[Bug 877812] [NEW] dpkg error when upgrading git package Too many links
Public bug reported: upgarding, or downgrading, git between versions 1:1.7.5.4-1 and 1:1.7.6.3-1 produces the following error: Preparing to replace git 1:1.7.5.4-1 (using .../git_1%3a1.7.6.3-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement git ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/git_1%3a1.7.6.3-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./usr/lib/git-core/git-mktag' before installing new version: Too many links No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) dpkg.strace attached, since i found a similar bug #93320 , though I presume it unrelated, unless it's FS corruption again. Syste is a very new install- upgrade from oneiric, using btrfs, ... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: dpkg 1.16.1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Oct 19 01:28:30 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64+mac (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: dpkg UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877812 Title: dpkg error when upgrading git package Too many links To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/877812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877812] Re: dpkg error when upgrading git package Too many links
** Attachment added: dpkg.strace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877812/+attachment/2559043/+files/dpkg.strace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877812 Title: dpkg error when upgrading git package Too many links To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/877812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599749] Re: User directory not writable and missing
** Changed in: assaultcube (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599749 Title: User directory not writable and missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/assaultcube/+bug/599749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599749] Re: User directory not writable and missing
Hello, thanks for reporting this bug and helping to improve Ubuntu. A new version of Assaultcube is available in the development release of Ubuntu (Oneiric Ocelot), and this version hopefully addresses this issue, I am therefore marking this bug incomplete. Please test this latest version and re-open this bug if the issue still remains. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599749 Title: User directory not writable and missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/assaultcube/+bug/599749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579052] Re: [needs-packaging] Lugaru HD
** Description changed: It is a DRM-free, third-person action game available for Mac, Windows, and Linux. The main character, Turner, is an anthropomorphic rebel bunny rabbit with impressive combat skills. In his quest to find those responsible for slaughtering his village, he uncovers a far-reaching conspiracy involving the corrupt leaders of the rabbit republic and the starving wolves from a nearby den. Turner takes it upon himself to fight against their plot and save his fellow rabbits from slavery. Website: http://www.wolfire.com/lugaru - License: GPL + License: GPL, CC-BY-SA, freeware Source code: http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/05/Lugaru-goes-open-source ** Description changed: It is a DRM-free, third-person action game available for Mac, Windows, and Linux. The main character, Turner, is an anthropomorphic rebel bunny rabbit with impressive combat skills. In his quest to find those responsible for slaughtering his village, he uncovers a far-reaching conspiracy involving the corrupt leaders of the rabbit republic and the starving wolves from a nearby den. Turner takes it upon himself to fight against their plot and save his fellow rabbits from slavery. Website: http://www.wolfire.com/lugaru - License: GPL, CC-BY-SA, freeware + License: GPL, CC-BY-SA, freeware (NC) Source code: http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/05/Lugaru-goes-open-source +: http://code.google.com/p/lugaru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579052 Title: [needs-packaging] Lugaru HD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/getdeb.net/+bug/579052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579052] Re: [needs-packaging] Lugaru HD
I've provided packages for Lugaru for Debian (c.f. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lugaru.html lugaru-data.html), they should auto-sync soon and thus be available in the next release of Ubuntu (11.10). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #626156 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626156 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626156 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579052 Title: [needs-packaging] Lugaru HD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/getdeb.net/+bug/579052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774516] Re: pango-graphite renders gdm unusable
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. However, we think the bug has been fixed in a later version of Ubuntu
- Maverick Meerkat.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pango-graphite/+bug/540035 and
the links back to the upload in Debian, etc. for more info.
Please, if possible, test this in a later version of Ubuntu and see if
the issue still remains, and report back here.
If you need a fix for the bug in previous versions of Ubuntu, please follow the
instructions for How to request new packages at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#request-new-packages
I do no think that it is a small enough change to simply SRU (although I
thought so before {cf. my last comments on above bug}).
