[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491 Title: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491 Title: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
just remember that in Debian alternative build-depends are count *only* in backports, meaning that the first alternative should be what's in actual use in sid at the time. I recommend you do have a deeper look at qtbase5-dev, as you said it's very odd for it to not work in xca's case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
just remember that in Debian alternative build-depends are count *only* in backports, meaning that the first alternative should be what's in actual use in sid at the time. I recommend you do have a deeper look at qtbase5-dev, as you said it's very odd for it to not work in xca's case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
FWIW, this is the change that Thomas mentions: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca/-/commit/bbce8d50361bd0593ba4be88c3442fcc0527a400 I'm a bit confused: why are you referencing an explicit library package in build-dep instead of using a -dev package (in this case, qtbase5-dev)? In any case, go ahead and upload to the queue. ** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
FWIW, this is the change that Thomas mentions: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca/-/commit/bbce8d50361bd0593ba4be88c3442fcc0527a400 I'm a bit confused: why are you referencing an explicit library package in build-dep instead of using a -dev package (in this case, qtbase5-dev)? In any case, go ahead and upload to the queue. ** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361 Title: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2067261] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy
approved, thank you! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067261 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2067261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067261] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy
approved, thank you! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067261 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2067261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491 Title: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065359] Re: [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble
Thank you for your contribution! ** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065359 Title: [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsp-plugins/+bug/2065359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2065359] Re: [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble
Thank you for your contribution! ** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065359 Title: [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsp-plugins/+bug/2065359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491 Title: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2008583] Re: VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen: Invalid VMCB.
hwe is not handled by the backports team, so I'm unsubscribing us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008583 Title: VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen: Invalid VMCB. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2008583/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2008583] Re: VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen: Invalid VMCB.
hwe is not handled by the backports team, so I'm unsubscribing us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008583 Title: VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen: Invalid VMCB. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2008583/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062140] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy
Accepted, thank you! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062140 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2062140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062140] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy
Accepted, thank you! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062140 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2062140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2059029] Re: proposed-migration for vdeplug-slirp 0.1.0-2build1
the package now built on armhf too. ** Changed in: vdeplug-slirp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059029 Title: proposed-migration for vdeplug-slirp 0.1.0-2build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdeplug-slirp/+bug/2059029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874662] Re: Corrupted installation medium
Hi everyone, in my situation (installation by USB drive, lubuntu 22.04.4), I've followed these steps: 1. Started a normal installation process and waited the error occurs 2. Reboot computer 3. Started a new installation process and at the hard disk partitioning stage, selected manual mode, and re-installed only the OS partition. JM2C Mattia -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874662 Title: Corrupted installation medium To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1874662/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 2058634] Re: scribus-doc puts docs in wrong place
I see what's happening there... That's due to snap's containerization efforts, which blocks loading of files from /usr/share/scribus. If you use any other non-snap browser it should just work. I don't use snaps, no, so I'm having no good ideas on how to fix that. And ISTR I had a good reason to have the symlinks that way instead of installing in usr/share/doc amd symlinking on usr/share/scribus, but i could always try again, as that's likely the easier workaround to those blocks. On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm Ian Bruntlett, <2058...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Mattia, > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 at 20:30, Mattia Rizzolo <2058...@bugs.launchpad.net> > wrote: > > > You are right that scribus needs them in what is the "wrong" location > > for the Debian policy, but I remember doing things so that it would work > > for both. > > > > The package ships everything in /usr/share/scribus/doc and then sets up > > symlinks from e.g. /usr/share/doc/scribus/de to ../../scribus/doc/de > > (i.e. /usr/share/scribus/doc/de). > > > > What is not working for you? > > > > Well, Firefox (as a snap), for some reason or another, can't access the > files. > > /usr/share/doc/scribus/en$ xdg-open index.html > Yields this error page in Firefox: > > > > > *File not foundFirefox can’t find the file at > /usr/share/doc/scribus/en/index.html.Check the file name for > capitalisation or other typing errors.Check to see if the file was > moved, renamed or deleted.