Re: [ubuntu-in] OT : Any website(s) in india that provide prices for computing devices

2009-11-25 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Ramnarayan.K  wrote:

> Needed to know of any non subscription based site that provide
> information on prices and availability of digital devices. Specially
> computers laptops, peripherals and accessories,

http://computerwarehousepricelist.com/
http://www.theitdepot.com/
http://infibeam.com/

HTH
Udhay
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] A Blog On Ubuntu Hardy Heron

2008-07-30 Thread Udhay Shankar N
[Hi Niyam, long time]

Linux Lingam wrote:

> no wonder you no longer have ubuntu on your machines, ramky.
> i moved back to fiesty, and discovered if you regularly apply all
> updates (but NEVER upgrade) your system is quite stable and works
> sweetly.


I have quite the opposite experience. Feisty was so bad (KDE and then 
Gnome crashing repeatedly in spite of multiple installs on a vanilla 
Dell Vostro) that I gave up and installed Fedora. Hardy seems much more 
stable.

Udhay

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] CUE-BIN file to ISO file

2008-04-01 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Moz wrote, [on 3/31/2008 9:54 PM]:

> 
> Also, I can not find a single player that will play the dat files in 
> these VCDs?

VLC player does the job quite well for me.

Udhay
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] SSH Forwarding how to?

2008-03-24 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Ravi Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi friends,
> I have a server which cannot be accessed through Internet. Now, I want to
> expose a service to internet, but in secure way. So I choose SSH Port
> forwarding...
> The scenario is:
>
> Server A host a service i.e CVS on port 2401 (default_)
>  Server B has SSH service running.
>
> Both A and B are in local network.
>
> Now computer C from far world needs access to that service on A, so I want
> to tunnel the communication between B and C for A-C communication.
>
> Something such as : [A : cvs] <--> [B : sshd] <---
> tunnel ->[C]
>
> Please guide me how can I enable ssh tunneling in such, I read many online
> documents, but could not get the grip over the theory,
>  Also, for C i would like B as transparent. that is same port 2401 on B
> would be forwareded to A:2401

SSH has a built-in option for a SOCKS proxy, which may be what you're
looking for. See http://www.plenz.com/tunnel-everything for details on
this and other options for tunneling traffic over SSH.

Udhay
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] OT: Unable to access the internet even though the BSNL WLL connection is working

2008-03-22 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Ramnarayan.K wrote: [ on 01:00 PM 3/22/2008 ]

>2. What are openDNS servers ??

See www.opendns.com

Udhay

-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))


-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


Re: [ubuntu-in] Is Ubuntu messing up on QA?

2008-03-16 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Parthan SR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  So, when you download-install  or upgrade your stable version of Ubuntu
>  to an Alpha version, you are consciously accepting the fact that things
>  may seriously break ad you are ready to face such things. Secondly, you
>  are seriously advised not to use an Alpha release for you stable system
>  requirements. Alpha release *is* our QA process and it is meant for
>  those daring devils who have passion to try them out, find and report
>  bugs, try fixing issues and a lot more. It is not meant for any one who
>  doesn't want to look at things breaking and who do not have the patience
>  or inclination to fix things on their own. If you do not understand
>  this, your rants are meaningless. Please stop saying "Ubuntu broke my
>  system" or "Ubuntu doesn't work for me" if you tried an alpha release
>  and it messed you up. Even most of us try alpha releases over a VM, or
>  at least have a old box to spare the occasional curses of a breakage.
>  Please understand and stop ranting! :)

Parthan,

How does this apply to the post I forwarded? Raju applied a Ubuntu
*security patch* which broke mailman, and it is his contention that
this is due to bad QA practices. He didn't install an alpha release of
anything.

Udhay
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in


[ubuntu-in] Is Ubuntu messing up on QA?

2008-03-16 Thread Udhay Shankar N
A rant originally posted to the linux-delhi (and other) lists by Raju 
Mathur - a Unix guru of nearly 2 decades' standing, and a member of 
the OSI board.

This is only the latest example of a phenomenon I am noticing of 
late. I think Ubuntu is experiencing a backlash that they would do 
well to pay careful attention to - as this is happening among the 
geek / early adopter demographic that is a powerful opinion-shaper.

Udhay

>Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:25:22 +0530
>From: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [LIG] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control
>To: "The Linux-Delhi mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"
>
>First thing yesterday morning: urgent IM message from Suresh
>Ramasubramanian (hoster of this mailing list):
>
>   Mailman is down, can you help?
>
>OK, so we start investigating his box.  He has upgraded Python2.4 to
>Python2.5, and applied a Mailman security patch package.  However,
>whenever we try to access the page, the server barfs.  On to server
>logs -- syntax error in one of the Mailman support files.
>
>Right, I can understand an upgrade causing logical errors, but a SYNTAX
>ERROR!??!?  Nah, I must be missing something, so I look all over the 2
>upgrades.  Switch back to Python2.4 from Python2.5, no joy.  Recompile
>all the Mailman files from scratch, no joy.  Recompile the Ubuntu
>Mailman package from source and reinstall it, no joy.  Bang head
>against wall, no joy.
>
>Finally, desperate, I start comparing Mailman files on Suresh' server
>against Mailman installed on other servers.  While they are different
>versions of Mailman, I do notice one anomaly: where one file has:
>
> mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
> val, mlist.preferred_language) <- *** Note this line ***
> elif property == 'info':
>
>Suresh' server has:
>
> mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
> elif property == 'info':
>
>Saying, `no, no, it can't be!' I insert the missing line into the file
>on the broken machine, cross fingers, eyes, legs, etc and restart
>Mailman.
>
>It works!
>
>[Shift to today]
>
>Ubuntu issues a security notice that says, in effect, ``We screwed up
>with the previous Mailman patch, so here's the latest and greatest
>version of Mailman, and this one really, Really, REALLY works!  Believe
>us!''.
>
>I don't believe them.  In the past 6 months Ubuntu has issues 80 new
>security advisories.  For those 80 advisories, they have issued no less
>than SEVEN regressions (a regression is a patch to fix a broken patch).
>A near-10% regression rate sends only one message to me -- we can't be
>bothered with doing any quality control before we release packages.
>
>Before Ubuntu came onto the scene, I didn't even /know/ what a
>regression was.   Today it's a common word in my lexicon, because of
>Ubuntu's pathetic testing and quality control process (or lack of
>process, more likely).  An operating system vendor who issues a package
>with a syntax error (so that the package doesn't even start up, leave
>alone do something wrong), is a pure crap snake oil vendor in my book.
>
>So, the question: will I trust Ubuntu on an Internet-connected system?
>Nah.
>
>Will I trust Ubuntu on a server?  Er, please excuse me while I finishing
>laughing hysterically!
>
>Use Debian or CentOS or any of those reasonably tested other
>distributions for your boxes, and when someone asks you to use Ubuntu,
>in the immortal words of Fancy Raygun, ``Just Say No!''.
>
>Regards,
>
>-- Raju
>--
>Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://kandalaya.org/
>  Freedom in Technology & Software || February 2008 || http://freed.in/
>GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
>PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/   ||   It is the mind that moves


-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))


-- 
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in