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
It may even be appropriate to completely remove the Lucid version of the
package from the archives as per
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing_Packages
** Changed in: pango-graphite (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774516
Title:
pango-graphite renders gdm unusable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pango-graphite/+bug/774516/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
@John Lewis I think compression cannot be an exclusive cause of the issue, seeing how me and whakim have not touched compression and are seing this. What does the btrfsck tool from debian unstable report in your case with you compression setup, I would assume this might be different? It could be that there are several issues all reporting the same nondescript error. Compression would be a very logical explanation though, if the userspace fsck is simply outdated compared to the kernel btrfs code. I still maintain that enabling btrfsck at all was a big mistake... I was never meant to be used like this. ...I wonder if it wold be possible to reproduce this error using only snapshots and balancing, since that would explain the non-compression cases... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 785940] [NEW] gtk theme engine not working
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gtk2-engines As far as I can tell what I'm seeing is the symptom of the gtk theme engine not working properly, this is on a qemu-kvm instance, using unity-2d. The unity-2d specific theming seems to remain as intended. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gtk2-engines 1:2.20.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-2.8-generic 2.6.39-rc7 Uname: Linux 2.6.39-2-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri May 20 20:39:26 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gtk2-engines UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gtk2-engines (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785940 Title: gtk theme engine not working -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 785940] Re: gtk theme egninge not working
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785940/+attachment/2136740/+files/Screenshot.png ** Summary changed: - gtk theme egninge not working + gtk theme engine not working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785940 Title: gtk theme engine not working -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621704] Re: needs to be updated to version 1.1.0.4
This has synced over from Debian, hence is fixed in Oneiric. ** Changed in: assaultcube (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621704 Title: needs to be updated to version 1.1.0.4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
For reference, I had not touched any compression setting on my install which i reported the bug initially on. I am guessing that it is at least not directly related to compression... Though of course it may be an enhancing factor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621704] Re: needs to be updated to version 1.1.0.4
I am in the process of upgrading to 1.1.0.4 in Debian, this will most likely make it into the 11.10 release (and hopefully if .5 is released soon-ish we could get that in before ubuntu goes frozen as well). PlayDeb has packages for this version, in the meantime.. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #604109 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604109 ** Also affects: assaultcube (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604109 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621704 Title: needs to be updated to version 1.1.0.4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674676] Re: Client rejected by materserver
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621704 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621704 This is because the master server for this old version of the game has been shut down, so the core issue is that the package is out of date. I'm hence marking this as a duplicate of Bug #621704 If you think this is incorrect, please comment on this bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 621704 needs to be updated to version 1.1.0.4 * You can subscribe to bug 621704 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/assaultcube/+bug/621704/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674676 Title: Client rejected by materserver -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 759803] Re: Unity-2d not working on KVM
This is a slight regression, I was able to run unity-2d without this particular issue in version: 3.6.1-0ubuntu1 Using the cirrus video on 3.8.4.1-0ubuntu1 I get the same as shown in above screenshot. Using vga with 3.8.4.1-0ubuntu1, the gtk-engine seems to work alright however the panels are still not: The left panel flashes in solid white or is invisible constantly if using the mouse within the VM, it calms down and ends up in the distorted state seen on cirrus occasionaly, screenshot attached. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-ubudev Virtual Machine-1.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/759803/+attachment/2092801/+files/Screenshot-ubudev%20Virtual%20Machine-1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759803 Title: Unity-2d not working on KVM -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 759803] Re: Unity-2d not working on KVM
Ah, wrong of me, behavior described above was on cirrus as well, on vga both panels and gtk-eninge seems to work fine, similarly on vmvga, on xen it simply won't boot for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759803 Title: Unity-2d not working on KVM with xen and cirrus video devices -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750209] Re: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750209 Title: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I have confirmed with upstream that deleting a subvolume which has subsequent snapshots IS supported However, I was not able to reproduce this by some brief mucking about with snapshots in a new kvm install. (Replacing @/ with a snapshot and deleting the old (original) @/-subvolume.) So presumably this does not (exclusively?) relate to deleting snapshotted subvolumes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772122] [NEW] gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity-2d Using unity-2d on a simple kvm instance, it seems gtk-engine is not working and hence resulting in very ugly window controls, in addition panels look like gibberish. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity-2d 3.8.4.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Apr 28 02:35:43 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity-2d UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772122 Title: gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772122] Re: gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772122 Title: gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772122] Re: gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d
Screenshot of symptoms attached. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-ubudev Virtual Machine.png https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/772122/+attachment/2092329/+files/Screenshot-ubudev%20Virtual%20Machine.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772122 Title: gtk-engine(?) and panel ugliness with unity-2d -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727521] Re: unity-2d-spread assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/unity-2d-spread: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0xb1869008 ***
I don't see this particular issu on current natty in a similar setup. ** Changed in: unity-2d Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727521 Title: unity-2d-spread assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/unity- 2d-spread: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0xb1869008 *** -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727520] Re: unity-2d-spread crashed with SIGSEGV in QPainter::fillRect()
I don't see this particular issu on current natty in a similar setup. ** Changed in: unity-2d Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727520 Title: unity-2d-spread crashed with SIGSEGV in QPainter::fillRect() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711571] Re: xfdesktop4 crashes on exit with xorg-server 1.10
** Tags added: patch-needswork ** Tags removed: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711571 Title: xfdesktop4 crashes on exit with xorg-server 1.10 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711571] Re: Xfce Shutdown/Restart doesn't work (logout instead)
Upstream did a workaround fix. Probably something we might want in before relese. debdiff attached my main PPA should soon have patched packages for testing: https://edge.launchpad.net/~arand/+archive/ppa ** Patch added: xcrashhes_xfdesktop4_4.8.1-1ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/711571/+attachment/2083306/+files/xcrashhes_xfdesktop4_4.8.1-1ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711571 Title: Xfce Shutdown/Restart doesn't work (logout instead) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732149] Re: [natty] btrfs grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem
If you are unable to boot as a result of similar symptoms as was seen in this bug (which should be fixed by now, presumably, comment/report new if not) there is a possible workaround to enable booting after the grub config file has been written whilst grub-probe is unable to detect the btrfs: 1. At the boot menu [e]dit the entry and look at the kernel line: linux /vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=/dev/mapper/mellu-uburooot ro rootflags=subvol=@ quiet splash vt.handoff=7 3. IF the rootflags=subvol=@ boot option is missing add it, and then boot the command list using ctrl+x 4. Once booted make sure that grub-probe detects the btrfs OK and then run update-grub. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732149 Title: [natty] btrfs grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 764672] [NEW] type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
Crashed upon installing pinta via USC
Install was successful and application seems to work fine.
