yahoo can tell me how to apply a debdiff to a source package. How do I do that? Surely I don't have to manually go through the debdiff and copy/paste the changes to the source directory!? -- Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105334] Re: No search field
No, this isn't a duplicate, although on rereading this bug, I can see that I wasn't very clear. This is basically a complaint that the search bar is different from what I would expect. I'd find a search bar that searched for menu entries easier than a beagle search bar--especially since I don't have any use for beagle. In other words, this bug is about the way the search bar works, not whether it is shown or not. As I write this, it appears to me that this bug is really an upstream bug. -- No search field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84007] Re: Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list
Any idea when the fix will be released for Feisty? I'm doing my best to wait (somewhat) patiently. -- Cannot edit audio profiles without closing the list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119006] Re: OpenOffice.org crashes on startup
I'm currently running OpenOffice 2.2.0-1ubuntu3. My computer is an HP Compaq NX9010 laptop. Pentium 4 processor, 512 MB RAM, 1.5 GB swap, ATI Radeon IGP 330M/340M/350M integrated graphics. I'm not able to get a crash anymore, so I can't attach a backtrace. The current issue is the missing graphics, as illustrated by the screenshot I attached to my previous post. -- OpenOffice.org crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119427] Re: Please backport scribes for feisty
I've been using the Debian unstable packages in both Edgy and Feisty for a while, now. I built them from the (unmodified) source package--as I always do when using Debian packages. -- Please backport scribes for feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 119006] Re: OpenOffice.org crashes on startup
Various other programs were crashing in my previous install. In this install, I've only had trouble with OOo. I've run memtest86 already, and it didn't find any problems with my memory. I think that there is something wrong with my hardware, although I couldn't say what and I'm not too good at troubleshooting hardware. But the fact that OOo is the program with problems suggests that it might have something to do with the way OOo works, as well. I tried starting OOo again today, and the mystery deepens. It runs now, but without any icons (toolbar, menu, program, settings dialog expanders, etc.) . Also, in-document graphics are aliased and font kerning is off. I'm attaching a screenshot that shows what I mean. How could this occur (especially the lack of icons)? ** Attachment added: OOo's weird display http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8105439/OOo%20-%20no%20icons%20-%20aliased%20rendering.png -- OpenOffice.org crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108290] Re: theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab
I just tested this with a regular install of Feisty and didn't get any crashes. -- theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118906] Re: Console displays colors incorrectly
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 60915 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60915 I'm not sure that this is really a duplicate of bug 60915. Maybe it is, but my color issue occurs with or without usplash. In other words, booting without usplash results in better colors, but they still aren't correct as there's no difference between bold and regular colors. On every other console I've used--as well as terminal programs--bold colors display as lighter colors. For example, bold brown is actually yellow. -- Console displays colors incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118906] Re: Console displays colors incorrectly
It adjusts the font (I actually prefer the bolder standard font), but does nothing for the color situation. -- Console displays colors incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119427] Please backport scribes for feisty
Public bug reported: Please backport the scribes package for Feisty (and maybe Edgy?). ** Affects: feisty-backports (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Please backport scribes for feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 118914] Firefox: Please default browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll to true
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Firefox is more usable with the browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll preference in about:config set to true. Most of the time, when I click on the URL bar, I intend to type a new URL, rather than edit the existing one. In every Windows and Mac browser, clicking the address bar selects the URL. Presumably, the reason that Linux browsers usually don't is due to X's odd habit of copying selected text to the clipboard, replacing whatever was there previously. Since Ubuntu takes a more enlightened approach to clipboard management, why not restore a useful feature and make it the default? ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags: firefox ** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox Firefox is more usable with the browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll preference in about:config set to true. Most of the time, when I click on the URL bar, I intend to type a new URL, rather than edit the existing one. In every Windows and Mac browser, clicking the address bar selects the URL. Presumably, the reason that Linux browsers usually don't is due to X's odd habit of copying selected text to the clipboard, replacing whatever was there previously. Since Ubuntu takes a more enlightened - approach, why not restore a useful feature and make it the default? + approach to clipboard management, why not restore a useful feature and + make it the default? ** Tags added: firefox -- Firefox: Please default browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll to true https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119006] OpenOffice.org crashes on startup