* > > /usr/share/scribus/doc/en$ xdg-open index.html > Yields this error page in Firefox: > > > > > *File not foundFirefox can’t find the file at > /usr/share/scribus/doc/en/index.html.Check the file name for > capitalisation or other typing errors.Check to see if the file was > moved, renamed or deleted.* > Is it possible that the snap system does not like the symlink approach? > > Do you have Firefox installed as a snap? Do you have scribus-doc installed? > That way, you should be able to experience this problem, too. > > BW, > > > Ian > > -- > -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org > -- My writing - https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/ > -- Free Software page - > https://github.com/ian-bruntlett/TECH-Manuals/blob/main/tm-free-software.md > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to > scribus-doc in Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058634 > > Title: > scribus-doc puts docs in wrong place > > Status in scribus-doc package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > the issue is that scribus does not use a standard location for > its docs ... typically deb packages ship their docs in > /usr/share/doc/ while scribus ships them in > /usr/share//doc ... > > This is important because the Firefox snap only has permissions to > access files in the standard location. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 > Package: scribus 1.5.8+dfsg-2 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-26.26~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13 > Uname: Linux 6.5.0-26-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 > Architecture: amd64 > CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown > CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME > Date: Thu Mar 21 10:32:17 2024 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-08-07 (1321 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 > (20200731) > SourcePackage: scribus > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-15 (584 days ago) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus-doc/+bug/2058634/+subscriptions > > Launchpad-Notification-Type: bug > Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; sourcepackage=scribus-doc; > component=multiverse; status=Incomplete; importance=Undecided; > assignee=None; > Launchpad-Bug-Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy packaging wayland-session > Launchpad-Bug-Information-Type: Public > Launchpad-Bug-Private: no > Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no > Launchpad-Bug-Commenters: ian-bruntlett mapreri > Launchpad-Bug-Reporter: Ian Bruntlett (ian-bruntlett) > Launchpad-Bug-Modifier: Ian Bruntlett (ian-bruntlett) > Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (scribus-doc in Ubuntu) > Launchpad-Message-For: mapreri > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058634 Title: scribus-doc puts docs in wrong place To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus-doc/+bug/2058634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058634] Re: scribus-doc puts docs in wrong place
You are right that scribus needs them in what is the "wrong" location for the Debian policy, but I remember doing things so that it would work for both. The package ships everything in /usr/share/scribus/doc and then sets up symlinks from e.g. /usr/share/doc/scribus/de to ../../scribus/doc/de (i.e. /usr/share/scribus/doc/de). What is not working for you? ** No longer affects: scribus (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: scribus-doc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058634 Title: scribus-doc puts docs in wrong place To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus-doc/+bug/2058634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052555] Re: [BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble
Note that the Ubuntu backports team does not provide prepare backports themselves, so you'd need to find some Ubuntu Developer willing to do that. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports ** Changed in: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Also affects: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052555 Title: [BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git-credential-oauth/+bug/2052555/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2049779] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.8-0ubuntu1 from noble
approved, thank you ** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049779 Title: [BPO] carla/2.5.8-0ubuntu1 from noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2049779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
today's meeting
Today we are scheduled to have a meeting in less than 2 hours from now. I don't have any update concerning the current items nor my own TODOs (sorry about this!), and I don't think we have any pressing issue/case we need to discuss. I think it would be fine to just skip this meeting and jump on the next one. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2039150] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy
thank you, approved! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039150 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2039150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2039150] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy
@BPO team: did we ever decide on whether, for the sake of not breaking upgrades, we care about -proposed vs -updates? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039150 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2039150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy
this has now been published. ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy
Right. Just upload and ping the bug once that's through! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy
Of course, this is fine. I don't see libreoffice in the jammy queue, so feel free to upload :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: next meeting
Hello!
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 03:33:48PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Sorry I wasn't able to make the last meeting date; I'm looking at when
> to schedule the next meeting, and since mapreri will be away at
> Debconf soon, and not available until late Sept (per IRC comments)
Quite amusingly, I'm more available during DebConf (i.e., starting
yesterday) than before (when I was doing some traveling around India)!