Seems to occur similarly when installing inkscape as well, global bug
for USC?
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.41+bzr646-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
Annotation: Applying software changes failed
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:59:10 2011
DesktopFile: /usr/share/aptdaemon/aptdaemon.desktop
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/aptd
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: aptdaemon
Title: type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined
TransactionDepends: [[], [], [], [], [], [], []]
TransactionErrorCode: error-unknown
TransactionKwargs: {}
TransactionLocale: en_GB.UTF8
TransactionOutput:
TransactionPackages: [[dbus.String(u'pinta')], [], [], [], [], []]
TransactionRole: role-commit-packages
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty unity-2d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764672
Title:
type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 764672] Re: type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764672 Title: type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 764672] Re: type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 764422 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764422 No errors when using aptitude or synaptic, seems isolated to USC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764672 Title: type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'trans' is not defined -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
** Description changed: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: - gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml + gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel (kills and auto-respawns, possibly need to run gnome-panel as well) - I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 Title: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 757631] [NEW] grub-probe fails on lvm-encrypted install with btrfs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Install was done using the Setup encrypted LVM option, simply changing ext4-btrfs Grub fails to add the rootflags=subvol=@ to the kernel boot options, making the system stop at initramfs on boot, unless added manually, at which point it seems to boot fine. When booted grub-probe seems not to work, which I assume is the core issue: arand@nnb:~$ sudo grub-probe / grub-probe: error: no such disk. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: grub-pc 1.99~rc1-11ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 11 15:44:50 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta amd64 (20110410) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Triaged ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757631 Title: grub-probe fails on lvm-encrypted install with btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 757631] Re: grub-probe fails on lvm-encrypted install with btrfs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757631 Title: grub-probe fails on lvm-encrypted install with btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
It seems like somehow the trigger for this is the act of snapshotting... In combination with reinstalling kernel packages? I've bee using apt-btrfs-snapshot, hence why it was (though still is) really tricky to pin down.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
Aha! It seems like sometimes, for some reason, reinstalling the kernel packages renders grub-probe unable to detect the type of the filesystem for /, hence why it doesn't writ the btrfs-related bootflag... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
...And for some reason, making a snapshot of the / subvolume is somethimes a way to unstuck this behaviour. It is fae from consistent though, which is rather bothersome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: -8 kernel sometimes makes grub-probe unable to detect btrfs
** Summary changed: - new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs + -8 kernel sometimes makes grub-probe unable to detect btrfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: -8 kernel sometimes makes grub-probe unable to detect btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: -8 kernel sometimes makes grub-probe unable to detect btrfs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732149 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732149 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 732149 [natty] btrfs grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem * You can subscribe to bug 732149 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/732149/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: -8 kernel sometimes makes grub-probe unable to detect btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732149] Re: [natty] btrfs grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem
Just marked my Bug #752506 as a dupe of this. I've had some luck reproducing this issue by repeatedly reinstalling the linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic and linux-headers2.6.38-8-generic packages, alternatively. I've also quite often been able to get btrfs out of this un-probe-able state by just creating a standard snapshot: mount /dev/sda5 /mnt btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt/@ /mnt/@$(date +%s) But as mentioned it comes and goes very randomly still. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732149 Title: [natty] btrfs grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] [NEW] new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
Public bug reported: Running the 2.6.38-8.41 kernel, update-grub no longer adds the rootflags=subvol=@ option for btrfs. Booting back into -7 and running update-grub correctly adds the option to all kernels. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic 2.6.38-8.41 Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: I82801AAICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH], device 0: Intel ICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: arand 1305 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'I82801AAICH'/'Intel 82801AA-ICH with STAC9700,83,84 at irq 11' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9700,83,84' Components : 'AC97a:83847600' Controls : 34 Simple ctrls : 24 CurrentDmesg: [ 20.404989] ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A [ 22.190168] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Wed Apr 6 13:44:17 2011 IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Bochs Bochs ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=UUID=54e7f946-69a5-4cf7-891c-c7fad695ea4e ro rootflags=subvol=@ console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-firmware1.49 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Bochs dmi.bios.version: Bochs dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Bochs dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnBochs:bvrBochs:bd01/01/2007:svnBochs:pnBochs:pvr:cvnBochs:ct1:cvr: dmi.product.name: Bochs dmi.sys.vendor: Bochs ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug kernel-fs natty needs-upstream-testing regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
It currently seems like this issue has magically disappeared, there was an upgrade, however I see no packages which would be related to this. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752506] Re: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs
...And back again. Seems to have popped up again when I reinstalled linux-image-###, and disappeared again when I reinstalled linux-headers-###. However I can't actually reproduce this... *sigh* ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752506 Title: new -8 kernel makes update-grub ignore writing subvol option for btrfs -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] [NEW] btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: btrfs-tools current btrfsck on natty reports: couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. ...if invoked on the standard root/home. Meaning that when the link fsck.btrfs - btrfsck was enabled as per Bug #660649 my system now stops booting with this message: fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. Warning... fsck.btrfs for device /dev/sda5 exited with signal 6. mountall: fsck /home [313] terminated with status 8 mountall: Unrecoverable fsck error: /home couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. Warning... fsck.btrfs for device /dev/sda5 exited with signal 6. mountall: fsck / [312] terminated with status 8 mountall: Unrecoverable fsck error: / /dev/sda1: clean, 233/48768 files, 44709/194560 blocks init: udev-fallback-graphics main process (625) terminated with status 1 If [I] is pressed to ignore errors booting can be done normally, just bypassing btrfsck completely. --- Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: btrfs-tools 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Tags: natty Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-collected natty ** Tags added: apport-collected natty ** Description changed: Binary package hint: btrfs-tools current btrfsck on natty reports: couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. ...if invoked on the standard root/home. Meaning that when the link fsck.btrfs - btrfsck was enabled as per Bug #660649 my system now stops booting with this message: fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2 couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. Warning... fsck.btrfs for device /dev/sda5 exited with signal 6. mountall: fsck /home [313] terminated with status 8 mountall: Unrecoverable fsck error: /home couldn't open because of unsupported option features (2). fsck.btrfs: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. Warning... fsck.btrfs for device /dev/sda5 exited with signal 6. mountall: fsck / [312] terminated with status 8 mountall: Unrecoverable fsck error: / /dev/sda1: clean, 233/48768 files, 44709/194560 blocks init: udev-fallback-graphics main process (625) terminated with status 1 - If [I] is pressed to ignore errors booting can be done normally, just - bypassing btrfsck completely. + If [I] is pressed to ignore errors booting can be done normally, just bypassing btrfsck completely. + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 + Package: btrfs-tools 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 + Tags: natty + Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340/+attachment/1968767/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I just tested updating btrfs-tools with the latest from http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary and now btrfsck seems to work fine. I think the debian experimental version is similar, so syncing that might be fitting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
Semi-rectraction of previous statement: Turns out the reason it was booting was simply that it was failing due to the extra -a flag and skipping the fsck entirely. I did not manage to apply the latest ubuntu change to the debian experimental version (and I know to little to resolve the merge there I think) However, Simply grabbing the btrfsck binary from debian experimental and running it alongside the ubuntu version on the latest liveCD, the ubuntu one fails with the error above, whereas the debian exp succeeds to run the fsck. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I've spoke to another user who did not seem to have these issues on the current version so it seems it might be something to do with my particular system.. When I run fsck using the debian experimental version of the userspace tools I get this output: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo btrfsck /dev/sda5 fs tree 259 refs 7 not found unresolved ref root 261 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 262 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 263 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 264 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 265 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 266 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 unresolved ref root 267 dir 256 index 31 namelen 4 name snap error 600 found 3873710080 bytes used err is 1 total csum bytes: 3517348 total tree bytes: 258281472 total fs tree bytes: 241065984 btree space waste bytes: 70634105 file data blocks allocated: 15013134336 referenced 4583772160 Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 This is a fairly recent (few days) install, but what I have done so far is taken snapshots of my / subvolume via apt-btrfs-snapshot, rolled back to one of these snapshots, and deleted the old / subvolume along with some apt-snapshots that I did not use. So my guess is that btrfs doesnt like that I've removed my original / subvolume, which is then what crashes current, and reports the above erros in experimental btrfs-tools. So updating to the newer version wouldn't make much of a difference in practice, since mountall would still halt on these errors? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 747824] [NEW] unable to press serch button on ubuntu start page
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubufox It is impossible to press the search button on the current natty firefox about:startpage ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xul-ext-ubufox 0.9~rc2-0ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 1 22:52:24 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha amd64 (20110312) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubufox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747824 Title: unable to press serch button on ubuntu start page -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 747824] Re: unable to press serch button on ubuntu start page
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747824 Title: unable to press serch button on ubuntu start page -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746048] [NEW] package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Failed to build kernel module on install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 DKMSBuildLog: DKMS make.log for oss4-4.2-build2003 for kernel 2.6.38-7-generic (x86_64) Wed Mar 30 22:05:56 BST 2011 Date: Wed Mar 30 22:06:02 2011 ErrorMessage: oss4 kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha amd64 (20110312) PackageVersion: 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 SourcePackage: oss4 Title: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: oss4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746048 Title: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746048] Re: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746048 Title: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2003-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 736037] Re: today's update makes Ubuntu unbootable