Public bug reported: OpenOffice crashes on startup every time. First, it popped up a dialog complaining that another instance of OOo was open (I guess a file was locked) and asking what to do, but OOo crashed before I was able to completely read the dialog. This was before any window appeared. If I can find a way to attach the crash report, I'll do so--there doesn't seem to be such an option on the bug report form. I renamed my .openoffice.org2 directory, but that didn't make any difference. OOo crashes every time. Sometimes immediately, sometimes during the splash screen, and sometimes while it's in the process of drawing the main window. It hasn't left anything in /var/crash after the first time, though. I'm running a fresh install of Feisty (but with /home preserved from my previous install). I experienced OOo crashes (along with a number of other programs crashing in Edgy, shortly before upgrading. I upgraded to Feisty, hoping that the upgrade would solve my crashes, but it just made matters worse. So I reinstalled. But OOo is still crashing. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- OpenOffice.org crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119006] Re: OpenOffice.org crashes on startup
** Attachment added: Crash report from /var/crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8007386/_usr_lib_openoffice_program_soffice.bin.1000.crash -- OpenOffice.org crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118902] Can't shutdown because an NFS share isn't being unmounted
Public bug reported: I have a particular NFS share that apparently is buggy. Once mounted, it can't be unmounted, always reporting that it's busy. Consequently, the system hangs toward the end of the shutdown process (at the partition unmounting step, I believe). It's then necessary to use the Magic SysRq functions to reboot in a somewhat-nice manner. Here are the details. I'm experiencing the issue on a clean install of Feisty, but I previously experienced it in Edgy (upgraded from Dapper). My server is still running Edgy--also upgraded from Dapper. I have four NFS shares in my fstab. Only one gives me problems. I suspect that something's wrong somehow with it, but I don't know what to do to troubleshoot it. One of my shares exports a subdirectory of the problem partition; that share causes no problems. I can work around the problem by writing a sysvinit kill script that unmounts all partitions mounted on the troublesome mount, then remounts the buggy share read-only. I run this script before any NFS or network kill scripts (K02). When that happens, the partition gets unmounted properly and doesn't hang the system. I'm really not too sure about in which package this bug should be addressed. I listed sysvinit because ultimately, there should be some sort of timeout (at the minimum) so that a misbehaving program can't hang the system. On the other hand, this might be an issue with NFS. ** Affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Can't shutdown because an NFS share isn't being unmounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118906] Console displays colors incorrectly
Public bug reported: For command line work, I use differently colored prompts to help distinguish between machines. When I first installed Ubuntu, Dapper was the current version, and the colors worked equally well in gnome- terminal as on the console. When I upgraded to Edgy, my prompts broke. I've now done a clean install of Feisty and experienced the same thing. My laptop's prompt color is yellow/brown (actually, color codes 1;33m and 33m, respectively). They show up as a dark gray that is very difficult to read against a black background. Furthermore, the console fails to distinguish between bold and regular text, making my two colors identical. When I boot without the splash option, I get a different console font --beginning with Feisty. In this situation, my yellow/brown color scheme displays as brown/brown (due to the lack of distinction between normal and bold colors). But, that's better than dark gray. Still, I have to boot without usplash to get the benefit of readable text. (There must be some bug somewhere that prevents the console from being set up properly when usplash runs.) This bug occurs on my HP Compaq nx9010 laptop. My Edgy desktop behaves perfectly. ** Affects: console-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: For command line work, I use differently colored prompts to help distinguish between machines. When I first installed Ubuntu, Dapper was the current version, and the colors worked equally well in gnome- terminal as on the console. When I upgraded to Edgy, my prompts broke. I've now done a clean install of Feisty and experienced the same thing. My laptop's prompt color is yellow/brown (actually, color codes 1;33m and 33m, respectively). They show up as a dark gray that is very difficult to read against a black background. Furthermore, the console fails to distinguish between bold and regular text, making my two colors identical. When I boot without the splash option, I get a different console font --beginning with Feisty. In this situation, my yellow/brown color scheme displays as brown/brown (due to the lack of distinction between normal and bold colors). But, that's better than dark gray. Still, I have to boot without usplash to get the benefit of readable text. (There must be some bug somewhere that prevents the console from being set up properly when usplash runs.) - This bug occurs on my HP Compaq nx9010 laptop. My desktop behaves + This bug occurs on my HP Compaq nx9010 laptop. My Edgy desktop behaves perfectly. -- Console displays colors incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108290] Re: theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab
I've tested it with the Feisty live CD and my buggy half-functioning upgrade and haven't experienced any crashes. Apparently the other fix worked. However, it would be nice if something could be done about cursor themes showing up in the theme manager in the first place. But that's an upstream issue, isn't it? -- theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115122] Re: Dist-Upgrade failed silently
OK. Here are my log files. I don't know whether they've been overwritten by my subsequent attempts to resume the upgrade. ** Attachment added: dist-upgrade.tar.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7703114/dist-upgrade.tar.gz -- Dist-Upgrade failed silently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115122] Update manager crashed during upgrade and left no diagnostic information
Public bug reported: During my upgrade from Edgy to Feisty, the upgrade program that update- manager crashed. It was in the process of installing packages, although I wasn't watching it carefully enough to know which package was being installed. All of a sudden the upgrade window vanished without a trace. There was no error message, the exit status was 0, and and nothing was printed to stdout. This means that I don't think that it's possible to debug the crash. There should be error messages when a program crashes. If it's any help, when I re-ran update-manager, some package kept causing a segfault with cupsys. I thought that it was the cupsys package, but closer inspection revealed cupsys to be already installed and upgraded. Really though, this bug is more about the crash handling setup than my specific crash. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Update manager crashed during upgrade and left no diagnostic information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115131] When upgrade manager crashes, upgrade can't be resumed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager My upgrade from Edgy to Feisty failed when the update manager crashed (see bug #115122). When I tried to restart update-manager, it didn't re- offer the upgrade, nor did it start the upgrade GUI. I don't know how important the upgrade program (that powers the GUI) is, but it should be possible to resume where the crash happened. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- When upgrade manager crashes, upgrade can't be resumed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108290] Re: theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab
I'll try to remember once I upgrade. It'll be a bit before I have the time to upgrade, though. -- theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108290] theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab
Public bug reported: When choosing an icon theme in gnome-theme-manager, cursor themes are displayed in the list. Clicking one causes gnome-theme-manager to segfault and brings down the GNOME session (sometimes leaving only the wallpaper visible). I know that gnome-panel and nautilus both crash, and I'm unsure what else crashes. When logging in, GNOME hangs at the splash screen. I can't get back to normal until I log in to a failsafe terminal session and run gnome- theme-manager from there. ** Affects: control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108290] Re: theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab
** Description changed: When choosing an icon theme in gnome-theme-manager, cursor themes are displayed in the list. Clicking one causes gnome-theme-manager to segfault and brings down the GNOME session (sometimes leaving only the wallpaper visible). I know that gnome-panel and nautilus both crash, and I'm unsure what else crashes. When logging in, GNOME hangs at the splash screen. I can't get back to normal until I log in to a failsafe terminal session and run gnome- theme-manager from there. + + EDIT: This occurrs in Edgy; don't know about Feisty. -- theme manager: segfault when accidently choosing cursor theme on icon tab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105333] The More Applications window takes far too long to come up
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-main-menu My machine, which is running Edgy, is an older one with a slow processor and little physical RAM (though I have lots of swap). When I click on the more applications button, the window takes anywhere between 10-25 seconds to appear and become fully functional (sometimes it appears, but the contents haven't yet been drawn). This delay seems to be caused by the overhead of launching a separate, high-overhead process. In my opinion, the delay should be no longer than 1 second, and whatever measures necessary to avoid such a delay (using a single process, keeping the application browser in memory, etc.) should be taken. The application browser is in effect a menu, and should be just as easily accessible--especially since there's no other way to access programs not in the favorites list through gnome-main-menu. I'm not sure if I'm reporting this in the right place. I installed the package gnome-main-menu, not slab (which doesn't exist in the edgy repos). I followed a link here from the Launchpad entry for gnome-main- menu. ** Affects: slab (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- The More Applications window takes far too long to come up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105334] No search field