> was thinking of scheduling the next meeting for Wed Sept 27. I know
> that's a big gap between meetings but I don't think we have anything
> pressing that we need a meeting for.
>
> Does that date work for everyone?
27th is good for me. And I agree we don't have anything pressing to
discuss.
I'll actually be travelling elsewhere then, but I should be able to make
it without any problem.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2027961] Re: [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic
approved, sorry it took so long. ** Changed in: rednotebook (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: rednotebook (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027961 Title: [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rednotebook/+bug/2027961/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2030302] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.6-0ubuntu1 from mantic
approved, thank you for the update! ** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030302 Title: [BPO] carla/2.5.6-0ubuntu1 from mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2030302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2030259] Re: [BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy
I don't feel strongly against this, so I'm accepting this. It is kind of out of line with what we normally like, however. ** Also affects: mozc (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mozc (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: mozc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030259 Title: [BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/2030259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2029130] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.5 for jammy
thank you for your work! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029130 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.5 for jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2029130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic
Right, well.. backports are not done to be compatible with the base distribution, of course. They have to be manually installed by the system administrators knowing what they are doing exactly for this reason. But huge incompatibilities for sure make for a "negative point". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676 Title: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic
Hello Nathan, we had a couple of meetings in the Backports and we have some concerns about this proposed update: 1) you haven't provided any debdiffs, nor it's clear who is going to prepare the backports and do the future maintenance, as you don't seem to be an active Ubuntu contributor 2) you'd like to do the bpo from kinetic, but doing so will break updates as jammy is not covered. You'll need to either include a jammy bpo, or ignore kinetic and do the bpo from jammy, unless there are relevant changes later on. 3) I'm going to subscribe the ubuntu server team and I noticed that Andreas Hasenack subscribed himself already, as before approving such package I'd totally like to have their input 4) the bug #1812280 you mentioned is in a different source package, but either way, if it's relevant then it should be handled via SRU and not necessarily be considered while evaluating the benefits of backporting nfs-utils 5) I think I'd like to have the tests a little better defined than "tested the package manually in focal without any issues so far" Thank you for your interest! ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676 Title: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter
So, hello TB! Today we had a Backporters meeting, and indeed we don't have any opposition to this latest proposal, thank you for the prods, and I'm happy that this topic is finally coming to a close! Please do email us a bit more "formally" once it's done, so that we have a good authoritative reference to link to later on :) I think following this ratification the next question would be: where is a good place to collect them? Personally I'm going to copy it under our "wiki space" (and perhaps under launchpad as well? It's short enough…), but the final goal was for the TB to define a bunch of these for all the other interesting teams too, so I wonder if you already have something good in mind? On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:45:35AM +0930, Alex Murray wrote: > Hi backporters team, > > The TB has still not received any response on the proposal to adopt > Mattia's suggested Charter. As such, in today's TB meeting it was agreed > that the TB would ratify this as the Charter for the Backporters team > after Monday 12th June. Please let us know if you have objections to > this proposal before that date. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 18:30:12 +0930, Alex Murray wrote: > > > Hey backporters team, > > > > Just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts on this? The TB are keen > > to move this forward and are just waiting on some kind of ACK from your > > side. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 14:59:22 +0930, Alex Murray wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> After the most recent Tech Board meeting, the TB agreed that the best > >> way forward here would be to go with Mattia's proposal outlined below (I > >> have reproduced it here): > >> > >> * Maintain the Ubuntu "backports" pocket. > >> * Establish and manage an effective process and a set of policies to > >> handle contributions to the "backports" pocket. > >> * Define a set of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its > >> internal structure and members' responsbilities. > >> > >> Would the Backporters Team be willing to adopt this as their Charter? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Alex > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 16:22:13 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:03:02AM +1030, Alex Murray wrote: > >>>> Just wondering if you had a chance to review my feedback? It would be > >>>> great to try and make some progress here. > >>> > >>> We have a meeting later today, but I'll give you my own inputs. > >>> > >>> The tl;dr: I'm more in-line with Dan comments. > >>> > >>>> >>> * Establish and manage an effective process to handle backport > >>>> >>>requests based solely on their technical merit. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I'm not sure this is correct, to handle requests *solely* on technical > >>>> >> merit. For example, part of the backport process is the expectation > >>>> >> that the backport requestor/uploader will remain responsible for > >>>> >> further backports as needed; if an uploaded backport seems technically > >>>> >> correct but the backports team does not believe the uploader would be > >>>> >> responsible for further uploads, the backports team should be able to > >>>> >> reject the upload on that basis. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Stating "solely on their technical merit" places undue restrictions on > >>>> >> our team, I believe. > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > I feel it is perhaps a bit too onerous to expect that just because a > >>>> > user contributes one backport that they then should be expected to keep > >>>> > doing backports for that package - this is placing undue restrictions > >>>> > on > >>>> > your possible contributors. Regardless though, I don't think the > >>>> > backports team should be trying to guess whether someone is likely to > >>>> > contribute further backports in the future - this leaves too much > >>>> > chance > >>>> > for the team to ignore proposed backports on arbitrary grounds. As > >>>> > such, > >>>> > this is the exact point of the statement "solely on their technical > >>>> >
[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic
** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676 Title: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2022875] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.5-0ubuntu1 from mantic
sure, approved :) ** Also affects: carla (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2022875 Title: [BPO] carla/2.5.5-0ubuntu1 from mantic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2022875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2009944] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009944 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2009944] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy
Yes, it seems that René didn't follow the latest rules about epochs, and used it to revent accidental uploads (multiple!) of 7.5 to unstable instead of experimental. The current policy states that in those cases he should have used the +really notation, but I reckon he wouldn't have liked to release bookworm with a +really in the version string of libreoffice… (I'm leaving the approval to Dan since he is on this task already) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009944 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2012724] Re: [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy
approved the jammy bpo. I'm rejecting kinetic since that's out of policy (non-LTS target). Please tell us if you have some special needs for kinetic. ** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012724 Title: [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/borgmatic/+bug/2012724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 2012945] Re: [BPO] studio-controls/2.3.9-0ubuntu2 from lunar
good for me. ** Changed in: studio-controls (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012945 Title: [BPO] studio-controls/2.3.9-0ubuntu2 from lunar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/studio-controls/+bug/2012945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter
Hello Robie!
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:21:10PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth first discussing what the text would actually be
> used *for*, since your reply suggests to me that we might not have the
> same view on this here.
This seems to be the case indeed.
> I see the (my) proposed text as a point of reference between the
> backporters team and the rest of the project, but generally only for use
> to guide the backporters team in defining their own policies, procedures
> and documentation, cases where it was unclear what their
> responsibilities are, or in case of some kind of unhappiness
I think we are in complete agreement then.
Your description perfectly matches my definition as well.
To me, Charter and Polices are to be the actual rules that describe
how the team has to behave.