Could you post also the regenerated grub.cfg which is working for you? The vt.handoff=7 boot parameter, does that change between this and the regenerated grub.cfg? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736037 Title: today's update makes Ubuntu unbootable -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729394] Re: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems
I was able to reproduce this issue on a virtual KVM instance by creating one singe primary partition, adding it as a physical volume, adding it to a volume group, and then creating one logical volume spanning all free extents. At this point starting partman fails. Then I ran a simple mkfs.ext4 on the before completely blank logical volume. At this point starting partman is succesful, and I was able to get past the partitioning step and into the installing base system step (by which time I exited the installer). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729394 Title: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729394] Re: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems
Similar issue using latest daily (12-Mar-2011 07:42) I currently have an LVM setup on the main disk, and a PV with no associated VG on my attached usb disk. Attaching syslog and partman log for the install session. ** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-base/+bug/729394/+attachment/1904774/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729394 Title: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729394] Re: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems
** Attachment added: partman https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-base/+bug/729394/+attachment/1904775/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729394 Title: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729394] Re: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems
I have tried to run the installation without the additional USB disk mentioned above, it made no difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729394 Title: partman fails to load during install on LVM systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732832] Re: software-center crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()
Similar crash launching in unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732832 Title: software-center crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574287] Re: tasksel: forcefully removes packages when tasks overlap
** Summary changed: - tasksel uninstalled my system! + tasksel: forcefully removes packages when tasks overlap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287 Title: tasksel: forcefully removes packages when tasks overlap -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Aptitude included in Maverick by default
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net wrote: On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:40 +1000, Chris Jones wrote: We already have apt-get, dpkg and gdebi. And between the 3 of those, all bases are already covered. That's actually not so, I don't believe. The only one of these three that is in any way competitive with aptitude is apt-get. And, aptitude has an advantage over vanilla apt-get in that it remembers the difference between packages you have installed directly, and those which were installed by the system in order to satisfy dependencies. If you later remove the packages that were installed directly, then aptitude can also remove the other packages that were installed to satisfy prerequisites (as long as nothing else is using them, of course). snip Anyway, an unpacked aptitude package is less than 5M (aptitude itself is just 2.2M). That's actually not so, I don't believe. Both apt-get and aptitude does marking of auto-installed. It's just that you need to run apt-get autoremove separately. Aptitude + tasksel (dependency) is, in context, very big. I do agree that aptitude is much superior, though not in those ways. - arand -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[Bug 395279] Re: directory for mount not completing
Lucid bash-completion: 1.1-3ubuntu2 I'm using this in my fstab: # Manually added for automount of DATA partition /dev/disk/by-uuid/A66C42F16C42BBB5 /media/DATA ntfs defaults,gid=46,umask=007,group 0 0 And when using mount bash always completes to /media/DATA even though I have several other folders in /media/ and even though I'm trying to mount something new, and /media/DATA is already mounted. I would agree that this behaviour is questionable. Marking as confirmed. ** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- directory for mount not completing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395279 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296028] Re: AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug
fullscreen application flicker tooltip -- AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296028] Re: AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug
Erm, sorry for noise, that was meant for a search, ignore, ignore... -- AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571407] Re: Grub 1.97 doesn't parse the 1.98 grub.cfg correctly
Well, I guess it shouldn't really be confirmed yet, if one is o follow policy. Though since confirming on a vm I would definitely claim so. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- Grub 1.97 doesn't parse the 1.98 grub.cfg correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574287] Re: tasksel uninstalled my system!
Reported in Debian as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587046 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #587046 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587046 ** Changed in: tasksel (Debian) Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: tasksel (Debian) Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: tasksel (Debian) Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #587046 -- tasksel uninstalled my system! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597775] Re: rdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in XPutImage()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809172/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809173/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809174/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809175/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809176/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809177/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809178/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809179/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50809180/XsessionErrors.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- rdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in XPutImage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597775 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597775] Re: rdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in XPutImage()
Just tested on main Lucid system, and it works fine there, hence I would assume it is a regression. Other factors that might make a difference is that the Maverick machine is a i386 KVM virtual machine, whereas my main Lucid is on 64bit and bare metal -- rdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in XPutImage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597775 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574287] Re: tasksel uninstalled my system!