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-main-menu In screenshots of gnome-main-menu that I've seen, there is a search bar. However, there's no search bar on my machine. Bug #84414 suggests that it might be because beagle isn't running on my machine. But it shouldn't matter whether I have beagle or any other search service running. The most important feature of a search box would be to quickly provide a way to start programs not listed in the favorites--especially since the application browser takes so long to come up (see bug #105333). Running beagle for the sole purpose of searching menu items (if beagle is even capable of this) is overkill, and I have no other use for beagle since locate works admirably for me. I'm not sure if I'm reporting this in the right place. I installed the package gnome-main-menu, not slab (which doesn't exist in the edgy repos). I followed a link here from the Launchpad entry for gnome-main- menu. ** Affects: slab (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-main-menu In screenshots of gnome-main-menu that I've seen, there is a search bar. However, there's no search bar on my machine. Bug #84414 suggests that it might be because beagle isn't running on my machine. But it shouldn't matter whether I have beagle or any other search service running. The most important feature of a search box would be to quickly provide a way to start programs not listed in the favorites--especially since the application browser takes so long to come up (see bug #105333). Running beagle for the sole purpose of searching menu items (if beagle is even capable of this) is overkill, and I have no other use for beagle since locate works admirably for me. + + I'm not sure if I'm reporting this in the right place. I installed the + package gnome-main-menu, not slab (which doesn't exist in the edgy + repos). I followed a link here from the Launchpad entry for gnome-main- + menu. -- No search field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52830] Re: Installer doesn't comfirm resizing partitions
Colin, Thanks for fixing this! -- Installer doesn't comfirm resizing partitions https://launchpad.net/bugs/52830 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83757] Re: Dangerous default settings in Kubuntu Installer
I believe that this is a duplicate of bug #52830. -- Dangerous default settings in Kubuntu Installer https://launchpad.net/bugs/83757 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68321] Re: Import Error: No module named ltihooks
Why is this bug rejected? It's very much a legitimate bug in the packaging system. Purging the package, then removing /usr/lib/python2.4 /site-packages/istanbul fixes it. This directory doesn't get recreated on reinstall, so apparently it's left over from some previous version, and the packaging scripts failed to properly clean up during some upgrade. Note that I initially installed Istanbul while running Dapper. Now, I'm running Edgy. -- Import Error: No module named ltihooks https://launchpad.net/bugs/68321 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68874] Re: ubuntu-desktop depends on totem-mozilla
I agree. Totem is incompenent software that is unable to play much of what mplayer can. Wht depend on it to the exclusion of better software? -- ubuntu-desktop depends on totem-mozilla https://launchpad.net/bugs/68874 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82131] totem and totem-mozilla dependency problem
Public bug reported: Currently, I have totem, totem-mozilla, and totem-xine installed, all at version 2.16.2-0ubuntu1 (I'm running Edgy, by the way). I'm being offered an upgrade of totem and totem-mozilla to version 2.16.2-0ubuntu3, but I can't upgrade due to dependency issues. apt- get/aptitude/synaptic insist that I must switch to totem-gstreamer, which is more incompetent than totem-xine. Clearly, something is broken, because I've been using totem-xine since I installed Ubuntu (except for when the Edgy upgrade unhelpfully reverted me to totem-gstreamer, leading me to wonder for a while why I could no longer play the media I was used to playing). ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- totem and totem-mozilla dependency problem https://launchpad.net/bugs/82131 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82123] Re: bash (feisty) is not freeing memory of backticked output
I can confirm this on Edgy. If you increase the number of iterations, the result is more dramatic. In Edgy, it occurs for both syntaxes. I noticed, however, that memory usage seems to peak. If you repeatedly run the loop, bashs memory footprint will eventually stop growing. -- bash (feisty) is not freeing memory of backticked output https://launchpad.net/bugs/82123 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52830] Installer doesn't comfirm resizing partitions
Public bug reported: On the Dapper install Live CD, when you come to the partitioning section, if you choose the default resizing option and click forward, the installer doesn't ask before resizing the partition. Instead, it immediately does so. This is a bug because every other partitioner that I'm aware of makes sure that the user is very well aware that it's about to alter the partition table. And since no documentation that I was able to find mentioned that it was able to safely resize NTFS partitions with data that would have to be moved, and since past partitioners haven't been able to do this safely, then there needs to be some sort of confirmation. I think that no disk operations of any kind should be done until the install actually begins. More information on my specific issue is in this thread: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=212985 ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Installer doesn't comfirm resizing partitions https://launchpad.net/bugs/52830 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