Indeed, team members needs to be aware of them, and so do those who
aspire to actually be part of the team. But people who interact with
us (i.e. those contributing backported packages) really have no
business with these documents.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter
et of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its internal structure and members' responsabilities. > > So I think we are starting to get to the crux of the difference in > > viewpoints from the TB to the backporters team. Due to the past history > > of some perceived dysfunction within the backporters team, I feel it is > > important to try and set some more specific expectations for how the > > newly rebooted team would function - particularly to an outsider wishing > > to contribute. The problem in my opinion is that also your (rbasak's) original proposal is also "useless" for an aspiring contributor. Also, what's "contributor" here? Somebody wanting to propose a backport update is really not served by these documents (either Charter or Policies)... > > This is not trying to constrain the efforts of those on > > the team in any way, but more trying to set an expectation of quality > > for all possible contributions, and to also give contributors confidence > > that their submissions won't potentially be in vain. Overall, this is > > really about trying to ensure the backports subcommunity is vibrant and > > welcoming to encourage contributions, and not potentially perceived as a > > gated group that is only accessible to the special few. I don't think I look forward to any sort of "backports subcommunity", so I'm afraid we might have some sort of disconnect here. What I look forward is more people interested in backporting updates to the packages they are (and keep being) interested in. I don't imagine these people forming any kind of submcommunity around backports, rather those being mostly regular ubuntu develpers that have an extra interest. Are we trying to assure these people? I joined this team reboot because in the past the team just died, nobody knew who was responsibile for what, etc. In my view, the best reassurance we can give to those potential contributors, is being actually available to their enquiries and requests. Summing up my proposal: * Maintain the Ubuntu "backports" pocket. * Establish and manage an effective process and a set of policies to handle contributions to the "backports" pocket. * Define a set of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its internal structure and members' responsabilities. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process
I just committed 0f3d2fed2a4ed67b90b5d49aab25ca2bda5d9d37 updating requestbackport. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115 Title: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1998834] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/6.01-1 to Jammy
@Fantu: please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports#Finding_a_Sponsor for the details regarding sponsorship. I'm subscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors for now and see if somebody picks it up, or you might want to check with your usual ubuntu sponsor, if you have one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998834 Title: [BPO] memtest86+/6.01-1 to Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1998834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1997189] Re: [BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar
accepted. ** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997189 Title: [BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/1997189/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1998624] Re: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic
ah, you already uploaded, accepted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998624 Title: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pyelftools/+bug/1998624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1998624] Re: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic
If this is a plain backport without any change, feel free to go ahead. ** Changed in: python-pyelftools (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: python-pyelftools (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998624 Title: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pyelftools/+bug/1998624/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy
We have discussed this in the last Backporters meeting, and we decided not to accept this, as a simple performance bug, which is not what the backport pocket is intended for (that's more about new features). ** Also affects: man-db (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163 Title: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: popcon.ubuntu.com gone?
[ your email was html only? ] On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:43:03AM +0300, Ozgur wrote: > Please read: href="https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/popcon-to-be-removed-from-the-standard-seed/17238; > rel="noopener noreferrer" > target="_blank">https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/popcon-to-be-removed-from-the-standard-seed/17238 > oh, thanks. TIL meh, that's why I don't like discourse, I really can't get used to that :( Since the domain and obviously a web server is still there, couldn't somebody make it show a page at least telling that the service is gone? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
popcon.ubuntu.com gone?
Hi!
I'd like to ask what happened to popcon.ubuntu.com, that is now showing
the default nginx page instead of any useful data.
Also, https://popcon.ubuntu.com/all-popcon-results.txt.gz is a text file
with "Thanks!" in it, rather than containing anything...
Was the service disabled at some point?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy
@teward: look at https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-
db/-/merge_requests/2/diffs - it's quite the big change to defend for a
SRU. or, rather, quite deep into the code.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Users of man-db/2.9.1-1 in focal are sometimes facing
unresponsiveness when man-db is called from an `apt upgrade` or `apt
install` command (the man-db command freezes).