I've tested this on current Debian testing, and the problem exists, but is less problematic, since there seems to be much less overlap in the Debian tasks. However one example is if the tasks: ~t^desktop. ~t^gnome-desktop and ~t^laptop, are installed and then the ~t^laptop task is removed. This will result in the removal of e.g. wpasupplicant, network-manager and network-manager-gnome, all of which are also a part of the ~t^gnome-desktop task. I will take this upstream to Debian. I've been told that the package sets are indeed defined by tasksel, hence the apt task would be invalid. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: tasksel (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tasksel uninstalled my system! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597918] Re: ubuntuone-launch crashed with ImportError in module()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- ubuntuone-launch crashed with ImportError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: pango-graphite causes several applications to crash
Fixed with the new version from Debian in Maverick, is likely material for SRU, hence opening tasks... ** Changed in: pango-graphite (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- pango-graphite causes several applications to crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596015] [NEW] package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Both 2ubuntu1 and 2ubuntu2 fails to install on a i386 kvm 10.10. currently installed grub2 works fine. And re-running grub-install works. Crash report taken from state where old grub-pc was purged and manual installation of new version was done. Automatic updating failed earlier similarly. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: grub-pc (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-4.5-generic 2.6.35-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-4-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jun 18 18:04:37 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) SourcePackage: grub2 Title: package grub-pc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 maverick -- package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596015] Re: package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50551080/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50551081/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50551082/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50551083/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596015] Re: package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Complete purge or grub-pc and grub-common, and then a manual install of the older grub2 and subsequent upgrade saw no errors. Might've been some odd residual configuration somewhere. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package grub-pc 1.98+20100614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #471642 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471642 ** Also affects: pango-graphite (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471642 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
Updated version available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/silgraphite/files/ fixes the issue both on maverick and sid, a NMU has been sent to get the updated version quickly into debian unstable, which should sync to maverick, by which time we'll start worrying about fixing earlier versions of ubuntu as well (either by updating, or removing, i guess). Source for the new version in debian is available here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pango-graphite/ I'm thinking I'll mark all earlier bug reports as a duplicate of this one, just to collect some structure. -- gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563486] Re: 9.10 (Karmic): gnome-volume-control segmentation fault on startup (crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_free())
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 404681 gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in free() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- 9.10 (Karmic): gnome-volume-control segmentation fault on startup (crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_free()) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563486 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529896] Re: Rhythmbox crashes when systray icon is accessed to say show music player
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- Rhythmbox crashes when systray icon is accessed to say show music player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445483] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in gr::PangoGrFont::operator!=()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- gimp-2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in gr::PangoGrFont::operator!=() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443135] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in graphite_PangoGlyphString()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in graphite_PangoGlyphString() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435002] Re: gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in pango_utf8_strlen()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 404681 gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in free() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in pango_utf8_strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404681] Re: gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in free() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291843] Re: firefox crashes like mad with double free or corruption
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- firefox crashes like mad with double free or corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290532] Re: firefox keeps crashing WARNING **: Exception in gr::RangeSegment
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- firefox keeps crashing WARNING **: Exception in gr::RangeSegment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240752] Re: Installing pango-graphite corrupts text in gvim and other apps
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540035 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 Just to collect some structure, I'm insolently marking this as a dupe of Bug #540035. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540035 gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() -- Installing pango-graphite corrupts text in gvim and other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
** Description changed:
+ PROBLEM
+ Installing pango-graphite in combination with some of the ttf-sil-* fonts
causes all kinds of crashes in several applications
+
+ ORIGINAL
Binary package hint: gimp
I'm running 32-bit Kubuntu Lucid on an external hard drive. Opening GIMP
causes a little bouncing GIMP icon next to to my cursor which just
disappears without the window loading, and running from the command line
tells me a Segmentation fault has occurred. This happens every time GIMP
is opened. Same deal with firefox, which I'll report separately
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Tue Mar 16 23:57:02 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gimp-2.6
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100225)
Package: gimp 2.6.8-2ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/gimp-2.6
ProcEnviron:
- LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
- SHELL=/bin/bash
+ LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
+ SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic
SegvAnalysis:
- Segfault happened at: 0x3963ba2 _ZN2gr9GlyphInfo12logicalIndexEv+34:
mov(%esi),%eax
- PC (0x03963ba2) ok
- source (%esi) (0x7b706074) not located in a known VMA region (needed
readable region)!
- destination %eax ok
+ Segfault happened at: 0x3963ba2 _ZN2gr9GlyphInfo12logicalIndexEv+34:
mov(%esi),%eax
+ PC (0x03963ba2) ok
+ source (%esi) (0x7b706074) not located in a known VMA region (needed
readable region)!