[Scope]
* Backport from jammy man-db/2.10.2-1
* Backport to focal
[Other Info]
- * man-db >= 2.10.0-2 fixes the behavior described above as per
- LP#1858777 ("Fix Released")
+ * man-db >= 2.10.0-2 fixes the behavior described above as per LP:
+ #1858777 ("Fix Released")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163
Title:
[BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy
From what I read (and remember), the command doesn't freeze but just takes a bit long. Honestly I don't really consider such issue worth a backport, and it's not really bringing any new feature to the table (at least, you are not describing anything). I was thinking that perhaps this could be done as part of an SRU, but the relevant patch is just huge, so probably not either... Other BPO team members: what do you think? On Fri, 7 Oct 2022, 6:10 pm Jorge Rodríguez, <1992...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Backported debs in: > https://launchpad.net/~jrodrigu/+archive/ubuntu/bpo/+packages > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163 > > Title: > [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions > > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163 Title: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: charter/policies
Hello hello, On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter I still find weird that this document doesn't include a provision that requires the TB to ACK any change to it, but I understand that they don't want it, so meh… The document states that the team chair will be "approved" (? should this be "appointed" instead?) with a process specified in the Policies page, but I can't seem to see a paragraph describing that. TBH, I would just list it in Charter §5.3 instead, just saying "The chair shall be elected with a majority vote within the current team members; the current chair has a casting vote" or something similarly simple. This is so to avoid another possibly useless cross-document reference. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies Can we drop the possibility of people joining the team with just a IRC meeting agenda item? I really want a full email with link to LP profile, etc... else my mind really can't work on it. The voting doesn't seem to have any provision for a casting vote? (which "obviously" should be in the hands of the team chair (which… in case the meeting chair is a different person, the casting vote is still in hands of the team chair, hopefully it's obvious). These details are the only points I have to make on the two documents. Thank you for working on them, and sorry it took me forever to read through them -.- -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1987356] Re: [BPO] elfutils/0.187-1 from Kinetic
** Also affects: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987356 Title: [BPO] elfutils/0.187-1 from Kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/1987356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1983414] Re: [BPO] dh-python 5.20220403 to focal
** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983414 Title: [BPO] dh-python 5.20220403 to focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-python/+bug/1983414/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1983415] Re: [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy
sure, I assume it's a no-change rebuild, if so then go ahead with an upload :) ** Also affects: limnoria (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983415 Title: [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/limnoria/+bug/1983415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 02:02:06PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> How about either Aug 3 at 1500 UTC,
This is great for me, yes.
> or we can just skip this month and plan for Aug 10 at 1600 UTC?
Between the 6th and the 22nd Aug I will be mostly offline, so I won't be
available.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:50 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06:10AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters > > > meeting today, unfortunately. > > > > We figured on IRC that we'd be posponing then. What about the 27th same > > time slot for you? It's fine for us. > > Could we do Aug 3, same time slot? Aug 3 same slot I have also another meeting going (that runs 1600-1700 UTC), so I would be able to attend properly. But if you pick any different time (the rest of the day is still open) it would be fine by me. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06:10AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters
> meeting today, unfortunately.
We figured on IRC that we'd be posponing then. What about the 27th same
time slot for you? It's fine for us.
BTW, the only thing I would have like to report this meeting is that I
uploaded a bunch of debhelper packages to bpo, up for review if you have
some time (there is a tracking bug).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1980579] Re: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy
bionic is not really feasible anymore, since newer devscripts requires dpkg-dev (>= 1.19.1) and libgitlab-api-v4-perl (and libfile-dirlist- perl). I haven't investigated whether it's easy to drop those dependencies, but I'd propose to just forget about bionic for devscripts' backports. ** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579 Title: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devscripts/+bug/1980579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1980579] Re: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy
for focal this is a plain backport with no change besides a changelog entry, and I've just uploaded it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579 Title: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devscripts/+bug/1980579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1980580] Re: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy
** No longer affects: libfile-dirlist-perl (Ubuntu Bionic) ** Description changed: [Impact] - * This is a new dependency of devscripts/2.20.5, and since we are + * This is a new dependency of devscripts/2.20.5, and since we are backporting a newer version of it, it's nicer to have it than reverting the change that introduced the dependency. [Scope] - * from jammy v 0.05-2. + * from jammy v 0.05-2. - * to focal and bionic. + * to focal. [Other Info] - - * This is a new package that is not available in either focal nor bionic - * It's a very lightweight perl module, with no foreseeable maintenance overhead. + + * This is a new package that is not available in focal + * It's a very lightweight perl module, with no foreseeable maintenance overhead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580 Title: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfile-dirlist-perl/+bug/1980580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1980580] Re: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy
focal uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580 Title: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfile-dirlist-perl/+bug/1980580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal
thank you for your contribution, and sorry it took so long for handling this request! ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614 Title: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
(in fact, this is not really different than debian: also debian backports require the proposed version to be available in the "next stable", to assure the upgrade path) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
I think, looking at the list of packages currently in the backports pockets, nothing need rebuilding for that bug, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965800] Re: [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)
uploads approved. ** Changed in: debugedit (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
Thank you Dan! I accepted both uploads! ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
apologizes for the upcoming meeting
Hi, this wednesday june 1st I'll be coming back from https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2022/DebianReunionHamburg - at the time of the meeting I'll be traveling on land but I won't be able to join IRC. I'd like to propose to reschedule the meeting to June 15th, same time. On June 8th I have another meeting planned that overlaps, so I wouldn't be able to match that; furthermore I already know that I wouldn't be able to attend on June 29th either, so shifting would likely match better my calender (I'm selfish here!) ;) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal
Hi, in the last backporters team meeting we decided to approve this backport. We'd still like to see some of those bugs you mentioned properly fixed in focal itself (as an SRU), but we recognize that doing so would be a non-trivial amount of work and as such probably not a good use of your time since this proposed backport has good reasons to exist on its own. As such, please feel free to continue with the process (send a debdiff against the package in jammy and upload). ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614 Title: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal
Hi, in the last backporters team meeting we decided to approve this backport. We'd still like to see some of those bugs you mentioned properly fixed in focal itself (as an SRU), but we recognize that doing so would be a non-trivial amount of work and as such probably not a good use of your time since this proposed backport has good reasons to exist on its own. As such, please feel free to continue with the process (send a debdiff against the package in jammy and upload). ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614 Title: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1968448] Re: package libxslt1.1:i386 1.1.34-4 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Something like this normally indicates a previously interrupted installation or something of the like. Please contact user support for more help. ** Changed in: libxslt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968448 Title: package libxslt1.1:i386 1.1.34-4 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxslt/+bug/1968448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1716656] Re: Plugins not loading
I just synced it. ** Changed in: entangle (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716656 Title: Plugins not loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/entangle/+bug/1716656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
then you should prepare the change (likely in the form of a debdiff against what's currently in jammy, or an upload to a ppa) and attach it here, then subscribe the ~ubuntu-sponsors team. (also note that we expect your backports to have been tested in the target release, I'll assume you've done that) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
then you should prepare the change (likely in the form of a debdiff against what's currently in jammy, or an upload to a ppa) and attach it here, then subscribe the ~ubuntu-sponsors team. (also note that we expect your backports to have been tested in the target release, I'll assume you've done that) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
Do you have a sponsor lined up for this? The backporters team by themselves don't do it. ** Also affects: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware
Do you have a sponsor lined up for this? The backporters team by themselves don't do it. ** Also affects: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076 Title: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1967003] Re: [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy
The backports team does not prepare nor sponsor uploads to backports, only review them. You should find somebody interested in doing the work, testing it, and maintain it, as well as a sponsor for it. ** Also affects: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967003 Title: [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obfs4proxy/+bug/1967003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1967003] Re: [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy
The backports team does not prepare nor sponsor uploads to backports, only review them. You should find somebody interested in doing the work, testing it, and maintain it, as well as a sponsor for it. ** Also affects: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967003 Title: [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obfs4proxy/+bug/1967003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1963829] Re: [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy
We would be fine with this backport, but I don't see it in the queue. Also, the text is not mentioning anything about what testing has been done to it, which we expect. Please note that we (backports team) do *not* sponsor backports, so you should find a sponsor for it yourself. ** Also affects: primecount (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963829 Title: [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/primecount/+bug/1963829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1963829] Re: [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy
We would be fine with this backport, but I don't see it in the queue. Also, the text is not mentioning anything about what testing has been done to it, which we expect. Please note that we (backports team) do *not* sponsor backports, so you should find a sponsor for it yourself. ** Also affects: primecount (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963829 Title: [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/primecount/+bug/1963829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)
So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist. Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route). Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in universe. So it would also need a MIR, which is definitely not happening for a stable release. I also guess that's the reason debugedit was split off rpm. So I suppose we either need to check whether backporting debugedit would make it build on i386, or revert that change in debhelper. On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm David Ward, <1965...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as > p7zip-full:i386 is built first. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 > > Title: > debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building > (missing dependency) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions > > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)
So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist. Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route). Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in universe. So it would also need a MIR, which is definitely not happening for a stable release. I also guess that's the reason debugedit was split off rpm. So I suppose we either need to check whether backporting debugedit would make it build on i386, or revert that change in debhelper. On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm David Ward, <1965...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as > p7zip-full:i386 is built first. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 > > Title: > debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building > (missing dependency) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions > > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > ubuntu-backpo...@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)
I think we have three choices here: 1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19) that make use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why* he did that) 2. backport debugedit too (honestly I don't remember if that would be enough to make it build on i386, however, or it also needs an addition to the i386 whitelist) 3. get the archive admins to add src:rpm in the i386 whitelist, and rebuild it (if that's enough to make it build and doesn't require more). I'd be for option 1 here. comments welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)
I think we have three choices here: 1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19) that make use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why* he did that) 2. backport debugedit too (honestly I don't remember if that would be enough to make it build on i386, however, or it also needs an addition to the i386 whitelist) 3. get the archive admins to add src:rpm in the i386 whitelist, and rebuild it (if that's enough to make it build and doesn't require more). I'd be for option 1 here. comments welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965855] Re: p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control
that's hardly the reason that debhelper/focal-backports is uninstallable on i386. Remember that Multi-Arch fields are used for multi-arch installations, that are irrelevant for things like native builds, and are totally unused in buildds and such. ** Changed in: p7zip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965855 Title: p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965855] Re: p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control
that's hardly the reason that debhelper/focal-backports is uninstallable on i386. Remember that Multi-Arch fields are used for multi-arch installations, that are irrelevant for things like native builds, and are totally unused in buildds and such. ** Changed in: p7zip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965855 Title: p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
@teward: I'm pretty sure that bug only affects -backports: according to the debian bug the commit introducing it is 6067bc2f, which was first available in debhelper 13.4, which is only in jammy and -backports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish
@teward: I'm pretty sure that bug only affects -backports: according to the debian bug the commit introducing it is 6067bc2f, which was first available in debhelper 13.4, which is only in jammy and -backports. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
tbf, I don't think this is actually *urgent* and can really just stay there for another week. ** Summary changed: - [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal + [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
tbf, I don't think this is actually *urgent* and can really just stay there for another week. ** Summary changed: - [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal + [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
Oh, that's probably a good reason to update the backport indeed, that I've been procrastinating. Unfortunately at this time I'm quite busy so I wouldn't be able to do it before next Monday at the earliest. Personally I'm fine if somebody else take it and I'll later review the diff; I don't expect anything "interesting" in this task either. ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
Oh, that's probably a good reason to update the backport indeed, that I've been procrastinating. Unfortunately at this time I'm quite busy so I wouldn't be able to do it before next Monday at the earliest. Personally I'm fine if somebody else take it and I'll later review the diff; I don't expect anything "interesting" in this task either. ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758 Title: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: updated charter and policies wiki pages
(thanks for the prod on IRC)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:33:05PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> so, if i'm being totally pedantic, the exact version of the charter
> and policies is:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter?action=recall=5
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies?action=recall=6
>
> let me know if either of you have any comments or concerns, otherwise
> if the charter looks ok to you, we can send it up to the TB sometime
> next week.
I'm good with those 2 versions, thank you.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1964390] Re: Inkscape will not launch on Ubuntu 22.04
As suspected, since in debian the very same bug was reported against 1.1.2-3 Well, I don't have time to debug this now, besides when I tried I couldn't reproduce it. I'm unassigning me, I'll take it when/if I can if nobody beats me to it. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1006697 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006697 ** Also affects: inkscape (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006697 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964390 Title: Inkscape will not launch on Ubuntu 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1964390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