+ destination %eax ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gimp
StacktraceTop:
- gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() ()
- graphite_PangoLogAttrs ()
- graphite_engine_break ()
- tailor_break (text=0x97ee728 H\340{\t\f,
- get_items_log_attrs (layout=value optimised out)
+ gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() ()
+ graphite_PangoLogAttrs ()
+ graphite_engine_break ()
+ tailor_break (text=0x97ee728 H\340{\t\f,
+ get_items_log_attrs (layout=value optimised out)
Title: gimp-2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare
XsessionErrors: (process:1854): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave:
assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
** Summary changed:
- gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
+ pango-graphite causes several applications to crash
--
pango-graphite causes several applications to crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: pango-graphite causes several applications to crash
Carsten Hey made a reduced version of the patch (autofoo and docs removed). And I've tested and confirmed it fixing the issue on maverick, here attached. Might be SRU-material? ** Patch added: u01_crasher-fix.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50187008/u01_crasher-fix.patch -- pango-graphite causes several applications to crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540035] Re: gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex()
Testing on Maverick development release seems to indicate that only a combination of some of the ttf-sil-* packages (e.g. doulos and abyssinica, but not gentium) creates problems. -- gimp-2.6 crashed on launch with SIGSEGV in gr::GlyphInfo::logicalIndex() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 592336] Re: Removal of aptitude from base installation
Updated description with references to the decision. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: aptitude It has come to our attention that the developers want remove aptitude from the base installation again. Most of us that run a testing version use aptitude safe-upgrade, in order to not break the installation when upgrading new packages, especially when we've been notified of new packages that could cause severe breakage. I find aptitude with it's options is a very useful tool during testing, removing it will make the job a lot harder. + + NOTES ON THE DECISION + (This is based on a conversation with Colin Watson on IRC and the references given) + The initial rationale is basically size; approximately 2MB (which in the scope of things are very precious on the liveCD) will be gained by removing tasksel and aptitude. + + The initial reason why aptitude was included in ubuntu was that the + desktop installer (ubiquity) depended on it, but now the desktop + installer has been rewritten to not require it unless in particular + cases, and hence it goes. + + The alternate install CD will still install aptitude and tasksel, since + the debian-installer which is used in installation requires it. + + Likewise the server install of ubuntu will still include it (presumably + also since it uses debian-installer) + + This was part of the Maverick Spring Cleaning which was discussed during UDS-M and is specified here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubu...pring-cleaning + As Install tasksel and aptitude dynamically + + More info here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsT...SpringCleaning + We could substantially reduce the size of the minimal seed by installing tasksel and aptitude dynamically, so that we don't end up with them on live-installed systems. We will still need to keep tasksel in the server seed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-2.3-generic 2.6.35-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-2-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jun 10 09:52:34 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_CA.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_CA.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: aptitude -- Removal of aptitude from base installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581331] Re: error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee
Hrm, seems like I missed update-maintainer on the lucid version, that one could use a re-upload I'm afraid, here's the, hopefully correct, debdiff. ** Patch added: update-maintainer_bitlbee_1.2.4-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50005973/update-maintainer_bitlbee_1.2.4-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582035] Re: User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum
Okay, with the new version this change is in the e2fsprogs in Maverick. I would argue that this is something that'd be worth an SRU, hence subscribing sponsors and sru teams. Also fixing debdiff to use lucid-proposed instead. ** Patch added: proposed_e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49943082/proposed_e2fsprogs_1.41.11-1ubuntu2.1.debdiff -- User cancel of fsck gives: fsck.ext4: Inode bitmap not loaded while setting block group checksum https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591236] [NEW] apt/python errors displayed by update-manager-core on TTY login
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager PROBLEM On login to TTY (and on running ubuntu-bug) this error is displayed: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py:192: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Find' of the 'apt_pkg.Configuration' object is deprecated, use 'find' instead. if apt_pkg.Config.Find(Acquire::http::Proxy) != '': /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py:196: DeprecationWarning: apt_pkg.newConfiguration() is deprecated. Use apt_pkg.Configuration() instead. cnf = apt_pkg.newConfiguration() /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py:198: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'FindB' of the 'apt_pkg.Configuration' object is deprecated, use 'find_b' instead. use_proxy = cnf.FindB(Synaptic::useProxy, False) /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:185: DeprecationWarning: apt_pkg.ParseTagFile() is deprecated. Please see apt_pkg.TagFile() for the replacement. index_tag = apt_pkg.ParseTagFile(self.metarelease_information) /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:186: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Step' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'step' instead. step_result = index_tag.Step() /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:188: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if index_tag.Section.has_key(Dist): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:189: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. name = index_tag.Section[Dist] /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:191: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. rawdate = index_tag.Section[Date] /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:193: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. supported = int(index_tag.Section[Supported]) /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:194: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. version = index_tag.Section[Version] /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:197: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if index_tag.Section.has_key(ReleaseNotes): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:198: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. dist.releaseNotesURI = index_tag.Section[ReleaseNotes] ar...@arand-laptop:~$ /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:202: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if index_tag.Section.has_key(ReleaseNotesHtml): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:207: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if index_tag.Section.has_key(UpgradeTool): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:208: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. dist.upgradeTool = index_tag.Section[UpgradeTool] /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:209: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if index_tag.Section.has_key(UpgradeToolSignature): /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:210: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. dist.upgradeToolSig = index_tag.Section[UpgradeToolSignature] /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:211: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Section' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'section' instead. if UpgradeBroken in index_tag.Section: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py:216: DeprecationWarning: Attribute 'Step' of the 'apt_pkg.TagFile' object is deprecated, use 'step' instead. step_result = index_tag.Step() ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: update-manager-core 1:0.141 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-1.1-generic 2.6.35-rc1 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-1-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jun 8 13:04:22 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- apt/python errors
[Bug 591236] Re: apt/python errors displayed by update-manager-core on TTY login
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49943246/Dependencies.txt -- apt/python errors displayed by update-manager-core on TTY login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510571] Re: Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox
Hence marking as verification-done ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 323424] Re: [needs-packaging] 3D FPS Game Blood Frontier
The game has now been forked into Red Eclipse and BF seems to have quietly died with all active main developers and community moving to RE. ...Just an fyi, RE might be more relevant to package (once there is an initial beta). -- [needs-packaging] 3D FPS Game Blood Frontier https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581331] Re: error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee
** Tags added: patch -- error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510571] Re: Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox
@undefined: Yes, I'm aware of that problem, but as stated earlier, it does not seem as though the patch here fixes it, so presumably there are more issues in need of addressing in the hardy version of virtualbox. And I really don't have many a clue on how to do so. Since the version in hardy is quite old there are a lot of revisions that have gone into vbox since, and the way to solve it would be to figure out what specific revision(s), presumably in addition to the ones in this here patch, which does address the issue. Or simply request that a later version of virtualbox be put in the -backports repository, which may be added by users if need be. I do not intend to poke any further in this matter currently. -- Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526849] Re: pastes to pastebin.com no longer work
Well I've tested on both with success, however I was thinking it'd be
appropriate that someone confirmed it independently... I'm not sure
exactly how the policy goes there.
Also, regading Hardy.
One option would be to simply switch the default site to paste.ubuntu.com for
hardy, it's a horrible cop-out, but it's a very simplesafe change, I guess
{all other considerations ignored (fact that pastebin.com is the proper
default)}.
--
pastes to pastebin.com no longer work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526849
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588478] Re: RuntimeError: Can not find port of couchdb.
I can also confirm the above, if gwibber is invoked with sudo, it starts up seemingly fine (despite errors). Strangely enough, it does not when using gksu, in which case this error is seen: ** (gwibber:2396): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'WnckWindowActions' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' ** (gwibber:2396): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 'WnckWindowMoveResizeMask' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/gwibber, line 47, in module from gwibber.microblog.util import log File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/util/__init__.py, line 3, in module import log File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/util/log.py, line 9, in module mkdir(cache_dir) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/root/.cache/gwibber' -- RuntimeError: Can not find port of couchdb. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/10 18:16, James Hogarth wrote: Hey all, Quick question for anyone that can give a quick answer... The kernel released for lucid last night (2.6.32-22.35) broke kvm guests - prevented them from starting. The kernel that was in proposed (2.6.32-22.33) has no problems. Looking at launchpad it looks like 2.6.32-22.35 never hit proposed and went straight to updates/security: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.32-22.35/+publishinghistory Given that this broke KVM guests on an LTS release no less (and kvm is pushed by Ubuntu as the virtualisation system to use) it presents a reasonably serious problem. How did this get straight to release with no testing in proposed? What is the point of having proposed for bug testing if a released package never goes through it - especially for something as critically important to the core system as the kernel? Hopefully the issue can be fixed soon so those of us who use KVM on Lucid are able to use the latest kernel with any bug fixes again.. As it is anyone with this issue cannot get a fix from Ubuntu as a vendor for the following CVE's as they are part of the update that broke kvm: CVE-2010-0419 CVE-2010-1162 CVE-2010-1488 CVE-2010-1148 CVE-2010-1146 CVE-2009-4537 And if they don't have the savvy (or are unwilling to run a 'proposed' kernel) to obtain the 2.6.32-22.33 kernel directly from the launchpad build page they will also be missing updates for launchpad bugs 526354 and 567016. Any thoughts on this issue? Regards, James As stated on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelUpdates: * Security updates will be uploaded directly into -security without other changes. This just requires a temporary GIT fork which will be immediately merged back into the main branch for that stable release. * Normal updates will be provided as pre-releases through the kernel-ppa users PPA. At certain points those get made into proposed releases which are uploaded to the proposed pocket. Then again they have to get verified to fix the problems and not to cause regressions. As far as I know, this applies to most security updates, skipping the - -proposed step Whether or not this policy is a good one, is a matter of discussion, since it obviously failed this one. Would more testing, which would mean a slower procedure for getting the security fixes through, be a viable compromise in some cases? What kind of testing is already in place by the security team? Could that be expanded? - - arand -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwIHE4ACgkQ67RiDgo9GiNR8QCghLwEDutw3x6i3YhxWJHlLrx4 xf0Anjle/R4uciiMfMGOfylk/AJZ2E8O =ImT2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[Bug 588478] Re: RuntimeError: Can not find port of couchdb.
Here, I do not have a .log.1 but only .log in that directory, and what it shows is simply: [Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:14:25 GMT] [info] [0.2.0] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:36868/ Which I presume indicates that it started fine when the machine started. There is no additional mention of anything, even if I try to launch gwibber just now. -- RuntimeError: Can not find port of couchdb. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
